US vs. Chinese Aircraft Carriers - Which Is Better

1/12/24, 11:01 PM US vs. Chinese aircraft carriers: Which is better?
Dai un'occhiata alla nostra copertura in diretta dal CES 2024!
Portaerei statunitensi vs. cinesi: qual è la migliore?

La Cina ha recentemente presentato la sua terza e più avanzata portaerei, la “Fujian”. Ma come si confronta con le portaerei americane?
Christopher McFaddenPubblicato : 27 novembre 2022 03:44 EST
ELENCHI  
Portaerei della marina americana. AvigatorPhotographer/iStock
La Cina ha recentemente fatto notizia con il lancio della sua terza portaerei.
La "Fujian" è ad oggi la portaerei più avanzata della Cina.
Ma come si confronta con le compagnie aeree degli Stati Uniti?
Nel giugno 2022, secondo quanto riferito, la Cina ha lanciato la sua terza e presumibilmente la più avanzata portaerei. Di fabbricazione nazionale, questa nave, chiamata
"Fujian", rende la Cina la quarta potenza navale più potente per numero di portaerei.
Ma quantità non significa necessariamente qualità.
Gli Stati Uniti, la potenza navale più potente del mondo, hanno molte più portaerei. Sono anche alcune delle cose più avanzate e costose a galla.
Quindi ti starai chiedendo: la nuova compagnia aerea cinese è alla pari con le sue rivali americane? Diamo un'occhiata.
Cos'è la portaerei "Fujian"?

La portaerei Type 003 conosciuta come "Fujian" è una portaerei cinese attualmente in fase di sviluppo per la Marina dell'Esercito Popolare di Liberazione (PLAN) della Cina.
Prende il nome dalla provincia cinese del Fujian e, una volta completamente equipaggiata, sarà la terza e più avanzata compagnia aerea della PLAN fino ad oggi.
SOTTOSCRIVI
Resta un passo avanti rispetto ai tuoi colleghi in tecnologia e ingegneria: The Blueprint
E-mail
Iscrivendoti accetti i nostri Termini di servizio e l'Informativa sulla privacy .
Invia
https://interestingengineering.com/lists/us-vs-chinese-aircraft-carriers 1/14
Immagine del comunicato stampa dello scafo incompiuto del "Fujian". China News Service/Wikimedia Commons
La "Fujian" è stata lanciata ufficialmente il 17 giugno 2022 ed è la prima portaerei cinese con un design completamente autoctono, dotato di un sistema CATABAR (Catapult
Assisted Take-Off Barrier Arrested Recovery) (ne parleremo più avanti) e catapulte elettromagnetiche.
Tutto molto interessante, ma cosa sappiamo del suo design?
Per quanto è possibile accertare, si pensa che il Tipo 003 utilizzi una combinazione di catapulte elettromagnetiche e turbine a vapore, in contrapposizione ai trampolini con
gli sci utilizzati dalle precedenti portaerei cinesi per lanciare aerei, il che rappresenta un importante progresso rispetto alle portaerei precedenti e la mette maggiormente
in luce. alla pari con le varietà NATO.
Per quanto riguarda il modo in cui viene spinta nell'acqua, sono disponibili poche informazioni concrete, ma è stato affermato che funziona con "propulsione elettrica
integrata". In termini di dimensioni, si prevede che la nave avrà un dislocamento di oltre 80.000 tonnellate, a metà tra la portaerei sovietica "Ulyanovsk" incompiuta da
85.000 tonnellate e le superportaerei da 100.000 tonnellate utilizzate dalla Marina degli Stati Uniti.
Rough measurements of her dimensions (no official statistics are available) put the Type 003's length at about 984 feet (300 meters). This makes her slightly smaller than
the Gerald R. Ford-class ships of the U.S. Navy, if accurate. Estimations indicate her flight deck is also around 76 meters (250 meters) long.
Type 003 aircraft carrier launched! Overview of the Chinese supercarrier 'Fujian'

