Scribd Logo
Carica

Benvenuto in Scribd!

  • Adorno, Parataxis

    Caricato da

    Martin Pokorný
    272 visualizzazioni24 pagine

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formati disponibili

    PDF o leggi online da Scribd

    Hai trovato utile questo documento?

    Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

    Segnala questo documento

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Scarica in formato PDF o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    272 visualizzazioni24 pagine

    Adorno, Parataxis

    Caricato da

    Martin Pokorný

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Scarica in formato PDF o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    di 24
    8:88 NOTES iG LIL BR AU RE me Teo THEODOR W. ADORNO For commentery, ike the German Baroque dra to hich the learned Silsume appended the soli But this ncrases, co bewildering kgrens 2 gay long pecan modernism: aside from Jost mel, whose Finrgon ws never embarrased about is nex for exp ‘ato, iti found in Er and Pound Helms work provokes the obj: fon of tram, The plot tht one cn exact dcusvely from LL APAANZESGOW, te etc scenes between Miche apd Hel lat they would of themselves require sch inet aan TRlpuramater of omen des ot Kp pate withthe patameer of tech The xin hat onthe tsi of the authors youth. Why however Ge somthing tha by convention cap be narrated? The oiction ‘fae roman ates centred around the concep ofthe spb. 1 haste ence of metninge ovr wt i given contemplative fom in ‘rane with the norms of ht antes The hermetic cli inthis sce rnd, in ta itis dependent for immanent development something cannot accompli of el. This mach at Kes may seve wr rjender—tha hs fallure to be filly abwrbed inthe content Ere reled to the spr of allegory, esi wo this content. Like oe ofa work of at ara unceivaca! complex of mening ts harmonious form nod pare, closed immanent i ids other tan ht complex of fee - yas never realized, is given up, Sa ‘that is the discostinuity between the world and the work. The 2 ein Fon mang. The pur, wich evr Ss cr Parataxis On Hilderlin’s Late Poetry Dedicated t0 Peter Szmdi here i no question tha une standing of Hdl’ work bs ea along with is Game snc the choo of Sin George deme shod the conspion of im ava ie, rei! minor pt with touching Ie The lint the poet lle seme to npn the under ing of his Ite hymn work have ben rely cxtende. Halder rection within contemporary pocry sce Tral hes contributed fo ofthe prt falas, The proce wasnt rye of edt Th the rob lelogy pede mmission the coronary SEEGEFEEL tepreton of alvin, Water Muse Corry cnphac the courbuion of logy cing. cdot iene Kit May and il Seige ad ona it th er elas rerey Gabo gh es eng pea pliers we ng thy le bt tn te one Cope earpiece wir yee mt ar wefuo abe my he is caploing an sso et on ne Pobboselinetdi eka Gea ceneet rece eed ay orwell wah ha weeiag ates ling che arom die {Sav of te "ery I Faker, Rie, Raf, td Tra The Ciao ese mtr, who ae rainy nt ice Eh oc so mich xs denen it, According to tran: knowlege of ierary works would contin the econ ‘rac of what the autor tendo. But the frm fundstin plilagy imagine pone ha proved usable. Whee i he nt ga obj estore at at an be recovered where dats a texts shal light ont, But prc ‘Ther maers, whee te intention ober, the pags n from the which can be eased through parallels, and conjecture hs ite to afer uses ts based on Tr amecedetphilosphical poston; tere is 2 repeal relation be en hem, Most important, the atie procs, which tat axiom re und artvya rnd to the eal ofthe ter a hough the pl of Ditheys meta sil secretly ely ie by ap mvs exhustd inthe tubjetive intention, asthe axiom Smpiclyasumes.Inteton is one ‘Moc iy imerion i rarforied at a work only in exbuosive mrcration wth other moments: he subject mate, the immanent ow of {fe more and—epecly i Hilder objecting frm Pact of she sanges refed tate from a Ha recite ait ith everyting, while ari experince techs them how Hite what = Trak thei oma bclengs to therm ow much the are under the compl ‘on ofthe work elf The more completly the rts intention tak Spats wlat he makes and diapens inf without a trac, the more mccufl the work iy In accordance withthe notion of the seal? Wes Hegel oe eam “esis tr object with regard to sje {re uterance in that none of the gensin substance of the object hat pied the art rere within i jective erin rather,

    Potrebbero piacerti anche