Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Siegecraft - No Fortress Impregnable
Siegecraft - No Fortress Impregnable
Siegecraft - No Fortress Impregnable
Ebook349 pages5 hours

Siegecraft - No Fortress Impregnable

Rating: 5 out of 5 stars

5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

It has been said that the taking of a fortress depends primarily on the making of a good plan to take it, and the proper implementation and application of the resources to make the plan work. Long before a fortress has been besieged and conquered, it has to have been outthought before it can be outfought. This book outlines some of the more successfully thought out sieges, and demonstrates why it is that no fortress is impregnable.

A siege can be described as an assault on an opposing force attempting to defend itself from behind a position of some strength. Whenever the pendulum of technology swings against the "status quo," the defenders of a fortification have usually been compelled to surrender. We must stay ahead of the pendulum, and not be out-thought long before we are out-fought, for, as it will be shown in this book, "no fortress is impregnable."

LanguageEnglish
PublisheriUniverse
Release dateApr 5, 2003
ISBN9781462047505
Siegecraft - No Fortress Impregnable
Author

Harold A. Skaarup

Major Hal Skaarup has served with the Canadian Forces for more than 40 years, starting with the 56th Field Squadron, RCE and completing his service as the G2 (Intelligence Officer) at CFB Gagetown, New Brunswick in August 2011. He was a member of the Canadian Airborne Regiment, served three tours with the Skyhawks Parachute Demonstration Team, and worked in the Airborne Trials and Evaluation section. He served as an Intelligence Officer overseas in Germany and Colorado, and has been on operational deployments to Cyprus, Bosnia, and Afghanistan. He has been an instructor at the Tactics School at the Combat Training Centre in Gagetown and at the Intelligence Training Schools in Borden and Kingston. He earned a Master's degree in War Studies through the Royal Military College, and has authored a number of books on military history.

Read more from Harold A. Skaarup

Related to Siegecraft - No Fortress Impregnable

Related ebooks

Wars & Military For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Siegecraft - No Fortress Impregnable

Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
5/5

1 rating0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Siegecraft - No Fortress Impregnable - Harold A. Skaarup

    Siegecraft—No

    Fortress Impregnable

    Harold A. Skaarup

    iUniverse, Inc.

    New York Lincoln Shanghai

    Siegecraft—No Fortress Impregnable

    All Rights Reserved © 2003 by Harold Aage Skaarup

    No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or by any information storage retrieval system, without the written permission of the publisher.

    iUniverse, Inc.

    For information address:

    iUniverse

    2021 Pine Lake Road, Suite 100

    Lincoln, NE 68512

    www.iuniverse.com

    The information presented here has been gleaned from a great number of living and historical sources, many of whom were participants in the sieges described. They were there, I was not, and an individual eyewitnesses view is often open to many interpretations. You must choose for yourself what to believe in these accounts, and remember that it is your right to do so.

    E Tenebris Lux et Ex Coelis…

    ISBN: 0-595-27521-4 (Pbk)

    ISBN: 0-595-65685-4 (Cloth)

    ISBN: 978-1-4620-4750-5 (eBook)

    Contents

    Dedication

    Epigraph

    Foreword

    Preface

    Acknowledgements

    List of Abbreviations

    Introduction

    Siegecraft

    Early Defenses

    Strong Walls

    Troy

    Tyre

    Siegecraft

    Roman Siege Tactics

    Celts and Gauls

    Siege of Jerusalem

    Masada

    Huns, Ostrogoths and Visigoths

    Charlemagne

    Byzantine Armies

    Castles and Fortification

    Carcassone

    Château Gaillard

    Orleans

    Constantinople

    Rhodes and Malta

    Tenochtitlan

    Science of Fortification

    Newark

    Vienna

    Londonderry

    Vauban

    Louisbourg

    Gibraltar

    The Alamo

    Fort Pulaski

    Mafeking

    Verdun

    Eban Emael

    Leningrad

    Dien Bien Phu

    Alliances

    Epilogue

    Afterword

    Conclusions

    About the Author

    Appendix A

    Appendix B

    Glossary

    Bibliography

    Endnotes

    Dedication

    To the past and present members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) and the United Nations (UN) Security Forces, thank you. Grant we keep the peace.

