Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Unavailable
    What St Paul Really Said
    Unavailable
    What St Paul Really Said
    Unavailable
    What St Paul Really Said
    Ebook269 pages4 hours

    What St Paul Really Said

    By Tom Wright

    4/5

    ()

    Currently unavailable

    Currently unavailable

    About this ebook

    Paul has provoked people as much in recent times as he did when he was alive. Some regard him as a pestilent and dangerous fellow. Others think of him as the greatest teacher of Christianity after Jesus himself. In this book, leading theologian Tom Wright focuses on key areas of Paul's teaching, helping us to understand what he was doing and saying. He sweeps away the confusion of much modern theology to uncover the real man and his message.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherLion Books
    Release dateDec 23, 2011
    ISBN9780745958675
    Unavailable
    What St Paul Really Said
    Author

    Tom Wright

    Tom Wright is Research Professor Emeritus of New Testament and Early Christianity at the University of St Andrews and Senior Research Fellow at Wycliffe Hall, Oxford. He is the author of more than 80 influential books, including The New Testament for Everyone, Simply Christian, Surprised by Hope, The Day the Revolution Began, Paul: A biography, The New Testament in its World, On Earth as in Heaven and Into the Heart of Romans (all published by SPCK).

    Read more from Tom Wright

    Related to What St Paul Really Said

    Related ebooks

    Christianity For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      In LGBT-Welcoming Britain, Church of England Tries to Find Its Path

      Dec 22, 2017

      Anglican membership in Britain has shrunk radically in recent decades, particularly among youth. One cause is Britons' embrace of LGBT issues, which has outpaced the church's. But the church's efforts to respond are causing internal tensions.

      4 min read

    • Article

      Book of Uncommon Prayer

      May 3, 2023

      Book of Uncommon Prayer
      3 min read

    • Article

      The Rise Of Paul

      Mar 26, 2020

      How do you think Paul achieved such personal authority? He was evidently a remarkable man, possessed of extraordinary charisma, persuasiveness and a capacity for relentless travel. By the end of his life it has been estimated he had travelled some

      1 min read

    • Article

      Woman letters

      Mar 21, 2024

      Woman letters
      6 min read

    • Article

      A Pained Intuition and a Palpable Longing: Katie Ford on Theology, Poetry, and the Unknowable

      Sep 13, 2018

      If You Have to Go, the new collection of poems by Katie Ford, is a book that conjures powers of possession. I feel that way about all of her books: Her poems bring me to a mystical plane somewhere between language and life. I’m left shaken. Her willi

      17 min read

    • Article

      What The New Testament Doesn’t Say

      May 20, 2019

      When professing Christians deny Biblical creation, we often point them to the Words of Jesus and the New Testament authors, which clearly affirm their own belief in Biblical creation. Because Christians are, by definition, people who believe what Jes

      5 min read

    • Article

      What Happened Next?

      Feb 24, 2022

      What Happened Next?
      9 min read

    • Article

      Of Faith and Tragedy

      Dec 3, 2018

      Ecco, 235 pp., $27.99 “WHY RELIGION, OF ALL THINGS?” a confident young physicist asks the young Elaine Hiesey, while she is pursuing her graduate studies at Harvard. “Why not something that has an impact in the real world?” His question is, for her,

      4 min read

    • Article

      To Thine Eyes

      Feb 12, 2023

      To Thine Eyes
      3 min read

    • Article

      A Burden On The Heart Of The Believer “I Charge You Therefore, Preach The Word!”

      Oct 21, 2019

      Most of us would recognise that the last words of a great and godly man or woman before their death would likely be words of great value. Words to consider and ponder. Jesus’ seven statements from the Cross are of that category and are thus recorded

      5 min read

    • Article

      A Saga Of Sievekings

      Dec 2, 2021

      A Sieveking Family History Paul Sieveking Privately published 2021 Hb, 200pp, £25 inc p&p from sieveking@forteantimes.com The magnificent if notoriously snobbish novelist Anthony Powell was so obsessed by family trees and breeding that he even took a

      8 min read

    • Article

      Who Wants To Be A Catholic?

      Feb 7, 2024

      I spent five long years at a strict Paris convent boarding school studying l’histoire de l’église. This failed to engage my attention all that time. The Middle Ages seemed interminable and monotonous, and 12 was far too young to be reading Montaigne.

      2 min read

    • Article

      The Medieval Shock Of Thenew

      May 25, 2023

      IN 1700 A MATHEMATICIAN submitted a paper to the Royal Society in which he attempted to calculate, among other things, the rate at which oral testimony — that is, memory — decayed over long periods of time. It’s a quixotic idea, to be sure, but that

      4 min read

    • Article

      Zeal Of The Convert

      Sep 1, 2022

      Most people think that scripture is a noun, but it’s actually a verb. That is, scripture is an event, a relational activity. It’s what happens when people read or hear a text and they transcend themselves. Like mercury releasing gold from ore, script

      4 min read

    • Article

      Elaine Pagels Is Famous For Asking Hard Questions. Her Latest: ‘Why Religion?’