When finished, the Type 003, according to analyst Robert Farley, will be the "largest and most advanced aircraft carrier ever built outside the United States."
But no aircraft carrier is worth it's salt without aircraft. Experts believe the carrier will have an increased air wing compared to her other PLAN sisters. These will likely
consist of China's Shenyang J-15 fighters.
Also referred to as the "Flying Shark," these are Chinese all-weather, twinjet, carrier-based fourth-generation multirole fighter aircraft created by the Shenyang Aircraft
Corporation (SAC) and the 601 Institute specifically for the People's Liberation Army Naval Air Force.
Loosely based, allegedly, on the Russian Su-33, the fighter is equipped with Shenyang J-11B avionics and domestic Chinese technology.
As for how many, we cannot be entirely sure, but Kyle Mizokami, a defense analyst, has anticipated that the carrier would fly a 40-fighter air group. She would also be
equipped with propeller-powered transports and airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft. This is supported, in part, by the test flights for the KJ-600 carrier-
based AEW&C aircraft that started in 2020.
A Chinese J-15 viewed from below. 日本防衛省・統合幕僚監部/Wikimedia Commons
Several Chinese media publications, including Xinhua and China's primary military newspaper, discussed replacing the aircraft in February 2018, claiming it is a member of
the 4th or 4.5th generation of fighters. As a result, the J-15 is seen as a temporary carrier-based fighter until a fifth-generation replacement, which could be based on the
Chengdu J-20 or Shenyang FC-31, enters service.
Is the Fujian carrier nuclear-powered?

In short, it appears not.
Her propulsion and powerplant systems are currently unknown, but most analysts believe she is of a more conventional combustion-engined or electrical variety. But
China's next, and fourth, aircraft carrier might be nuclear.
According to a report in the South China Morning Post, analysts predict that China will build another nuclear-powered ship as a follow-up to the successful launch of the
"Fujian." Nuclear-powered carriers are currently solely used by the U.S. and France; the U.S. uses the Nimitz and Ford classes, while France uses the Charles de Gaulle.
According to the same article, the China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC) may have already begun developing the technology needed to make it happen. However,
this is somewhat contradicted by the fact that, according to the military affairs social media account The Wave of South China Sea, China's main shipyards are not
authorized to work on nuclear power.
HOW A NUCLEAR POWERED AIRCRAFT CARRIER WORKS?.||AIRCRAFT CARRIER 3D ANIMATION ||LEARN FROM THE BASE
However, if China is to ever compete on equal footing with the U.S. Navy, nuclear-powered ships of this kind would likely be their top priority.
After all, together with Type 055 cruisers and next-generation submarines, China's nuclear-powered carriers would become a formidable force for international missions.
But will not be easy to develop. They are not always the best option anyway.
According to some analysts, conventional carriers cost less to build and require less maintenance than their nuclear-powered counterparts. However, nuclear power is
more suited for carriers with aircraft catapults, like the "Fujian," because its reactors provide virtually unlimited range and power.
But, there are other reasons that future Chinese carriers may be nuclear-powered. For example, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute's senior security analyst Malcolm
Davis predicts that China's upcoming carrier will be nuclear-powered for two main reasons.
First, Davis points out that China's desire for a world-class navy with long-range power projection capability reduces the need for forward bases and resupply ships. A
nuclear-powered carrier falls within this goal. Secondly, according to Davis, nuclear-powered carriers are regarded as prestige assets whose acquisition would enhance
China's standing as a world superpower.
Selfmade warframe with AMRA3 and DSC game
Other experts on the subject also agree with Davis.
Brad Martin, a senior policy researcher at the think tank RAND, agrees that China's next carrier will likely be nuclear-powered. He points out that the EMALS technology
used with "Fujian" demands a lot of energy, which is impossible for a carrier to provide using conventional power.
Martin adds that a nuclear-powered carrier would seem to be the logical next step, given that China already employs nuclear-powered submarines.
This would also make sense about China's long-term plans. For example, China's so-called "Maritime Silk Road," a network of ports it leased or funded that stretches from
Europe to Asia, reflects its ambitious worldwide plans. Long-range power projection capabilities may be necessary to safeguard this network, which acts as a maritime
trade route focused on China, with nuclear-powered carriers meeting the criteria.
What are the newest American aircraft carriers?

