Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Negli Stati Uniti vennero concentrate le risorse sullo sviluppo delle fibre di boro con buoni risultati. In
Giappone ed in Inghilterra invece si concentrarono le risorse sulle fibre di carbonio prodotte mediante
pirolisi del poli-acrilo-nitrile (PAN).
FIBRE DI CARBONIO
Il materiale di partenza che deve essere usato per realizzare la fibra deve possedere le seguenti
proprietà:
-Temperatura di fusione maggiore della temperatura di decomposizione
- Contenuto di carbonio il più alto possibile
- Scarsa presenza di ossigeno nella molecola (per evitare la riduzione della resistenza a trazione).
Tra i polimeri disponibili in commercio alcuni vennero scartati pur avendo una percentuale di carbonio
elevata (Polistirolo 92%, Polietilene 86%, Polipropilene 86%, Poliestere 80%) relativamente al primo
punto delle caratteristiche precedenti .
Furono quindi utilizzati il Poliacrilonitrile (PAN) la cellulosa (rayon) , il Nylon (6,6), il Bitume.
Reazione
La reazione primaria di pirolisi avviene in un intervallo di temperatura
compreso tra 423 e 513 Kelvin (150-240 C) in presenza di ossigeno
(decomposizione primaria lenta e decomposizione secondaria veloce) ,
con la successione indicata nella figura precedente.
L’ultimo schema presenta la formazione di unità peridinica. Per successivi
passaggi si giunge alla polipiridina.
Basket
Satin
Tipologie di tessuti e laminati
COMPOSITI AVANZATI
INTRODUZIONE AI MATERIALI FIBROSI
Parte II: ASPETTI GENERALI
Defect in
adhesion.
POROSITY
Porosity is also known as resin voids and void content. It usually occurs as a
result of the application of pressure at too late a stage during the cure cycle,
which causes entrapment of air or vapour. This results in porosity throughout the
lay-up and is not usually confined to a restricted area. Contamination by dust
particles or other foreign objects increases the possibility of void nucleation.
Resin rich zones are also preferred sites for the formation of voids. A high
population of voids within the lay-up causes some reduction in the load transfer
capabilities of the lay-up, therefore affecting the resin dominated properties. Voids
also act as reservoirs for moisture retention and can have a marked effect on the
moisture Initiated changes in the lay-ups overall properties.
Porosity can occur in filament wound components when departures from correct
procedures occur. These include insufficient resin applied to the yarn, over-rapid
winding and incorrect curing. The presence of these voids can cause changes in
the mechanical and environmental properties of the composite.
POROSITY and voids
Prepreg Gaps
A sheet of unidirectional prepreg is produced by rolling and flattening several bundles of fibres
which are then impregnated. Either damage or inadequate monitoring of this process can
result in gaps in a fibre sheet, or less seriously, a disturbance of the fibre direction. These gaps
in as-delivered prepreg should be identified by quality control procedures, both by the
producer and the user, and are, therefore, not a major problem in practice.
Contamination
Contamination can occur in the form of dust (see Porosity), grease or solvent, or solids which
become incorporated into the laminate. This problem is normally controlled by careful
cleanliness procedures. Two types of contamination demand particular care. The first is sharp
solid debris such as metal swarf which may, if incorporated into a laminate, cause a risk of
significant fibre cutting and local damage. The second is the accidental inclusion of small
pieces of protective prepreg backing sheet Into a laminate. These can be left when prepreg is
cut to shape with subsequent removal of the backing sheet. Where backing sheet is present
between plies, no bonding occurs with a consequent drastic local change in laminate
properties.
Fibre Alignment
During prepreg manufacture and handling, fibres can become detached from the
prepreg and form either into whorls (during prepreg manu-facture) or misoriented
fibres (during lay-up or in the prepreg). These affect the local properties of the
laminate and introduce stress raisers and resin rich areas which constitute
preferential void forma-tion sites. Whorls are coils of fibre that are formed 1n the
prepreg sheet. They occur at the end of production prepreg runs and are rarely
encountered. Misoriented fibres are usually caused by the essential prepreg "tack" or
stickness causing fibres to be dragged during lay-up operations.
Lay-up Order
The number of plies and their relative orientations are determined by the design
strength and stiffness of a laminate. The same is true for the number and winding
angle of layers in a filament wound item. It is possible for a particular layer to be
either laid or wound at the incorrect angle to the other layers or even to be omitted
altogether. If either of these occur, the properties of the laminate will not be those
specified in the design.
Fibre and lay-up defects
State of Cure
This heading incorporates both the state of the resin determined by cure cycle and the state of
the resin as affected by variations in resin chemistry. It is included because both effects can
have signi-ficance for the final properties of the composite. The cure cycle consideration is
rare as a cause of faulty laminate production because procedures can be readily established
and auto-matically monitored. These procedures are usually the result of extensive
development using destructive and mechanical test programs.