    To the Coalition Forces who crossed the line at 1930 hours EDT on 19 March 2003. The vice-like grip of a tyrant will not be allowed to stand.

    Epigraph

    Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed.¹

    The great struggles of the 20th century between liberty and totalitarianism ended with a decisive victory for the forces of freedom-and a single sustainable model for national success: freedom, democracy, and free enterprise. In the 21st century, only nations that share a commitment to protecting basic human rights and guaranteeing political and economic freedom will be able to unleash the potential of their people and assure their future prosperity. People everywhere want to be able to speak freely; choose who will govern them; worship as they please; educate their children-male and female; own property; and enjoy the benefits of their labor. These values of freedom are right and true for every person, in every society-and the duty of protecting these values against their enemies is the common calling of freedom-loving people across the globe and across the ages.²

    Foreword

    Major Hal Skaarup has woven together an informative and incisive synopsis of the impact of fortresses, sieges and siege craft in history. He highlights the importance of these upon key turning points in history along with milestones in the development of siege capabilities. We often associate the evolution of military prowess with the advancement of sophisticated technology. Major Skaarup’s descriptions of sieges throughout the centuries reveals that military planners had to be just as creative and sophisticated in their thinking then as now. They had to devise many intricate techniques, tactics and procedures to surmount the barriers of the day. As Major Skaarup succinctly states, Long before a fortress has been besieged and conquered, it has been outthought before it has been outfought. This book will outline some of the more successfully thought out sieges, and demonstrate why it is that no fortress is impregnable for all time.

    Captain (Navy) ret’d

    Scott Lewis Former J2 NORAD

    Preface

    Image298.JPG

    Since the beginning of time, man has sought to defend himself and his family by finding a shelter or building a strong fortification. In equal measure and determination there have been those who have sought to overcome these defenses, which generally consisted of three different methods of protective works. The earliest and most simple field fortifications often consisted of stakes, stones, ditches and other common obstacles constructed just before a battle began and which were primarily only intended for temporary or immediate use during a battle. The techniques used often mirrored the basic techniques used by early hunters, who built obstacles whose design and implementation were derived from simple but effective pits and traps which had been used to catch animals. As attack methods grew in sophistication, more ingenious ideas and methods of defense came to be employed. Sharpened stakes joined together to form a palisade came into increasing use.

    Improvements in the use of metallurgy contributed to the tools available to the defender, including such devices as the caltrop (shown above), a metal device which was formed from four iron spikes joined together in the form of a tetrahedron shape. Many of these devices would be thrown on the ground forward of a defensive position with the object of causing the attacker’s horse to stumble or fall, so unhorsing the rider or knight and rendering them more vulnerable in their cumbersome armor on the ground.

    The use of stakes led in turn to the construction of more complex fortifications made of wood, as well as the idea of making them portable. William the Conqueror’s Norman troops, for example, brought pre-fabricated wooden castles with them when they landed in England in 1066, and the first thing they did on arrival was to erect one of them on the beach. The aim of these fortifications, and the reason they were initially effective, was to divide an attackers attention between trying to overcome them while simultaneously trying to keep his own forces protected.

    Fortifications, both temporary and long-term, have helped to decide the outcome in a number of very famous battles, including those at Crécy in 1346, Poitiers in 1356, and Agincourt in 1415.³ In each of these specific battles, English archers fired their arrows from behind a protective shield of sharpened wooden stakes angled to face the assaulting French knights. Since the idea was effective, it remained little changed for centuries, and in fact variations on wooden stakes were used in Vietnamese defense works in the 1960s and 70s.

    Early fortifications could be by-passed and picketed-a term we use in present day service when a commander directs his mechanized formation of tanks and armoured vehicles to surround and guard a defended enemy position while the rest of the military formation presses on to its objective. In ancient times, the way to prevent a fortress from being outflanked was to build a continuous wall, such as the 400-mile long Limes Germanicus constructed by the Romans across southern Germany in the 2nd century; the Byzantine Wall erected to protect Constantinople; or the more than 5000-mile long Great Wall of China; and the complicated concrete defenses of France’s Maginot Line.4

    The drawbacks to these extended lines of defensive walls were many, including the labor, time and expense required to build them, and more so, the troops required to man them to maintain the defenses which is reason for their construction in the first place. Constant patrolling was required as well as regular rotations of the personnel manning the signal towers and garrisons stationed at intervals along these walls. Eventually, siege techniques were designed to overcome even the most elaborate walls and complexes of fortifications. For practical purposes, early defensive strongpoints evolved to a form of closed ring or enceinte to use the French term.

