Trova il tuo prossimo book preferito

Abbonati oggi e leggi gratis per 30 giorniInizia la tua prova gratuita di 30 giorni

Informazioni sul libro

Secret Sauce: The Founders' Original Recipe for Limited American Democracy

Name: Secret Sauce: The Founders' Original Recipe for Limited American Democracy
Brand: Bob Zadek
Price: 9.99 USD
Availability: InStock
ISBN: 9781546752950

Di Bob Zadek

Azioni libro

Inizia a leggere

Lunghezza: 171 pagine2 ore

Editore:: Bob Zadek
Pubblicato:: Jun 23, 2017
ISBN:: 9781546752950
Formato:: Libro

Descrizione

No single person could write a definitive account of America's founding period, much less apply its lessons to the present political situation in a coherent way. However, when seven top scholars are interviewed on their respective specialties in the legal, political and economic history of the United States, the result is a simple and zesty recipe for renewed American democracy. The Bob Zadek Show is California's longest running libertarian talk show, and has featured discussions with hundreds of thinkers on the ideas underpinning a free society. *Secret Sauce: The Founders' Original Recipe for Limited American Democracy* features edited, condensed transcripts of the best of the best of Bob's interviews. Read about the squabbles and compromises that almost tanked the early Republic, and learn how we can restore the original safeguards against all-powerful Federal Government.

Everyone feels that the great American experiment in democracy has turned sour, but no one can pinpoint the source of our ills. Trump supporters with "Make America Great Again" hats demonize the free trade and liberal immigration policies that have been at the bedrock of America's greatness for more than two centuries, while "the Resistance" marches for expansions of Federal power that would make the Founders' heads spin.

If the cognitive dissonance hasn't gotten to you yet, try spending more time reading the comments on your friends' political Facebook posts. We are a nation divided, in search of a shared story that unites our country's complex, imperfect origins with our continued aspirations for "a more perfect union." In the popular mythology, one sacrosanct idea stands hallowed above all others – democracy. What gets lost in this narrative are the Founders' deep divisions and wariness of pure democracy. Hence their decision to form a constitutional republic, with multiple checks and balances on all kinds of tyranny. *Secret Sauce* shows how democracy can prevent the accumulation of power in the hands of few, or enable it. Yes, Virginia, there is such a thing as too much democracy... Find out what this means for America in 2017 and beyond.

Featuring:
• Donald J. Boudreaux of Cafe Hayek
• Thomas Fleming, author of over 50 fiction and non-fiction history titles
• William Maurer & Clark Neily III of the Institute for Justice
• Alex Nowrasteh of the Cato Institute
• Ilya Somin & Todd Zywicki of George Mason University's economics department and law school

Leggi altro

Azioni libro

Inizia a leggere

Informazioni sul libro

Secret Sauce: The Founders' Original Recipe for Limited American Democracy

Di Bob Zadek

Lunghezza: 171 pagine2 ore

Descrizione

Leggi altro

Editore:: Bob Zadek
Pubblicato:: Jun 23, 2017
ISBN:: 9781546752950
Formato:: Libro

