Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Personal Liability of Public Officials in Virginia’s Local Governments and Its Impact on Their Willingness to Serve
    Personal Liability of Public Officials in Virginia’s Local Governments and Its Impact on Their Willingness to Serve
    Personal Liability of Public Officials in Virginia’s Local Governments and Its Impact on Their Willingness to Serve
    Ebook168 pages1 hour

    Personal Liability of Public Officials in Virginia’s Local Governments and Its Impact on Their Willingness to Serve

    By George O'Neil Urquhart

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    These are challenging times, and perhaps it is here that humans are viewed at their best and their worst. Everyone is accountable for what they say and do. And since government at all levels and its officials are not exempted, and who operate in a more open environment than they once did, primarily as a result of legislation providing for open meetings, more accessible public information, and under more open and recordable visibility, public officials must be more cautious and more aware of the decisions they make. Although a conscious effort on the part of public officials to avoid personal liability suits will help reduce the number of suits filed against them or the government, some preventive and proactive measures--e.g., becoming more proficient in the duties and responsibilities of office, cultural and social education, sensitivity training--must be taken to avoid the possibility of successful liability lawsuits.

    Public officials are held morally responsible for their decisions, and they are to be respected for the demands placed on them by virtue of that office. However, individuals, including those injured by a particular governmental policy or an official's decision, are not accepting grievous actions which go against their individual interests. Many are not content with exhausting administrative remedies; rather, they are turning to the courts for a remedy in cases of wrongful death, misuse of legal procedure, etc. A conscious, individual effort to reduce the occurrence liability suits through responsible public decisions will help hold the number of successful suits to a minimum.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherWipf and Stock
    Release dateJan 14, 2016
    ISBN9781498239660
    Personal Liability of Public Officials in Virginia’s Local Governments and Its Impact on Their Willingness to Serve
    Author

    George O'Neil Urquhart

    George Urquhart holds a DMin from the Samuel DeWitt Proctor School of Theology at Virginia Union University. He is the pastor of the Plank Road Baptist Church and is Special Programs and Project Manager with the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Emergency Management. He is the author of a publication titled Personal Liability and the Willingness of Public Officials to Serve (1980). Pastor Urquhart and his wife Jeanetter Maxcean reside in a farm community near Waverly, VA.

    Related to Personal Liability of Public Officials in Virginia’s Local Governments and Its Impact on Their Willingness to Serve

    Related ebooks

    American Government For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Prosecute the Police

      Jun 13, 2020

      Prosecute the Police
      7 min read

    • Article

      Innocent Until Proven Poor

      Aug 1, 2018

      THREE YEARS AFTER A TEXAS STATE TROOPER RIPPED her out of her car and slammed her to the ground over a traffic violation, Sandra Bland’s name still evokes images of police brutality. Her name also remains on the lips of bail reform activists; her dea

      2 min read

    • Article

      How to Get Your Estate Plan Done While Under Coronavirus Quarantine

      Mar 30, 2020

      The coronavirus lockdown began in the California counties of Sacramento, Palm Springs, Los Angeles and Ventura, issuing unprecedented orders for all residents to remain in their homes except for certain essential activities. Then Gov. Gavin Newsom ex

      5 min read

    • Article

      Reimagining Legal Education

      Jun 27, 2019

      Reimagining Legal Education
      3 min read

    • Article

      Supreme Court Lets Stand Ruling That Protects Homeless Who Sleep On Sidewalk

      Dec 16, 2019

      WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court refused Monday to hear a major case on homeless, letting stand a ruling that protects their right to sleep on the sidewalk or in public parks if no other shelter is available. The justices without comment or a dissent s

      3 min read

    • Article

      Busting Trust Myths

      Sep 3, 2020

      “Trust busting” is the term often used to describe instances where a court finds in favour of a claimant trying to access trust assets. Here, though, I do not want to talk about “trust busting”. Instead I want to bust some trust myths. There has been

      2 min read

    • Article

      6 Questions About The LandBack Movement, Answered

      Sep 1, 2022

      HOW CAN TWO LITTLE WORDS have such combustible power, setting passions ablaze, threatening to undermine 500 years of written law, multigenerational ranching operations and modernday sprawling subdivisions, not to mention contemporary conservation’s e

      4 min read

    • Article

      Trustees Are Accountable To The Master Of The High Court

      Jan 16, 2021

      A TRUSTEE of a trust is accountable at all times to the Master of the High Court and to beneficiaries. If trustees’ actions (a single or multiple trustees) contravene either the provisions of the Trust Property Control Act or the trust instrument, th

      3 min read

    • Article

      Repo Risk: Beware Illegal Car Repossessions

      Jun 13, 2022

      Used cars are suddenly so much more appealing than they used to be. With prices near historic highs and inventory near record lows, some officials are warning people with car loans that unscrupulous lenders may use more aggressive - and possibly ille

      4 min read

    • Article

      Don’t Subpoena Me, Bro

      Jun 20, 2017

      Don’t Subpoena Me, Bro
      5 min read

    • Article

      'Negro' Not Allowed On Federal Forms? White House To Decide

      Dec 13, 2017

      The Trump administration has delayed announcing its decision on an Obama-era proposal to stop allowing the term "Negro" to appear on federal forms collecting information about race.

