Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Volume non
interconnesso
Volume non
interconnesso Volume non
interconnesso
Porosità delle rocce
Porosità (totale) = Vv / Vt
Porosità efficace = Vvi / Vt
Ghiaie 20 ÷ 30 Dolomie 2 ÷ 5
Sabbie e ghiaie 15 ÷ 25 Calcari 2 ÷ 10
Sabbie 5 ÷ 20 Craie 2 ÷5
Limi 1 ÷ 5 Rocce intrusive e 0,1 ÷ 2
Calcare
Argilla
Porosità «primaria» nulla
La capacità di ritenzione di una roccia è la proprietà di trattenere acqua, allo stato liquido,
sottraendola all’azione della forza di gravità.
L’acqua pellicolare (1 ÷ 2 μm) è acqua adesa alla precedente, mediante forze più deboli, e
può essere estratta mediante centrifugazione
L’acqua capillare è rappresentata da menischi d’acqua, non soggetti alla forza di gravità, che
si collocano in meati di piccole dimensioni (<2.5 mm)
Disponibilità
Forze Metodi di
Tipi di acque Per la Per l’evapo-
agenti estrazione
captazione traspirazione
Igroscopica Calcinazione Non disponibile
dove:
h è l’altezza a cui risale l’acqua per capillarità [L]
τ è la tensione superficiale [M T-2]
θ è l’angolo tra la superficie dell’acqua e la parete del capillare
r è il raggio del capillare [L]
ρ è la densità dell’acqua [M L-3]
g è l’accelerazione di gravità [L T-2]
Distribuzione dell’acqua nel sottosuolo
(alla scala macroscopica)
Zone di
Direzione Verso Fenomenologia umidità
interessate
Percolazione
Discendente
verso la falda Zona di
Ascenzione aerazione
Prevalentemente Ascendente
capillare
verticale
Oscillazioni del
Fascia di
Alternato livello
oscillazione
piezometrico
Prevalentemente Zona di
-
orizzontale saturazione
K=kρg/μ
K > 10 -2
Alto Ghiaie
10-2 > K > 10-4
Medio Sabbie
10-4 > K> 10-9
Basso Sabbie fini; Silt
10-9 > K
Impermeabile Argille
Correlazione tra il grado di permeabilità relativa di alcune rocce e gli ordini di grandezza dei coefficienti di permeabilità
va = Q / S
dove:
va è la portata specifica attraverso il cilindro [L T-1]
Q è la portata che attraversa il cilindro [L3 T-1]
S è la sezione interna del cilindro [L2]
va è direttamente proporzionale alla perdita di carico idraulico (Δh) tra due punti di
osservazione [L]
va è inversamente proporzionale alla distanza (Δl) tra i medesimi due punti [L]
Quindi:
va = K (Δh / Δl)
Da cui:
Q=KiS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjvSShfdtvk
Dove: i è il gradiente idraulico
Il Carico Idraulico = Altezza di Pressione + Altezza Geometrica
Usando il tratto rosso come piano orizzontale di riferimento, il Carico idraulico nel
punto P è pari a 4 metri
In ambito idrogeologico, il Carico idraulico viene riferito al livello del mare (m s.l.m.)
I caratteri idraulici della roccia: Omogenea vs. Eterogenea
a) Layered heterogeneity
b) Trending heterogeneity
c) Discontinuous heterogeneity
I caratteri idraulici della roccia: Omogenea vs. Eterogenea
a) Layered heterogeneity
I caratteri idraulici della roccia: Omogenea vs. Eterogenea
b) Trending heterogeneity
I caratteri idraulici della roccia: Omogenea vs. Eterogenea
c) Discontinuous heterogeneity
I caratteri idraulici della roccia: Omogenea vs. Eterogenea
(Il fattore «scala»)
La porzione caratterizzata dalla presenza dei punti bianchi delinea una componente
«omogenea» all’interno di un insieme «eterogeneo»
K1
K2 K1
Hydraulic gradient
Limiti di validità della Legge di Darcy
(Flusso laminare vs. Flusso turbolento)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OzAx1bPGD4
Limiti di validità della Legge di Darcy
(Rocce fratturate vs. Mezzo «poroso equivalente»)
Spesso si ritiene che la Legge di Darcy non possa essere applicata in mezzi
fessurati, in quanto questi presenterebbero una distribuzione discontinua dei meati
n1 < n2, ma n2 = n3
n1 n2 n3
vr = K i / p e
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=k443Wmvgktw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3wsUYg3XV0
M, soil grain size d, pellet size pand tunnel diameter D tunnels or chambers.