Informazioni sull'autore

Bob Zadek

Bob Zadek is the host of The Bob Zadek Show, a Libertarian talk show broadcast live on 860 AM, KTRB – The Answer – every Sunday at 8am. Bob talks about the issues that affect our lives on a daily basis from a purely Libertarian standpoint. He believes in small government, less taxes and greater personal freedom. Bob was inspired to become politically active after watching an interview with Joseph Ellis, an historian who had just written “Passionate Sage: An Account of John Adams’ Retirement Years.” Adams achieved so much during his career, serving two terms as a Vice President, one term as President and playing a leading role in the adoption of the Declaration of Independence. Bob idealizes Adams for the work he continued to do for the revolution until his retirement. While watching the Ellis interview, Bob discovered his love for American ideals. He feels passion for the freedoms created in the Constitution and The Bill of Rights; what he refers to as “The Original America.” He believes that our system of government must recognize the successes of the past in order to live up to the dreams and ideals of the founding fathers. To borrow a phrase from law professor and Constitutional scholar Randy Barnett, Bob supports “Restoring the Lost Constitution.” It was not just Revolutionary history that influenced Bob’s personal philosophy. Ayn Rand’s epic novel “Atlas Shrugged” describes a frightening scenario in which all business has been nationalized, and its capitalistic saviors are oppressed. That is a bit too close to home in 21st century America for Bob’s comfort. Bob believes that America has lost its way. The country’s first principles are economic and social freedom, republicanism, the rule of law, and liberty. Our founders were correct about their approach to government as were John Locke, Adam Smith and the other great political philosophers who influenced them. America cannot and does not need to be reinvented. Bob believes we must take the best of our founding principles and work from them because a country without principles is just a land mass. Bob has been practicing finance law for 50 years, is listed in “The Best Lawyers In America” and has been awarded the highest rating for Ethical Standards and Legal Ability by Peer Reviewed Martindale Hubbell. He holds a law degree and a Master’s degree in Law from NYU School of Law and is a Charter Fellow in the American College of Commercial Finance Lawyers, Past President of the Association of Commercial Finance Attorneys, Past Chair of the 1,500 member Commercial Finance Committee of the Business Law Section of the American Bar Association, and Past Chair of the California State Bar UCC Committee. Bob has been retained as an expert witness in more than 25 cases dealing with finance law. As an entrepreneur, he created and now manages Lenders Funding LLC, which makes and participates in loans to small business. Bob’s favorite quote is from John Locke: “The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom. For in all the states of created beings capable of law, where there is no law, there is no freedom”. Bob’s passions are American history, entrepreneurism, Libertarianism and his number one fan and significant other Anne.

Autori correlati

Skip carousel

carousel previous carousel next

Correlati a Secret Sauce

Categorie correlate

Anteprima del libro

Secret Sauce - Bob Zadek

assistance.

INTRODUCTION

WE ARE ALL LIBERTARIANS

In my time on the radio, I’ve interviewed hundreds of guests on topics ranging from educational choice to foreign wars; from the Federalist Papers to food freedom. This book features transcripts of some of my most memorable conversations.

I began hosting The Bob Zadek Show to explore what I believe to be the core principles – shared by almost all Americans – that made America great. The show’s motto is ideas, not attitude. The ideas from my guests in each chapter have been neglected by the majority of pundits, although they contain answers to the most pressing problems facing America today. Ideas have always been the secret sauce of the American experiment in republican democracy. Our founders risked their lives and their sacred fortunes for the idea of self-determination, yet they were also aware of the dangers and deficiencies of this ancient idea. As you will learn in the pages that follow, our government is based on numerous other ideas intended to preserve personal liberty. Democracy was always meant to be a means to secure the end of freedom – never as an end in itself. This was the founders’ understanding of democracy, and it is shared by today’s libertarians.

When I was living in New York, there was a blackout in the late 1970s. The entire city went dark, and for years afterward New Yorkers were asking each other, Where were you when the blackout occurred? Then I moved to San Francisco, and the Loma Prieta earthquake hit. Where were you when the earthquake happened, was the topic of conversation for many years.

I remember where I was and what I was doing when I became a libertarian. I was 16 years old, a social loser (never had a date, except in my mind), and was totally intimidated by girls. I had read a bit of Jack Kerouac, but didn’t understand it – it was just something remote to me. However, I was yearning for adventure. I was living in Queens, and I announced to my parents one day that I was going to go to this exotic place – Fire Island, off the south shore of Long Island. I told my mother, I’m off. I’m going to go to Fire Island for the weekend. My plan was to take the ferry across with a couple of dollars in my pocket, and to sleep on the beach with this blanket that I brought slung over my shoulder like a hobo. My mother forbade it, and I said, Why?

She said, Because I’m your mother.

It made no sense to me. Wait a minute, I said, "The fact that you’re my mother is irrelevant. I want to go to Fire Island. Either convince me on the merits that I shouldn’t go, or else I’m going. We fought about it a bit and she didn’t convince me on the merits. It seemed an arbitrary infringement of my freedom (although, I never would have used those words when I was 16, and certainly not when thinking about my mother, who was arbitrary in any event). I remember telling her on our front porch, You tell me bad things are going to happen – it’s much better for me if I experience those bad things myself and learn on my own that you were right, rather than blindly follow your advice."

Off I went to Fire Island. I had the most absurdly boring and lonesome weekend imaginable. I slept on the front porch of somebody’s house. It was cold and uncomfortable. I did not sleep on the beach as I imagined. Despite the dearth of thrills, I came back flush with this feeling of freedom. Bad things did not happen to me despite not obeying my mother.

