A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes: The seminal text on rocket science that foretold the Space Age
()
About this ebook
The seminal text on rocket science that foretold the Space Age
“Every vision is a joke until the first man accomplishes it; once realized, it becomes commonplace.” wrote Robert H. Goddard in 1920 after a particularly harsh editorial in The New York Times made fun of his most recent efforts. He had spent the last few years building and launching rockets at the physics lab at Clark University where he taught and did research. By experiment, Goddard knew their efficiency could be greatly improved, and that rockets would work well in a vacuum – something many of his colleagues were not convinced of, and certainly not jeering members of the press.
Already holding several patents on rocket technology, Goddard was urged by the Smithsonian Institution to also publish the theoretical framework underpinning the ideas and experiments carried out. In response, based on a report submitted a few years earlier, he laid out his groundbreaking work in the rather brief “A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes”. Although negative reactions such as The Times’ were in the majority when Goddard made national news following the publication, it planted a grand milestone on the just-discovered path that would eventually lead to the Space Age.
The NYT editors must surely have had Goddard’s chapter about raising mass to “infinite” altitude — in other words have it escape Earth’s gravitation — in mind when on the day after the launch of Apollo 11 in 1969 they issued an apology: “Further investigation and experimentation have confirmed the findings of Isaac Newton in the 17th Century and it is now definitely established that a rocket can function in a vacuum as well as in an atmosphere. The Times regrets the error.”
So, forty-nine years after “A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes” saw the light of day, doubt had dispersed. Engineers doing rocket work universally acknowledged Goddard to a degree that over time would earn him a legacy as the father of modern rocketry.
Related to A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes
Related ebooks
The Science and Design of the Hybrid Rocket Engine Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Introduction to Space Dynamics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mathematical Theory Of Rocket Flight Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDynamics of Atmospheric Flight Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Theoretical Aerodynamics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Aerodynamics of the Airplane Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRocket Propellant Technology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRockets: Two Classic Papers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Facing the Heat Barrier: A History of Hypersonics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHeat Transfer in Aerospace Applications Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Progress in Aeronautical Sciences: Volume 3 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Introduction to Hypersonic Flow Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStudy Guide for Physics in the Modern World 2E Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLiquid Rocket and Propellants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManned Spacecraft Design Principles Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntroduction to Rocket Technology Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Dynamics and Simulation of Flexible Rockets Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThermal Design Principles of Spacecraft and Entry Bodies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTypes of Rocket Propulsion and Potential Space Drives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEngineering Analysis of Flight Vehicles Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Plasma Propulsion: Can SpaceX use Advanced Plasma Propulsion for Starship? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPulse Detonation Engine: How Shall We Travel from London to New York in 45 Minutes Instead of 8 Hours? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNanomaterials in Rocket Propulsion Systems Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ballistic Missile and Space Electronics Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Rocket Science: From Fireworks to the Photon Drive Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElectric Propulsion Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFaster Than Light: Warp Drive and Quantum Vacuum Power Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Space Power Systems Engineering Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOrbital Mechanics: For Engineering Students Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Rocket Propellants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Mechanical Engineering For You
The CIA Lockpicking Manual Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Walk on Water and Climb up Walls: Animal Movement and the Robots of the Future Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Basic Engineering Mechanics Explained, Volume 1: Principles and Static Forces Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Basic Machines and How They Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Albert Einstein's Theory Of Relativity Explained Simply Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Repair Briggs and Stratton Engines, 4th Ed. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMechanical Engineering Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Small Gas Engine Repair, Fourth Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPractical Electronics Handbook Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Making Things Move DIY Mechanisms for Inventors, Hobbyists, and Artists Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEinstein's Fridge: How the Difference Between Hot and Cold Explains the Universe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Airplane Flying Handbook: FAA-H-8083-3C (2024) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Machining for Hobbyists: Getting Started Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Orbital Mechanics: For Engineering Students Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Operational Amplifier Circuits: Analysis and Design Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5EPA 608 Study Guide: HVAC, #1 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Robotics, Mechatronics, and Artificial Intelligence: Experimental Circuit Blocks for Designers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Principles of Engineering Mechanics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Welding: Featuring Ryan Friedlinghaus of West Coast Customs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreeCAD Basics Tutorial Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge (2024): FAA-H-8083-25C Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsZinn & the Art of Mountain Bike Maintenance: The World's Best-Selling Guide to Mountain Bike Repair Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMechanical Engineer's Handbook Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Science of Everyday Life: An Entertaining and Enlightening Examination of Everything We Do and Everything We See Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsModern Gear Production Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tides: The Science and Spirit of the Ocean Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Machinery's Handbook Guide: A Guide to Tables, Formulas, & More in the 31st Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related categories
Reviews for A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
A Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes - Robert H. Goddard
A Method of Reaching
Extreme Altitudes
(With 10 Plates)
by
Robert H. Goddard
Clark College, Worcester, Mass.
Originally published by the
Smithsonian Institution, 1919
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
Volume 71, Number 2
(Publication 2540)
City of Washington
Digital Edition by Sibyl Publishing, 2017
Edited by Markus Amalthea Magnuson
ISBN: 978-91-88547-01-9
Sibyl Publishing is not affiliated in any way
with the Smithsonian Institution.
