The Art of Military Deception
By Mark Lloyd
3/5
()
About this ebook
This in-depth analysis of military deception examines tactics employed across centuries and continents, from ancient times to WWII.
The art of military deception is as old as warfare itself. It has been a vital part of virtually every successful campaign ever recorded, and yet has been largely overlooked in the annals of military history. In The Art of Military Deception, Mark Lloyd corrects this oversight with a wide-ranging analysis of strategies and tactics through the ages.
Lloyd treats this much-neglected aspect of warfare thematically rather than chronologically covering such topics as disinformation campaigns, lies on the home front, and psychological warfare. He draws on a wide range of examples to show the elaborate techniques which have been employed in the struggle to outwit the enemy. Particularly fascinating is his analysis of the fatal error of self-deception.
Mark Lloyd
Mark Lloyd served in Vietnam as a US Army Green Beret. He worked two years as a police officer with the Los Angeles Police Department before joining the Drug Enforcement Administration as a special agent, where he worked for thirty-one years on foreign and domestic assignments. Lloyd currently lives in Bentonville, Arkansas.
Read more from Mark Lloyd
The London Scottish in the Great War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDragon Chaser: a Memoir Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Art of Military Deception
Related ebooks
Practise to Deceive: Learning Curves of Military Deception Planners Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Strategic Military Deception: Pergamon Policy Studies on Security Affairs Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Covert Military Strategy The Theory Of War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRoots of Strategy: Book 4 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Information Warfare: The Lost Tradecraft Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilitary Reconnaissance: The Eyes and Ears of the Army Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Victory for Hire: Private Security Companies’ Impact on Military Effectiveness Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPsychological Operations Supporting Counterinsurgency: 4th Psyop Group In Vietnam Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The New Rules of War: Victory in the Age of Durable Disorder Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Key Moments in Espionage: Spy Ships, Failures, & the Cold War Era: SPYCRAFT, #3 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitical Warfare and Psychological Operations: Rethinking the U.S. Approach Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Tactics: A Theory of Victory in Battle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Psychological Warfare Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Key Figures in Espionage: The Good, the Bad, & the Booty: SPYCRAFT, #2 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerica and the Future of War: The Past as Prologue Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the World Wars Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Generalship: Its Diseases and Their Cure. A Study of The Personal Factor in Command Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Redefining the Modern Military: The Intersection of Profession and Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOperational Encirclements: Can The United States Military Decisively Follow Through? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Grey Line: Modern Corporate Espionage and Counter Intelligence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Cold War Spy Pocket Manual: The official field-manuals for spycraft, espionage and counter-intelligence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Science of War: Defense Budgeting, Military Technology, Logistics, and Combat Outcomes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCIA Manual for Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy Intelligence Fails: Lessons from the Iranian Revolution and the Iraq War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Transformation of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Spycraft: Essentials: SPYCRAFT, #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExecutive Warfare (Review and Analysis of d'Alessandro and Owens' Book) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCorporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Roots of Strategy: Book 2 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Wars & Military For You
Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Doctors From Hell: The Horrific Account of Nazi Experiments on Humans Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Plane in the Sky: An Oral History of 9/11 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/577 Days of February: Living and Dying in Ukraine, Told by the Nation’s Own Journalists Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The History of the Peloponnesian War: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unacknowledged: An Expose of the World's Greatest Secret Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Washington: The Indispensable Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5109 East Palace: Robert Oppenheimer and the Secret City of Los Alamos Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Raven Rock: The Story of the U.S. Government's Secret Plan to Save Itself--While the Rest of Us Die Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Faithful Spy: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Plot to Kill Hitler Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for The Art of Military Deception
3 ratings1 review
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The book covers the period of World War I to the US effort in Iraq.
One interesting section deals with SELF-DECEPTION : Hitler's belief that he could conquer Russia; Goering's
belief that the Luftwaffe would overcome the RAF; some in the US said that Japanese could never fly planes or,
because of poor eyesight, could not shoot accurately.
Covered in some detail were the deception plans to deceive the Germans into thinking that Calais was the
real objective, German efforts to deceive Stalin before launching their invasion and the well known
" Man Who Never Was ".
Throughout time phony radio broadcasts, leaflets, appeals from POWs to surrender, etc. were used to
make an untruth believable. A wide range of these methods in many parts of the world were discussed.
Book preview
The Art of Military Deception - Mark Lloyd
CHAPTER ONE:
The Unworthy Foe
Generals rarely, if ever, set out to lose battles. The fact that they do nonetheless can be attributed to a number of factors. Most of these fall into the catagories of bad luck, bad judgement or ineptitude. However, occasionally a campaign is doomed from the start. As often as not this is due to the fact that one adversary has completely underestimated the worth of the other.
For centuries Europeans have assumed that it is their right to wage war successfully, particularly against non-European adversaries. Traditionally, even within Europe, certain countries have regarded their armies as inherently superior to others. In 1415 the French allowed themselves to be lured into bloody defeat at Agincourt by giving battle to the ‘inferior’ English in a muddy field of the latter’s chosing. Prevented by the terrain from deploying, and forced by the atrocious conditions to advance at no more than a trot, the French cavalry elite were massacred by the English and Welsh bowmen before they could even join battle.