Excavation in fine-grained clay KC is limited to short
tunnels near the upper boundary of the sediments. On the
Porosità Efficace & Permeabilità della Roccia other hand, a widespread tunnel network in all directions is
observed in silt SF at low-to-medium water content. Excava-
vs. tion in dry sands, F110 and OS 20/30, causes granular sliding,
therefore ants transform level-ground into a sand pile at the
Organismi Viventi angle of repose. Yet, moist sands are stable at the tunnel scale
and can support extensive tunnel networks.
Excavation in dry fine gravel CG 10/14 is prone to granular
Granular Matter (2010) 12:607–616 sliding, as in sands. Occasional short and intricate small size
DOI 10.1007/s10035-010-0202-y “passages” can be seen in the coarser CG 6/10 gravel; tunnels
size D > ∼ 6 mm are built occasionally in moist gravels. In
all cases, particle removal in these coarse soils takes place
from the base of shafts or even the top face in upwards exca-
vation rather than lateral grabs from walls. Therefore, vertical
Ant tunneling—a granular media perspective shafts are more frequent than horizontal tunnels. Instability
always threatens particle excavation in both dry and moist
Fig. 2 Particle removal strategies as a function of relative mandible-
to-grain size M/dand capillary forces in terms of water saturation S% gravels, and tunnel collapse often leads to ants becoming
D. Nicolas
or suctionEspinoza J. Carlos
s. a Single ·grain. Santamarina
b Few grains held by friction, augmented trapped.
610 by capillary effects. c Capillarity is critical for the effective excavation D. N. Espinoza, J. C. Santamarina
and transport of multiple particles. d Loose conglomerates formed by
raking with legs. e High attractive forces limit excavation to small blocks
followed by pellet formation for effective transport does not exceed the mandible size (see similar observation
with P. occidentalis in Ref. [9]).
PUBLICATIONS
Water Resources Research
RESEARCH ARTICLE Evidence of an emerging levee failure mechanism causing
10.1002/2015WR017426
disastrous floods in Italy
Key Points: Water
Stefano Resources
Orlandini Research
1, Giovanni Moretti1, and John D. Albertson2 10.1002/2015WR017426
! Animal burrows are demonstrated to
1
be a serious threat of earthen levee Dipartimento di Ingegneria Enzo Ferrari, Universit!a degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy, 2School of Civil
failure and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
! Internal flow and erosion around a 44°41’57.85"N
Mirandola Bondeno
den can cause the collapse of the
4970000
c ch i a R iv er
o
n ar
rapid mitigation efforts were successfulCamposanto a
in averting a fullPlevee failure. The paired breach events that occurred
Northing, m
4960000
San Prospero
Supporting Information:
along the Secchia and Panaro Rivers provided an excellent window on an emerging levee failure mechanism.
