Günter Figal - Ando: Space Architecture Modernity
By Günter Figal
()
About this ebook
territory in philosophy leads the phenomenological and
hermeneutical philosopher Günter Figal onto its unexplored
paths. After previously surveying the work of Frank Lloyd
Wright and Peter Zumthor, Figal turns his attention to Tadao
Ando’s buildings in this book. Figal’s philosophical considerations
include refl ections on space, modernity, but also—in
light of the fact that many of Ando’s buildings are museums
or house works of art—on art.
Figal explores Ando’s buildings—simple and reduced in their
sparing use of only a few materials—as manifestations of the
architect’s sense for what is possible. Ando’s buildings determine
and change their locations; through their passageways,
staircases, and transitional areas, they infl uence how visitors
behave in them, and also communicate a sense of tradition
without being traditional. Figal’s book steps away from the
beaten track of architectural discourse.
Günter Figal
Günter Figal *1949, Professor für Philosophie an der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Related to Günter Figal - Ando
Related ebooks
Stillness and Light: The Silent Eloquence of Shaker Architecture Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Commune: Designed in California Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings20th Century Japan in 20 Buildings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLouis I. Kahn: The Nordic Latitudes Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Language of Houses: How Buildings Speak to Us Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Seven Lamps of Architecture Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Eileen Gray: Her Work and Her World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPalladio and Concrete: Archaeology, Innovation, Legacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKorea Style Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Global Housing Projects: 25 buildings since 1980 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArchitectural Aesthetic Speculations: On Kahn and Deleuze Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTransformational Architecture: Reshaping Our Lives As Narrative Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Alchemy of Architecture: Memories and Insights from Ken Tate Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMy Father, Frank Lloyd Wright Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5You Say to Brick: The Life of Louis Kahn Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Kissing Architecture Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Perfect House: A Journey with Renaissance Master Andrea Palladio Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resisting Postmodern Architecture: Critical regionalism before globalisation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnlearning Architecture: Louis I. Kahn Graduate Studio and Office Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArchitecture beyond Anthropocene: Essays on Reflective Resistances Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Architecture of Humanism - A Study in the History of Taste Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Alfred Preis Displaced: The Tropical Modernism of the Austrian Emigrant and Architect of the USS Arizona Memorial at Pearl Harbor Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Castle to Teahouse: Japanese Architecture of the Momoyama Period Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Poetry of Architecture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArchitectural Body Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Loving Le Corbusier Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTraditional Japanese Architecture: An Exploration of Elements and Forms Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Architecture In the Anthropocene: Essays on Reflective Resistances II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPost-Modern Buildings in Britain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGunnar Asplund's Gothenburg: The Transformation of Public Architecture in Interwar Europe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Art For You
The Shape of Ideas: An Illustrated Exploration of Creativity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Alchemist: A Graphic Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All the Beauty in the World: The Metropolitan Museum of Art and Me Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everything Is F*cked: A Book About Hope Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art & Fear: Observations on the Perils (and Rewards) of Artmaking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vanderbilt: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Creative Habit: Learn It and Use It for Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anatomy for Fantasy Artists: An Essential Guide to Creating Action Figures & Fantastical Forms Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Draw and Paint Anatomy, All New 2nd Edition: Creating Lifelike Humans and Realistic Animals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Living: The Classical Mannual on Virtue, Happiness, and Effectiveness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5And The Mountains Echoed Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Botanical Drawing: A Step-By-Step Guide to Drawing Flowers, Vegetables, Fruit and Other Plant Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Drawing School: Fundamentals for the Beginner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bibliophile: An Illustrated Miscellany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Electric State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Make Your Art No Matter What: Moving Beyond Creative Hurdles Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Draw Like an Artist: 100 Flowers and Plants Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art 101: From Vincent van Gogh to Andy Warhol, Key People, Ideas, and Moments in the History of Art Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Designer's Dictionary of Color Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Make Love Like a Porn Star: A Cautionary Tale Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Story: Style, Structure, Substance, and the Principles of Screenwriting Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Find Your Artistic Voice: The Essential Guide to Working Your Creative Magic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Creative, Inc.: The Ultimate Guide to Running a Successful Freelance Business Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Günter Figal - Ando
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Günter Figal - Ando - Günter Figal
text.
