Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
PALAIOS.
http://www.jstor.org
ofPaleogenePaleobathymetric
An Evaluation
Models:BenthicForaminiferal in
Distributions
theMetrellaMemberoftheTejonFormation,
CentralCalifornia
MARTINB. LAGOE
Department
ofGeological
Sciencesand Institute
ofGeophysics, ofTexasatAustin,Austin,TX 78712
University
PALAIOS,
1988, V. 3, p. 523-536 neeredbyNatland(1933,1952,1957)inhisstudiesofmodern
sedimentsand late Cenozoicrocks of southernCalifornia.
Benthicforaminiferal biofacies providea usefulmeansfor Natland'sinitial attempts were refined bytheworkofBandy
estimatingpaleobathymetry in Mesozoic and Cenozoicmarine (e.g., 1953a, 1953b,1960), Bandy and Arnal (1957,1960),and
rocks.Theseestimates aremadeon thebasisofbiofacies models Ingle(1967, 1975, 1980). Currentbiofaciesmodels,fortime
reflecting
thedistribution ofbenthic foraminifera in themodern periodsrangingfromthe Cretaceousto the Holocene,rely
ocean.Paleooceanographic evidencesuggeststhatpast oceans heavilyon thedetailedanalysisofmodernforaminiferal distri-
wereprobably muchdifferent fromthemodern ocean;therefore,butionsand theirrelationships to variousenvironmental fac-
benthicbiofaciesmodelsneedtobe recalibrated forperiodsthat tors. These modernstudies are used to interpretfossil
differsignificantlyfromthepresent.An analysisof benthic assemblagesusingthe principleof homeomorphy (Bandy,
foraminiferafromthemiddleEoceneMetrellaSandstone Mem- 1960)-similarmorphology betweenextinctandmodernspe-
beroftheTejonFormation provides an opportunity totestcurrent cies connotessimilar environmental relationshipsas based on
paleobathymetric biofacies modelsfor continental marginset- themodernbiofaciesmodel.Thisapproachis a classicuse of
tings.Sedimentologic and stratigraphic evidenceidentifiedthe uniformitarian principles.
Metrellastrandline, shelf-edge, and slope.The distribution of Benthic foraminiferal clearlychangeina systematic
biofacies
threetaxathought torepresent deepwater(lowermiddlebathyal mannerwithincreasing depthalongbasinmargintraverses.
ordeeper),Bathysiphon eocenica,Cyclammina spp.,and Plec- Earlybiofacies modelssimply documented thisrelationshipor
tofrondiculariapackardi s.l., indicatesthattheyall arepresentor triedtorelateittotemperature changes(Natland, 1933).More
abundantin outer-shelf toshelf-edge environments. The much recentworkon modernbiofaciesshowsthatthese changes
broaderbathymetric rangeof thesetaxa may reflecta less actuallyreflectbathymetric gradientsin numerousenviron-
density-stratified
watercolumnthanin themodern ocean. mentalvariables(e.g., temperature, salinity, nu-
illumination,
trientconcentration, oxygenation,turbulence,substrate)
rather thanindepthitself.WorkbyIngle(1975,1980),Ingleet
INTRODUCTION al. (1980),andDouglas(1979,1981),amongmanyothers,has
shownthattheapparent bathymetric arrangement ofbiofacies
Biofaciesanalysisof benthicforaminifera is an importantis largelya responseto oceanicwater-mass structure.