! Supporting Information S1
Se
In the Secchia River, by combining the information content of photographs taken from helicopters in the early
! Figure S1
Ponte Bacchello b
! Figure S2 stage of breach development and 10 cm resolution aerial photographs taken in 2010 and 2012, animal bur-
BastigliaBomporto
rows were found to exist in the precise levee location where the breach originated. In the Panaro River, inter-
San Matteo
4950000
Correspondence to: nal erosion was observed to occur at a location where a crested porcupine den was known to exist and this
S. Orlandini, Ponte Alto
erosion led to the collapse of the levee top. This paper uses detailed numerical modeling of rainfall, river flow,
Rubiera
stefano.orlandini@unimore.it
and variably saturated flow in Viathe
Tronco
levee to explore the hydraulic and geotechnical mechanisms that were trig-
Modena
gered along the Secchia and Sant’Ambrogio
Panaro Rivers by activities of burrowing animals leading to levee failures. As hab-
Citation:
Orlandini, S., G. Moretti, and itats become650000
more fragmented 660000
and constrained
670000
along river
680000
corridors, 690000
it is possible that this failure mechanism
J. D. Albertson (2015), Evidence of an could become more prevalent and, therefore,
Easting, m will demand greater attention in both the design and mainte-
emerging levee failure mechanism
nance of earthen hydraulic structures as well as in wildlife management.
causing disastrous floods in Italy,
Water Resour. Res., 51 , 7995–8011,
5 10 20 30 40 50
doi:10.1002/2015WR017426.
Elevation, m asl
Figure 1. (a) Map of the land flooded after the levee failure occurred along the Secchia River at San Matteo (Northern Italy) on 19 January 2014. (b) The delineation of the flooded areas
Received 21 APR 2015 is based on aerial surveys carried out by the Civil Protection as part of the emergency response plan for the occurred disaster. A volume of water of about 363106 m3 (Figure 3a, area
Accepted 27 AUG 2015 under the breach loss hydrograph) left the Secchia River by flooding (red arrows) an area of about 52 km2. Topographic gradients and barriers are shown by the 1 m resolution digital
elevation model reported1. in theIntroduction
background.
Accepted article online 18 SEP 2015
Published online 12 OCT 2015 Burrowing 2.2. animalsWildlifeareImpact acknowledged
on the Levee by agencies responsible for earthen dams and levees to have an
Evidence of wildlife impact on the failed levee was derived from the analysis of 10 cm resolution aerial pho-
Porosità Efficace & Permeabilità della Roccia
vs.
Water Resources Research
Organismi Viventi 10.1002/2015WR017426
A
I H G F E D C B
T1
T4
T2
01-19-2014 10:11
T9 T8 T6 T5 T4 T2
T7 T1
A I
E F
B G L
C D H
01-19-2014 12:22
Figure 4. Photographs of the breach formed along the Secchia River at San Matteo taken from helicopters at 10:11 (Figure 4a) and 12:22
(Figure 4b) of 19 January 2014. Relevant geometrical features of the land surface close to the breach (trees T1–T9 in the riverbed and tree
rows A–L in the landside plain) are identified on the photographs to allow the breach configuration to be georeferenced and transferred
to relevant aerial photographs (Figures 5b and 5c).
First, the hydroclimatic conditions were very similar in the two cases, with both the failed levees directly
I
H
T5
10:11 G
F
: 22
Porosità Efficace
T6
T7
& 12Permeabilità della Roccia
C
D
E
T8 B2
T9 vs.
A B3
B4 B
0 10 20 m Organismi Viventi
B1
10:11
c A
Istrice
B
Tasso
C
Volpe
D
0 20 40 mm Nutria
Figure 5. Evidence of burrowing animals in the location of the Secchia River levee that failed on 19 January 2014. Long parallel lines mark the
top and landside bottom boundaries of the levee. Figure 5a shows animal burrows appearing in the 10 cm resolution aerial photography taken
on 27 March 2010. Figure 5b indicates that on 29 March 2012, animal burrows were further developed. Figure 5c shows the footprint of a wild
Water Resources Research
animal (probably a badger or a crested porcupine) observed on 24 February 2014, along the repaired levee.10.1002/2015WR017426
The burrowing animals that have
impacted the levees of the Secchia River include those shown in the insets of Figure 5c: (a) crested porcupine Hystrix cristata (Linnaeus, 1758),
(b) European badger Meles meles (Linnaeus, 1758), (c) red fox Vulpes vulpes (Linnaeus, 1758), and (d) nutria Myocastor coypus (Molina, 1758).