My mother didn’t get it. She was hardly a libertarian – she was a just a strict mother (not quite a despot, but close enough in my world). I think that was the day that I became a libertarian in a rebellious 16-year-old way. I certainly wasn’t focusing on free markets and limited government. I was focusing on limited Mom, but the principles were the same.

Where were you when you first became a libertarian, and what does it all mean to you in today’s economic and political environment?

Back in 2010, the Republicans published a document with great fanfare, called the Pledge to America, stating: We pledge to honor the Constitution as constructed by the framers. Republicans talk about honoring the original intent. Those are red-meat words for conservatives (which I am not) and Republicans. Whose original intent are we talking about? Republicans would say, The original intent of the framers. I say, hmm … let’s see. Thomas Jefferson was a framer, sure. Alexander Hamilton was a card-carrying framer. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton agreed on nothing – nothing – when it comes to the Constitution. Therefore, what does the original intent of the framers mean if we are talking about the original intent of Alexander Hamilton? George W. Bush and President Obama were probably following the original intent of Alexander Hamilton, who favored a very strong and powerful central government, but not of Thomas Jefferson.

The words original intent of the framers are a hollow, empty, shallow political phrase with no substance. When we talk about the intent of the founders, which founders are we talking about? If you say, No, the original intent of James Madison, he wrote the Constitution – or at least the first draft. Let’s take his original intent. Well, James Madison was furious at the final product, which we call the Constitution. He was grossly disappointed in many ways as to how it came out, because the Constitution was a political document. It was a profound compromise that was made in order to get the country created, which was the goal of every founder, even if they couldn’t agree on the principles. There were parts of it that Madison hated and that did not represent his worldview, although he vehemently supported and lobbied extensively for the enactment of the Constitution through The Federalist Papers.

It gets even more complicated. James Madison had strongly held beliefs about how powerful the executive branch should be, and he changed his mind three times on this crucial issue between 1790 and 1800. If he couldn’t even agree with himself over a ten-year period, then which original intent and which founder are we talking about?

Here’s my point: We are reliving today, in an exciting way, the same fight the founders had in secrecy from May to September of 1787. The founders had a set of principles, and they were struggling to draft a constitution which embodied those principles. They created a country, which has worked vigorously and will continue to work. The country is stable and will survive. The Constitution works.

However, the principles on which the Constitution is based have less and less to do with the Constitution itself, as interpreted by the courts. Therefore, if you care, you should not vote according to this empty fealty to the framers’ original intent, but rather the principles that drove the framers, which are clearly libertarian principles. The test of whether any political party gets it right is not how they see or interpret the Constitution, but how true or untrue they are to libertarian principles.

If the Republicans want to win over the hearts and minds of libertarians, who make up roughly a quarter of the electorate, they must honor libertarian principles. Taking an oath to the Constitution as originally intended is an empty oath, which tells us nothing about what they believe. We have to examine their loyalty to libertarian principles.

What are libertarian principles? They’re very simple and I think everybody out there within the sound of my voice (as they say in radio) subscribes generally to libertarian principles. They can be ticked off in a few moments.

Individual rights: Libertarians believe that the smallest unit in government is an individual – not a group. Therefore, laws are tested insofar as they affect individuals, not groups. The dignity of every individual matters. No group identification. No disabled, blacks, Hispanics, poor, rich, middle-class, male or female. American is the only classification, and we are all individuals. Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence, Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. He changed the word property, which was a Lockean concept, to pursuit of happiness. He wanted to include virtue and other strongly held principles. Furthermore, we have the rights of life, liberty, and property because we are human beings. They are not rights granted to us by the government. The government doesn’t give us rights. No way! We give the government rights. Individual rights is a core principle of libertarian beliefs. In short, rights preceded government.

Rule of law: Laws are created only to protect person and property, i.e., to protect our individual rights. That’s the only legitimate purpose of government. Laws aren’t created to transfer wealth from one person to another. They are created to protect our inherent rights as human beings and that is the only purpose of laws.

Limited government: Libertarians abhor power. We all know the Lord Acton quote, Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. We fear any accumulation of power, which is why the framers drafted a Constitution with checks and balances: to limit the power of government and of each of its branches, and to divide power between the states and the Federal Government.

Finally, the principle of free markets.

Who out there doesn’t believe in those principles? In trying to heal the wounds between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists in his first inaugural address, Thomas Jefferson said, We are all Federalists. We are all Anti-Federalists. I close this segment by saying, We are all libertarians.