methodofestimating paleobathymetry inMesozoicandCeno- Ifbenthic biofaciesvariations
foraminiferal reflectthemod-
zoicmarine basins.Thesepaleobathymetric estimates areused ernocean'swater-mass structure,thenthepaleobathymetric
toconstruct paleobathymetric maps,provideestimates ofbasin biofacies modelsbasedontheserelationships willworkwellas
subsidence anduplift, determine basinalgeometries, andinter- longas past water-massstructure is similarto thatin the
pret depositional environments. The development of geo- modernocean. Water-mass structure is dynamic, however,
historyanalysis(vanHinte,1978),whichdetailsthetimevs. andrespondsto changesintheearth'sclimate(Bergeret al.,
depthrelationships ofsedimentary sections,has producedan 1981) andcontinental configurations(Berggrenand Holister,
increaseddemand for better biostratigraphic/chronostrati- 1977). Isotopicevidenceofmarinewater-mass characteristics
graphic ages andpaleobathymetric estimates.Clearly,benthic indicates thatthepre-middle Mioceneoceanwas substantially
foraminiferal biofaciesanalysiscan play a key role in the different fromthemodernocean.Variations inthesurface-to-
solutionof a wide varietyof stratigraphic, depositional,tec- bottomwatergradient ofoxygenisotopes(Fig. 1) indicatea
tonic,andpetroleum exploration problems. three-stepevolutionof the Cenozoicocean (Bergeret al.,
The use of benthicforaminiferal biofaciesin estimating 1981). The earlyand middleCenozoicocean exhibitlower
paleobathymetry of easternPacificmarinebasinswas pio- temperature gradientscomparedto the modernocean. The
CU
PLEIST. 0 BAKERSFIELD , m
PLIOC. "MODERN 0~~~~~
0
Z 10 OCEAN"
TAFT
twC N
1
A; 6 - t+' vC ltt8
7V?~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.2' 4
0.
GeologicandGeographic
Setting withcrystalline basementand representsthe initialEocene
transgression intotheSan Emigdioarea. The unitcontainsa
The studyarea is locatedat the southernend of the San varietyof generallycoarse-grained lithologiesin additionto
JoaquinValleyon thenorthern flankoftheSan Emigdioand megafossils, all ofwhichshowthattheunitbecomesyounger
westernTehachapiMountains (Fig. 2). These rangescontain fromwestto east (Fig. 4; see Nilsen,1987,fordetails).The
an extensivesequenceofCenozoicrocksranging inage from UvasConglomerate is overlain
bytheLiveoakShale(0-610 m;
middleEocene to Pleistocene(Fig. 4). The stratigraphy of 0-2000 ft thick)whichconsistslargelyof mudstonewith
these rocks, characterizedby complex east-west facies common burrows. Thisunitcontains common Narizian(middle
changes(Nilsen,1973, 1987; DeCelles, 1986), is further Eocene) foraminifera. The MetrellaSandstone(0-610 m;
complicated by late Cenozoiccompression, whichproduced 0-2000 ftthick)overliestheLiveoakShaleintheeasternpart
large-scalefoldingand northward-directed thrustfaulting ofthestudyarea. This thickunitofsandstone,conglomerate
(Davis, 1986; Davis and Lagoe, 1984). This late Cenozoic andminormudstone gradeswestwardintoa dominantly mud-
compression produceduplift andexposureofPaleogenerocks stonesectionwestofDevilsKitchenSyncline (Figs. 3 and4).
normal tothepaleostrandline, making thisareaidealforstudies A thininterval ofmudstone theMetrellaSandstonein
overlying
ofbasinmargin biofaciesdistribution. In addition, numerous oil the easternpartof the sturdyarea is assignedto the Reed
fieldsin the area (Fig. 3) providesubsurfacestratigraphicCanyonSiltstone(0-61 m; 0-200 ftthick).BoththeMetrella
control. SandstoneandReed CanyonSiltstone contain
Narizian(middle
The Paleogenestratigraphy ofthisareais discussedindetail Eocene) foraminifera.
elsewhere(e.g., Lagoe, 1986,1987; DeCelles, 1986; Nilsen, In theeasternpartofthestudyarea theTejonFormation is
1973,1987).The stratigraphic unitofinterest hereis theTejon unconformably overlainby the nonmarine TecuyaFormation
Formation (Fig. 4). (lateOligocene-early M.iocene).To thewesttheTejonForma-
The Tejon Formation is a complexsuccessionof marine tionis overlain byandmaygradeintothemiddletolateEocene
mudstone, sandstone, andconglomerate. It is thebasalunitin marineSan EmigdioFormation (Fig. 4).
thePaleogeneoftheSan EmigdioMountains. The formation is
subdividedintofourmembers(Marks,1941,1943): theUvas Methods
Conglomerate, LiveoakShale,MetrellaSandstone,and Reed
CanyonSiltstone. The unitofprimary hereis theMetrellaSandstone
interest
The Uvas Conglomerate (0-122 m; 0-400 ftthick)is the Memberof the Tejon Formation. The following sectionwill
basalunitoftheTejonFormation. It is indepositional contact showthattheMetrellaSandstonerepresents a progradational
20z TEMBLOR iD C
2=Neritic rocks; 3=Nonmarine
c
rocks; 4=Volcanic rocks; and
TbW
E1,SHALE e T CUY
5="Seismite" of DeCelles (1986).
