New Philosopher

Changing minds

“Change is the process by which the future invades our lives.” Alvin Toffler

Jonathan Swift was one to choose his words carefully. In a letter from 1725 written to his good friend, the poet and satirist Alexander Pope, he contested the contemporary definition of humanity. “I have got materials toward a treatise, proving the falsity of that definition animal rationale,” he wrote. That common definition of humans being ‘rational animals’ was one that Swift found outrageously vain. Instead his treatise was to “show it should be only rationis capax”. That is, humans are “capable of reason”, although we typically choose not to employ it.

If we’re honest with ourselves, Swift was right. Indeed, one of the richest veins of recent scientific research has shown that the human animal is rarely rational, and rational discourse is

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from New Philosopher

New Philosopher1 min read
Online At
In February 2023, Australia’s corporate regulator came under fire for hiring a bunch of robots. You might be envisioning a Robocop-type scenario or an army of droid soldiers right now... Why do we work so much? Why do we even work at all? For a great
New Philosopher5 min readDiscrimination & Race Relations
How Rich Is Too Rich?
To many basketball fans, Wilt Chamberlain was one of the greatest players of the 20th century. To others, Chamberlain is better remembered for his claim to have slept with twenty thousand women. (The figure seems impossible, but Chamberlain insisted
New Philosopher6 min read
Cautionary Tales
Zan Boag: It has been said that you draw inspiration from the Dutch artists Hieronymus Bosch and Pieter Bruegel. Both had a dark take on humanity’s desires and deepest fears – is that what you’re delving into with your work? Christopher Spencer (Co

Related Books & Audiobooks