Relevance of the movie “Argo” in Public International Law

First, the film highlights the concept of diplomatic immunity. When the U.S. embassy in Tehran is seized,
the Iranian militants violate the principle of diplomatic immunity by taking the embassy personnel
hostage. This principle is a fundamental aspect of public international law, which holds that diplomatic
personnel are protected by the host state and cannot be subjected to arrest or detention. The film shows
the consequences of violating this principle, as the hostages are subjected to mistreatment and long-
term captivity.

Second, the movie depicts the tension and complexity of international relations during a crisis situation.
The United States and Iran were at odds during the time of the Iranian Revolution, and the situation was
further complicated by the involvement of other countries, including Canada. The film highlights the
importance of communication and cooperation among nations in resolving conflicts and promoting
peace.

Third, the film illustrates the role of intelligence agencies in international affairs. The CIA plays a central
role in the movie, as it devises a plan to rescue the American hostages. The CIA's actions raise questions
about the limits of its power and the role of intelligence agencies in international law. The film also
depicts the difficulties that arise when intelligence agencies operate outside of the law or ethical
guidelines.

Finally, the movie raises broader questions about the use of force and military intervention in
international affairs. The United States considered using military force to rescue the hostages, but
ultimately opted for a covert operation. The film invites viewers to reflect on the use of force in
international law and the potential consequences of military intervention.

Overall, "Argo" is a thought-provoking film that touches on several key themes in public international
law, including diplomatic immunity, international relations, intelligence operations, and the use of force.