      Dec 19, 2018

      The scholar’s professional life has been about challenging orthodox ways of thinking about Christianity. In her new book, she shows the personal struggle behind that quest.

      7 min read

    • Article

      Characters of the Bible Epaphroditus & Epaphras

      Dec 29, 2023

      This month we will take a look at two biblical men who, while related in name, served the early Church in different ways. The name Epaphroditus and its diminutive form Epaphras are male names associated with the Greek goddess of love, Aphrodite. Lite

      3 min read

    • Article

      Forgotten Women Of The Bible

      Mar 24, 2022

      Helen Bond (right) and Joan Taylor are professors of Christian origins and ancient history. Their book Women Remembered: Jesus’ Female Disciples came about after they made the documentary Jesus’ Female Disciples: The New Evidence in 2018, which took

      6 min read

    Reviews for What St Paul Really Said

    4/5

    86 ratings4 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 4/5
      Caveat: this is only the second book on religion I've read since high school, lo these many geological ages ago. This is a good book that could have been great. What I was able to get out of it was really good stuff. However, it seemed that he kept dancing around many of his points, without ever actually coming out and making them explicit, so that the reader had, finally, to infer them. Many of them are good points, to be sure; but dude, just spit it out. But it is unclear to me whether this experience is because I am inexperienced with this sort of literature, or if it really is more wordy and less straightforward than need be. For example, one critical, and technical, concept that he made much reference to is "redemption;" but while there was much discussion of other critical technical terms (such as justification), redemption was used as though the reader were already comfortable with it. Again, I don't know if this is my failing or the book's, but I found it a problem throughout my reading.Perhaps in addition to, or because of, my inexperience with this sort of literature, there seemed to be a small but significant component of apologetics. I found this component annoying and distracting, as I was seeking explanation and exegesis rather than evangelism. It seemed to be largely responsible for the dancing around points rather than their clear declaration.As it was, I had to work pretty hard to get as much as I did out of it, and I flatter myself that I'm no slouch at reading. I know I didn't understand a few important parts of his argument. I do hope to read it again someday.
    • 5/5
      An excellent if short analysis of Pauline theology and doctrine-- an attempt to navigate the shoals of modern controversy while remaining true to what Paul said.The title is a bit sensationalistic; Wright does eventually get around to examining the question of Paul as founder of Christianity (and does well at showing how Jesus is the focus, and Paul the pointer to Jesus). Most of the book is an attempt to make sense of Paul as a first-century former Pharisaic Jew promoting the message of Jesus of Nazareth as the Crucified Lord. Wright makes strong arguments regarding the nature of the Gospel, justification, and God as Paul believed and elaborated. He shows how Paul is no Hellenist but a Jew maintaining a strong criticism of paganism while also critiquing the Jews themselves. I have a strong suspicion that this book sets out in short form what was most recently more expanded in "Justification" and, ultimately, will be more thoroughly demonstrated in the 4th volume of Christian Origins and the Question of God. In the meantime, an excellent book, one necessary for consideration when one attempts to make good sense of true, first century Pauline theology and doctrine.
    • 4/5
      Without a doubt, N.T. Wright is one of the most controversial and well respected New Testament scholar of our time. His work has been ground breaking. This relatively small book on Paul and his theology is packed with amazing insight. His ability to articulate the gospel has reshaped (and brought me closer) my view of God. I would recommend reading this book several times to fully grasp the implications of what Wright is saying. The book tends to get repetitive, but nonetheless, it is filled with some stellar scholarship. With all that said, I don't know how much I agree with Wright. His views of justification are different, but he may have a basis for what he is saying. I think he explains the gospel well, but I don't know if he implements it correctly. As with all theology, one must continue to read and discern before the Lord what is truth. Anyway, I found the book to be enlightening and refreshing.
    • 5/5
      The US subtitle of this book (Was Paul of Tarsus the Real Founder of Christianity), and the blurb on the back about A.N. Wilson, are a little misleading, as this question really only occupies the last chapter, where Wright critiques Wilson’s Paul the Mind of an Apostle. Most of the book sets out Wright’s views on the theology of Paul’s letters. Wright has a grand synthesis, and it may serve as a corrective to some deeply ingrained Christian beliefs. A few of his distinctive and central points are:1. Setting Paul’s letters against the Judaism of his day. Wright insists that only a proper historical understanding of Paul can make full sense of his writings. Wright analyses Paul’s attitudes and actions prior to his conversion and finds that Saul of Tarsus was a radical Shammaite Pharisee, an ideological fellow-traveller with the zealots who rebelled against Roman rule. Saul’s extreme zeal to see Israel return to Torah was transferred into an equally zealous attitude towards the Christ who revealed himself to Saul on the road to Damascus. Wright insists on seeing all of Paul through the prism of the expectations of first century Judaism. It is certainly a necessary and fruitful exercise, putting much of what Paul wrote in new perspective, and making better sense of some things. I did wonder at some of the implications of needing