Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Term project
II
By
Bridget Lungu
SIN: 23900276
6th June,2023
Topic:
1
Table of Contents
CHAPTER ONE 3
1 INTRODUCTION 3
1.1 Background 3
1.2 Statement of the problem 4
1.3 General objective 5
1.3.1 Specific objectives 5
1.4 Research questions 5
1.5 Significance of the study 6
1.6 Scope of the study 6
1.6.1 Summary of chapter one 7
2 LITERATUEE REVIEW 8
2.1 Introduction 8
2.2 Project Management 8
2.3 Co-operate social responsibility. 8
2.4 Challenges are experienced by the industrial sector in promoting social and environmental
responsibility. 10
2.5 Strategies that can be applied to advance the construction of industrial projects that take into
consideration social and environmental responsibility. 13
2.6 Theoretical frame work 14
2.7 Conceptual Framework 16
2.8 Summary of Chapter two 17
CHAPTER THREE 18
3 METHODLOGY 18
3.1 Research approach 18
3.2 Study design 18
3.3 Study site and study population 18
3.4 Sampling technique 19
3.5 Sampling frame 19
3.6 Sampling size 19
3.7 Data collection instruments 20
3.7.1 Primary Data 20
3.7.2 Secondary Data 20
3.8 Data analysis 20
2
3.9 Ethical issues 20
4 REFRENCE LINKS 22
5 SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW GUIDE 25
5.1 SECTION A 25
5.2 BACKGROUND 25
5.3 SECTION B 25
5.4 SECTION C 25
5.5 SECTION D 26
3
CHAPTER ONE
1 INTRODUCTION
This thesis proposal seeks to discuss the role of project management in promoting social
co-operate responsibility in Lusaka province, Zambia in the construction industry. The key
sectors in the Zambian construction market are commercial construction, industrial
construction, infrastructure construction, energy and utilities construction, institutional
construction, and residential construction.
The Ndola Oil Refinery and Oil Pipeline, Kafue Gorge Lower Hydro Power Plant 750MW,
Lusaka to Ndola Dual Carriageway, Kansanshi S3 Expansion, Ndola Cement Plant, and
The Kalulushi Smart City are the major construction projects in Zambia. In terms of value,
the Ndola Oil Refinery and Oil Pipeline project is in the forefront.
However, with backing from investments in the mining, industrial, electrical, and
transportation infrastructure sectors, the Zambian construction industry is anticipated to
start improving in 2024. The government stated that it will undertake policies to encourage
investments and expansion in important economic sectors, including as mining,
manufacturing, energy, and tourism, as part of the 2023–25 Medium Term Budget Plan.
The government will likewise move toward renewable energy over the next three years,
concentrating on increasing solar and geo-thermal electricity (Rionda, Z. L. 2002). In
order to fill infrastructure gaps and relieve pressure on the Treasury, it also plans to
increase Public Private Partnership (PPP) for infrastructure development. As a result, a
forecast of how these investments in the construction industry will affect the environment
and the role that project management plays in cooperative social responsibility as a
strategy to lessen the negative externalities caused by the construction center in Zambia
will be created.
1.1 Background
The market interest for development administrations can be utilized to dissect the
development area. How much providers and purchasers, the evaluating structures, the
effortlessness of passage and leave, the volume of data stream (or imbalances), and
4
different factors all assume a part in how the business is coordinated (modern association
focal point).
Scientist interest in project manageability the board in emerging nations has endured.
The people group and the public authority confronted various difficulties because of the
ventures; by and by, reasonable improvement is currently viewed as an answer for the
issue and a method for accomplishing manageability. Eventually, Zambia has not been a
special case for the fostering scene's speed increase of the coordination of supportability
into projects. Social obligation works with the administration of manageability in drives.