Variations of resin chemistry within a single prepreg sheet can be assumed to be very small;
however, significant variations between batches have been found for some types of resins.
Prepreg properties should be within the tolerances laid down by the prepreg supplier and note
of these tolerances should be made when designing with the pre-preg. Although the chemistry
of a resin changes throughout storages as the "life" of the prepreg is used, the most rapid
changes occur during the cure cycle. Consequently to ensure even chemistry throughout’s
fabrication, it is necessary to ensure even curing in terms of tempera-ture distribution,
pressure etc. An important note here is that there is no practical non-destructive means of
checking the state of cure. Furthermore, even destructive quality control samples taken from
peripheral test areas cannot ensure uniformity across a laminated sheet.
Incorrect Cure
Prepreg Joints
Two types of prepreg joint can occur in any given layer. These are end-to-end joints (joint
perpendicular to the fibre direction) and side-by-side joints (parallel to the fibre direction). The
first case, end-to-end joints, are not recommended except possibly in the most uncritically
stressed area of a specimen. There is a sharp discontinuity of stress transfer at the joint; the
high mechanical properties of the fibre being lost.
Joints parallel to the fibre direction are much less critical to the integrity of the fabrication. They
should be arranged so that the two pieces of prepreg butt exactly together; an overlap causes
an extra ply to be formed locally with resin rich fillets; a gap results in a local lack of fibres and
a resin rich area.
Delaminations
and disbond
Fig. : Disbonds
Delaminations and craks
Matrix cracks
Resin Micro-cracks
These can be caused by processing during the cure cycle and further thermal cycling. Resin rich zones
are preferred sites for the nucleation of cracks within the resin but they can be created throughout the
whole cured laminate. Due to the nature of CFRP composite a differ-ential stress is inherent in the
material and it is believed that micro-cracking is the mechanism by which this stress is relieved. As the
resin is a plastic the rate of loading will affect the strain at which the resin breaks, therefore rapid
temperature changes are more likely to cause micro-cracks than slower temperature changes. It has also
been found that resin starvation can give rise to micro-cracking in the direction of the fibres. Whilst resin
micro-cracking is essentially a defect in the matrix, it may have either beneficial or adverse effects
depending on the require-ments for the composite. There are instances where the presence of micro-
cracks provides stress relief in the composite, thus providing a beneficial effect.
Cracks and disbonds
Maximum design damage (MDD) is defined as damage that establishes the strength design values to be used
in analysis damage tolerance requirements. The extent of such damage is established prior to the design phase.
Critical damage thresholds (CDT) are defined as damages that reduce the residual strength to the regulatory
requirements. Given that the structure’s strength with MDD size damage will result in positive margins at design
limit load (DLL), the corresponding CDT will be larger than the MDD. Characteristics describing the detectability
of the CDT as well as the type and extent of damage are documented to support the establishment of required
inspection methods and intervals. Using the selected inspection technique, realistic damages smaller than the
corresponding CDT are shown to be detectable with high probability before any growth causes it to exceed the
CDT.
Readily detectable damage (RDD) is defined as damage that can be detected within a small number of load
cycles. For damage that is not readily detectable, the structure should be evaluated for all possible damage
growth mechanisms. The maximum extent of damage that is considered readily detectable, but which is not
immediately obvious, should be established.
Damages larger than the maximum readily detectable damage are considered to be immediately obvious.
Established parameters:
Established parameters:
It can be seen that only a small band of the residual strength curve is defined. Since
residual strength of in-service damage sizes are not available, often BVID sizes are
used for ADL sizes in structural repair manuals. This are conservative sizes and can
result in increasing maintenance costs.
The following are recommended approaches for developing data to support certification and to
allow for reduced maintenance costs of composite structures:
- the residual strength curve for each significant type of potential damage on each principal
structural element should be determined by analysis and/or test;
-characteristics describing the inspectability of the CDT as well as the type and extent of the
damage should be documented to support maintenance planning activities;
-for readily detectable damage, the magnitude of the threats that should be considered, should
include impact damage by ground vehicles and ground handing equipment, impacts, etc. Service
experience has shown that damage associated with such events may persist before the damage
is detected and the structure repaired. The extent of damage that should be considered must be
established by taking into account susceptibility to each type of accident.
-Structural damage design should be coupled with development of the eventual maintenance
plan in order to reduce damage occurrences and costs. Test validation and analyses should
address design ultimate strength, damage growth, residual strength and maintenance issues for
composite structures. Independent studies of design ultimate load or limit load strength without
data and analyses at intermediate load levels will not provide a balanced design that supports
cost effective maintenance, when maintenance is possible.
