Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265014827
READS
37
1 AUTHOR:
Mahmoud Al-Riffai
University of Ottawa
16 PUBLICATIONS 40 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
RSUM
Dans le monde gotechnique, le degr de saturation est un paramtre critique puisque son effet sur la pression de pore peut
miner la stabilit de pente d'un barrage de terre. En cas d'une averse de pluie intense, des conditions de sols quasi-saturs
dans le bas de la pente peuvent amplifier la permabilit locale du sol. La canalisation naturelle peut aussi avoir davantage
deffets dfavorables. Cet article tudie les diffrentes mthodes pour raliser des conditions insatures ainsi que son
application aux barrages de terre. Tandis que la connaissance des rapports constitutifs existe entre la conductivit
hydraulique et les paramtres de conception (c.--d. matriel de sol, paisseur de couche, pore-taille et teneur en eau) une
analyse intgre est ncessaire pour dfinir les variables de commande.
1.
INTRODUCTION
2.
BREACHING MECHANISMS
2.1
Piping
Overtopping
2.3
2.3.1
Upstream
Downstream
Slope Instability
Table 1. Dam embankment failures up to 1986 excluding dams constructed in Japan pre-1930 and China (after
Foster et al. 2000).
Mode of Failure
Overtopping
Overtopping
Spillway-Gate
Total Overtopping
No. of Cases
% Failures
46
16
62
33.1
11.5
44.6
0.41
0.14
0.55
39
19
2
60
28.1
13.7
1.4
43.2
0.35
0.17
0.02
0.54
Downstream
Upstream
Earthquake-Liquefaction
Total Slides
6
1
2
9
4.3
0.7
1.4
6.5
0.05
0.01
0.02
0.08
5.8
0.07
Piping
Through Embankment
Through Foundation
From Embankment into Foundation
Total Piping
Slides
Total Failures
No. of Embankment Dams
139
11,192
Figure 2. Model for development of failure by piping (a) backward erosion, and (b) concentrated leak (after Foster and Fell,
1999)
Figure 6. Possible mechanisms at the origin of tunnel scouring and seepage erosion (after Crosta and di Prisco, 1999).
Figure 7. Three-dimensional sketch of transient fronts and sequential slope failures (shaded volumes and failure surfaces
numbered 1-5), mainly limited to the highly saturated slope sector below the water point sources (after Crosta and di Prisco,
1999.
C 1
ln 1
r
1,000,000
ln 1
[2]
Where:
r
3.
w C ( )
ln e
[1]
Where:
w
s
e
a
n
[4]
Hysteresis
4.1
Piping
Drainage
[5]
and;
D15)f/D15)s < 4 to 5
[6]
Where D15)f is the diameter of the 15% finer for the filter
particles, D85)s is the diameter of the 85% finer for the soil
particles and D15)s is the diameter of the 15% finer for the
soil particles. Criterion one is also known as the piping
ratio.
Note: The U.S. Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers, 1986, states that the second criterion translates
into the following expression:
D50)f/D50)s
25
[7]
Where D50)f and D50)s is the diameter of the 50% finer for
the filter and soil particles respectively, and that the filter
particles would 25 times more permeable than the soil
particles. However, Army Corps of Engineers, 1986, also
mention that the second criterion is valid for soils with a
gradation curve parallel to that of the filter material, and that
further filtration tests must be carried out to determine the
filter size particles (Cedergren, 1989). For example, with CL
and CH clays, filter particle size can be up to 0.4 mm.
Other methods can be carried out to increase the
unsaturated zone within the downstream slope and will be
discussed herein this paper. Heed must be taken in order to
not to significantly desaturate the downstream slope, since
this could lead to cracks due to drying shrinkage
(Cedergren, 1989).
4.1.2
Figure 13. (a) Central core and chimney drain, and (b) grout
curtain (after Craig, 2004)
Since piping occurs as internal erosion along a path of
highest hydraulic conductivity, it will be unlikely for the
seepage to propagate along an unsaturated soil medium.
Compaction
Overtopping
Where:
f
c
ua
'
ua-uw
Slope Instability
[8]
Clay Covers
also state that the primary variables for lateral diversion are
the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of the fine soil and
the gradient of the soil interface. An increase in gradient
increases the diversion length (Figure 26). The nondimensional diversion length represents the ratio between
the diversion length to the difference between the maximum
and minimum diversion length for the corresponding slopes.
Another important variable is the shape of the SWCC which
is governed by the soil characteristic parameters for
unsaturated flow (i.e. water entry value, water storage, and
desaturation rate).
Figure 24. Lateral drainage in unsaturated soils due to (a) capillary barrier (b) inclusion of intermediate material to form
unsaturated drainage layer (UDL) (after Stormont and Morris, 1997).
S R P ET aP
[9]
S R ( z B )dz
[10]
Where:
(z + B)
z
L
5.
FEM TECHNIQUES
h h
h
w
k x k y m2 w g
x x x y
t
[11]
Storm Simulations
Where:
k x & ky
h
t
w
m2
w
g
mesh
using
calculated
based
on
the
I P ET aP
following
[12]
Where:
I
P
ET
a
[13]
Where:
U
es
ea
5.2.2
Moisture Flux
Capillary Barriers
Dam Breach
Figure 33. Water and sediment outflow hydrographs from the hypothetical failure of the homogenous embankment (after
Mohamed et al. 1999).
6.
Design Guidelines
7.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Table 2. Input parameters: cause-effect relationship between other input parameters and/or design variables.
Table 3. Design variables: cause-effect relationship between other design variables and/or input parameters.
Hydrologic
Input
Parameter
s
Geotechnical
Input
Parameters
A
Design
Variable
s
SEEP/W
HELP (ET)
SEEP/W
(GWT Data)
Yes
Stable
GWT
No
Yes
Stable
GWT
Guideline
Redefine
Design
Variables
SEEP/W
(ET & GWT Data)
No
Stable
ET
Yes
SLOPE/W
Yes
Stability
No
WEPP
Yes
Next Time
Step
Erosion
No
No
9.
REFERENCES
three-dimensional
groundwater flow computations, Technical Report of
the Geotechnical Engineering Office of the Hong Kong
Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong.
U.S. Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Office of
the Chief of Engineers, 1986. Seepage analysis and
control for dams, Engineering Manual EM 1110-21901, 30 September, 1986, pp. D-1 to D-5; (1986a), p.
D-6.
Vanapalli, S.K., Fredlund, D.G., and Pufahl, D.E. 1997.
Saturated-unsaturated shear strength and hydraulic
th
conductivity behavior of a compacted glacial till, 50
Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Ottawa, October
20-22, pp. 625-632.
Watabe, Y., Leroueil, S., and LeBihan, J.-P. 2000. Influence
of compaction conditions on pore-size distribution and
saturated hydraulic conductivity of a glacial till,
Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37: 1184-1194.
Wilkinson, P.L., Anderson, M.G., and Lloyd, D.M. 2002. An
integrated hydrological model for rain-induced
landslide prediction, Earth Surface Processes and
Landforms, 27: 1285-1297.
Xu, Y.-Q., Unami, K. and Kawachi, T. 2003. Optimal
hydraulic design of earth dam cross section using
saturated-unsaturated seepage flow model. Advances
in Water Resources, 26: 1-7.
Zhang, L.L., Fredlund, D.G., Zhang, L.M., and Tang, W.H.
2004. Numerical study of soil conditions under which
matric suction can be maintained, Canadian
Geotechnical Journal, 41: 569-582.