COMPORTAMENO IN COMPRESSIONE DI PILASTRI IN CALCESTRUZZO FIBRORINFORZATO

Prof. G. Campione Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale e Aerospaziale Universit di Palermo - campione@diseg.unipa.itl
st2

Al1 bc

bc
b

s1

Al2 bc

st1

Progettare e realizzare elementi strutturali in calcestruzzo fibrorinforzato a cinque anni dal documento CNR DT-204

Obiettivo del lavoro

Studio del comportamento in compressione di pilastri a sezione quadrata con armature tradizionali e calcestruzzo ordinario o fibroso con fibre di acciaio. Messa a punto di un modello di calcolo semplificato in grado di cogliere gli aspetti salienti legati : al confinamento del calcestruzzo fibroso; al contributo del copriferro; alla resistenza delle barre con effetti di instabilit.

Ref. Campione G., (2002), The effects of fibres on the confinement models for concrete columns , Canadian Journal of Civil columns Engineering, Vol. 29, pp. 742742-750. CampioneG., CampioneG., Fossetti M.e.Papia M. (2010), Behaviour of fiberfiber-reinforced concrete columns under axially and eccentrically compressive laods,, laods,, ACI Structural J. V.107,N3, .107,N3, pp. 272.282. Campione G.(2011), Compressive behavior of short fibrous reinforced reinforced concrete members with square crosscross-section,, Stuctural Eng. Eng. and Mechanics, Mechanics, 1in press.

Legame tensione-deformazione cls compresso

= fc 0

0 = 0.0016 + 0.00002 f c

E c = 6900 + 3320 f c

1+ 0

= 1.4276 e (0.0247 f c )

Ec f Ec c 0
(MPa)

100

Experimental
80

Analytical

60

40

20

0 0.000

0.002

0.004

0.006

0.008

0.010

(data of Ahmad and Shah, 1985)

Tensione-deformazione di picco SFRC

Vf = 0 Vf = 3 %

HSC

RI = F = v f
Vf = 2 % Vf = 1 %

Lf f

f cf = f c + 6.913 F
0f = 0 + 0.00192 F

FRC - circular section

R = 0.98

NSC R = 0.70

cf - o
R = 0.64

HSC R = 0.68

FRC - circular section

data of Fanella and Naaman (1985); HSU of HSU and Hsu (1994)

Legame tensione-deformazione SFRC

= fc 0 1+ 0

1 = + 0.175 F

80

Experimental
60

Analytical vf =1.5%

(MPa)

vf=1.4%
40

vf=0.75%

20

vf =0.7%

0 0.000

0.003

0.006

0.009

0.012

0.015

data of Fanella and Naaman (1985); HSU of HSU and Hsu (1994)

Legame tensione-deformazione per copriferro

60
cls senza softening SFRC con softening cls con softening

50

40

(MPa)

30

6 f1 (tension)

20

Experimental Analytical
5

vf= 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5%

10
f2 (compression)
-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5

0 0

0 0 0.004 0.008 0.012 0.016

Lf F = vf f

Effetti del confinamento dovuto a FRC

2 st1 st 2 2s ( ) ( ) + 2 + f fl = s t t t b s bc s bc s c
f l max 2 st1 st 2 2 = + + 2 f b s y b fr b s c c c
0.5

b bc

st2s fct s st1 s

b bc

st2s fl fct s st1 s

Plain concrete FRC

f r = 0.2 F (f cf )

F = vf

Lf f
b

unconfined concrete

2 2 ' 4 w s 1 i 1 1 2 i=1 6 b c 2 bc ke = 1 cc
' s1 = s ' 10 F

( )

r wi

confined concrete

f le max = f l k e

45 s'

Legame tensione-deformazione del SFRC confinato

= fc 0 1+ 0

f le max = f l k e
0.7

f le f cc = 1 + 2.1 fc fc

k e fl cc = 1 + 5 k1 ' 0 fc

0 .7

Eq. (1)

Eq. (3)

Hsu and Hsu, 1994; Campione et al.,1999

Hsu and Hsu, 1994; Campione et al.,1999

Legame costitutivo barre

for s y s Es s = f y for y s 8 y E + ( ) E for 8 40 s y p y s y s s
fy L ; = 55 2.3 7 100 l y y fy L 1.2 0.016 = 100 l l
1,4 1,2