(FigureafterLagoe, 1987.)
20 ETCHE
2 TEMBLOR
: R TDEMBLOR A A
FME TtETtm F NFM. vvv
lo 0C MONTEREN MONTEJON FM
30 fc .$
s F M.
FM ~~~ ~
COEJNGTEJNOF
~~FM.ERT cS9.
TEMBLRIZMNTAERSCALE C,
ACALIT
EOTOB L S 0 PLEITO FM P
REFUGIAN
REFUGIAN ~ CREA CRATRAtRAcCEK CEK CRO CAA RA RE
A
PALEOENVIRONMENTALFRAMEWORK
KM I
SLOPE
paleobathymetricpositionwithinthebasin.Studiesofdeep-sea
X
Lii tinental
margins, particularly
activecontinental
margins suchas 10-20
are muchmorecomplexthanthatforoceaniccrust
California, SANDSTONE?
5 km
04
0 4mi
I ~~~~~~ t /
~~~~~~N 0 2
FIGURE7-Isopach map of the Me-
trellaSandstone Memberinthe up-
I~~~~IE per and lower Plate of the Pleito
Thrustsystem. Horizontalrulingin-
* -I
ml
'
\0
o . At MIE
dicates the depocenter for the
7 member. Contours are in feet.
p~~/ I~; (FigurefromLagoe, 1987.)
* ~ ~ O~~~~~~('
~ ~ ~ ~
0-j~~~~ c>~'\
4~~~~~~
TEJON FM RPOUT'~' O U C
ISOPACHMAP(
METRELLAMEMBER f cc
TEJON FORMATION cc/
CONTOURSIN FEET W-l
U.* IaZ
10-
44
S~~~~~~
* 3 ~~~~~~. 0.
~~jLh. ~~0I 0
LL
V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~~' '
300
CA~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~00~ao
0
4-4 I
"m
i l l
~0 u. *i
Izo0 U.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MBL
I
0 current ripplesandsmall-scale do occur.An
cross-stratification
PO 0~~ 0
is indicated
i-~~~~~~~~
modifiedfo 0s outer-shelf, relativelylow-energy environment
(Nilsen, 1987). Thisfaciesdominates sectionsinthemiddleof
0
0
thetraverse,fromGrapevine Canyonto PleitoCreek(Fig.9).
1
The deep marinesandstone(bathyal)facies consistsof
O
interbedded finegrainedsandstoneandmudstone.The sand-
stones are characterized by gradedbeds and Bouma se-
j,OWER PLATE 0P
quences. Rip-upclasts of mudstoneare commonlocally.
Evidenceforslumping (contortedbedding andsandstone dikes)
is also found.The sandstonescan be classifiedas faciesD
turbiditesandtheabsenceofsubmarine fanfeaturesindicates
o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~P
0 0 a slopeenvironment (Nilsen,1987).
The MetrellaSandstoneMemberexhibitsmanyof the
FIGURE8-Sandstone percentagemap forthe MetrellaSandstone characteristics ofanunstable, progradationalbasinmargin. The
Member.Noteincreasing sandstonepercentage to theeast. (Figure sedimentologic and stratigraphicevidenceprovidesmultiple
modified fromNilsen,1987.) criteriaforlocating shelf-edge,
thestrandline, andslopeofthe
Metrella-age basinmargin(Fig. 9). Lithofaciesevidenceindi-
cates thatthe Metrellastrandline was at or just east of the
parallellamination and medium-to large-scalecross-stratif-easternmostoutcropsin thestudyarea (Fig. 9). Lithofacies
ication.Small-scalecross-stratification, currentripples,and patternsand the prominent north-south depocenter(Fig. 7)
megaripples occur less frequently.Beach foreshore, shore- place the Metrella shelf-edgebetween Pleito andSan Emigdio
face,andinnermost shelfenvironments are indicated bythese Creeks,witha basinslopetothewest(Fig.9). Thisbasinedge
-~~~/
LITHOFACIES
geometry can nowbe used to constrain benthicforaminiferal The ReedCanyonsection(Fig.10) is thetypelocality forthe
distributions. MetrellaSandstoneMemberandis locatedtowardstheeast-
ern end of the bathymetric gradient.Lithofaciesanalysis
METRELLA FORAMINIFERA suggeststhatit lies nearthe shoreward edge of the shallow
marinesandstonefacies(outershelf)of Nilsen(1987). The
The east-westcross-section through the Tejon Formation Metrellaforaminiferal assemblageshere are dominatedby
(Fig. 6) represents a westward-deepening bathymetric gradi- speciesfrom factor1 (Table1): variousspeciesofCibicidoides,
ent. Foraminiferal biofaciesshouldvarysystematically across Eponidesyeguaensis, Lenticulina inornatus,Melonisplanatum,
the gradient. A quantitative studyof the Tejon foraminiferal Bolivinakleinpelli, and Caucasinaschencki. Plectofrondicula-
biofaciesis currentlyinprogress.Somepreliminary resultswill na packardis.l. is also a prominent faunalelement(Fig. 10).