There are currently more CSR studies accessible. Regardless of the development of CSR
research, there is still no settled upon meaning of CSR, which brings about vague use of
the term. The disarray, as Fischer would see it, results from the way that CSR has been
concentrated on in different scholastic fields. The Commission of the European People
group, refered to in Dahlsrud, portrayed CSR as "the idea by which organizations
coordinate their social and natural worries in their business tasks and in their cooperation
with their partner on a deliberate premise" (2001). This expression is utilized in this
exploration since it conceptualizes CSR plainly and is by and large perceived by different
scholastics. In view of this, the accompanying review expects to investigate the capability
of task the executives in cultivating corporate social obligation: A Relative Investigation of
the Best Strategies in Zambia's Development Area. As well as portraying the
5
organization's commitment to social and ecological difficulties, the meaning of CSR
likewise thinks about three different variables: monetary, partners, and willfulness.
Creating their business value is the primary objective of every corporation in the globe.
Regardless of the business, Projects have recently come to be recognized as an effective
approach to generate this value through enhanced managerial procedures. Zambia, a
developing nation, carries out several construction projects to close the gap between the
development policies outlined in various ministerial strategic plans and the realization of
economic value, as is typical for developing nations.
6
2.To lay out difficulties experienced by modern organizations in advancing social
and ecological obligation in Zambia.
3.To lay out methodologies that could be applied to propel the development of
modern tasks that think about friendly and natural obligation in Zambia.
Furthermore it is presumed that findings of the study will benefit project managers,
participants and stakeholders who are currently missing strategies for successful
implementation of projects as well as researchers. Project monitoring and evaluation
organisations will also enhance their capacities by adopting and operationalizing
developed strategies. The framework will provide the project managers with a checklist
against which they will base their decisions.
Despite the fact that these construction projects exist in abundance in the country to help
achieve government’s strategic objectives, it has been noted that they are often poorly
managed. It is noted that when a project management approach is rooted into an
organization’s culture, performance and competitive advantage improves according to
7
PMI’s pulse study (2015). This research is vital for the ministry of commerce and local
government and housing , it provides reach insight on how projects can be implemented
with social cooperate responsibility being the center of attention to caution the impact of
projects on social and economic development of Zambia at large.
The act of venture the board is utilized broadly across various organizations, in addition to
the development area. The focal point of this study will be on Zambia's development
industry, with an inclination for the structure and street areas. To more readily fathom the
capability of undertaking the board, an example of 30 tasks finished somewhere in the
range of 2012 and 2022 will be taken.
8
CHAPTER TWO
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
This section provides a general overview of the development of the construction industry
in Zambia, discusses how project management supports the sector's efforts to promote
social responsibility in business, explores the challenges the industrial sector faces in
doing so, and explores techniques for advancing the creation of industrial projects that
take social and environmental responsibility into account in Zambia.
Perceiving the current work and the venture supervisor is the most important phase in
figuring out project the board. The 2017 release of the PMBOK Guide states on page 4
that "an undertaking is a momentary task that is resolved to deliver an item that is novel
help, or result." Ventures regularly start when there is a critical or testing trouble that must
be settled. "A venture association is then made because of the necessity for an intentional
hierarchical exertion and a significant level coordination" (Sd erlund, 2004:p) to finish a
scope of undertakings.
A few studies that have previously been conducted on CSR practices in Zambia focus
mainly on mining companies. These studies show that the most common CSR activity in
Zambia is community involvement. For example, Lungu and Shikwe observed that CSR in
Zambia is more social and philanthropic in nature and CSR is viewed as a way of
supporting the local community. Similarly, Mayondi reported that CSR in mining firms is
mostly focused on community development activities such as building of schools, roads,
providing jobs and offering micro-credit loan to people in the local community. There is
however one study that focuses on sustainable opportunity identification (opportunities to
engage in sustainable behaviour such as CSR) by SMEs in Zambia and another study on
CSR motivations in Zambian SMEs. Choongo et al. established that altruism towards
others was the main reason why entrepreneurs identify sustainable opportunities.
10
The nature of sustainable opportunities investigated in this study included opportunities
related to the social environment (Such as care for employees, supporting community
activities) and natural environment (Such as recycling, water and energy saving).