REPAIR
Damaged composite structures are definitely repairable, shown clearly in the before and after images
below.
However, there are challenges:
Hidden damage issues, including manufacturing defects. (for example, a low velocity impact, which
normally wouldn’t cause much damage may cause a sandwich structure to disbond between the skin and
core due to poor adhesion during manufacture. If this disbond is the only damage, there may be no visible
trace of it from the surface.)
Unexpected damage sources. (for example, an aircraft vertical tail part may be designed to withstand
hailstone impact but not able to resist damage from being dropped during shipping or removal for
inspection)
“Best” repair techniques are heavily dependent on details of the structure. In other words, because
composites excel at being tailored to meet very specific needs, there are few “universal” materials and
methods that can be used to achieve successful results. Composite repair specifics really have to be
determined on a case-by-case basis.
COMPOSITI AVANZATI
INTRODUZIONE AI MATERIALI FIBROSI
Parte III: Riparazioni
The very basic fundamentals of composite repair include the following steps:
Inspect to assess damage (extent and degree)
Remove damaged material
Treat contaminated material
Prepare repair area
Complete composite repair
Inspect repair for quality assurance (e.g. delaminations, inclusions,
proper cure, etc.)
Restore surface finish
Damage assessment
Considerations,
practicalities and
parameters of composite
repair:
Types of Repair
Basic types of composite repair include the following:
Cosmetic A superficial, non-structural filler is used to restore a surface to keep fluids out until a
more permanent repair is made. This type of repair will not regain any strength and is used only
where strength is unimportant. Due to high shrinkage, cosmetic repairs may start to crack after
a relatively short time in service.
Resin Injection This type of repair can be effective in limited instances, where the delamination
is restricted to one ply. However, not much strength is regained, and the primary benefit is that it
is quick and cheap. At best, this type of repair can hope to slow the spread of delamination and
is generally considered a temporary measure. :
Bonding minimizes corrosion. Adhesives also make good sealants. No fastener holes to weaken
structure. No point stress concentrations. Smooth surface finish.
Therefore, a basic rule for achieving the highest strength composite repair is to use bonding for
thin laminates and bolting for thick laminates. Thickness here refers to the original laminate or
skins, excluding any core materials. The crossover point varies tremendously with the specific
details of each case, but in general 1/64inch (0.4mm) is considered thin and 1/2inch (12.5mm) is
somewhat thick. Note that parts with an aerodynamic or cosmetic surface usually require a flush
repair, which almost necessitates bonding. However, when bonding is not possible, a bolted
temporary or permanent repair may be necessary.
Scarfing
After completing initial damage removal, the area around the repair must be prepared. The
corners of the repair hole must be rounded off and the hole itself should be tapered to provide the
best load transfer when the repair patch is bonded in. Scarfing, or taper sanding, is usually
achieved using a compressed-air powered high-speed grinder. This is a gentle process, which
prepares the damaged area for application of a repair patch. It is imperative to follow all repair
manual guidelines, and significant skill and practice on the part of the repair technician is
mandatory. Note: If the damaged area exceeds allowable repair limits in applicable repair
manuals, then specific engineering support is required in order to proceed with the repair.
Is it possible to make a repaired structure as strong as the original? Yes. However, extra repair plies
must be added to compensate for the loss of strength caused by the repair. This means the repair will
not be perfectly flush, and also that the repaired structure will be stiffer than the original.
Is the extra stiffness a problem? If the original structure is not stiffness critical but is primarily loaded in
straight tension or compression, then a stiffer repair will most likely be fine. However, if the structure
flexes significantly under load, the “stiff spots” caused by a full-strength repair can cause failure at the
edges of the repair. Some repairs may therefore need to be deliberately under-strength, in order to
match the stiffness of that original area in the structure.
Scarfed Repair
Below is a review of the general outline for steps in performing composite repair, but with
detail added specifically for a scarfed repair with flush bonded repair patch.
1. Inspect for extent of damage: Visual , Tap, Ultrasonic, and/or X-rays
2. Get best access possible, both sides if feasible.
3. Remove all damaged and delaminated material. Circular or rounded corners
4. Grind away scarf angle taper: Smooth, flat ground surface
5. Determine ply orientations and materials of original structure.
6. Replace plies: Adhesive layer first , One or more filler plies, orientation not important ,
Repair plies - match orientations with original structure ;Extra plies - usually orientation
matches original outer ply ;Often an outer adhesive layer
7. Vacuum-bag and cure repair plies as required
8. Trim to net edge dimensions after cure, if necessary.
9. Inspect repair for delaminations, inclusions, proper cure documentation, etc.
10. Sand and finish as required. Do not sand into fibers of repair plies.