jipolitics sesthe generic being of man chatles me coy Faculte de phitosozite‘TE GENERIC USING OF KAN BE cor ‘Tho/s0. den" in the proceedings Meal Sgeiaty, vol 82, nonk ‘the Beate, theologigue et Sones Lego ‘ritique Harsiete-de 14 Religion. Graries De Koni | totes our ia carxisne iprozes le Communiene Chre! Fourgbacht ‘The Begone of Christianity. Sredrich Ungels? Ludslg Feyrebach. + Karl Hara: “Compuete Yorke ( Costes, editor) Vol. VI 2 Geman Tas 2 voy )/1i/30 9.2 can bo read cs @ progressive emancipation of nan by ‘himself ~ Norces eormunian an be sean #8 the end product of this” Wiage due to the contrartety Jogieal outcons of the long fs the protuction of things thet neles nan the sutier yiSvords “Wah sSdtess the goose of nie ern subslogence 2 eile Sake jorking on inorganie mature = Peiates himself to sd and he. car be 8a! : Han ean dentnata sis pros en free fron need Vark unites inecn nature and tie. 8 by the fact that he ut ve Bane Enis dotion of the generic beins we can see all history as ‘Govabstrection of alienation of san'fran his generic veins. July 12, 1950 ‘This notion of the generic being 1s not fully explained in Ee ‘ormoned 26 fron Feural ‘there is such Srretionalicy in arx, but “in hig shen Sn Fourctacn. Iv se quite Ton seriously secause tcey are co-tanfusing, {erations and superficial ~ yet thoy are significant in there effecs. present this notion ag Hers did. ‘ion't try to find out ore—" Thee’ at sens for hin, for it Se very coafusing in theory. start with a aan conceived as a conscious generic being, |All ‘Tight of histories) sateriation has been a ‘dian fron hie generic being due toa fund- Between human € sed master, This hae 's alsenations! a) Peligion b) neil, and corals 60 ete; To rid can of these elienations and return isa to fn individual generic veing ay te _/ fandanentel conflict between thought and natter. The let thing tobbe degizoyed must be religion and ‘siicnaved in en abstract vay ‘economics are also alienatin TEE fe shepagees eves property pebed by mazersal. Abstract: Religion and shilow phy. sieénation | Yates + PoLites ant economics: take place in the Za onder, extertorssions. : Private property and state are defended by setting up the comon good es do the inéivaduel good. This of course alionates man fron Ep senses betngy tn the last shase’ of She soeial evolusson tio, contradiction will be re- Sect che" camson good SEOUL AT contents ‘coy agonemtcn, eee pis 20 eho the iden dual foot and the common E008. Feuretech did not consider regarded 12 a5 ste los: oth Feueredach end Hare de Iocoking backward, not for Gevelopenents in hatertatiss 8 notion of the gonerie being ag 1 uteone of aristatie and St. Th | fe prociainad tint man's intellect cnother alsenation. For Yarx 45 a1? hed so production. Hen is distinguished from nelding things. = not, shee {thie sounds Ike Aristotle] in relation to From Das Eapical: ork ~ pan controle, matter. Tn eraneforaing t= posure outelde of hin man fe changing his om nature in the process. BERES Sorting fo fovact vet e ash, Ee becomes a aun gniy be'oo and not mere anisal work ~ specifiéelly Noean work ( Hart says even Sbidars spin Like weavers ans becs build like architect; ER Chat fe lias the idee in his heed toforehe begins to ¥ fork realised first in head and then in satter, lian realises Bin- Siof in nature. Sunanion 42 perfectly achieved in nature as natura- PSs Wo poekitiay abtlerse inThumenton, (Artevotie see nature as aigubstttute inceliect = for Coal nao-man inpregnating hie incellect for Sane nan holds the place in the earning to peak. His hand 2 ov Limba and nade Begnp on neturé — all tis thanvs to the Rand. Concommivently one sens the other is ‘useless, By donostication an Eninate nature toa. Ke turn fo Ma ow ends ‘kof labor is the principle of of all history. History begins pegins to wort and produce his ct man can creave and in~ ts tn en inginive division 2 works contradiction: the fecundi worl ceitdes man prisorédal reall ReLiect must be ‘fromthe Bruces, but ine tof produesion. when at is seperated, ‘way co cormupeion and deat! jenation of man begins’ wit From the division into intellectual ené nauel ebor rises the economic loctuale wilt invent ‘hey are defonding se oxteting social systen of ised and exploiter ciassss.. 1 Bi octe of reasons entirely extraneous & Pin porer. they wall soy 1 ideas, f generic being Eiersesce, ow tho stave tries to Ell are considered equal before. the ough podstioeity exand: nd the fa abets TS Geate is etraneuus to the individual, it can nov completely enan- '¢ emancipation fron religion ‘Tn a country of poletical fon = the two. seen, bo 60 Be only for chat resson. Political tothe degree that thosa tl Je Bi sams gus End gous on to, Seaneigecion shore cen 3 SSgeihors, heresore both must EesSslpetion from religion te ‘imansty to She state, . ‘the perfect stage io the generic, being of B3 ESEegc Re" WGah on SeHSES ony ae 22 RBETESES 1838. wn. Zo Jive in a stave, serel: Shi 8 Looked"on by others