My full archive of shows is available at BobZadek.com/subscribe. Every week I interview a really smart guest. Hear my show streaming live or on the radio every Sunday morning. Check your listings at BobZadek.com/listen-live.

1 – WAS THE RATIFICATION OF THE CONSTITUTION A MISTAKE?

Guest: Thomas Fleming

Interview Date: October 21, 2012

Bob Zadek: In my time on the radio, I have sometimes spoken with unconditional praise for the Constitution and its drafters – specifically James Madison. I have bemoaned Supreme Court decisions and efforts by Congress to alter what I perceive to be the original intent of the Constitution.

However, after I started reading about the ratification process – the four and half months in Philadelphia beginning in September 1787, after the founders had drafted a constitution with important compromises – I became curious. The framers created a process in which each colony was invited to form a convention to review the Constitution, discuss it, and decide whether to ratify it. The drafters concluded that once the Constitution was ratified by nine colonies, then at least there would be a country with those nine colonies, plus any other colonies who chose to ratify afterwards. Ultimately, 12 of the 13 colonies ratified, and all 13 ultimately became states. Thus, we have the United States.

Specifically, I started to read the arguments of the patriots who opposed ratification – the Anti-Federalists. Here were some pretty smart men: George Mason, Edmund Randolph, Robert Yates in New York, George Clinton, DeWitt Clinton, Patrick Henry, and many others. They were as patriotic as those who supported ratification of the Constitution. In reading the arguments and predictions of the Anti-Federalists, I said to myself, Oh, my God – the Anti-Federalists were right! What they feared would happen after ratification, did, in fact, happen.

That called into question much of what I had believed, and I found myself confused. To straighten myself out, and to share the history of ratification with you, I sought refuge with America’s (in my opinion) greatest living historian. Thomas Fleming has been on my show before, and I’m happy to welcome him again. Tom has written close to 60 books on the American Revolution, the Civil War, Harry Truman and others. Each one of his books is a must read. When I committed myself to learning all that I could about the American Revolution and American history, I started to accumulate documentaries dealing with the period of our country’s founding. So often, Tom was right there on the screen. He didn’t know it, but Tom was my private tutor for years.

I’m happy to have Tom on the show to discuss the process of ratification of the Constitution and specifically, how the Anti-Federalists could have been so right on so many points. It was hardly the pure process that one would imagine; it was intensely political, with a lot of nasty business going on as well. Perhaps the ends justified the means, but you will decide.

The Meeting at Mt. Vernon: A Prelude to the Constitution

BZ: Tom, thanks so much for joining me on the show. I hope we will discover before we end the show some lessons about political life today that can be derived from the intensely political period starting roughly

Hai raggiunto la fine di questa anteprima. Registrati per continuare a leggere!

Inizia il periodo di prova gratuito

Pagina 1 di 1

Recensioni

Cosa pensano gli utenti di Secret Sauce

Valutazione: 0 stelle su 5

0 valutazioni / 0 recensioni

Cosa ne pensi?

Valutazione: stelle su 5

Scrivi una recensione (facoltativo)

Lingua

Benvenuto in Scribd!

Trova il tuo prossimo book preferito

Informazioni sul libro

Secret Sauce: The Founders' Original Recipe for Limited American Democracy

Azioni libro

Descrizione

Azioni libro

Informazioni sul libro

Secret Sauce: The Founders' Original Recipe for Limited American Democracy

Descrizione

Informazioni sull'autore

Autori correlati

Correlati a Secret Sauce

Government by referendum

Summary: Spanking the Donkey: Review and Analysis of Matt Taibbi's Book

America's Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy - Expanded Edition

Democracy Unchained: How to Rebuild Government for the People

The Responsibilities of Democracy

The Liberty Intrigue

Inspiring Democracy: New Forms of Public Participation

"Taking Back America"

The Courage of Our Convictions: A Manifesto for Democrats

Democratic Rules of Order: Easy-to-Use Rules for Meetings of Any Size

Billionaires and Stealth Politics

Democratic Political Theory

Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America

Democracy in America?: What Has Gone Wrong and What We Can Do About It

Contested Democracy: Freedom, Race, and Power in American History

Popular Democracy

Such Little Accident: British Democracy and Its Enemies

School and democracy

The Rise of the American Corporate Security State: Six Reasons to Be Afraid

Hybrid Democracy Works Better: From Adversarial Democracy To Collegial Democracy

The Beltway Beast: Stealing from Future Generations and Destroying the Middle Class: Abridged Version