40
ORLANDINI ET AL. AN EMERGING35.70
LEVEEmFAILURE MECHANISM
asl at 4:20 B1 (36.3) B2 (37.1) 8001
Elevation, m asl
35 B4 (35.1)
B3 (34.8)
30
25
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance, m
Figure 6. Geometrical relationship between the elevations of burrows B1, B2, B3, and B4 observed (in 2010 and 2012) in aerial photographs
(Figures 5a and 5b) of the Secchia River at San Matteo and the river stage reconstructed from hydraulic modeling for the same levee location
on 19 January 2014 at 4:20 (Figure 3). Direct river inflow into the den system can be considered possible if an uncertainty of 0.3 m in the
determination of both burrow elevations (uncertainty bars) and river stages (light blue band) is acknowledged (hypothesis 1 and section 4.1).
4. Possible Triggers
Porosità Efficace & Permeabilità della Roccia
vs.
Organismi Viventi
Figure 6. Geometrical relationship between the elevations of burrows B1, B2, B3, and B4 observed (in 2010 and 2012) in aerial photographs
(Figures 5a and 5b) of the Secchia River at San Matteo and the river stage reconstructed from hydraulic modeling for the same levee location
on 19 January 2014 at 4:20 (Figure 3). Direct river inflow into the den system can be considered possible if an uncertainty of 0.3 m in the
Porosità Efficace & Permeabilità della Roccia
determination of both burrow elevations (uncertainty bars) and river stages (light blue band) is acknowledged (hypothesis 1 and section 4.1).
a 4.1. Hypo
Only
direct rainfall on the levee The first h
O the presen
of direct in
A tem as sim
den tunnel raising. Fr
and terrain
b O that the e
01−19−2014 16:01 burrow B1
riverside w
stability analysis of an
b 1 undisturbed levee segment
above sea
elevations
Wi
B2, B3, an
Ti
2 Ti
levee land
Ni Ni Wi from 34.8 t
From river
c O found tha
January 20
burrow el
stability analysis of a 2012) on t
levee segment disturbed they signi
by an animal burrow burrow el
01−19−2014 19:48
2012) on t
ure 3b).
Figure 7. Observational evidence of the levee failure mechanism occurred along the Panaro River at Via Tronco (Figure 1) on 19 January Figure 8. Sketch of the slope stability analysis performed to assess the impact of animal acknowled
2014, under hydroclimatic conditions similar to those occurred along the Secchia River at San Matteo (Figure 2). An internal erosion pro- burrows on equilibrium conditions (hypothesis 2 and section 4.2). The bold line in Figure
cess was observed at 16:01 as documented in Figure 7a. This internal flow process developed around a crested porcupine den that was 8a indicates the levee portion on which the analysis focuses. The equilibrium of green seg- the order
observed and filled with earth in the past. The collapse of the levee top over the gallery formed by internal erosion was documented at ments shown in Figures 8b and 8c is evaluated: O is the center of the circular sliding sur- reconstruc
19:48 as reported in Figure 7b. The picture reported in Figure 7b was taken from the top of the levee close to the collapsed portion high- face, Wi is the weight of the ith element composing the sliding segment, Ti and Ni are the
lighted by the arrow directed downward. The failure mechanism consisted therefore of two stages. In stage 1 (Figure 7a and sketch
and river s
shear and normal components of Wi to the sliding surface. The blue vertical arrows indi-
labeled ‘‘1’’ in Figure 7b), the internal erosion develops around the animal den. In stage 2 (Figure 7b and sketch labeled ‘‘2’’ in Figure 7b), cate the direct rainfall on the levee. The blue horizontal line indicates the river stage. The cluded tha
the levee top collapses by filling the gallery in the eroded levee and by exposing the collapsed material to further erosion and overtop- two cases in which the animal burrow is not present (Figure 8b) or is present (Figure 8c) the positio
ping. The collapsed levee was rapidly repaired, preventing a second disaster. are considered.
rows obse
flow may
pietrame.
