Magic for Who Can to Be a Mage

Magic

for who can be a mage

by

Pedro Moreira Nt

A short history like essay

Copyright, 2020

*******

Smashwords Edition, License Notes

This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to Smashwords.com or your favorite retailer and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.

*******

Magic

for who can be a mage

Copyright, 2020

*******

Picture by Pedro Moreira Nt

*******

This book was produced by Pedro Moreira Nt, 2020.

*******

Presentation

This book has the pretension of treating things that happen and not happen in our life. As evidence we can note that it is about contradictions. It lives around us, into a timeline of the intentions, inside that parameter keeps clear what does not come out of the shadows, the consistency of the contradictions. When we get the center of the question right and we can not change anymore, overcoming is the result of our thinking and we can not even react, except through an avatar we have created, our magic. It is when we are invested in skills for creating new questions that not complementaries result in other times.

It is not, how makes appearance, that can be sufficient. The action produces an appearance of eternal searches, the idea of activity when in response for this situation said to be contradictory for a moment of resolution. However we are not being made finities, or of infinities. What has a finitud not is the objectivation, or an objective that needs action, is thus the relation with the object of the action. It is like that the object could have a sustain in itself, known or not he makes the motive for excellence of the action. We can say that a beginning exists, but we do not know which can not be. When we started we had only an idea about this time. The exactitude of finnish of a proposal too not has. The relations and interaction not are perfect. What is perfect if not our incertain that walks around us, that shows us another path, or sphere of knowledge, or still something that achieves and next time we lose.

So, how much more we loses the meaning of something or sense that we produces inside us, how much the loss of evident things more, much more different in all senses and meanings, much stranger to the usual, many more absurd, extremely lost in the order of things ready, slow cultures, the moralities that point the fingers, more and more decisive we become, more ethical and more balanced for making demanding decisions in life, this is because, also, without a doubt, of so many losses, the richer we become because we more understand social collectors of futility. I need to say or remember that this is the real magic that transforms someone in the someone opening the curtain based on the theater of thought.

Magic is something that I have had a personal experience, it concerns the use of intelligence always taken for a good. Having an expectation for something that can be considered good itself.

Close to yourself. Close to you, like a theater curtain based on thought.a content, that is clear, has a flexible matter than is made, but it is with something that we can see, touch, understand but not reveal. The task of existence is for the first time to be different, and for this it needs to overcome the contradictions. For example, is in complete contradiction to a life in measure, have a definitive purpose, want only in specific a something, or to live with a kind people in community, modes of life, behaviors mimetic, without never nothing lost. This is a typical life from who clean cups, have a sense of permanence, remains into river searching shores of the river, one clear, soft, beautiful, secure, guarantee that can arrive without problem until sea, and there - oh! -, all things are tediously tragic.

Is need to lose for acquired condition magic, to be in sync with your action in relation, in interaction to take what is needed for in reality overcome not the answers, but the asking.

The task is what has to be overcome. Over time of knowledge.

Is this magic that occupies life, that between rational and mental makes a sense of it unexpected, a syntax like a given name for something in that this something turns universal meaning.

The magic in those processes is exigent, and has required a position from who produces her and for whom is directioned the poison creative that here we call magic. So, remember that the language is not a mquinal design, as an esthetical form, a technique or a technology for a function of use. Like uses and after not. The language is antologic processing of whole historical human knowledge. Not is a thing static that we take and put in somewhere or simply idea dislocated with contents separated. The language is all and is an individual creation. For this we say that a personal proposal is the mystery of the I-language.

The presence in a place is something extraordinary if we think that it is in just a moment that someone appears in front of us all configurative language, all contents from possible, all signs, cultural symbols that show us and not always have conditions for understanding. This is magic like life in whole representivity or interpretation. If it happens immediately into a place, think and know that is bigger magic when we imagine. Imagination makes these words, the imagination makes you think without boundaries. We follow our thoughts entwine with our emotion, creating an affectivity that is brought like a birth of knowledge for sharing. Imagine most knowing that another that you are in conversation what both brings for this immensely puzzly.