Furthermore, Choongo et al. [20] reported that internal motivations (financial motivation
and moral and ethical motivation) are the reasons why SMEs adopt community-CSR and
environmental-CSR practices in Zambia. In addition, the identification of sustainable
opportunities also positively influences the adoption of community-CSR practices.
External motivation appears to play no role at all for any form of CSR engagements.
However, these two studies did not consider the impact of CSR activities on firm
performance.
This was because over an extended period COST Zambia had not demonstrated
progress towards implementing COST standards. Thus, although the country was among
the eight where COST was successfully piloted between 2008 and 2011, by 2015 it had
been declared ‘inactive’, having failed to make meaningful progress for an extended
period. COST Zambia was given a further six months to get itself ‘reactivated’ through
appropriate policy reform and compliance measures. With no high-level commitment or
movement from the responsible institutions, the timeline and all subsequent timelines
lapsed, forcing the board to take its March 2017 decision. The risk is high that
weaknesses in transparency, accountability, and good governance will continue to obtain,
making room for vices like corruption and rent-seeking.
11
In some instances, the room for corruption is created by the over-design and over-
specification of construction projects at inception. Anecdotal evidence on road
construction costs in Zambia compared to Kenya is a first-line indication of the possibility
of over-design and over-specification related to corruption and rent-seeking. On average,
road construction costs in Zambia were around US$1.6 million per km, which, on the face
of it, was not very different from the average in Kenya ($1.5 million per km). However,
once it is observed that the road projects selected in the Kenyan case were all relatively
more complex urban road engagements with an average road length of 20 km, we readily
notice than the Zambian case, with a fairly large number of long truck road projects (of 120
km length on average), has some seemingly overpriced roads. In particularly, many
experts and observers have aired suspicions that the Lusaka–Ndola dual carriageway
construction project (commissioned in late 2017) and the Chikwa road construction
project (of 2018), worth an estimated US$3.3 million and US$3.1 million per km
respectively, were grossly over-specified and thus overpriced. Saasa (2018) provides
evidence lending support to these suspicions.
Milton Friedman, a notable critic, observed that CSR might ultimately pit corporate goals
against social goals. “There is one and only one social responsibility of business—to use
its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays
within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without
deception or fraud” (Friedman, 1970). In his view, CSR creates impediments in the
running of business and can make for confusion about the true goals of the firm. With
growth in the complexity of business and concerns about sustainability, there may be
conflict between the enhancement of a company's long-term profitability and its
contribution to the public good. The situation is often exacerbated by the apparent lack of
rewards in following a CSR strategy. For example, Wal-Mart is rewarded by the market for
cutting costs; Costco, which offers better insurance and benefits to its workers, is
penalized by the market for not cutting costs as well, and therefore not being as profitable
as Wal-Mart.
More recently, championing an active role for government, Robert Reich argued in his
book “Super capitalism” that companies who don't embrace the principles of Corporate
12
Social Responsibility are neither brutally insensitive nor ruthlessly greedy. “They're doing
what they're supposed to do, according to the current rules of the game giving their
customers good deals and thereby maximizing the returns to their investors” (Reich, p.
12). Just as games require rules to define fair play, the economy relies on government to
set the economic ground rules. If government wanted to change the way Wal-Mart does
business, it would change the current rules making it easier for employees to unionize, to
get health insurance and pensions, and to grant a living wage. He posits that CSR is
undermining democracy by giving companies an excuse to indulge in superficial social
work and diverting government from taking action to address real and pressing social
concerns.
One major problem is that CSR simplifies some rather complex arguments and fails to
acknowledge that ultimately trade-offs must be made between the financial health of the
company and ethical outcomes. And when they are made, profit frequently wins over
principles (Doane, 2005). In her book “The High-Purpose Company,” Christine Arena
uses wide-ranging research to show that a corporation does not have to choose between
being socially responsible and making a profit. By studying public records, news articles
and company issued reports, and by interviewing stakeholders comprising employees,
executives, consumers, watchdog groups and industry experts, Arena's team found that
contributing to the greater good is more than just a marketing tool it is a market
opportunity (Arena, 2006).