      4 min read

    • Article

      Your Home is Your...Snitch?

      May 24, 2018

      In the age of Alexa, new questions arise about how your smart devices could be used by police.

      5 min read

    • Article

      It’s Time For Action On Privacy

      Jan 28, 2019

      IN 2019, IT’S TIME TO STAND UP FOR THE RIGHT TO privacy—yours, mine, all of ours. Consumers shouldn’t have to tolerate another year of companies irresponsibly amassing huge user profiles, data breaches that seem out of control and the vanishing abili

      2 min read

    • Article

      Don’t Throw Away a $12.06M Estate Tax Exemption by Accident

      Apr 14, 2022

      The federal estate tax exemption and gift exemption is presently $12.06 million. A married couple can transfer $24.12 million to their children or loved ones free of tax with proper planning. The exemption is tied to inflation, so it will continue to

      3 min read

    • Article

      How Do You Prove You’re Innocent If You’re On Death Row?

      Nov 13, 2019

      Rodney Reed faces execution in Texas despite mounting evidence of innocence and bipartisan support.

      5 min read

    • Article

      Common Law Principles And The CPA

      Dec 11, 2019

      Common Law Principles And The CPA
      1 min read

    • Article

      When A Trustee Can And Cannot Be Removed

      Feb 20, 2021

      TRUSTEES are legally vested with the administration of a trust’s assets. They must manage the assets and liabilities of the trust in terms of the provisions of the trust instrument and the law, and not necessarily in a manner that pleases the benefic

      3 min read

    • Article

      Quick Cash When You Need It Most

      May 15, 2020

      Quick Cash When You Need It Most
      7 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Personal Liability of Public Officials in Virginia’s Local Governments and Its Impact on Their Willingness to Serve

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Personal Liability of Public Officials in Virginia’s Local Governments and Its Impact on Their Willingness to Serve - George O'Neil Urquhart

      9781498239653.kindle.jpg

      Personal Liability of Public Officials in Virginia’s Local Governments and Its Impact On Their Willingness to Serve

      George O’Neil Urquhart

      2008.WS_logo.jpg

      Personal Liability of Public Officials in Virginia’s Local Governments and Its Willingness to Serve

      Copyright © 2016 George O’Neil Urquhart. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in critical publications or reviews, no part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without prior written permission from the publisher. Write: Permissions, Wipf and Stock Publishers, 199 W. 8th Ave., Suite 3, Eugene, OR 97401.

      Wipf & Stock

      An Imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers

      199 W. 8th Ave., Suite 3

      Eugene, OR 97401

      www.wipfandstock.com

      paperback isbn: 978-1-4982-3965-3

      hardcover isbn: 978-1-4982-3967-7

      eisbn: 978-1-4982-3966-0

      Manufactured in the U.S.A.

      Table of Contents

      Title Page

      Preface

      Introduction

      Chapter 1: Historical Development of Common Law Immunity and Liability

      Chapter 2: Traditional Principles of the Doctrine of Official Immunity

      Chapter 3: The Legal Foundations of Personal Liability

      Chapter 4: The Potential Effects of Personal Liability Suits

      Chapter 5: Policy Recommendations for Legislative Action

      Conclusion

      Appendix

      Bibliography

      Preface

      The title of my thesis, as stated above, is primarily the result of a suggestion by Richard L. DeCair, Executive Director of the Virginia Municipal League. In the ensuing research on the subject of personal liability, the author has learned through informal conversations with several public officials in various local governments in Virginia that they are concerned about the threat of lawsuits and court action against them as a result of their actions as governmental decision makers. Many of these officials express concern that personal liability suits against them in their official positions could have an adverse effect on their willingness to continue in public office.

      Recognizing that personal liability lawsuits against public officials are increasing and that the implications of this phenomenon are important in governing the activities in Virginia counties, cities, and towns, the author believes that an examination of public official liability, including an analysis of the impact of personal liability on Virginia local governmental officials in terms of their willingness to serve, is valuable to all state and local public officials and administrators in the effective continuance of local government.

