Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Stop Judicial Abuse
Indipendent Inventors and Pro Corporate Federal Courts
Ebook series2 titles

Patent Reform Series

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

About this series

A patent claim filed in court is not decided under the “supreme law” of the land (Article I Section 8 of the Constitution) but under color of the huge and onerous Patent Law. Once an eminent domain case is filed in court it is not decided under the “supreme” law lof the land (5th Amendment) but under color of the huge and onerous Eminent Domain Law. Judges have been converted becoming the commissars and gauleiters of government and its agents, for taking property without compensation. Recently, in a 5 to 4 decision, the U. S. Supreme Court in Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, No. 17-647, 588 U.S. ___, 139 S. Ct. 2162 (2019) held that a government violates the Takings Clause the moment it takes property without compensation, and a property owner may assert a Fifth Amendment claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 at that time, without pursuing a state-law remedy first. The intended, or unintended, effect of the Knick decision is to replace eminent domain law by the Takings Clause (Amendment V). Who knows, constitutional principles now matter.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateJul 24, 2013
Stop Judicial Abuse
Indipendent Inventors and Pro Corporate Federal Courts

Titles in the series (2)

  • Indipendent Inventors and Pro Corporate Federal Courts

    7

    Indipendent Inventors and Pro Corporate Federal Courts
    Indipendent Inventors and Pro Corporate Federal Courts

    This book provides links for problems faced by the independent inventor in trying to litigate his claims against global corporations for patent infringement. The patent system is rigged as the pro corporate legislators write the laws and appoint the pro corporate judges, all paid for by the globals. Once in court, individual inventors get slaughtered by the patent law which, bypassing constitutional guarantees, is written to protect the global interests for free intellectual property. The independent inventor should think twice about the value of his patent in a federal court.

  • Stop Judicial Abuse

    9

    Stop Judicial Abuse
    Stop Judicial Abuse

    The treatment of individual pro per inventors shows how federal courts, federal judges and the Supreme Court operate as willful decision makers of a judicial system which institutionalizes judicial abuse. This is the story of one inventor who went to court claiming that 17 global corporations infringed his patents but found himself ensnared in the web of a corrupt judicial system for 15 years and emerged bankrupted. The lower district court held that the inventor's 2 patents were invalid without deciding the claimed patent infringement issue, the basis for a court’s jurisdiction over patent infringement claims. Appellate courts rubber stamped the lower courts and the Supreme Court denied the inventor's petitions for certiorari without giving reasons. The corrupt justice system is not only broken but institutionalized abuse of inventors who seek the guarantees of the Constitution, a fair trial. The reader of these pages will find links to judicial abusers who operate with impunity under color of law.

Author

James Constant

writes on law, government, mathematics and science, as they are and as they should be

Read more from James Constant

Related to Patent Reform

Related ebooks

Law For You

View More

Related categories

Reviews for Patent Reform

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words