These results show that the absence of instant rewards in the form of profits should not be
a justification for abstaining from CSR. Rather, if a company chooses a comprehensive
strategy that capitalizes on CSR, then it not only minimizes a possible clash between
corporate and social goals, but also is able to exploit market opportunities that eventually
bring in clear gains and rewards.
13
groups, that is, (1) management problems, (2) financial problems, (3) technical Problems
and (4) political problems. Amade et al. (2012) categorized them as (1) financial
problems, (2) environmental factors and (3) participants’ problems.
Therefore, this article from BSI Global, London by Carroll, A. B. (1991) opens the door to
the realization that the project manager is responsible for ensuring that these issues are
raised appropriately in project execution. It is essential not to assume that company
executives are aware of the social ramifications of a project. A project manager's data can
help him or her make bold decisions, develop ethical business practices beyond what the
law requires, and determine the extent to which project management can positively
contribute to cooperative social responsibility.
14
Additionally, Levi Strauss and Company strictly enforces its anti-underage worker policy.
However, executives in the United States did not demand that the workers be fired or shut
down the factories when they discovered that two factories in Bangladesh had workers
under the age of 15. Instead, the field project managers investigated the issue and
discovered that families in Bangladesh rely on income from child laborers to survive. As a
result, they contributed to the creative solution. The factory had to pay for the education of
the already employed workers, sending them to a nearby school or even hiring a teacher
for the child workers if there were no nearby schools. Like that, the organization could
guarantee the kids were getting legitimate training, while not driving families into
neediness. In the end, such actions set an example for other factories in the area (Arena,
2006, p. 123).
Carroll, A. B. (1991), in his article from BSI Global, London, poses the question, "How can
the project manager evaluate CSR risk?" By probability and impact, he or she can rank
social issues in the same way that they rank all other project risks. How likely is it that this
project will lead to an ethical, environmental, or social problem? What might happen, not
only to the project but also to the community and society as a whole? Risk can be reduced
and societal benefit promoted by incorporating these considerations into project planning
and execution.
Moreover, as per BSI Worldwide, London Carroll, A. B. (1991), project chiefs have the
ability to convince their associations to act in a socially dependable way locally in
association with issues like provider relations, ecological protection, and regard for
human and work privileges. Projects that work together with the neighborhood have the
potential to forge lasting bonds based on kindness, respect, and mutual benefit. However,
in order for this to work, the company must actively participate in the community by
regularly interacting with residents and learning about their needs. Before embarking on
the path to social responsibility, project managers should first determine where their
organizations stand with regard to CSR.
The project manager can specifically investigate how social responsibility affects the
projects that he or she is currently working on, whereas executive management might
come up with a comprehensive plan that integrates CSR strategy with business strategy.
15
The likely effects on the business, the community, and society as a whole will also play a
role in determining whether or not a particular initiative is desirable. This is because of its
connection to the project.
Because incorporating CSR into a business involves more than just carrying out projects,
the next task is to develop a communication strategy before tackling social action. By
demonstrating the necessary risk mitigation and clearly outlining the reasoning behind the
proposed course of action, it will be crucial to gain the support of the organization's senior
managers and influencers. To effectively monitor any CSR activity, management must
ensure that metrics and key performance indicators are in place.
The stakeholder theory was developed from four lines of organization management
research: strategic organizational planning, systems theory, corporate social
responsibility and organizational theory. Strand and Freeman (2015) explores the
development of the stakeholder idea, specifically the Scandinavian contribution to early
theory development. The term stakeholder (direct translation of the Swedish term
“intressent”) was first used by Rehnman in his 1964 book “Företagsdemokratioch
Företagsorganisation”. Along with other innovations, the book included the first published
stakeholder map and identified many key concepts in stakeholder thinking, including 1)
jointness of interests, 2) cooperative strategic posture and 3) rejection of a narrow
economic view of the firm.