Time To Show Up: Poets For Democracy

In Search of Hippocrates: A Solution to the Health Care Crisis Facing America

America Abandoned: The Secret Velvet Coup That Cost Us Our Democracy

Democracy on the Edge: A Discussion of Political Issues in America

Boogeyman, A Great American Witch Hunt

Epic of Being George Washington: And Declaration of America’S Independence over High Taxes, Usurpations of Power, and No Economic Growth

Democracy in America, Book II

The Wee Blue Book

Greenways (Green Island Book I)

Nico Slate, "Lord Cornwallis is Dead: The Struggle for Democracy in the United States and India" (Harvard UP, 2019): Slate paints a picture of the two countries as learning perpetually from each other...

Yascha Mounk: Is Trump’s incompetence saving us from his illiberalism?

This isn’t Joe Kennedy’s grandfather’s Democratic Party, and he knows it

Peter Macfadyen on Democracy, Community and Local Government - E25: Rewriting the rules for local politics

Saqib Iqbal Qureshi, "The Broken Contract: Making Our Democracies Accountable, Representative, and Less Wasteful" (Lioncrest, 2020): Can we make democracy work? Really work?

Swipe Right For Democracy: Today we travel to a future where America has converted to a direct democracy. Everybody votes on everything! - Hey, did you know it was an election year in the United States? I know, you've probably not really heard about this,

Jason Stanley - Is the United States a ‘Racial Democracy?: This week, Point of Inquiry welcomes Jason Stanley, professor of philosophy at Yale and co-author of a provocative essay in last week’s New York Times entitled Is the United States a ‘Racial Democracy? Dr. Stanley and his...

Podcasting for Democracy: Civics 101: “If you don't understand the system you're in, you can't change it.”

Jay Sexton, "A Nation Forged by Crisis: A New American History" (Basic Books, 2018): A popular myth in the American nationalist imaginary is that the country has been on a continued path of progress...

March 24, 2011 Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN: "Newtonian Politics: Def. Lies Drop Down to People from Lofty Steeple" *Title/Poem and Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - March 24, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)

A User’s Guide to Mail-In Voting

#1152 Rise of the oligarchy (Money in Politics): Air Date: 12/15/2017 Today we look at the history and current state of rich people seeking to undermine democratic rule by the people in favor of oligarchy for the rich Be part of the show! Leave a message at 202-999-3991 Support our Winter...

How the Health Reform Law Reduces the Deficit, Part 1: Paul Van de Water, a Senior Fellow at the Center, discusses how the health reform law saves money for the federal government.

Black Agenda Radio - 08.13.18: Welcome to the radio magazine that brings you news, commentary and analysis from a Black Left perspective. I’m Glen Ford, along with my co-host Nellie Bailey. Coming up: The Black economic condition has dramatically worsened in the 21st Century, with med...

Black Agenda Radio - 04.13.20: Welcome to the radio magazine that brings you news, commentary and analysis from a Black Left perspective. I’m Margaret Kimberley, along with my co-host Glen Ford. Coming up: The coronavirus had caused people in authority to take measures they’ve never ...

Scott Warren: “Our democracy can be something that's vibrant; something that's living and breathing.”

Feb. 29, 2008 Alan Watt on The Jeff Rense Program

A User’s Guide to Mail-In Voting

Letters: Bari Weiss vs. the 'Outrage Mobs'

Scientists Step Up to Defend Democracy

Democracies Try To Boost Public Service

Take It From A Historian. We Don't Owe Anything To Confederate Monuments | Timothy Snyder

Land Of The Free (Market): The Oxymoron Of American Democracy

George W. Bush Slams 'Bigotry,' Politics Of Populism That Led To Trump, Sanders

Democracies Try To Boost Public Service

Readers Write: India’s Growth, Education And Democracy, And Fashion Choices

Lessons From Isaac Asimov's Multivac

Is American Democracy Really Under Threat?

POWER & THE PEOPLE

The Return to Great-Power Rivalry Was Inevitable

Larry Diamond

This Is How Democracy Dies

Trust Is Collapsing in America

Obama DNC Speech: Full Transcript As Former President Says Joe Biden Will ‘Save Democracy’

Is Humor the Best Antidote to Tyranny?

National Unity During Crisis? Look To Lessons From WWII.