The U.S. Navy's latest carrier, the mighty USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78), is quite a ship.
The USS Gerald R. Ford is quite a ship. Sea Forces
The leading ship of her class, she was put into service in 2017. The Gerald R. Ford-class will be the top forward asset for crisis response and early decisive strike force in a
significant military operation.
The USS Gerald R. Ford, also known as "Carrier, Volplane, Nuclear 78" (CVN 78), is the newest and most technologically advanced aircraft carrier ever constructed for the
United States Navy. It was named in honor of the 38th President of the United States, Gerald R. Ford, who served in the Navy during World War II and saw action on the
light aircraft carrier USS Monterey in the Pacific Theater.
The primary capabilities of forward presence, deterrence, sea control, force projection, maritime security, and humanitarian assistance will be provided by aircraft carriers
and carrier strike groups of the Gerald R. Ford class. The U.S. claims that the class will "improve our ability to wage war, enhances the standard of living for our sailors, and
lowers total ownership costs."
Compared to its predecessor class, the Nimitz-class ship, the Ford class is built to function successfully with around 600 fewer crew members. New technologies and ship
design elements decrease the crew's workload related to watch standing and maintenance.
The USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78), the lead ship of the class, is the first aircraft carrier to be built entirely using electric utilities, removing the ship's steam service lines,
lowering maintenance needs, and enhancing corrosion prevention. Advanced Arresting Gear (AAG), Dual Band Radar (DBR), the new A1B reactor, and Electromagnetic
Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) all provide more capabilities with less staffing.
Regarding size and capability, the Ford class is the undisputed master of the sea.
American carriers are very advanced pieces of kit. Sea Forces

The USS Gerald R. Ford has a total length of 1,092 feet (333 meters), a beam of 134 feet (41 meters) at the waterline, a flight deck width of 356 feet (78 m), and a height of
nearly 250 feet (76 meters) over 25 decks. That, to put it mildly, is huge.
With regards to her fighting capability, each ship of the class will carry several squadrons of some of the most advanced aircraft in the world too. Official records indicate
that each can carry well over 75 aircraft, but some sources state 90.
These include a mixture of Boeing F/A-18E/F "Super Hornet," the F-18's electronic warfare variant, the EA-18G "Growler," other support aircraft like the Grumman C-2
Greyhound, the Northrop Grumman E-2 Hawk, the Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk helicopters, and a variety of unmanned aerial combat vehicles are all included in this mix.
The USS Gerald R. Ford will also receive a complement of some of America's most cutting-edge aircraft, including the Lockheed Martin F-35C Lightning II.
That's impressive enough, but the ship can look after itself even without some fighter cover. Her hull is bristling with specialized advanced defensive weapons that provide
a formidable shield against incoming threats.
These include, but are not limited to, 0.8-inch (20mm) Vulcan cannons from the Phalanx Close-in Weapon System (CIWS), RIM-162 Evolved Sea Sparrow surface-to-air
missile launchers, RIM-116 surface-to-air missile launchers, and M2.50 caliber (12.7mm) machine guns. All by itself, the Phalanx system can independently identify, locate,
and eliminate a range of airborne threats, including approaching missiles, flying objects, and unmanned aerial vehicles.
The USS Gerald R. Ford has potent offensive and defensive systems. Sea Forces
The Ford is also outfitted with a multifunction AN/SPY-3 X Band radar and a volume search radar AN/SPY-4 S-Band to detect possible threats and assess the fighting theatre
around the ship. She also possesses a Dual Band Radar (DBR), which was first designed for destroyers of the Zumwalt class.
The Gerald R. Ford class will be the key forward asset for crisis response and early decisive strike capabilities in a significant combat operation.
Naval officials say each ship in the Gerald Ford class will save more than $4 billion in total ownership costs during its 50-year service life compared to the Nimitz class.
Thanks to advancements in ship design over her forebears, the USS Gerald Ford's air wing can operate with about 400 fewer crew members. Additionally, the USS Gerald R.
Ford is the first aircraft carrier to be constructed entirely from electric utilities, doing away with the requirement for steam service lines and lowering maintenance
expenses and corrosion control.
Two improved A1B nuclear reactors, the so-called Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS), Advanced Weapons Elevators, Advanced Arresting Gear (AAG), and Dual
Band Radar are all included in the ship and her class's equipment (DBR). All of these solutions boost capability while lowering the vessel's staffing needs.
American carriers benefit from decades of U.S. carrier experience. Sea Forces
However, technical issues with the new machinery substantially delayed the vessel's deployment.
The ship's configuration and electrical generating system are also made to accommodate future technologies, such as direct energy weapons, as and when they are
considered suitable for retrofitting throughout its anticipated 50-year service life.
So how does the new Chinese carrier compare to the U.S. ones?
In short, not very favorable.
Nevertheless, it is important to note that we only have concrete information on American carriers, so a direct and accurate comparison is impossible.
However, we can make some assessments.
Type 003 Fujian vs Gerald Ford - Aircraft Carrier Comparison
1. The U.S. has more experience building aircraft carriers

