Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Report:
1
Decision History
2019 2020 2021 2022
Units to Produce (units) 48.0M 58.0M 51.5M 52.5M
Channel Price (per 100 loads) $7.00 $6.00 $6.00 $6.00
Formulation Pods Pods Pods Pods
Product Features and Odor Odor Odor Odor
Positioning elimination elimination elimination elimination
Trade Channel Spend
Convenience $6.3M $9.2M $9.7M $8.5M
Club $6.3M $9.2M $9.7M $8.5M
Grocery $6.3M $9.2M $9.7M $8.5M
Mass $6.3M $9.2M $9.7M $8.5M
Total Trade Channel Spend $25.1M $36.9M $38.6M $34.1M
Media Spend
Print $3.1M $4.6M $4.8M $4.3M
TV $3.1M $4.6M $4.8M $4.3M
Radio $0.6M $0.9M $1.0M $0.8M
Digital Ads $5.6M $8.3M $8.7M $7.7M
Total Media Spend $12.5M $18.5M $19.3M $17.0M
Pods formulation, Odor elimination as brand attribute, Market share and brand demand.
2
Part 1B
Objective: Market Share Capture, Dashboard:
while maintaining a decent Operating Profit and
high revenue generation (Alt. approach)
Run Archive
Date Current Cumulative
Year Profit
08/08/20 2022 $272M
01:28AM
GMT+5:30
3
Report:
Strategy
Value Rank Leader
Leader Profits for 4 years(in USD Mil)
Parameter Value 95
Gain Market 75
30% 2 Turbo 38.50%
Share 55
Revenue 403 1047 35
2 Turbo
(in USD) Mil Mil 15
-5
Operating 39.6 39.6 -25
1 Blue 2019 2020 2021 2022
Profit (in USD) Mil Mil
Blue Turbo
4
Part 2:
Q1: Based on your analysis of the market data dashboard for the last 4 years, what is your diagnosis of
the fundamental problem with the Blue detergent brand? What was the primary simulation objective
you set for the Blue detergent brand – Sales Volume, Market Share, or Profits?
How did you go about choosing your target segment for Blue detergent? Describe the target market you
selected. Did you try to appeal to a particular geographical region? Which one? How successful were
you with this strategy?
The strategy has resulted in increase in brand sales at the expense of Store (Exhibit 2(a)). It has also
resulted in increase of valuable market share among the youth, capturing a total of around 40% total
detergent market in the age group of below 44 years (Exhibit 2(c)).
The target market share increased from 11% in 2018 to 17.7% by the end of 2022 and the operating profit
increased from $75M to $325M in the same time frame, second to Turbo (Exhibit 2(b)).
The profit was highest in 2019 at $92M and steadily declined as the demand is dependent on market price
dynamics (pricing chart at Exhibit 3(a).
5
Exhibit 2(a)
Exhibit 2(b)
Exhibit 2(c)
6
Q3: Describe the price competition and price elasticity in the detergent market from this case. Did
you adjust the price to gain market share? How did it work?
Ans. The price elasticity is high in the laundry detergent segment as the demand varies with
change in price of our brand as well as from competitors (refer Exhibit 2(a) and Exhibit 3(a)). The
pricing competitiveness can be viewed in the Exhibit 3(a) as to maintain our marketing objectives.
The price in the current model has been adjusted to gain market share and maintain an increased
profitability. Hence, the price has been kept in range of $5-$7.
Exhibit 3 (a)
Q4: If you were recruited to manage the Blue detergent brand now, what would you have done
differently? What kind of additional data would help to solve its problems? What kind of marketing
analytic approaches would best address your decision-making needs for the Blue detergent brand?
Ans. Brand manager at Blue: