Intimations Pursued: The Voice of Practice in the Conversation of Michael Oakeshott
()
About this ebook
Read more from Andrew Sullivan
The Conservative Soul: How We Lost It; How to Get It Back Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGrassfires: Fuel, Weather and Fire Behaviour Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5VMware vSphere PowerCLI Reference: Automating vSphere Administration Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Intimations Pursued
Related ebooks
Michael Oakeshott, the Ancient Greeks, and the Philosophical Study of Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEarly Political Writings 1925–30 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Liberty and Its Enemies: Essays of Kenneth Minogue Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Limits of Political Theory: Oakeshott's Philosophy of Civil Association Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Companion to Michael Oakeshott Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Oakeshott on History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat Is History?: and Other Essays Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Michael Oakeshott on Hobbes: A Study in the Renewal of Philosophical Ideas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Meanings of Michael Oakeshott's Conservatism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Decadent Society: How We Became a Victim of Our Own Success by Ross Douthat: Conversation Starters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Democratic Theory of Michael Oakeshott: Discourse, Contingency, and 'The Politics of Conversation' Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Legendary Past: Michael Oakeshott on Imagination and Political Identity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTocqueville in Arabia: The Anxieties of the Democratic Age Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBuckley vs. Vidal: The Historic 1968 ABC News Debates Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Santayana Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Place of Michael Oakeshott in Contemporary Western and Non-Western Thought Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Methods of Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat's Wrong With The World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Bryan Caplan's Don't Be a Feminist Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Essential Russell Kirk: Selected Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Statesman as Thinker: Portraits of Greatness, Courage, and Moderation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommon Sense Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComing Home: Reclaiming America's Conservative Soul Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEdmund Burke for Our Time: Moral Imagination, Meaning, and Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy I Turned Right: Leading Baby Boom Conservatives Chronicle Their Political Journeys Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Florida Atlantic University Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTomáš G. Masaryk a Scholar and a Statesman. The Philosophical Background of His Political Views Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnhitched: The Trial of Christopher Hitchens Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Woven Figure: Conservatism and America's Fabric Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Philosophy For You
A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bhagavad Gita (in English): The Authentic English Translation for Accurate and Unbiased Understanding Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Little Book of Stoicism: Timeless Wisdom to Gain Resilience, Confidence, and Calmness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The School of Life: An Emotional Education: An Emotional Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Be Here Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Be Perfect: The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lessons of History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mindfulness in Plain English: 20th Anniversary Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Living: Peace and Freedom in the Here and Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bhagavad Gita Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5History of Western Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Intimations Pursued
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Intimations Pursued - Andrew Sullivan
57-60.
Chapter One
The Claims of Philosophy
The knowledge imposes a pattern, and falsifies,
For the pattern is new in every moment
And every moment is a new and shocking
Valuation of all we have been.[1]
Perhaps the most noteworthy character of the distinction drawn between philosophy and practice in Michael Oakeshott’s first major work, Experience and Its Modes (EM), is its absoluteness. It is a point made forcefully in the introduction and reiterated in the conclusion. It is sustained throughout Chapters II and V devoted to philosophy and practice respectively. It frames the opening and concluding paragraphs of the book. It is impossible to avoid the impression that the distinction is critical to the entire project. In a clear rebuttal of the classical tradition which saw practical and theoretical wisdom as separate but hierarchically connected, and the Enlightenment tradition which saw practical wisdom as a product of theoretical wisdom, Oakeshott urges their utter irrelevance to one another. And much hinges on this radical claim.
The extremity of the claim is perhaps its most salient characteristic. Philosophy, Oakeshott argues, ‘depends for its existence upon maintaining its independence from all extraneous interests, and in particular from the practical interest’.[2] The separation of the two realms is, in other words, not merely an after-thought to their elucidation; it is intrinsic to the respective identity of each. Philosophy is not simply endangered or confused by inter-penetration with practice, its very existence is dependent upon the distinction. And, in response, practice cannot remain merely indifferent to the invasions of philosophy. It must react with extremity: ‘Indeed, the pursuit of philosophical truth is something which must be condemned by practice as inimical to life.’[3]
The two realms not only deny each other, they destroy each other. Oakeshott echoes Nietzsche against Socrates in the rhetoric of his claim: ‘To turn philosophy into a way of life is at once to have abandoned life and philosophy. Philosophy is not the enhancement of life, it is the denial of life.’[4] Later, he frames the distinction in even more dramatic terms:
Not until we have become wholly indifferent to the truths of this world of practice, not until we have shaken off the abstractions of practical experience, of totality and religion, good and evil, faith and freedom, body and mind, the practical self and its ambitions and desires, shall we find ourselves once more turned in the direction which leads to what can satisfy the character of experience.[5]
Yet the nature of the distinction - for all its extremity - is unfamiliar. It is not the intuitive distinction between thought and action, subjectivity and objectivity, with which we are familiar in everyday discourse. Within Oakeshott’s idealist system, such a distinction cannot exit. All experience for Oakeshott is thought, and action cannot exist without being in some sense thought. Within this system, the distinction between philosophy and practice cannot be between two different realms of experience, since there can be only one realm of experience, which is thought.