highlight majorbiofaciesvariationsacrossthemiddleEocene The Devil'sKitchenSyncline outcropsection(Fig. 11) and
San Joaquin basinmargin.The majorfocusforthispaperis a the Richfield Ramsey#1 wellsection(Fig. 12) are fromthe
paleobathymetric evaluationofthreeimportant generawithin westernend of thepaleobathymetric gradient.The Metrella
theMetrellaMember-Bathysiphon, Cyclammina, andPlecto- SandstoneMember(oritsstratigraphic equivalent)consistsof
frondicularia. the deep marinesandstoneand mudstonefacies(bathyal)of
Nilsen(1987). Benthicforaminiferal assemblagesare charac-
MetrellaBiofacies
terizedbyspeciesfromfactor3: Uvigerina garzaensis,Gyroi-
A preliminary factoranalysisof 78 samplesthatspan the dinasoldanii,andBathysiphon eocenica,inaddition to Cyclam-
east-westbathymetric gradientof the MetrellaSandstone minaspp.,Buliminacorrugata, andUvigerina churchi (thelast
Member,providesan initial viewofmajorbiofacies variations twospeciesnotoccurring inenoughsamplesto be included in
(Table 1). The factoranalysisuses principalcomponents the prelminary quantitative analysis-Table 1). In general,
analysisforfactorextraction andvarimax rotation(see Davis, species fromfactor1 dominatefaunalassemblageseast of
1986). The firstfivefactorspresentedhere(whichrepresent PleitoCreekandspeciesfrom factor3 aremostimportant west
majorbiofacies)accountforover 50% of the originaldata's ofPleitoCreek.
variance/covariance. The distribution
ofthesebiofacies across Currentpaleobathymetric models(e.g., Ingle,1980)forthe
the gradient willprovidesome indication oftheirpaleobathy- Paleogenewouldsuccessfully interpretthiswestward variation
metricsignificance. of biofaciesas a westward-deepening bathymetric gradient.
TABLE I-Sorted and rotated factor loadings of the firstfive factors derived from a factor analysis of 78 samples
fromthe Metrella Sandstone Member
less than0.250aresetto0.000.
*Factorloadings
5L
and shelf-edge environments. These taxa had muchbroader
_
XCi * zzno 1 '
;at
TECUYA bathymetric rangesthantheirmodernhomeomorphs.
a
Lu
a
Plectofrondicularia packardis.l. has a bathymetric range
FM. :O*
0 0 co L) _0
o
co -O significantly fromits modernhomeomorphs.
different Rather
thatcharacterizing lower-middlebathyaltolowerbathyal water
depths,it seems to be mostabundant in thisbasinnearthe
shelfedge,ranging ontotheoutershelf.In thistransverse at
0 0
LLIk
z
CI least, it is not as commonin deeperbathyalenvironments.
LU Eitherthis taxa also had a widerbathymetric range than
modernhomeomorphs or it mayhavehad a shallowerrange
z thatis disjunct frommodernhomeomorphs.