detailed historical knowledge to grasp some of Paul’s basic doctrines. I wish at times Wright had emphasized more that Paul’s gospel was grounded in the Old Testament as much as being Jewish. But perhaps I reveal my cultural heritage which has seen the Jews as outcasts who missed the boat/ark.2. Israel in Paul’s day saw itself as still in exile. According to Wright, while the Jews had returned from exile in Babylon and had a form of national government, the great post-exilic promises of the prophets had not been fulfilled. Jews, therefore, saw themselves as still in virtual exile, still awaiting the day of the Lord and their vindication when they would rule the nations. This perspective is, in a sense, undoubtedly true. Whether it controlled the perspectives of first century Judaism is another matter. And how much that perspective controlled the New Testament is yet another matter again. I suspect there is much truth in it, and some Jewish sects seem to have been influenced by this perspective. The trouble is that it doesn’t seem to be the central background idea of the New Testament writers, or even Paul. It is probably one key to unlocking the New Testament meaning of Jesus. That is it the controlling key, as Wright argues here and elsewhere, is less certain.3. The gospel is about Jesus. Well, that may seem obvious. But the term “gospel” has been a muddled concept. Evangelicals, to whom Wright belongs and who (I’m guessing) are the main readers of his works, have traditionally seen the gospel as a message on how to escape hellfire or , on a more sophisticated level, as an outline of a theological transaction involving atonement and justification that shows individuals how to be saved. Wright says that the gospel involves these things, but is more. It is the proclamation of a royal message: that the life, death and resurrection of Jesus the King is the pivot of history, and that we should submit to him as Lord (rather than to Caesar, or any other power).Others have said the same, and surely they read the New Testament rightly. Much of what passes for “gospel” or “evangelistic” work in the church is too narrowly focussed on personal salvation, in a take-it-or-leave-it manner. If God has done these things in Jesus and he is Lord, then not only are we, as individuals, commanded to submit to him, but also all worldly (and spiritual) powers. It therefore challenges every ideology, every action, and every thought of everyone, Christian or not. This gospel from the Creator of all is a message for all: it is public truth, not just personal piety (although of course it commands our personal spirituality). To which I can only add my “Amen” to Wright.4. Justification is not about how you become a Christian, but about what distinguishes those who are Christian. As Wright puts it, the gospel about Jesus is God’s message to the world. Justification is God’s message to the church. Wright here follows in the wake of E.P. Sandars (1977), while developing his own (more evangelical) view. The argument goes like this: the central expectation for a Jew like Saul was that, at the end of human history, God would intervene in the world and would bring the nations to account, as in a great law court, and declare his people, Israel—or those who were truly Israel by virtue of Torah observance—in the right, or justified. For Saul the central question was not about individual “salvation by works” (proto-Pelagianism, as Wright puts it), but about the vindication of God’s faithful people. When he became a Christian and responded to the gospel through the personal intervention of Jesus, Paul realised that God had done in Jesus in the middle of time (Wright could have acknowledged Conzelmann) what he expected him to do at the end of time.This means that the great vindication had effectively happened, in Jesus. Against Jews (and Judaisers, such as those in Galatia) who claimed that the justified people of God are marked by Torah observance (with attendant marks such as circumcision), Paul says that faith—that is, faithful response to the gospel message—is the mark of the justified. In the great assize, it is not Israel against the nations, but all under condemnation before God. Torah observers are just as sinful as pagans. God graciously declares the faithful justified through Jesus. This is a message for the church because it destroys arguments about who is “in and out” according to class, ethnic, economic, or even doctrinal lines, because the ones justified are those who have faith. Justification is, then, a message to God’s people as much as to individuals.There is a lot more to Wright’s argument about justification than this (such as God’s righteousness {dikaiosune theou} not being imputed to us, but a quality peculiar to God and distinct from the righteous status {dikaiosune ek theou} that God grants the justified), and I have to think (and pray) through it more. But it has the ring of truth. In stressing the communal aspect of justification present in the New Testament, Wright probably transforms its meaning for individual Christians. He claims it cuts across confessional lines because (viz. Richard Hooker) one can be justified without knowing it. Thus, many who respond faithfully to Christ but rely on their works are, in fact, justified. This all cuts across much of my understanding of justification, formed by conservative evangelicals, but I think it grows rather than supplants that understanding.A very long review, but it helps to put my reactions down in black and white. While in the main I find much to commend in Wright, there are reservations, some of which I have voiced above. John Stott (2001) has queried Wright’s reluctance to say that Jesus considered himself God, and I sensed that reluctance in this book (although Wright does state that Paul considered God as Trinity, with Jesus and the Holy Spirit). On a more mundane level, an index would have increased the book’s usefulness. This book may not make full sense to someone without any background or reading in biblical studies. But Wright is a voice to be listened to, by evangelicals and by the broader church.