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Pedology
Article history: Biological soil crusts (BSCs) are highly specialized topsoil microbial communities commonly found in arid
Received 23 June 2011
Biological Soil Crusts in the Mojave Desert, USA:
Received in revised form
and semiarid environments, permeated by a polymeric matrix of polysaccharides. BSCs can in principle
influence edaphic properties such as texture, pore formation and water retention, which in turn deter-
B
some of which are intrinsic to the soil, ranging from cracking, Romkens et al., 1990; Warren, 2003a, b) or to an increase in run-off
iological soil crusts are complex matrices of cyanobacteria, mosses, lichens,
microtopography, and sealing, to particle size and organic matter yields (Kidron et al., 2003), in others studies the opposite effect is
distribution (Warren, 2003a, b). bacteria, algae, andreported
fungi that fuse around
(Belnap soil particles
et al., 2001; Greenetoand
create a living,
Tongway, 1989; Seghieri
protective membrane in arid
et al., soils In
1997). (Eldridge
studiesand Greene,
carried out1994). Biologicalfor instance,
in Australia,
Porosità Efficace & Permeabilità della Roccia
vs.
Organismi Viventi
Pedology
ted in Au for 30 s with a All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by
any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage
and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for
putter and examined and reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.
Fig. 2. The study area, the Hidden Valley Area of Critical Environmental Concern
ty of Nevada, Las Vegas (ACEC), lies within the Muddy Mountains Wilderness Area, Nevada. Soil Science Society of America Journal
and Imaging Laboratory
ning electron microscope (SEM). The mosses (Fig. 4 and 5). Grain size, orientation, and compaction
taken under the backscatter electron varied with biological and sedimentary factors but ranged from
magnifications with working distances clay to medium sand with few coarse sand grains (Fig. 4A). Void
o 20 kV, and at spot sizes of 30 to 40. morphologies included the following: irregular, linear voids up
were verified using an attached Oxford to 5 mm wide; irregular interior voids up to 24 by 36 mm with
x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) system at smooth margins of compacted clays, silts, and very fine sands Fig. 1. (A) Cyanobacteria crusts display slightly darkened surfaces (arrow) and (B) knob features (arrow; marker for scale); (C) tall, pinnacled crusts with
extensive lichens (l) have summits cemented in authigenic mineral precipitates (p); and (D) short, moss-dominated crusts accumulate eolian sand grains.
cations with working distances of 15 to that commonly contained photosynthetic tissues that appeared
nd at spot sizes of 30 to 40. In all cases to be blocked from light (Fig. 4D and 5F); vesicular pores from reproductive strategies of the component organisms (Belnap and MATERIALS AND METHODS
pitates were suspected, SEM-EDS was 0.1 to 0.8 mm in diameter (Fig. 4B and 4C); and horizontal to Warren, 2002; Thomas and Dougill, 2007; Kidron et al., 2008; The Hidden Valley portion of the Muddy Mountains
alogy and potential origin. A total of vertical 0.5- to 1-mm-wide linear voids that commonly aligned
Williams et al., 2008; Langhans et al., 2010). Previous studies Wilderness Area in Nevada is an ideal natural laboratory to in-
vations were recorded and subsequent- parallel to all biological structures or penetrated the bio-rich
Porosità Efficace & Permeabilità della Roccia
vs.
Organismi Viventi
Fig. 3. Three biological soil crust morphotypes display distinct bio-sedimentary structures and surface morphologies.
4E). Vascular plant roots were uncommon features that occurred cession proceeds from cyanobacteria crusts to tall moss-lichen
in large interior voids near the base of pinnacle mounds. Short pinnacled crusts overlying mineral Av horizons (Fig. 6). Through
mosses, such as Bryum and Pterygoneurum, commonly occurred this succession, component organisms change, organic and min-
Processes Forming Topo
Several theories of crust
been proposed by previous r
Fig. 6. Biological soil crust succession proceeds along geomorphically inactive fine-grained sediments. Processes (blue) co-develop with changes in species composition and surface morphology.