None of the examinedtaxa occurredin the inner-shelf
sections.
w 000
x 0
N
w~~~~~~ CONCLUSIONS
#
. Sandy mudtone OI 1 E
C 1 C z ' *1
C
N
and sandstone
ZC
E~~~~
-:- o
C.~~~~~~0 eaosl N o s
Sandstone eco 'c 0
-T e,- Sandstone,com 2t
L ~~~~~w
U
B c
E Mon
megafossallsL
minor mudstone cn Ule0
Mudton
Sandstone and Z E
minormudatone CO w
nterbedded -
mudstone and uJ
o
L%, ogoeae n
Ecx >
sandysmadstone /
o; e sanmudatone
" L Granodiorite T
HeatherMurphyprovidedadvice,criticism,
and information.BERGGREN,W.A.,andHOLLISTER,C.D., 1977,Platetectonics andpaleo-
My thanksto all. circulation-commotion v. 38, p. 11-48.
intheocean: Tectonophysics,
sequences in Miocene shoreline
CLIFTON, H.E., 1981, Progradational
deposits,southeasternCalienteRange,California: ofSedimen-
Journal
REFERENCES taryPetrology,v. 51, p. 165-184.
CLIFTON, H.E., HUNTER, R.E., andPHILLIPS, R.L., 1971,Depositional
BANDY,O.L., 1953a,Ecology
andpaleoecology
ofsomeCalifornia
forami- structuresand processes in the nonbarredhighenergynearshore:
nifera.PartI. The frequency distribution ofRecentforaminifera off JournalofSedimentary Petrology,v. 41, p. 651-670.
California:Journal
ofPaleontology, v. 27, p. 161-182. CORLISS,B.H., andKEIGWIN,L.D., JR., 1986,Eocene-Oligocene paleo-
BANDY,O.L., 1953b,Ecology andpaleoecology ofsomeCalifornia forami- ceanography,in HsU, K.J., ed., Mesozoic and Cenozoic Oceans:
nifera.PartII. Foraminiferal evidenceof subsidence ratesin the AmericanGeophysicalUnion,Geodynamics Series, v. 15, p. 101-118.
Ventura Basin:JournalofPaleontology, v. 27, p. 200-203. DAVIS, J.C., 1986, Statisticsand data analysisin geology:JohnWileyand
BANDY,O.L., 1960,Generalcorrelation offoraminiferal structurewith Sons, New York,second edition,646 p.
environment: InternationalGeological Congress, 21stSession,Nor- DAVIS,T. L., 1986, A structural outlineof the San EmigdioMountains,in
den,pt.22, p. 7-19. DAVIS, T.L., and NAMSON,J.S., eds., Geologictransectacross the
BANDY,O.L., andARNAL, R.E., 1957,Distribution ofRecentforaminifera western Transverse Ranges: PacificSection, Society of Economic
offthe west coast of CentralAmerica:American Associationof Paleontologists and Mineralogists Book 48, p. 23-32.
Petroleum GeologistsBulletin,v. 41, p. 2037-2053. DAVIS, T. L., and LAGOE, M. B., 1984, Structuraldevelopmentof the
BANDY,O.L., and ARNAL,R.E., 1960, Conceptsof a foraminiferal north-central Transverse Ranges and southernmarginof the San
paleoecology:American AssociationofPetroleum Geologists,Bulletin, JoaquinValley: GeologicalSociety of America,AbstractswithPro-
v. 44, p. 1921-1932. grams,v. 16, p. 484.
BERGER,W.H.,VINCENT, E., and THIERSTEIN, H.R., 1981,Thedeep-sea DECELLES, P.G., 1986, MiddleTertiarydepositionalsystemsof the San
record:Major steps in Cenozoicocean evolution:SocietyofEconomic EmigdioRange,southernCalifornia: Societyof EconomicPaleontolo-
PaleontologistsandMineralogists SpecialPublication32, p. 489-504. gistand Mineralogists Book 47, 32 p.
FIGURE12-Distributionof selected
SELECTED foraminiferafromthe ROCORamsey
FORAMINIFERA #1. See Figure4 forlocationof sec-
tion. Paleobathymetricabbreviations
z PALEO- are the same as Figure10. EventA
E-LOG E
Lux
BATHYMETRY correlatesto same event in Devil's
Kitchen Synclinesection(Figure11).
a. co 0! LITHOLOGY m ? E <
00 Z co cm m
Sc 0 a
CC Mudstone and o ?) w
__ U. 'o CC LU
- *
0 minor Z a
sn sandstone
a OZ
Sandatone, io
z
<
glauconitic, corn 0
mon megafosslia 0 a *U.