How do we make choices in this absurdity, in this swamp that tries to take us off the understanding? How do we take a balance in this exchange of knowledge that is complete when too is a creation? A phrase out, a sentence not clear, an indirect intention, a metaphor without subject, what can happen is a loss of the path way of the possibility.

How is this, loss of the possibility? For example, what do you do with nonsense today? Will it go in the fridge? Magic is an exigent love. Is precisely necessary to support the impact in this play, is important to be a mage, search to be a wise person, recognize who is. Someone is a mage, accept. The wisdom not if taken in the library or university.

This does not mean that a pure magical action happens entirely like a good, any situation in ordinary life has many complexities about this phenomenon, we do not have in the world a proof with consistency that can say that a magical experience has been a good experience or that it always can be a perfect path. If we have a sense of goodness we are undoubtedly creating a great conflict about the meaning.

This is why our good sense is like an 'I language'. Something that is in use is what keeps between external reality and a mental reality. What is between these points is a linguistic phenomena. In this unknown place happens, with a not completely conscientious magic. Is the transformation of the reality through that magic, and all time we are doing this, during the existencial period of our life we are like mages. We are creatures that create from external reality a new reality that we universalize.

But coming back to turning on the meaning about what being good and not being good, we start about the good itself. The negative than is good starts in him, the good.

The good in a moral sense is different in each situation of life of someone that is why the word itself is polysemic and complex. Your goodness not is the same from others, the culture, the relations path, occupies different meanings and senses.

Magic is the dislocated meaning that is between reality and the mental, it has somehow the moral that conveys, like a brake on creativity. In that it is changed with another concept, for its remains the taken decision, is where to live it. It is the personal world of the choices, a referential attitude that falls upon whom makes this determination. In art, in other things from life we take decisions, it is the ethical function.

For this we can say that the moral is like a brake and the moral is the departure. The departure for action is charged with consciousness that goes in direction about what we propose us to do, whatever we propose to do.

The ethical decision puts us as responsable uniques on our acts. Is too a conscience an awareness of the sense of duty that afflicts us to make something, act. For this, because this relation with reality and decision, the ethic have something parameter on what to be good or not, but is magic.

A world of relationships guides us to whatever meaning that is while being used into time, the word, like the word good, walks in the direction of extinction or more possible can to arrive at a point of becoming an abstraction from reality. The word can to gain other forms, as well as signification in the cultural social place.

So, good is good while good is good. Who is good? All people can wish to be good, this lancted in behavior that is identified with community, a moral position.

The good is something that someone conforms with social belongers. An identity in that its manifestation is corresponding to a way of being, - same that singularity be alone -, with other persons that are trying to make the same.

The universal history has shown us that when the good alike essence of a thinking is for the bad changed, the pleasure of life is left on shoulders from who makes this, like be is the sin. A bad within the intentions of the bad is the bad. Nothing has given guarantee that someone being bad has conscience about what is good. However the idea of good is for who is bad, a bad. It is the contrasens or a paradoxical relation, maniqueismo.

However, who knows the good, in a certain sense aprioristic, would understand what was the bad.

We yet understand that there exist differences between these terms, but we do not know in exactly what are the categories that compose the words in its contradictions or dubiously its references.

If we could be absolutely certain about what is good thus like what is the bad the world could be a peaceful place.

Making the bad one and receiving the bad can not be something good, that a people or nation can be good because it makes more bad than others. Who is the winner from a war?

A life made of exploitation and misery can not consist of some people who can be happy. Who is happy having around yourself someone in suffering?

From this we can think that the bad or good come from the relations and interactions with others, including this 'someone' that talks with us. This 'someone' that lives into us. Or out us? Reflective about us or not it is what makes the thoughts. We are who talk in solipsy, alone and with others at the same time.

A world of relationships guides us to whatever meaning that is while being used into time, the word, like the word good, walks in the direction of extinction or more possible can to arrive at a point of becoming an abstraction from reality. The word can to gain other forms, as well as signification in the cultural social place.

So, good is good while good is good. Who is good? All people can wish to be good, and this is reflected in behavior that is identified with community, a moral position.

The good is something that someone conforms with social belongers. An identity in that its manifestation is corresponding to a way of