    Enceintes protected fortresses, citadels, castles and in some cases entire cities and came to serve as a point of refuge for the population in the surrounding area. The earliest indication of this practice is the stone fortifications which encircled the city of Jericho, which date to about 7000 BC.⁵ The Sumerian cities of Ur and Lagash in Mesopotamia have foundations which braced impressive structures dating back to 3500 BC. These buildings rose high above the irrigated flood-plain of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. The Egyptians may have built similar fortifications in the era of the Old Kingdom (2500-1500 BC).⁶

    Sargon of Akkad (2371-2316 BC) destroyed the city of Kazalla and made a specific point of wrecking the walls of cities he captured. His warriors rushed the cities gates or they built a sloping rampart of earth as high as the city wall and swarmed over them taking the cities by storm.⁷ Assyrian reliefs depicting siege warfare indicate it was in use at least as early as 850 BC, and by that time the basic principles of fortress construction such as making use of loopholes for shooting arrows, curtain walls, crenelation, parapets, reinforced gates and towers projecting from walls were well understood.

    Although many medieval fortresses consisted of castles rather than of town walls (many of which were built over foundations and stonework dating back to Roman times), there were very few new elements added. Medieval castles were generally centered on massive stone towers, keeps or donjons. These were often surrounded by multiple layers of curtain walls that had covered galleries, buttresses, parapets, crenelation, machiolations, flanking towers, sallyports, and protected gates incorporated into their design and construction. The designs evolved continuously over the lifetime of each fortress or castle, with ditches and moats being added where possible, particularly in Northwestern Europe because of the abundance of water. The primary difference in medieval castles over their primitive predecessors was their function. A castle was used to dominate the countryside it surveyed, which meant many were sited on strategically chosen spurs of hills overlooking all approaches, which gave additional warning and protection. To overcome them, an attacker had to be inventive and utilize increasingly sophisticated methods of siegecraft and siege engines.

    Siege warfare may have been practiced in Sumer as early as the third millennium BC. Based on ancient reliefs, the Assyrian army that destroyed the Biblical Kingdom of Israel and nearly did the same to Judea, already possessed a considerable array of apparently effective siege engines. They made use of ropes which had been attached to hooks, crowbars, scaling ladders, rams, and siege towers. They constructed mantelets which were basically wagons mounted with armor in front and which could be pushed close to the walls while providing cover for the archers. They also undermined the Hebrew defenses with tunnels and mines.

    The Egyptians of the New Kingdom which began in 1567 BC engaged in sieges using two new weapon’s systems adapted from their temporary conquerors, the Hyksos. The first was a double-convex composite bow made of wood, horn and sinew which was bound or glued together so that when it was unstrung or at rest, it appeared to be bent in the reverse direction from which it was designed to fire. When it was strung, drawn and fired, it had a range of 400 yards. Their second development was the single-axle chariot with spoked wheels which provided mobility for their archers and spearmen. When the Egyptians assaulted a fortified city, they hacked at the gates with axes and stormed the walls using scaling ladders. To protect themselves as they did so, they slung their rectangular shields over their backs, which left their hands free for climbing and fighting. Using this method, they successfully stormed and captured the Canaanite city of Megiddo in 1468 BC.⁸

    Subterfuge was also used. Thutmose III’s General Thot pretended to be abandoning a long siege at Jaffa in Palestine, by offering the defenders 200 baskets or sacks of supplies and tribute. Once they had been brought inside the walls, a soldier emerged from each container. These men then formed up and captured the gates, which allowed the Egyptian army waiting outside to gain access and to seize the rest of the city.⁹