      Depending on the nature of the issue under consideration, a researcher undertaking substantial inquiry into that area tends to pick up much support along the way through to the completion of the planned search. This thesis has not been an exception.

      First, I am grateful to Morton and Ruth C. Wallerstein who provided a grant for my study at the University of Virginia and to the directors of the Institute of Government at the University and the Virginia Municipal League who presented the award. I am also thankful to the directors of the Institute who allowed me the use of its facilities while in residence as the Wallerstein Fellowship Recipient during the 1977–1978 academic year.

      The list of other contributors and supporters continues. I am grateful to Michaux H. Wilkerson, Assistant County Manager—Henrico (formerly with the Institute of Government); Francis McQ. Lawrence, Attorney at Law —George R. St. John Associates, Charlottesville; and various members of the staff at the Institute and the Virginia Municipal League who provided information and other assistance during the earlier stages of this research.

      I am indebted to those officials of Albemarle, Chesterfield, and Henrico Counties and the City of Richmond, who allowed me valuable time to conduct interviews with each of them on this issue. Lawyers and attorneys from these localities and elsewhere who have been helpful include William L. Winbushe, Assistant City Attorney—Richmond; William G. Broaddus, Henrico County Attorney; and James B. Murray, Jr., Attorney at Law in Charlottesville. Reporters Robert Gibson of Charlottesville’s Daily Press and Ms. Memory Porter have been tremendous assets by making available their newspaper files of information relative to liability suits in Virginia.

      I am particularly grateful to my readers, H. Clifton McCleskey and Robert S. Montjoy, who helped me move this thesis along to its completion. Their wisdom and advice have made this research what it is and also have been comforting in that the anxiety associated with bringing this thesis to a close has been greatly reduced.

      Finally, my wife is even more deserving of my love and attention now that she has spent probably more than her share of sleepless and lonesome nights while I was away at the University. I remain grateful to her for her love and support.

      With respect to all of the above, I accept the sole responsibility of any errors as a result of selecting the material and choice of methods in presenting this thesis. I am equally responsible for material omissions which included could have made this effort more valuable.

      July 1979 G.O.N.U.

      Introduction

      The threat of personal-liability of governmental officials resulting from their decisions and actions is of considerable concern to current office holders and appointed officials. Their decisions and actions are being challenged more often and more vigorously than previously noted by the community and the electorate in general; they are being drawn into court more often than before by civil suits that seek judicial relief from some legislative or administrative decision or act. Local legislators and other public officials are concerned about actions taken by the various state courts and the disposition of personal liability suits. Whether statutes, ordinances, or constitutions are broadly or narrowly interpreted and defined will determine to a large extent the legal limits of discretion and the acts of local public officials.

      The primary intent of this legal analysis is to determine to what extent public officials as defined herein are personally liable for their official acts which injure others or infringe their rights protected under state and federal law. This analysis also should help provide the basis for a reassessment of state and local laws or policies which outline the official acts of local officials. The information necessary for this analysis was drawn from legal texts, court cases, law review articles, legal digests and personal interviews with public officials in four Virginia localities.

      This paper is addressed to Virginia state and local legislators and executives at the local level. Both State and local officials have roles in correcting the dilemma which exists in the concept of personal liability versus the doctrine of official immunity. The State legislature has a responsibility to help clarify ambiguities in the law regarding these two conflicting or competing principles of the common law doctrine. There are at present no statutes which specifically address the issue of reconciling personal liability and official immunity, with respect to local legislators or chief executives.

      The lack of uniform legislation throughout the State regarding privileges and immunities of local officials presents a problem for the courts when a ruling is being made on the question of immunity or liability of a local public official since judges must rely on a judicially-established official immunity concept as it evolved from the common law doctrine of sovereign immunity. The doctrine of sovereign immunity provides that the king (state) can do no wrong and thus, the state is a sovereign entity. The official immunity concept variously provides that judges, state legislators and to some extent, local legislators are absolutely immune for their official acts; they cannot be held liable for their acts carried out under the color of the law. This concept provides a degree of immunity for other public officials, for example, chief executives and local attorneys. The degree of immunity depends on the type of decision or act being made and by whom. The two types of decisions or acts discussed in the literature on this subject defy clearly-defined boundaries; discretionary decisions assume an element of judgment on the part of the official and a ministerial act is the execution of a function by instruction or without an element of personal judgment. To further complicate the issue a public official may commit either one or both acts simultaneously in the execution of a single function.

      At the State level, legislators are absolutely immune from damages suffered by an injured or aggrieved individual. Local legislators are not accorded the same protection. Local legislators and chief executives may be granted qualified immunity by a determination of the court following a "good

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1