16
One of the first and most important definitions of stakeholders was supplied by Freeman's
Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1984), along with Rehnman's
contributions. According to the book, organizations rely on and must take into account
"any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the
organization's objectives." The recognition and description of many interest groups,
including as employees, clients and customers, suppliers, shareholders, local
communities, etc., were among its most significant contributions. Definitions that limited
the range of prospective stakeholders subsequently resulted from the participation of so
many diverse parties in the managerial decision-making process.
Based on the stake holder theory bases its understanding that ethical business practices
must incorporate the notion that stakeholders are ends rather than means. All corporate
value creation activity depend on the willing participation of stakeholders to enhance
materials into products or services (Freeman et al. 2020). In renouncing the “narrow
economic” view of business, stakeholder theorists reject the “separation thesis” said to be
implicit in shareholders conceptions of the firm. The partitioning of ethics and business,
i.e. the separation of the human and social needs of stakeholders from value creation
activity is argued to be misguided both from an instrumental and normative perspective
(Freeman 1999). Strand and Freeman (2015 p. 67) claim that such a separation
mistakenly juxtaposes profitability and stakeholder concerns, arguing instead that “long-
term profitability is a byproduct of a well-run company that effectively engages with its
stakeholders”.
In addition to the aforementioned, distributive justice and fairness are seen by many
researchers as crucial elements of the theory. There isn't a single stakeholder
perspective, despite attempts to reach agreement on the creation of social welfare (Jones
and Wicks 1999; Freeman 1999). Traditional financial metrics do not fully reflect business
performance, according to the idea of consideration for all rightful stakeholders (Jones
and Wicks 1999). Theorists have expanded the scope of corporate activities to include,
for instance, just treatment of stakeholders by using ideas from ethics to construct
theories (narratives) for articulating the roles and duties of the corporation.
17
Several normative cores for guiding such efforts have been proposed, including Kantian
capitalism, fairness, fair contracts, personal projects and feminism (Jones and Wicks
1999). Aspects of utilitarian thinking has been endorsed by some theorists for the
maximization of social welfare for all stakeholders, however aggregate utility
maximization is rejected by stakeholder advocates of Kantian capitalism. Some
stakeholder theorists have argued that moral behavior does not need to be justified in
terms of instrumentality (Jones 1995).
According to Khan et al. (2013), the project success comprises five dimensions: Project
effectiveness, Impact on customers, Impact on teams, Business Success, and Future
planning.
In this study, project success is measured for its connection with PM social responsibility
as can be seen from the pictorial illustration below.
Dependent variable
Independent variable
Project efficiency
18
Impact on customers
Future preparations
19
CHAPTER THREE
3 METHODLOGY
This chapter presents the research methodology, includes the area of the study, the,
research design, research approach, population, sample and sampling techniques, data
collection instruments, validity and reliability issues, ethical considerations, and data
analysis plan.
20
every participant, person, or group that is anticipated to be represented in the study. 130
construction campaigns will be the subject matter of this study's population.
21
occurs when no fresh concepts or themes emerge. According to Marshall et al. (2013),
qualitative investigations place more emphasis on the information's quality than they do
on gathering the massive amounts of data that quantitative research require.
22
3.9 Ethical issues
With the participants' willing and aware consent, primary data or information will be
gathered. According to the concept of informed consent, respondents or participants will
consent to being interviewed after being informed of the type of information the
researcher is seeking from them, the purpose for which they are seeking the information,
and how it will be utilized. As a result, consent will be freely given and free from coercion.
The information that will be gathered from the respondents will be kept private so that no
one other than the researcher will see it.