    The battering ram was one of the earliest inventions to overcome fortifications, and its use dates from at least 2500 BC. By 2000 BC, it was a normal implement of warfare. The ability to fasten large spear blades to the front end of long wooden beams allowed engineers to pry stones loose from the walls until a breach was achieved. The Hittites used the technique of building an earthen ramp to a low spot in the wall on which they then rolled large, covered battering rams into place to attack the wall at its thinnest points. The Assyrians built wooden siege towers taller than the defender’s walls and then used archers to provide covering fire for the battering ram crews working below. The Assyrians also perfected the use of the scaling ladder by using short ladders to mount soldiers with axes and levers who dislodged the stones in the wall at midpoint. Longer ladders were used to bring combat forces over the higher walls.¹⁰

    Most of the early siege engines were made of wood, often in combination with leather and on occasion wickerwork to provide protective coverings for the attackers. In later years, iron plates were attached to them in order to provide additional armor for the sides of towers and covered siege devices exposed to a defender’s fire. Iron was relatively scarce in medieval times and was used mainly for the heads of battering rams and of course for the nails, rivets, axles, and hinges between moving parts that a good number of these devices required. Virtually all of the medieval siege engines were powered by man or beast.

    In the Bible in the book of 2 Chronicles, King Uziah of Judea made use of stone throwing engines to protect Jerusalem:

    Uzziah built towers in Jerusalem at the corner gate, and at the valley gate, and at the turning of the wall, and fortified them. Also he built towers in the desert…(and) had a host of fighting men, that went out to war by bands under the hand of Hananiah, one of the king’s captains.2,600 chiefs (with) 307,500 that made war…And Uziah prepared for them throughout all the host shields, and spears, and helmets, and habergeons, and bows, and slings to cast stones. And he made in Jerusalem engines, invented by cunning men, to be on the towers and upon the bulwarks, to shoot arrows and great stones withal.¹¹

    More details on the use of mechanical siege engines will be found in a later chapter. The storage of energy and the use of technology to launch missiles against a determined defender changed the face of war. A new kind of warrior was required in the form of engineers with technical expertise and professionalism. Mathematical calculations in the use of mechanical siege devices became the norm from about 200 BC until the dark ages, when they appear to have been forgotten for a period of time until they re-emerged in the middle ages.¹² About 1050 AD, both the Christian and Muslim world began to reintroduce siege machines into warfare, and by the time of the Crusades these weapons sometimes numbered in their hundreds. Onagers, mangonels, petriers, arbalasts, ballistae and catapults such as trebuchets led to fundamental changes in the nature of siege warfare until the age of gunpowder ushered in the next stage in the level of fire with effect.¹³

    No one side has a monopoly on the employment of useful ideas and weapons for attack and defense, and so it is that the development of enceintes and the siege engines to break them appears to have moved along at the same pace. Out-thinking the opposing side became a major problem for the commander. The capture of a well-designed and constructed castle or fortress from the 14th century onwards, for example proved to be an extremely difficult task as will be shown in detail later in these records. Finding a weak spot would prove to be the key, and this was rarely simple. Reconnaissance and good intelligence gathering would prove to be that essential key, permitting the successful commander to find and exploit the weakness in his opponent’s position. The result would basically depend on a well-coordinated plan based on a sound assessment of the best method of attack. A good commander who is supported by an excellent staff and the right resources is often in a better position to outthink his opponent, leading him to outfight and defeat him.

    This book will contain examples of sieges, both successful and unsuccessful, demonstrating that no matter how securely a fortress or defensive position is constructed and defended, eventually a good plan and a determined besieger can overcome it. One way or another, time, willpower and determined effort will be brought together in sufficient quantity and quality to bring a siege to a or defense to a successful conclusion. It will be argued through the examples presented in this book that ultimately, no fortress is impregnable.

    Major Harold A. Skaarup

    Acknowledgements

    I would like to thank US Navy Captain (retired) Scott Lewis, who knew the story of the long bow, and for taking the time to write the foreword to this book.