Over 450 years later the French again paid a terrible price for underestimating the worth of their enemy. In 1870 they allowed themselves to be duped by Bismarck into declaring war on Prussia, and in a few months of bloody fighting were soundly defeated on all fronts. In an ignominious peace they were forced to cede the province of Alsace and most of Lorraine, agreed to pay reparations of five billion francs, and suffered the indignity of an army of occupation until they had done so. Prussia had proved the worth of her Army in highly successful campaigns against Denmark in 1864 and Austria in 1866, but France had refused to learn the lessons of history and had instead chosen to rely on the unproven, and in this instance patently untrue, preparedness of her armed forces.
In 1940 French complacency, and an unerring belief in the infallibility of her tired and largely outdated army, led to its wholesale destruction at the hands of the Nazi panzers. German tactics should not have come as a shock to the Franco-British allies. They had been well documented by Heinz Guderian in 1937, yet they had been ignored by the traditionalists who had refused to allow for the possibility of military evolution.
Latterly the Americans have found themselves guilty of the same self-deceipt. In Vietnam they failed to differentiate between technology and ability, and assumed that they had a right to defeat the peasant armies of the Communist North. When they found themselves in an environment in which their technology was of little use, and in which victory or otherwise depended on the skills and resolution of the individual soldier, they were heavily defeated.
In many cases self-inflicted defeat has occurred when an imperial power has failed to appreciate the worth of a colony or former colony. Thus it was with Britain in the later 18th century when her American colonies began to flex their muscles and demand greater fiscal autonomy.
Disaster in the Americas
With the Treaty of Paris in 1763 and the end of the French wars, both Britain and the colonies looked forward to a period of stability. However, this was not to be, and peace brought with it new-found tensions. Nearly bankrupted by the war, Britain found herself having to station 10,000 extra troops in the American colonies which were now expanding fast to fill the void left by the French. Britain felt that the cost of these troops should be met by the colonists. They, on the other hand, resented the presence of the Redcoats whom they saw more as a restraint on territorial growth than a protection against the frontier Indians whom they had earlier proved inept in fighting. More fundamentally they were adamant that, by providing excellent militia throughout the war, the costs of which had been borne locally, they had contributed more than adequately to the campaign and should not now have to suffer higher taxation.
In 1773, in response to the recently passed Tea Act, a group of colonists stole aboard a number of tea clippers in Boston harbour and threw their precious cargoes into the sea. When Britain retaliated by closing the harbour and placing Massachusetts under military rule confrontation became inevitable. Determined to resist military rule, the Massachusetts Provincial Congress began to stockpile ammunition and supplies in Concord, a small settlement some 32km from Boston. General Gage, commanding the British garrison, reacted forcefully, sending a force of 700 men to seize the illegal stores.
However, the minutemen, an elite among the militia, were forewarned and formed on the village green at Lexington to block the advance. A brief firefight ensued after which the militia retired having sustained eight dead. The British proceeded to Concord but during their return to Boston were harried throughout by militia snipers. The British regulars had to call upon the assistance of a relief force to secure their safety and suffered 276 casualties. The militiamen suffered 95 dead and injured, a demonstration of the latter’s excellent use of guerrilla tactics. Within days the key forts of Ticonderoga and Crown Point were seized by the rebels.
The militiamen had proved themselves excellent adversaries who were clearly determined to fight the war on their own terms. Notwithstanding, the British continued to fight the insurrection by the tried and tested tactics of large-scale set-piece battlefield engagements. Foreseeing the need for a regular, disciplined force to protect the colonies against the inevitable onslaught, the settlers’ Continental Congress adopted the irregular New England Army assembled around Boston and appointed George Washington its Commander-in-Chief.
At the outset the Continental Army consisted almost entirely of infantry supplemented by irregular cavalry and artillery. However, in striking contrast to the British who failed to adapt, the Americans set up a training programme which was highly professional, comprehensive and adapted specifically for American conditions. Cadres returned to their units to inaugurate local training programmes, thus ensuring that the new tactics were disseminated throughout the Army.
After five years of sporadic fighting, and the intervention of the French, the British were forced to surrender. Had they attempted to adapt their tactics to the environment their logistical advantages might well have proved decisive in forcing a different outcome. Their failure to accept the worth of the local insurgents proved fatal. It would do so again.
African Adventures
During the course of the late 19th century Britain involved herself in a series of disastrous brush wars in southern Africa. In each case Imperial might should have prevailed. However, the failure of the establishment of the day to realize the potential of the enemy led the British to neglect a series of fundamental military tenets with fatal consequences.
When the Zulus began to menace the Boer settlements in the Transvaal the Boers, however unwillingly, sought the protection of the British military. The British High Commissioner, Sir Bartle Frere, determined to destroy the Zulu forces and, acting on his own initiative and against the wishes of the Government in London, ordered Lord Chelmsford to march into Zululand in January, 1879. The Zulu people had, by then, acquired a formidable military organization under successive warrior kings, yet Chelmsford deceived himself that their destruction would be a mere formality. His arrogance was to cost the lives of 1,600 men, half of them