Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Unavailable
    The Grasping Hand: "Kelo v. City of New London" and the Limits of Eminent Domain
    Unavailable
    The Grasping Hand: "Kelo v. City of New London" and the Limits of Eminent Domain
    Unavailable
    The Grasping Hand: "Kelo v. City of New London" and the Limits of Eminent Domain
    Ebook589 pages12 hours

    The Grasping Hand: "Kelo v. City of New London" and the Limits of Eminent Domain

    By Ilya Somin

    ()

    Currently unavailable

    Currently unavailable

    About this ebook

    In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that the city of New London, Connecticut, could condemn fifteen residential properties in order to transfer them to a new private owner. Although the Fifth Amendment only permits the taking of private property for “public use,” the Court ruled that the transfer of condemned land to private parties for “economic development” is permitted by the Constitution—even if the government cannot prove that the expected development will ever actually happen. The Court’s decision in Kelo v. City of New London empowered the grasping hand of the state at the expense of the invisible hand of the market.
               
    In this detailed study of one of the most controversial Supreme Court cases in modern times, Ilya Somin argues that Kelo was a grave error. Economic development and “blight” condemnations are unconstitutional under both originalist and most “living constitution” theories of legal interpretation. They also victimize the poor and the politically weak for the benefit of powerful interest groups and often destroy more economic value than they create. Kelo itself exemplifies these patterns. The residents targeted for condemnation lacked the influence needed to combat the formidable government and corporate interests arrayed against them.  Moreover, the city’s poorly conceived development plan ultimately failed: the condemned land lies empty to this day, occupied only by feral cats. The Supreme Court’s unpopular ruling triggered an unprecedented political reaction, with forty-five states passing new laws intended to limit the use of eminent domain. But many of the new laws impose few or no genuine constraints on takings. The Kelo backlash led to significant progress, but not nearly as much as it may have seemed.

    Despite its outcome, the closely divided 5-4 ruling shattered what many believed to be a consensus that virtually any condemnation qualifies as a public use under the Fifth Amendment. It also showed that there is widespread public opposition to eminent domain abuse. With controversy over takings sure to continue, The Grasping Hand offers the first book-length analysis of Kelo by a legal scholar, alongside a broader history of the dispute over public use and eminent domain and an evaluation of options for reform.
     
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
    Release dateNov 29, 2016
    ISBN9780226456829
    Unavailable
    The Grasping Hand: "Kelo v. City of New London" and the Limits of Eminent Domain

    Read more from Ilya Somin

    Related to The Grasping Hand

    Related ebooks

    Law For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      The Parties Understand and Agree That by Entering Into This Agreement They Are Each Relinquishing and Waiving Their Right Under Applicable Law to Have Any Claim Decided in a Court of Law Before a Judge and/or Jury.

      Nov 27, 2017

      I. SISTER IRENE MORISSETTE ALWAYS LOCKED HER DOOR AT night. Maybe it was force of habit from her decades teaching at an isolated missionary school in Africa, or maybe it was, as she told a police detective later, just that she didn’t want “anyone co

      11 min read

    • Article

      Texas Prosecutor Drops All Charges In 2015 Biker Shootout That Killed 9

      Apr 3, 2019

      The McLennan County district attorney said he aims to "end this nightmare that we have been dealing with in this county." Prosecutors were not able to win any convictions after indicting 155 bikers.

      3 min read

    • Article

      Reimagining Legal Education

      Jun 27, 2019

      Reimagining Legal Education
      3 min read

    • Article

      Data Scraping Is Not A Crime

      May 20, 2022

      SOUTH CAROLINA HAS the highest eviction rate in the country, and the state chapter of the NAACP wanted to find out why. Given the difficulty of tracking down every case by hand, the organization hoped to use a software program called a “scraper” to c

      2 min read

    • Article

      Unlikely Pair

      Sep 29, 2020

      Unlikely Pair
      4 min read

    • Article

      Drivers Successfully Challenge Debt-based License Suspensions

      Apr 22, 2022

      LIKE MANY STATES, North Carolina punishes drivers with unpaid fines and fees by suspending their licenses. But as a result of a successful legal challenge to that policy, roughly 185,000 North Carolina residents may be eligible to have their driver’s

      1 min read

    • Article

      Ten Years For Two Joints

      Dec 7, 2021

      Ten Years For Two Joints
      9 min read

    • Article

      Secret Surveillance Warrants Remain Secret

      Jan 21, 2022

      FOR NEARLY A decade, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has been trying to lift some of the secrecy cloaking the operations of the federal court that oversees foreign intelligence warrants. But in November, the Supreme Court declined to consid

      1 min read

    • Article

      Data Is The Best Advocate

      Dec 6, 2022

      DATA, DEFINED BY MERRIAM-WEBSTER AS “FACTUAL INFORMATION USED as a basis for reasoning, discussion, or calculation,” allows for proposals and decisions to be better informed, more equitable, and more likely to protect the rights of both consumers and

      4 min read

    • Article

      Supreme Court Lets Stand Ruling That Protects Homeless Who Sleep On Sidewalk

      Dec 16, 2019

      WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court refused Monday to hear a major case on homeless, letting stand a ruling that protects their right to sleep on the sidewalk or in public parks if no other shelter is available. The justices without comment or a dissent s

      3 min read

    • Article

      Legally Beautiful

      Nov 9, 2020

      Legally Beautiful
      2 min read

    • Article

      The Shame Deficit

      Apr 19, 2022

      The Shame Deficit
      5 min read

    Reviews for The Grasping Hand

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words