The first is the comparative experience in designing, building, and fielding them. Aircraft carriers have been the centerpiece of U.S. Naval strategy for many decades. To this
end, they are some of the most advanced and powerful ships Dai ever
un'occhiata
built. alla nostra copertura in diretta dal CES 2024!
When you compare American with the latest Chinese carriers, it is clear that China has some ways to go even to match the U.S. supercarriers, let alone surpass them.
The Chinese carriers are also smaller.
While this doesn't necessarily translate into being inferior, it physically limits the amount of stuff these ships can carry. This will include aircraft, munitions, and a wide array
of other gear needed to run everything on the vessel.
Unless the Chinese aircraft carriers have integrated some unknown level of operational automation that can save space, this is unlikely, given the lack of other
sophisticated equipment.
2. U.S. carriers are nuke powered; Chinese ones are not

What Aircraft Carriers Reveal About the Military Tech Race | WSJ U.S. vs. China
The next difference is that the existing and future planned Chinese carriers are conventionally powered. This reduces their range and speed, but it may also indicate the
technological capability of its naval shipbuilding industry.
Designing, building, installing, and maintaining nuclear reactors on ships is not easy, and the process comes with a whole suite of other advanced tech that must also be
installed on a ship. The nuclear benefits power offers a ship is well worth the investment, as we touched on earlier.
However, as we also touched upon earlier, the role of these carriers is allegedly more domestic in range than U.S. carriers that regularly need to operate for long periods
far away from home.
3. The U.S. carriers have better fighters and close-in defense systems
The next difference is the quality of each carrier's aircraft.
U.S. carriers currently operate some of the most advanced jet aircraft in the world. With the addition of the "Lightning II" to their compliments, U.S. carriers likely have the
better aircraft, at least on paper.
American aircraft carriers have some of the most advanced aircraft in the world. Sea Forces
Like many of China's military assets, there is not that much official information to go on. However, comparisons of the latest that China has to offer have left many experts
on the subject unimpressed.
The J-15 is effectively a 4th generation fighter, which might put it on par with older American fighters like the American F-18 Hornet or F-16 Fighting Falcon. Still, they are
likely too old to give the 5th generation F-35 a tough time.
The J-15 is thought to be built on the same Soviet blueprints as the Sukhoi Su-33 fighter jet. Chinese engineers were allegedly able to reverse-engineer the Su-33 carrier-
based fighter after being unable to purchase it from Russia. The result is a carrier fighter with numerous issues.
Although the prototype had a sturdy frame, it was missing the Su-33's engines. China, renowned for having trouble building effective jet engines, was forced to make do
with weaker domestic alternatives.
Numerous crashes, some fatal, were caused by the underpowered engines and other mechanical problems, and they became such a problem that the entire J-15 fleet was
grounded for three months at one point.
Given the limitations of the STOBAR system, the J-15 also holds the unpleasant distinction of being the heaviest carrier-based fighter in service. The J-15 weighs 38,000
pounds at empty weight, almost 6,000 pounds more than the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and 4,000 pounds more than the F-35C.
Is Chinese J-20 a better stealth fighter than F-35?
It is logical that, like the Ford-class carriers, the latest Chinese aircraft carriers will eventually receive wings of Chengdu J-20 fifth-generation fighters. Since little concrete is
known about the J-20, whether it is equivalent to the United States fifth-gen fighters is unknown.
The ships also probably differ drastically in their ability to defend themselves without fighters. The USS Gerald R. Ford and even the older Nimitz class have an impressive
array of proven anti-aircraft and anti-missile defenses.
Little is known about the close-in defenses of Chinese carriers. However, they appear to come with a collection of domestically made Gatling cannons and missiles.
Given the apparent outdated design of some other elements of the ships, especially the first two, these systems are unlikely to be as effective as American versions.
4. The U.S. has more experience using aircraft carriers