Editor’s notes on the 2017 Digital Edition
Preparing and publishing a century-old text that is a classic in its field has to strike a balance between truth to the original and readability according to current best practices. In very few cases have significant changes been made to the language itself, but some writing conventions are altered, as well as certain aspects of the typography, as compared to the 1919 edition published by the Smithsonian Institution. To never distort the author’s intentions, such adjustments have been checked against the 1916 typescript, including its handwritten notes and equations. When the typescript was prepared, its figures were renumbered, but a few instances were missed and made its way into print; these are now corrected. A summary of other changes that might be noticed is as follows:
All units are abbreviated and written as outlined by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in their Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) (NIST Special Publication 811, 2008 Edition), including non-SI units in the manner they are referred to in the same publication. For example, feet per second as Goddard would have written ft./sec.
is changed to ft/s
. In general, the old convention of having a period after such abbreviations, even mid-sentence, has been disregarded for the sake of readability.
These are all symbols used in the present edition of the text:
cal/g = calories per gram
cm = centimeter
dm = decimeter
ft = feet
ft/s = feet per second
g = gram
kg = kilogram
km/s = kilometers per second
lb = pound
mi = mile
mi/s = miles per second
min = minute
mm = millimeter
oz = ounce
s = second
T = ton (note this is short ton, not metric ton, which would rather be t)
An exception is made for inch
that instead of being abbreviated in
is most of the time written out to avoid confusion with the regular and common English word.
Mathematical expressions have sometimes been simplified to linear form, if possible without losing clarity, to lessen the effect on line height and other formatting. For example, some fractions are written in special form (e.g., ½) or piece/solidus form (e.g., 1/2) instead of built-up form.
All variables are in italics as you would expect from a modern text, that seems to have been Goddard’s intention when underlining them in the typescript, but somehow got lost when typeset.
Bibliographic references in the endnotes have been expanded into Chicago style citations including article name, more specific page numbers, full author names, and so on, and in cases where the referenced source is readily available on the Internet, the name of the article is hyperlinked to such an online resource.
Last, a short comment on geocoronium.
This was the name coined by Alfred Wegener in 1911 for a hypothetical chemical element, with an atomic weight of 0.4, which he believed the upper atmospheric layer to mostly consist of. By inferring its properties, this light gas was supposed to explain certain unidentified lines found in the spectrum of the aurora borealis, but these were later shown to be part of the oxygen spectrum, and the geocoronium theory was laid to rest.
Preface
The theoretical work herein presented was developed while the writer was at Princeton University in 1912–13, the basis of the calculations being the assumption that, if nitrocellulose smokeless powder were employed as propellant in a rocket, under such conditions as are here explained, an efficiency of 50 % might be expected.
Actual experimental investigations were not undertaken until 1915–16, at which time the tests concerning ordinary rockets, steel chambers and nozzles, and trials in vacuo, were performed at Clark University. The original calculations were then repeated, using the data from these experiments, and both the theoretical and experimental results were submitted, in manuscript, to the Smithsonian Institution, in December 1916. This manuscript is here presented in the original form, save for the notes at the end that are now added.
A grant of $5 000 from the Hodgkins Fund, Smithsonian Institution, under which work is being done at presented, was advanced toward the development of a reloading, or multiple-charge rocket, herein explained in principle, and this work was begun at Worcester Polytechnic Institute in 1917, and was later undertaken as a war proposition It was continued, from June 1918, up to very nearly the time of signing of the armistice, at the Mt. Wilson Observatory of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, where most of the experimental results were obtained.
In connection with the present publication, I take pleasure in thanking Dr. A. G. Webster for the facilities of the shop and laboratory at Clark University, used in the preliminary experiments herein described. I also take this opportunity of expressing my gratitude to the Smithsonian Institution, for its support and encouragement in the later work.
Robert H. Goddard
Clark College,
Worcester, Massachusetts,
May 26, 1919.
Outline
A search for methods of raising recording apparatus beyond the range for sounding balloons (about 20 mi) lead the writer to develop a theory of rocket action, in general, taking into account air resistance and gravity. The problem was to determine the minimum initial mass of an ideal rocket necessary, in order that on continuous loss of mass, a final mass of one pound would remain, at any desired altitude.
An approximate method was found necessary, in solving this problem, in order to avoid an unsolved problem in the Calculus of Variations. The solution that was obtained revealed the fact that surprisingly small initial masses would be necessary (table VII) provided the gases were ejected from the rocket at a high velocity, and also provided that most of the rocket consisted of propellant material. The reason for this is, very briefly, that the velocity enters exponentially in the expression for the initial mass. Thus if the velocity of the ejected gases be increased five fold, for example, the initial mass necessary to reach a given height will be reduced to the fifth root of that required for the lesser velocity. (A simple calculation shows at once the effectiveness of a rocket apparatus of high efficiency.)
It was obviously desirable to perform certain experiments: first with the object of finding just how inefficient an ordinary rocket is, and secondly, to determine to what extent the efficiency could be increased in a rocket of new design. The term efficiency here means the ratio of the kinetic energy of the expelled gases to the heat energy of the powder, the kinetic energy being calculated from the average velocity of ejection, which was obtained indirectly by observations on the recoil of the rocket.
It was found that not only does the powder in an ordinary rocket constitute