Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

This is What Democracy Looked Like: A Visual History of the Printed Ballot
This is What Democracy Looked Like: A Visual History of the Printed Ballot
This is What Democracy Looked Like: A Visual History of the Printed Ballot
Ebook222 pages58 minutes

This is What Democracy Looked Like: A Visual History of the Printed Ballot

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

This Is What Democracy Looked Like, the first illustrated history of printed ballot design, illuminates the noble but often flawed process at the heart of our democracy. An exploration and celebration of US ballots from the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, this visual history reveals unregulated, outlandish, and, at times, absurd designs that reflect the explosive growth and changing face of the voting public. The ballots offer insight into a pivotal time in American history—a period of tectonic shifts in the electoral system—fraught with electoral fraud, disenfranchisement, scams, and skullduggery, as parties printed their own tickets and voters risked their lives going to the polls.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateMay 26, 2020
ISBN9781616899318
This is What Democracy Looked Like: A Visual History of the Printed Ballot
Author

Alicia Yin Cheng

Alicia Yin Cheng is a founding partner of MGMT. design in Brooklyn, New York. She currently serves as an external critic for the MFA program at the Rhode Island School of Design and has taught at Yale University, Maryland Institute College of Art, Barnard College, and Cooper Union. Cheng was a past board member of the AIGA/NY chapter and the Fine Arts Federation.

Related to This is What Democracy Looked Like

Related ebooks

Design For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for This is What Democracy Looked Like

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    This is What Democracy Looked Like - Alicia Yin Cheng

    THE PHYSICAL DIMENSION OF DEMOCRACY

    Julian E. Zelizer

    Among the most enduring images from the controversial 2000 presidential election was the butterfly ballot. The design of the ballot that was used in Palm Beach County, Florida, created an utter disaster. Theresa LePore, the Palm Beach election supervisor who was responsible for the design, had meant to make things easier. I was trying to make the print bigger so elderly people in Palm Beach County can read it, she said.¹ But many elderly voters were confused by the way that the candidates’ names were lined up. A substantial number of these voters, who were Jewish and liberal, accidentally offered their support to third-party candidate Pat Buchanan, a conservative with a checkered history of anti-Semitism, instead of the Democratic candidate, Vice President Al Gore.

    The bitter fight that unfolded about the design of this ballot and others in Florida was a vivid reminder of the physical dimension of democracy. During the recount process that followed election day, Americans watched on television as officials used magnifying glasses to figure out what these and other ballots said about the intention of voters. While many of the histories of this country revolve around the great ideas of our political system or the institutional design that the founders created with the Constitution, we know too little about the actual mechanisms through which people participate in making our government work.

    The ballot is among the most fundamental components of our democracy. The ballot has literally been the way that people make their choice about who should lead them and how the government will register the final decision of the electorate. The ballot itself, which has been paper for most of our history, has been inscribed into the memorabilia that collectors find and history museums preserve. But the history of the ballot is something that we must pay much greater attention to. As the controversy over the 2000 election revealed, the structure and design of the ballot can have enormous consequences for how our politics function or fail us.

    In times before ballots were secret, this piece of paper could be used as a mechanism of intimidation and persuasion, since everyone could see who a voter was supporting. Parties also used the ballot to trick voters in certain cases. In 1857 some Democrats printed ballots with a font meant to look like the one on Republican ballots so that voters would be confused.² The color of the document or the size of the print also had the potential to mark the voting process. Throughout our history, the way in which the names of parties and candidates were listed and the visuals that were used could favor certain parties or persons and make it difficult for others to gain attention. For African Americans, women, and poor Americans, the paper ballot had enormous importance at different moments as the pathway to full citizenship. Mere access to this treasured piece of paper was what separated those who were disenfranchised from those who wielded the political power.

    Americans fought over the design of the ballot as part of the ongoing contest over power. At the same time that some party leaders were determined to preserve ballots that could be easily corrupted, reformers fought for ones that would protect the ability of voters to make their decisions and ensure that every vote was counted. Even the way in which individuals cast their ballots evolved, with greater protections created over time. In 1888, when municipal elections in Louisville, Kentucky, became the first to use the Australian Ballot, which was cast in secret, one writer noted: The election last Tuesday was the first municipal election I have ever known which was not bought outright.³ In recent years, however, the displacement of the paper ballot by the electronic voting machine has raised all sorts of new issues, including the possibility of hacking by overseas governments.

    The following pages offer one of the best visual histories of the ballot that we have available. Readers are taken on a wonderful tour of what voting looked like and what enfranchised America saw when they made their decisions. Through these images, we see the design, the evolution, and the complexities of American democracy in action. The book is a reminder that on election day, the ways in which we process our choices have had as many consequences as what politicians promise and the factors that guide the final decision of the electorate.

    Diagram of sample polling arrangement, 1889.

    THE MOST FUGITIVE EPHEMERA

    Alicia Yin Cheng

    It is the most potent of all sheets of paper: the ballot.¹

    PHILIP LORING ALLEN, 1906

    CORN AND BEANS

    As a material tool of democracy, the ballot should not, by its nature, be collectible. Legally required to be destroyed within a certain period after an election, surviving tickets are usually the result of an election officer who used a ballot to write down a tally and kept that record in his personal papers. Early ballots were easier to pocket, before regulations made election officers liable for all unaccounted ballots. Others must have been kept surreptitiously, but it is hard to know precisely just how these ballots managed to survive. One collector aptly described the election ballot as "the

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1