23
4 REFERENCES
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349494622_sustainability_Sustainability_in_Constructi
on_Projects_A_Systematic_Literature_Review/link/60338bd2a6fdcc37a842ba1e/download
Apolot, R., Alinaitwe.H. and Tindiwensi, D. (2016) An Investigation into the Causes of Delay and
Cost Overruns in Ugandan`s Public Sector Construction Projects, Uganda: Makerere University
Press.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267415309_An_Investigation_into_the_Causes_of_De
lay_and_Cost_Overrun_in_Uganda's_Public_Sector_Construction_Projects
Bagaya, O and Song, J (2006) Empirical Study of Factors Influencing Schedule delays of Public
Construction projects in Burkina Faso. Journal of Management in Engineering, 8(5), 57-87
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301511615_Empirical_Study_of_Factors_Influencing_
Schedule_Delays_of_Public_Construction_Projects_in_Burkina_Faso
Moore, G.; Spence, L. Editorial: Responsibility and small business. J. Bus. Ethics 2006, 67, 219–
226. [CrossRef]
Vo, L.C. Corporate social responsibility and SMEs: A literature review and agenda for future
research. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2011, 9, 89–97.
Kechiche, A.; Soparnot, R. CSR within SMEs: Literature review. Int. Bus. Res. 2012, 5, 97.
[CrossRef]
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., and Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in
corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of
management review, 32(3), 836-863.
24
Almahmoud, E. S., Doloi, H. K., and Panuwatwanich, K. (2012). Linking project health to project
performance indicators: Multiple case studies of construction projects in Saudi Arabia.
International Journal of Project Management, 30(3), 296-307.
British Standards Institute (2007). BS OHSAS 18001:2007: Occupational Health and Safety
Management Systems – Requirements.
BSI Global, London Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward
the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Carvalho, M. M. (2006). Competências para gerenciar projetos-teoria e casos. São Paulo: Atlas.
Carvalho, M. M., and Rabechini Jr, R. (2017). Can project sustainability management impact
project success? An empirical study applying a contingent approach. International Journal of
Project Management, 35(6), 1120- 1132.
Fang, D. P., Huang, X. Y., and Hinze, J. (2004). Benchmarking studies on construction safety
management in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(3), 424-432.
Freeman, R. E., and Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business
ethics quarterly, 12(3), 331-349.
25
Davis, I. (2005, May 26). The biggest contract: Business and society. The Economist [Electronic
Version]. Retrieved January 22, 2008
from http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=4008642
Barney, J.B. and Harrison, J.S. 2020, "Stakeholder Theory at the Crossroads", Business and
Society,
Björnsson, G., Kihlbom, U. and Ullholm, A. 2009, Argumentationsanalys: färdigheter för kritiskt
Boréus, K. and Bergström, G. 2018, Textens mening och makt: metodbok i samhällsvetenskaplig
textoch diskursanalys, Fjärde [omarbetade och aktualiserade] upplagan edn, Studentlitteratur,
Lund.
Bosse, D.A., Phillips, R.A. and Harrison, J.S. 2009, "Stakeholders, Reciprocity, and Firm
26
5 SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW GUIDE
5.1 SECTION A
5.2 BACKGROUND
1. Indicate position in organization (tick):
2. Indicate what role; your organization playing public sector construction projects, from
among the given categories below.
5.3 SECTION B
1. Doss project management contribute to promoting corporate social responsibility in the
construction industry in Zambia?
Yes No
5.4 SECTION C
1. Are there any challenges are experienced by the industrial sector in promoting social and
environmental responsibility in Zambia?
Yes No
2. If yes to Q1 above, what challenges are experienced by the industrial sector in promoting
social and environmental responsibility in Zambia?
27
3. Are there any project design related challenges in considering social and environmental
issues?
Yes No
............................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................
5.5 SECTION D
1. What strategies can be applied to advance the construction of industrial projects that take
into consideration social and environmental responsibility in Zambia?
............................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................
28
FOCUS GROUP DISCUSION
1.How does project the board add to advancing corporate social obligation in the development
business in Zambia?
2.What difficulties are capable by the modern area in advancing social and natural obligation in
Zambia?
3.What procedures can be applied to propel the development of modern activities that think about
friendly and ecological obligation in Zambia?
29