LU 0E LU
Mudstone a
0 z
Sandstone
|mnormdst
Sa 0
co)~
lu | | E
0O z z
Mudstone and E LU
E N
minor sandstone Z LU
z
Sandstone and - ~~~O a z
0 minor mudstone oLU oLU
,O~~~~~a-
Mudstone --
Is ~~~Crystalline
basement
U.--ULATISIAN
WATER a;
MASSES c
5 DOUGLAS,R.G., 1979,Benthic ecology
foraminiferal A
andpaleoecology:
/ 0~.TRACTO
INNER NERITIC
OUTER NERITIC
PHOTIC
ZONE
SURFACE
WATER cr reviewofconcepts andmethods: Foraminiferal andpaleoecol-
ecology
LITTORAL 150 UPPER INTERMED-
- I ogy,Societyof EconomicPaleontologists and MineralogistsShort
t
CURRENTS.=....
BATHYAL IATE co Courseno.6, p. 21-53.
s500 WATER Z< DOUGLAS, R.G., 1981, Paleoecology of continental marginbasins:A
O0Z
OXYGEN
MINIMUM UPPER IPERMANENT _
moderncase history fromthe borderland of southern California:
IDEPTH VARIESI
MIDDLE
THERMOCLINEI U.< Z
Depositionalsystemsof activecontinental marginbasins,Pacific
A 1000
BATHYAL
Section,SocietyofEconomic andMineralogists
Paleontologists Short
\-JBT
CourseNotes,p. 121-156.
L
________- A 1500
INGLE,J.C., 1967, Foraminiferalbiofaciesand the Miocene-Pliocene
LOWER boundary insouthern Bulletins
California: ofAmerican Paleontology,
PALEOENVIRONMENTAL BATHYLE v. 52,p. 1-217.
MODEL 200 INGLE,J.C.,1975,Paleobathymetric analysisof sedimentarybasins,in
[AFTERINGLE,1975,19801 LOWER WATER DICKINSON, W.R.,ed., Currentconcepts ofdepositional
systems with
forpetroleum
applications geology:San Joaquin Society,
Geological
LYSOCLINE- - BATH- p. 11/1-11/12.
INGLE,J.C.,1980,Cenozoicpaleobathymetry anddepositional
historyof
selectedsequenceswithin thesouthern California border-
continental
ABYSSAL WATER land:Cushman FoundationforForaminiferalResearchSpecialVolume
no. 19,p. 163-193.
FIGURE13-Summary of paleobathymetricsubdivisions of a basin INGLE,J.C., KELLER,G., and KOLPACK, R., 1980, Benthicforaminiferal
marginand theirrelationshipto major environmentalprocesses and sediments
biofacies, andwatermassesof the southern Peru-Chile
water masses. Position of the lysocline and calcite compensation Trencharea,southeasternPacificOcean:Micropaleontology,v. 26,
depth (CCD) varyin time and space. Shown on left is bathymetric p. 113-150.
distribution,according to currentbiofacies models, of the three KENNETT,J.P.,1982,MarineGeology: NewJersey,
Prentice-Hall, 813p.
foraminiferaltaxa evaluated here. (Figure compiled fromdata in LAGOE, nomenclature
M.B., 1986,Stratigraphic andtime-rock relation-
Ingle, 1980.) shipsinthePaleogenerocksoftheSanEmigdio Mountains,inDAvis,
Bathysiphon eocenica
COMMON
PRESENT 1000 300
ABSENT
ft m
5 km
0
0 4 ml
Cyclammina spp.
COMMON
PRESENT 1000 300
ABSENT
ft m
5 km
0
0 4 m1
RR DK PL SP SC TC RCFCGC LO PC EP
FIGURE 16-Distribution of
B1 K1/2 C1I T1I packardisI.1
Plectofrondicularia
withinthe Metrella Sandstone
Member. Same sections and
abundance categories were
used as in Figure14.