Nor can it be between two modes of experience, a distinction between two equal rivals for the human consciousness, between two types of thinking, since philosophy, unlike practice, is presented as more than a mode of experience, or a type of thinking: it is defined as experience itself when pressed to its irresistible conclusions. The distinction Oakeshott wants to draw, then, is a distinction between experience itself and one of its modes: between complete and incomplete experience; between the concrete and the abstract; between what is ultimately satisfactory in experience and what must be rejected altogether and put to one side.
There is no distinction in EM which is more insisted upon. Yet it is a deeply troubling assertion. To claim the complete autonomy of practice from philosophy would seem to drain from practice any reflective capacity whatsoever, to separate theoretical thought from moral thought, to argue that there is absolutely no connection between the questions: ‘What should I do?’ and ‘Why is it right for me to feel this obligation?’ That they are separate questions is obvious. That they can in no way inform each other seems to go against every moral and practical intuition. Yet this is the clear claim of Oakeshott’s argument.
The examination of this initial argument is the purpose of this chapter. Its inconsistencies and difficulties, I shall argue, are never fully resolved by Oakeshott throughout his entire writings, but this early wrestling with the dilemma in clear terms points to an eventual settling of his doctrine. How this is settled reflects importantly on the cogency of his later arguments about the autonomy of tradition in politics and morals, and the role of poetry in evoking that autonomy. In a sense, this early debate is a distilled version of the conversation which will echo and give coherence to much of his subsequent thought.
Part I deals with the distinction between philosophy and practice, at each point that it is drawn by Oakeshott, in order to pinpoint the dilemma exactly in the terms Oakeshott frames it. Part II analyses those aspects of practical experience as described by Oakeshott which seem most troublesome for his view of the absolute distinction between practice and philosophy. And Part III examines those aspects of philosophical experience as described by Oakeshott which seem most troublesome for his view of the absoluteness of the distinction. I hope to argue that Oakeshott’s initial separation is denied by his own text; that he is forced to support a more modified version of the case; and that, in the process, his more immoderate claims for philosophy as representing what is ultimately satisfactory in human experience are fatally qualified.
I
To discover what, for Oakeshott, the distinction between philosophy and practice entails, some understanding of the structure of thought which generates the postulates of experience and practical experience themselves is necessary. And this structure is heavily dependent on the concepts of late nineteenth-century Idealism.[6] Philosophy, for Oakeshott, is nothing but the consummation of ‘experience’, which has, as its primary definition, a unified world of ideas. It cannot be divided into what is experienced and what is experiencing; it is a concrete whole. It is indivisible and inseparable from thought. It is, in fact, thought itself.[7] There is no independent reality distinguishable from it: all reality is experience and all experience is thought. It is constructed, not received; created, not discovered.
The raw material of this thought is nothing but thought itself.[8] Nor is there any form of experience which escapes thought. Sensation is thought. Perception is thought.[9] Intuition is thought.[10] The notion of unmediated experience, experience without judgment, is categorically and elaborately rejected.[11]
In this universe, thinking cannot take the form of the relation of ideas to reality, since the two are indistinguishable; nor can it be the interpretation of sensation; nor even the action of mere thought upon itself, if thought is conceived as separate from the world of sensation. Rather, thinking is the action of thought upon itself, where thought comprises all of reality. As such, it is the tireless transformation of reality, ‘the explicit and conscious qualification of existence by an idea.’ The limitlessness of this is difficult to grasp, but Oakeshott insists upon it. Thinking is not
the mere qualification of existence by an idea; it is a qualification of existence by itself, which extends, in the end, to qualification of the whole of existence by its whole character.[12]
Because reality is thought, all thought is a transformation of all reality, as well as a transformation of itself: ‘in its full character thought is not the explicit qualification of existence by an idea, but the self-revelation of existence.’[13]
This mysterious conception of self-revelation operates according to a simple principle: it reveals itself by attempting to construct out of itself a world of experience which is unified and complete, which requires nothing beyond itself to make sense of itself. The criterion of this process, which Oakeshott at one point seems to understand as a form of self-correspondence, he generally refers to as ‘coherence’.[14] It is the master-concept of EM.
The process of reaching coherence is one of permanent transformation of all of experience so as to correspond with itself, a process of total revolution, since the indissoluble unity of experience requires that a change of any part is a change of every part, just as the addition of any new substance to a solution alters the entire balance and composition of the solution as a