The next significant difference is a little hard to quantify; operational experience.
America has nearly a century of operating aircraft carriers in many theatres worldwide. They have had many successes and failures over those years but have been able to
rack up a lot of experience that has fed directly into aircraft carrier design and operational doctrine.
The USS Gerald R. Ford was very expensive to build. Sea Forces
Senior staff and the crew of their aircraft carriers are some of the best in the world, with many having actual combat experience too. From the Second World War to more
recent conflicts like in Syria, American aircraft carriers have been in the thick of the fighting for decades.
On the other hand, Chinese carriers, probably inspired by American combat doctrine, lack real-world experience in battle. While this is not necessarily a deal breaker, after
all, Japanese carriers did quite well in World War II (initially), but a relatively inexperienced crew can be a hindrance.
Reaction times of crew, ability to prioritize actions in the heat of battle, and promptly deal with losses and damage can be life or death for a ship and her crew. American
ships and crew are well aware of this and drilled appropriately.
Are Chinese crews? That is anyone's guess.
The quality and experience of the American carrier's leadership have also been honed by their decades of experience in battle. We can't say the same for Chinese military
leaders.
5. There are far fewer Chinese carriers

The fact that China has only two operational carriers is a big disadvantage for them. If push comes to shove, America has many times that and could overwhelm the
Chinese fleet in short order.
The USA has many more aircraft carriers. United States Navy/Wikimedia Commons
In theory, America also has carriers to spare and could absorb losses and keep fighting. Each of China's is relatively more precious to them, so they would be less likely to
expose them to potential loss unduly.
Of course, each of America's aircraft carriers is also invaluable, but they can be a little more aggressive with them.
If a direct conflict were ever to occur, like with the German navy in World War II, the Chinese might attempt to keep them closer to their shorelines, perhaps never
deploying them at long range. This kind of strategy would eliminate the tactical advantage of these ships, leaving them vulnerable to air attacks.
However, not to labor the point, Chinese plans for its carriers are precisely for his kind of role. They are not designed to fight far away from home and can make some
trade-offs to take advantage of additional air cover from mainland China.
On the other hand, American carriers are designed to be little pieces of America projecting its power overseas. For this reason, they need to be able to defend themselves
anywhere as best as they are able.
This includes support ships that form part of an American carrier group.
How does a Carrier Strike Group work?
5. The number and type of aircraft catapults are critical