The Age of Space
When Michel Foucault, in a text from 1976 that has since become a classic, speculated that the nineteenth century, as the age of time and history, would be replaced by the age of space,¹ he could barely have guessed just how true this prediction would turn out to be. Historical categories that Foucault mentions, such as development and stagnation, crisis and circuit, and the accumulation of the past, are of scant importance for an actual understanding of the world. We are no longer bound to historical categories; neither do we feel the abundance of tradition as a burden or regard future as more important than the present. This becomes especially clear when contrasted with the period in which Foucault wrote his text, the time shortly before the fiercest eruption of historical and philosophical convictions concerning history after the Second World War, when many placed all bets on the future, and, in doing so, forgot how much this futurism was connected to the past, especially the nineteenth century. That has since changed radically. Orientation to time and history has faded to the extent that the possibility of new orientation has emerged. Who would seriously still doubt that the world is a spatial one, namely the space to which all continents of the earth belong and in which they belong together? The world is thus, as Foucault says, determined by nearness and remoteness, by distance and juxtaposition, by coexistence and separateness. These spatial tensions should be lived, if possible, free of conflict, because the conflicts of this world are not examples of the struggle of ‘progress’ against ‘reaction’, but rather contentions of powers competing, expanding, or self-isolating, following their interests – without philosophical legitimation, and in opposition to other convictions, without the promise of a ‘better future’.
Along with the idea of history as a progression towards a final aim, also comes the strange conviction according to which cultures, as stages of human development, might be arranged in a sequence. Cultures, one begins to understand, exist side by side, and if they want to do so for any length of time, they have to find out how this coexistence – which can only be achieved to varying degrees - can be lived. Accordingly, it is not the slowing down or stagnation of expected development that is to be feared, but rather that cultures and states are not learning how to tolerate each other, or, if nothing else is possible, are at least putting up with one another’s otherness.
Foucault did not intend his considerations to only be specific to his own time. Neither did he wish to declare the experience of space as something new – as if one had just recently noticed that life takes place in space. If it nevertheless makes sense to follow Foucault and designate the present as the age of space, this must mean that the experience of space has now become more conscious, more attentive and, as Foucault indicates, also more exigent. For instance, in order to answer to the question of how to recognize the diversity of coexisting cultures and traditions, considerations concerning the notion of ‘side by side’ as determination of space should be helpful – admittedly without guarantee of success, but at least as a contribution to clarifying how it might be possible to live alongside one another.
One could assume that considerations of this kind have been put forward for quite some time, or even that they dominate current discussions. If the present age really is the age of space, then it should also be an age of the experiencing of space that is particularly intense and reflected, and one in which recent philosophy should have strived towards in its understanding of space in an especially thorough manner. This, however, is obviously not the case. There are only a few thinkers Foucault refers to, and still fewer he could call on to support or justify his considerations. In regarding the world as space, Foucault seems to be quite isolated, although perhaps not completely.
As a result, Foucault’s considerations are tentative initial explorations, which are nonetheless substantiated by an overruling idea. As Foucault states, we do not live in empty let alone homogenous space, but rather in space entirely charged with qualities, amidst an ensemble of relations that define placements and are irreducible to each other. Space, if this were so, would be determined by related and connected places that, in turn, could be understood with reference to whatever has found, is finding, or can find its place within them. Space, then, would be the space of places, and places are what they are because someone or something was found or can be found there. First and foremost, Foucault concretizes his understanding of spaces by referring to ‘counter placements’ (contre-emplacement) that receive something which, for whatever reason, could not find a place in the normal space of everyday life. Foucault calls these places ‘heterotopies’ (heterotopies), thinking of places that in the normal web of relations and placements are like islands – barracks, prisons, cemeteries, gardens, libraries, museums, or holiday camps. As with places in general, the ‘other spaces’ that give Foucault’s essay its title, are also solely determined by their quality of meaning. However, in contrast to the meaning of normal spaces, the meaning of these spaces is ‘exclusive’ in a literal sense, because it is defined by not being included in the meaning of normal places. It is very likely that Foucault regards heterotopies as the clearest manifestations of space, namely of the interior and exterior, and of closedness as opposed to openness.
Foucault’s conception of space has been widely effective, probably not least because it is easy to understand. In seeking to understand and to explain what space is, one will almost automatically think of places. Whereas space is difficult to comprehend, places are simple to grasp. They are concretely determined, especially if they are, like Foucault’s heterotopies, special, i.e., exclusive places in a literal sense. Places, it may be repeated, are places for something or for someone. One can refer to them by saying what they are places for, and by determining where this ‘something’ is or can be – a vase on a table, a book on a bookshelf, or in a briefcase. Places can also be determined by indicating whom or what they are or could be intended for. Either way, places are factually or possibly related to something other than themselves. Something, for instance, a table, a bookshelf, or a briefcase, is only a place inasmuch as it can receive something in its own particular way. So places are different from the featureless indeterminacy that Foucault associates with the idea of empty space. Places are concrete. They are not emptiness in which living beings and things would levitate like stars or space stations in outer space.
Foucault is not the only one to have reservations concerning the idea of space as emptiness. Aristotle, too, took exception to the idea of emptiness and made attempts to prove the idea nonsensical. Neither is Foucault’s conception of space as a web of relations something new. Leibniz, as he wrote in a letter to Samuel Clarke on August 18,