Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Bioresorbable
IPRO5
Background – Artroscopia
Utilizarea implantelor biodegradabile este in crestere in
medicina sportiva si traumatologie
Varietate mare: suruburi de interferenta, capse, suturi,
ancore, pin-uri (brose)
Background – Reconstructia
ligamentara
90,000 reconstructii anuale in lume
Biodegradabile:
Rezistenta dependenta de
dorma
Multipli polimeri:
Poly(L-Lactic) Acid (PLLA)
Poly(Lactic-co-Glycolic)
Acid (PLGA)
Background – Suruburi
Dezavantaje suruburi metalice :
Lezarea grefei
Ablatia dificila
RMN artefacte
Kousa P, Jarvinen TL, Pohjonen T, et al.
Fixation strength of a biodegradable
screw in anterior ligament reconstruction.
J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:901-905.
Clinica - Optiuni
Analiza literaturii / implante biodegradable =
la 400 N tensiune (~ recuperare/sport) =
aceeasi rezistenta la smulgere
Holden JP, Grood ES, Korvick DL, et al. In vivo forces in
the anterior cruciate ligament: Direct measurements during
walking and trotting in a quadruped. J Biomech
1994;27:517-526.
Morrison JB. Function of the knee joint various
activities.Biomed Eng 1969;4:573-580.
Markolf KL, Burchfield DM, Shapiro MM. Biomechanical
consequences of replacement of the anterior cruciate
ligament with a patellar ligament allograft. Part II: Forces in
the graft compared with forces in the intact ligament. J
Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;78:1728-1734.
Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES, et al. Biomechanical
analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament
repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am
1984;66:344-350
Clinica - Observatii
Dezavantajul suruburilor IF
de a fi in contact cu lichidul
articular = reactii sinoviale
Weiler A, Hoffmann RF, Staehlin
AC, et al. Biodegradable implants
in sports medicine: The biological
base. Arthroscopy 2000;16:305-
321.
Clinica - Observatii
= Stabilitate comparativa a
celor doua tehnici de
fixare
Diferente privind modul
de esec:
Weimann A et al. Primary
Stability of Bone–Patellar fractura = CP
Tendon Bone Graft Fixation
With Biodegradable Pins pull-out (smulgere) = IF
Arthroscopy: The Journal of
Arthroscopic and Related
Surgery, Vol 19, No 10
(December), 2003: pp 1097-
1102
Clinica - Discutii
Complicatii -1 articol
Ilkyu Han, Yeon Ho Kim,
Jae Ho Yoo, Sang Cheol
Seong,Tae Kyun Kim -
Broken bioabsorbable
femoral cross-pin after
anterior cruciate ligament
reconstruction with
hamstring tendon graft a
case report Am J Sports
Med, 2005 Vol. 33, No.
11
Problema - Motivatie
= Probleme!
Design actual implante poate produce
debris-uri
Materiale actuale implante nu
promoveaza cresterea tisulara
rezistenta in timp
bioabsorbtie – cu mentinere rezistenta
biodegradare in timp util
fara produsi locali care afecteaza functia osoasa
materiale sigure
toxicitate, antigenicitate, pyrogenicitate, or
carcinogenicitate;
usor de sterilizat
capabile de constrangerile tehnicii chirurgicale
Materiale
Poly(Lactic-co-Glycolic) Acid (PLGA):
Degradable in vivo
PLGA
Alginate Hydrogel:
Posibil de suplimentat cu nutrienti, metaboliti etc.
Structura 3D ce promoveaza functia celulara
Design Materiale ~ 40 !
Polyglycolide (PGA) si copolimeri: polyglycolide-co-
trimethylene carbonate (PGA-co-TMC), poly-(D,L-lactide-co
glycolide) (PDLLA-co-PGA), poly-(L-lactide-co-glycolide)
(PLLA-co-PGA).
Poly-(L-lactide) (PLLA), poly-(D,L-lactide) (PDLLA), si
stereocopolimeri (L si D,L parts).
Polydioxanone (PDS)
Trimethylene carbonate (TMC)
Polyorthoester (POE)
Poly-c-capralacton (PCL)
Materiale composite
PLLA/tricalcium phosphate s
PLLA/hydroxyapatite
Intrebare…
Efectele acestor
substante pe
termen lung in
organismul
uman…
Degradare In Vivo
Fragmente surub de interferenta PLLA la 20
luni de la implantare.
Literatura – procesul :
In Vivo Degradation
1. Healing phase
2. Latency phase
3. Protracted resorptive phase
4. Progressive resorptive phase
5. Recovery phase
Degradare In Vivo
12 luni de la implantarea unor
brose PGA, Weiler si
colaboratorii nu au gasit
material birefringent in zona de
implantare
dar fragmente cristaline PGA
gasite in ganglionii aferenti si la
24 luni
Inlocuirea Osoasa
3 modalitati:
Crestere osoasa progresiva pe masura
degradarii implant
Crestere osoasa in centrul zonei dupa ce
implantul s-a degradat
Cicatrice osoasa in zona de implantare cu
dezvoltare marginala lenta de os nou
Inlocuirea Osoasa
Crestere osoasa
progresiva – cea mai
dorita dar rar intalnita.
Observata doar in
cursul degradarii
PLLA-co-PDLLA
(compozite)
Inlocuirea Osoasa
Crestere osoasa
centrala –
fluorescenta
tetraciclinei ca
marker dupa
absorbtia pinurilor
Inlocuirea Osoasa
Aspect CT-scan
scleroza osoasa
la locul
implantarii18 luni
dupa suruburi
PLLA-co-PDLLA
Inlocuirea Osoasa
Formare osoasa lenta (18 luni) la marginea
zonei; tetraciclina fluorescenta
Inlocuirea Osoasa
CT-scan la 30 luni dupa implant PLLA-co-
PDLLA.
Refacere osoasa aproape completa
Fantome
Fara aspect trabecular
Fibroza calcificata partial