; 0.2 fy

for y < 0.2 f y ; = 0.02 E s for >

y = 1 1 l l y

*/y,l*/fy
1

Without buckling s/fy

0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0 0 8 16 24 32 40

*/y,*/fy With buckling

Ered 0.2

/ y

Instabilit della barra compresse

Nsteel buckling of long.bar

E I L = 2 r 3 k

14

E I = 4.77 r k

14

stirrup longitudinal bar core

cover s

Pcrit = 12 E r I k
cover Nsteel

F=1

F=1

F=1

F=1
bc/2 bc

b/2

F=1

b/2

Calcolo rigidezza contrasto

F=1 F=1 F=1 F=1
bc/2 bc

b/2

F=1

b/2

eq = 2 E sec

s 2 E s st + b bc

4 st 192 s 3 E sec eq = 3 + Es bc 12 64

4 st s 3 192 eq = 3 + Es E sec 12 64 bc

2 E s st + bc

Al1 bc

Legame tensione barre - passo

Al2 bc

s1

500 yileding 400 fr = 1 MPa 300 0.8 s corner bar side bar

(MPa)

200

fr = 0.5 MPa

Eulerian response

100 fr = 0 0.2 s 0 0 0.5 1 s/b 1.5 2

PORTANZA COLONNA IN CFR

1.2 fr=1 MPa -/B=0.05 Ag/An =1 1 fr=1.0 -/B=0.1 Ag/An =0.81 Pu/Po 0.8 fr=0 -/B=0.1 Ag/An=0.64 0.6 fr=0 -/B=0.05

0.4 0 0.5 1 s/b 1.5 2

Pu f c 4 (b ) + f cc (b 2 ) f cc = + = 4 1 4 Po b f b fc b2 c
2

A n b 2 4 (b ) 4 4 (b ) = = 1 1 b b2 Ag b2

Piano di frattura e resistenza residua colonna CFR

fcu =Pu / Ac
carbon steel

Pu

s = 0.3530 Vf = 2%

polyolefin

(s = 0.3520, Vf = 2%, L / = 25)

cos + sin b Pu = A sh f yh + f n + f nsin + f y A l cos sin s tg

Ff ff Fn Fs

k e fl = 290 + 560 f' c

f (w )

f (w ) 1 1 f 0 (w ) + f 22.5 (w ) + f 45 (w ) + f 65.7 (w ) + 90 + f hook (w ) 2 2 2 4

Pu

RISPOSTA IN COMPRESSIONE COLONNA

7000 6000 5000

ordinary concrete FRC vf=0.5% s =45 mm

(MPa)

700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0

P (kN)

4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 0,005 0,01

s =90 mm s =180 mm

s / =3.75 s/ s / =15 ordinary concrete FRC vf=0.5%

0,015

0,02

0,005

0,01

0,015

0,02

20

ordinary concrete FRC vf=0.5%

15

s / =15 s / =7.5 s / =3.75

L /

10

0 0 0,005 0,01

0,015

0,02

Confronto teorico-sperimentale (Campione et al. 2010)

1400 = 25 mm 1200 1000 a)

P (kN)

800 600

= 10 mm R.C. members
CC1-CC2 CC3-CC4 Analytical

400 200 0 0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

1400 1200 1000

= 25 mm b)

= 10 mm

P (kN)

800 600 400 200 0 0 0.005 0.01

FRC members
CC5-CC6 CC7-CC8 Analytical

0.015

0.02

Conclusioni
The paper highlights the influence of the most relevant confinement parameters, i.e. type, volumetric ratio, spacing, yield strength, concrete grade, geometrical properties of fibers (length, diameter) and fiber volume, dimension of the transverse cross-section and cover thickness, focusing some advantages and disadvantages in using fibers for structural members. The main results obtained are: -the calibration of a stress-strain curves in compression for several grade of concrete both in plain and FRC; - the derivation of the softening coefficient for the biaxial state of stresses in FRC concrete cover; --the derivation of a simplified expression for prediction of load carrying capacity; -- the derivation of the minimum amount of transverse steel able to ensure that the strength reduction due to the cover spalling is balanced by the strength increase of confined core. The model was verified against data obtained from concentric compressive tests on concrete specimens reinforced with transverse steel and fibers.