Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
22
Urbanistica descrittiva
23
l'P
!I
It
mixin9,
Jears
lfhge 4
.
e new generation of [ talian a1'lhitts
Bernarlio Serchi
by PierreAl11i11 Grose/
For various reasons, I find myself examining, with great continuiry, o large quantity of city planning writings and projects: research reports, essls and volumes which gather the res ts of reflections which attempt to achieve a certain
degree of generalitt3nd originality, technical accounts of~ ns on various scales,
planning tables, p ans for vast areas such
as chose related ro entire cities and their
parts, master plans such as those for
enactment or urbanchrojects, the norms
and regulations whi accompany them,
the articles which comment on them, the
n;ore or. less precise!~ oriented dos
s1ers" which compare em. I 6n~elf
examining a ~eat quantity of p ucts
of the activities of cityckaooers in our
country but also, with
ering d~ees
of coverage and depth, in otlier uro
peso countries.
,In nearly all of the cases we are dealing
w1th an obscure crowd", as Gustave
Lanson would have put it, of authors and
products; of a complex of writings, of
plans and projeas which, taken sinfaly,
Will not change the his~ of ci~fv an
nin\ofourtime, which proba y ne
ver e thou~t of as "exemplary exampies" buc w 'ch, to~echer, express the
Culture of the era, "t e picture of its lite,
rary (city planning) life: its cliches, its
preferences and its taboos.
I undertake this exercise with ouriosiry and interest; I remain tied to the notion of urban plaMing and, more f!en~
rally, of research as a collective oct1vity
not heroic in which the contributions of
che individual can be useful only if we are
able to establish an adequate context of a
consensus of truths, of" manners" which
are capable of becaming pervasive.
This is why I explore the crowd with in
terest.
fter
61
62
l}j,ge 44
c horizons or the dispersed dty
Stefano Boeri 1md Arturo Lanza11i
[...] Much of this activity continues to
lost within the cenalnties of a sumrdised, anonymous version of archi
tectural aod city plannin$Jcrnctice. Nevertheless, today we can 1 entify a lloli
ted group of original ex~enccs. which
include some rent form of interrogative
::t.arding die significance of the territoi:y
o the spl'C9ding ciiy, observing its com
positionul dynamics and acknowledgln~
its autonomy. Such pro~cts - most o
which ere the work oft e latest generauon of Italian architects - are Chante
terised. above all, by thetr W&)' oi looking
at the urbanised countryside: they arc in
creasingly deuchl!d from, and less influcncccl bt, a nostal~a for the models
and examp es which t e discipline' s tradition has dC\'Cloped in large cities, L ]
~t
t,!
'
..
..
~