    There are a great number who have guided me throughout my military career, all of whom I would like to thank. Their names are too numerous to list here, suffice it to say that I had the great privilege to serve in the company of many of Canada’s finest soldiers and alongside a great number of soldiers with NATO, NORAD and the UN. I would specifically choose to mention the outstanding paratroopers of the Canadian Airborne Regiment, formerly of CFB Edmonton and CFB Petawawa. I had the honour to serve with the extremely professional Commanders, staff and soldiers of HQ 4 Canadian Mechanized Brigade and 1 Canadian Division Forward based in Lahr Germany. I am also greatly indebted to my colleagues in the Combat Training Center at CFB Gagetown. Few are more skilled in the art of tactical warfare. I currently serve with a great number of highly dedicated Canadian and American military personnel from all branches of the service in NORAD. All are outstanding warriors and comrades and it is a great privilege to serve in their company. None will be forgotten. Ex Coelis. E Tenebris Lux. Acorn sends.

    List of Abbreviations

    Introduction

    Siegecraft-the word brings to mind great hosts of crusaders smashing the walls of medieval castles using catapults flinging great stones against them, while flaming arrows flash through the air against attackers and defenders in peril. One can hear the sounds of horns coming to relieve the defenders, or see the walls crumbling as the besieged look on in horror when their defenses fall against the hammering war machines driven by a powerful and unrelenting foe. Stories, visions and history such as these of so-called impregnable fortresses being battered into submission, led me to examine the ruins and remains of several hundred medieval and modern castles and battlefields over the course of my military career, particularly during a number of tours of duty overseas. The information you will find here will be used to capture a number of the most famous as well as a few of the more obscure battles where effective Siegecraft-or the lack of it, decided the outcome for those who believed their fortresses were impregnable.

    The strange scallop-shaped walls of the inner defenses of Richard Coeur-de-Lion’s fortress at Chateau Gaillard, for example, continue to exist (albeit it ruins) to this day along the historic Loire River West of the city of Paris, and are well worth a visit by both historians and general tourists alike. Much further to the east of the city of lights you will find the remains of the French fortresses of Verdun. There, one may view a giant ossuary which holds the bones of many of the dead soldiers (German and French) which continue to surface more than 87 years after the combatants were buried beneath the surface in the incessant shelling that took place there in 1915. Some 750,000 soldiers never went home from that battle alone.

    I have walked the grounds of Normandy and Waterloo, Vimy Ridge and the WWI battlegrounds of the Vosges, stood on the Horns of Hattin where Saladin defeated the Crusaders before the Second Crusade, and guarded the line with the UN in Cyprus and in Sarajevo with the NATO-led peace stabilization force in Sarajevo. My observations of these events of the past, and the battles of the Gulf Wars and the terrorist attacks on America in recent times, is that no fortress is impregnable. I have specifically included the siege at Dien Bien Phu because of the use of paratroopers in the operation. When the embattled defenders ran short of manpower, they called on their headquarters staffs to send in reinforcements. Hundreds of rear-area staffs volunteered to go in, and most of them found themselves making their first parachute jumps as they did so.

    In our present time, there are often politically short-sighted reasons that a number of countries feel their military forces and defense networks do not need to be maintained. There is no quicker way to increase the vulnerability of your fortress, than to let your military arm be depleted to the point where it will be ineffective when you need it. Those who do so, will clearly find their homelands unsafe and insecure, and highly vulnerable to attack-and there will always be some group or other who hopes to gain power over the weak. Paratroops are only one of many links in an army’s necessary suit of chain-mail. It is the spirit, élan and professionalism of these kinds of dedicated soldiers that will ensure a successful outcome to a defense or attack. To let such people be lost to the exigencies of political expedience is to diminish the chances of survival for the nations who make such decisions.

    To understand how such men can be employed when conducting a modern siege, I would like to mention a typical exercise carried out by members of the Canadian Airborne Regiment during a training mission long before the regiment was disbanded. I would imagine that a number of similar preparations and plans were required to mount the operation for the jumps into the firestorm at Dien Bien Phu.

    Airborne Operations

    A typical airborne operation begins with the Commander’s O-group. The Hercules aircrews, the Company/Commando Commanders and all support staffs are briefed on where, when, and how the operation will take place. The objectives are defined, the drop points selected for the first group of pathfinders who will go in to mark the drop zone and a plan presented on how it will be defended etc. Men and equipment are cross-loaded. The loading is planned and mounted to ensure that not all the personnel from any

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1