Plectofrondicularia packardi
COMMON
PRESENT 1000 300
1
ABSENT
ft m
5 km
0 4 ml
WATER
MASSES
INNER NERITIC PHOTIC SURFACE P C B
5 -.TRAC OUTER NERITIC ZONE WATER
LITTORAL CRRENTS. 10
UPPER INTERMVED- LAGOE,M.B., 1987,Cenozoicstratigraphic fortheSanEmigdio
framework
r-- BATHYAL IATE Mountains,
turalevolution
California,
inDAVIS,T.L., andNAMSON,J.S.,eds.,Struc-
of thewesternTransverse Ranges:PacificSection,
500 A WATER
OXYGEN (PRANN Societyof EconomicPaleontologists and Mineralogists Book 48A,
UPPER
MINIMUM
IDEPTH VARIESI
\ PERMANENT
THERMOCLINEI
p. 85-98.
M 1000 IDDLE MARKS,J.G.,1941,Stratigraphy oftheTejonFormation initstypearea,
I SC@- BATHYAL
\ KernCounty, California
[unpub.M.A. thesis]:Stanford University,
Stanford,CA,65 p.
LOWER DE MARKS, J.G., 1943,Type locality of the Tejon Formation: California
A
MIDDLE
PALEOENVIRONMENTAL BATHYAL
DivisionofMines,Bulletin118,p. 534-538.
MODEL 2000
NATLAND,M.L., 1933,Temperature and depthclassificationof some
IAFTER INGLE.1975, 19801 LOWER WATER recentandfossil foraminifera
inthesouthern California
region:Scripps
LYSOCLINE- - BATH- Institutionof Oceanography, Bulletin,TechnicalSeries, v. 3,
YAL
p. 225-230.
NATLAND,M.L., 1952,Pleistocene andPliocenestratigraphy ofsouthern
CCD- 4000_____ California[unpub.Ph.D. dissert.]:University of California,Los
)'BOTTOM
ABYSSAL WATER Angeles, CA, 165p.
NATLAND,M.L., 1957,Paleoecology ofWestCoastTertiary sediments,in
FIGURE17-Revised paleobathymetricdistributionof P-Plectofron- LADD, H., ed., Treatise
onmarine ecology andpaleoecology: Geolog-
dicularia packardi s.l.; C-Cyclammina spp.; and B-Bathysiphon icalSocietyofAmerica, Memoir 57, v. 2, p. 543-571.
eocenica in lightof the analyses presented here. Questioned lower NILSEN,T.H., 1973,Faciesrelations intheEoceneTejonFormation ofthe
depth limitsare due to the limitof environmentsanalyses withinthe SanEmigdio andwestern Tehachapi Mountains, Sedimen-
California:
Metrella Sandstone Member. Compare this figurewith Figure 13. taryfacieschangesin Tertiary rocks-California Transverseand
Each of these taxa have bathymetricranges in the middle Eocene southern CoastRanges,SEPM Trip2, 1973Annual Meeting, Ameri-
whichare significantly different fromtheirmodernhomeomorphs. canAssociation ofPetroleum Geologists, p. 7-23.
andsedimentology
NILSEN, T.H., 1987,Stratigraphy oftheEoceneTejon
Formation, western TehachapiandSanEmigdio Mountains,California:
United StatesGeologicalSurvey, Professional Paper1268,110p.
OBERHANSLI,H., andHso, K.J.,1986,Paleocene-Eocene Paleoceanogra-
T.L., andNAMSON, J.S., eds., Geologic transect acrossthewestern phy,in Hsu, K.J.,ed., Mesozoicand CenozoicOceans:American
Transverse Ranges:Pacific Section, SocietyofEconomic Paleontolo- Geophysical Union,Geodynamic Series,v. 15,p. 85-100.
gistsandMineralogists Book48, p. 11-21. TJALSMA, R.C., andLOHMAN, G.P., 1983,Paleocene-Eocene bathyaland
abyssalbenthic
foraminiferafrom theAtlantic Ocean:Micropaleontol-WINKER,C.D., andEDWARDS,M.B., 1983,Unstable clastic
progradational
ogyPressSpecialPublication, no. 4, 90 p. SocietyofEconomic
shelfmargins: andMineralogists
Paleontologists
VANHINTE,J.E.,1978,Geohistory analysis-Applicationofmicropaleon- SpecialPublicationno.33, p. 139-158.
tologyin explorationgeology:American Association
of Petroleum
GeologistsBulletin,
v. 62, p. 201-222.
-MartinJ.S. Rudwick