The United States carriers have traditionally used steam catapults, or ski jumps to get their aircraft airborne. These two systems have advantages and disadvantages, but
the latest Ford class has installed something new; an EMALS CATOBAR.
Compared to steam catapults, EMALS use electromagnets to accelerate an aircraft up to speed before takeoff. This is more efficient and puts less stress and strain on
aircraft airframes, ultimately improving their lifespans.
The "Fujian" also allegedly has electromagnetic CATOBARs on her flight deck. However, it is not clear if this is the case.
The Ford class also comes with four EMALS catapults compared to what appears to be a total of three on the "Fujian." If true, this would mean that the Ford class has a
significant advantage in getting its aircraft in the air over time.
What Aircraft Carriers Reveal About the Military Tech Race | WSJ U.S. vs. China
Ciò si rivelerebbe fondamentale per la vittoria in combattimento, poiché il potere principale di una portaerei è nella sua flotta aerea. Facendo volare più piani in meno
tempo, l’esito di qualsiasi conflitto sarebbe una conclusione scontata.
Ciò è stato dimostrato più volte, soprattutto nei conflitti passati, come la battaglia di Midway .
E questo è il tuo destino per oggi.
Sebbene sia forte la tentazione di confrontare le compagnie aeree americane e cinesi, ciò non è del tutto possibile per alcuni motivi. Il primo è che entrambi i paesi
manterranno segrete gelosamente custodite le informazioni più vitali sulle proprie risorse navali, quindi non possiamo essere del tutto sicuri di cosa sia capace ciascuna
nave.
Il successivo e più importante è che sono simili solo superficialmente. Entrambi sono "flat top", ma i loro ruoli relativi differiscono.
Per questo motivo, la progettazione e le capacità complessive sono mirate a tali ruoli. Quindi, ci si aspetterebbe che le compagnie aeree americane siano più forti
nell’isolamento rispetto a quelle cinesi.
How US Aircraft Carriers Defend Themselves When Surrounded
Tuttavia, fino a quando (si spera di no) entrambe le forze navali non si scontreranno davvero, non sapremo mai quale sarà la migliore. Ciò è particolarmente vero per gli
sviluppi nel campo dei droni e delle armi ipersoniche.
Supponiamo che tali tecnologie possano sommergere e annientare queste navi in breve tempo. In tal caso, potremmo essere sul punto di vedere la potente portaerei
consegnata al mucchio di spazzatura della storia militare.
Proprio come fece la portaerei per la corazzata tanti anni fa.
CASA > ELENCHI
MOSTRA COMMENTO ( 0 )
PER TE
Come l'ingegneria dei Gli occhiali intelligenti LG: "Alpha-able" offre La tecnologia ti aiuta a Siemens leader, il Gli NPC AI di Nvidia Il motore a fusione È giunt
castori ha aiutato la di RealWear non offrono uno sguardo alle future dormire la notte con metaverso industriale consentono infinite nucleare di Helicity ripens
sopravvivenza degli esplosioni alla forza auto di lusso ad alta materassi dotati di conversazioni Space potrebbe far Dyson?
antichi esseri umani lavoro industriale tecnologia intelligenza artificiale e realistiche nei volare un veicolo
basata sull'intelligenza rumore bianco videogiochi spaziale su Marte in soli
artificiale 4 mesi
BACHECA DI LAVORO
Capgemini
Ingegnere meccanico e fisico - Ingegnere di calibrazione del motore principale
Colline Auburn
Vedi Giobbe
Blu Origine, LLC

Ingegnere informatico senior - Motori a razzo
Seattle
Vedi Giobbe
Arcadi
Ingegnere
Città del Lago Salato
Vedi Giobbe
AECOM
Ingegnere Civile – Ingegnere Senior delle Dighe
Denver
$ 130.000 - $ 180.000 all'anno
Vedi Giobbe
Cerca più ruoli
CONTENUTI SPONSORIZZATI Raccomandato da
Le tegole solari sono il 4 modi per smettere di

futuro e… lavorare con 500.000 €
Tegole solari | Annunci di ricerca Fisher Investments Italia
La maggior parte dei residenti in Italia non

sapeva come bloccare gli annunci
pubblicitari (fallo ora)
Rimuovere gli annunci è il primo passo per avere un'esperienza di Affitta il tuo terreno! [Galleria] Il Jet che scorta
navigazione più veloce, sicura e senza problemi! Guadagna fino a 3500€ pe… Air Force One, spiegato
Suggerimenti tecnici sicuri Affittoterreno sportsnewsman.com
La NASA organizza una Elon Musk afferma che Honda presenta il lancio Novità mondiale: la
festa di lancio per il nei test non sono state globale nel 2026 della Norvegia testa una
debutto del suo aereo… trovate nemmeno trac… gamma di veicoli… tecnologia eolica…
Ingegneria interessante Ingegneria interessante Ingegneria interessante Ingegneria interessante
Ho 500.000 € - Sono sulla buona strada per andare 25 set cinematografici costosi e abbandonati che
comodamente in pensione? sono ancora lì
Fisher Investments Italia Rivista sugli investimenti
Con Carta di Credito PAYBACK American Express Dottore: Se hai l'acufene (ronzio alle orecchie),
hai 100€ di sconto: scopri come fallo immediatamente! (Smettila di farlo)!
RESTITUIRE salutetrend.live
Fotovoltaico: ecco il nuovo bonus 2024, verifica se Gli aeroporti più pericolosi del mondo: Dove
rientri nessun pilota vuole volare
Vivingreen Rivista sugli investimenti
Unisciti alla comunità oggi

Indirizzo e-mail Join
Seguici su
    
CHI SIAMO
CARRIERA
CONTATTACI
FAQ
FATE PUBBLICITÀ CON NOI
NOTIZIARIO
SOTTOSCRIZIONE
Politiche | Termini di servizio | Non vendere le mie informazioni personali | Mappa del sito
©Diritto D'autore 2023 |Interessante Engineering, Inc. |Tutti I Diritti Riservati

US vs. Chinese Aircraft Carriers - Which Is Better

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

US vs. Chinese Aircraft Carriers - Which Is Better

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

1/12/24, 11:01 PM US vs. Chinese aircraft carriers: Which is better?

Dai un'occhiata alla nostra copertura in diretta dal CES 2024!

Portaerei statunitensi vs. cinesi: qual è la migliore?

Christopher McFaddenPubblicato : 27 novembre 2022 03:44 EST

Portaerei della marina americana. AvigatorPhotographer/iStock

La "Fujian" è ad oggi la portaerei più avanzata della Cina.

Ma come si confronta con le compagnie aeree degli Stati Uniti?

Ma quantità non significa necessariamente qualità.

Cos'è la portaerei "Fujian"?

Iscrivendoti accetti i nostri Termini di servizio e l'Informativa sulla privacy .

Dai un'occhiata alla nostra copertura in diretta dal CES 2024!

Tutto molto interessante, ma cosa sappiamo del suo design?

Dai un'occhiata alla nostra copertura in diretta dal CES 2024!

A Chinese J-15 viewed from below. 日本防衛省・統合幕僚監部/Wikimedia Commons

Is the Fujian carrier nuclear-powered?

Dai un'occhiata alla nostra copertura in diretta dal CES 2024!

Selfmade warframe with AMRA3 and DSC game

Other experts on the subject also agree with Davis.

What are the newest American aircraft carriers?

Dai un'occhiata alla nostra copertura in diretta dal CES 2024!

The USS Gerald R. Ford is quite a ship. Sea Forces

American carriers are very advanced pieces of kit. Sea Forces

Dai un'occhiata alla nostra copertura in diretta dal CES 2024!

However, we can make some assessments.

Type 003 Fujian vs Gerald Ford - Aircraft Carrier Comparison

1. The U.S. has more experience building aircraft carriers

The Chinese carriers are also smaller.

2. U.S. carriers are nuke powered; Chinese ones are not

Is Chinese J-20 a better stealth fighter than F-35?

4. The U.S. has more experience using aircraft carriers

Dai un'occhiata alla nostra copertura in diretta dal CES 2024!

Are Chinese crews? That is anyone's guess.

5. There are far fewer Chinese carriers

Dai un'occhiata alla nostra copertura in diretta dal CES 2024!

How does a Carrier Strike Group work?

5. The number and type of aircraft catapults are critical

E questo è il tuo destino per oggi.

How US Aircraft Carriers Defend Themselves When Surrounded

Proprio come fece la portaerei per la corazzata tanti anni fa.

CASA > ELENCHI

Dai un'occhiata alla nostra copertura in diretta dal CES 2024!

Blu Origine, LLC

Cerca più ruoli

CONTENUTI SPONSORIZZATI Raccomandato da

Le tegole solari sono il 4 modi per smettere di

La maggior parte dei residenti in Italia non

Dai un'occhiata alla nostra copertura in diretta dal CES 2024!

Unisciti alla comunità oggi

FATE PUBBLICITÀ CON NOI

©Diritto D'autore 2023 |Interessante Engineering, Inc. |Tutti I Diritti Riservati

Potrebbero piacerti anche