Trova il tuo prossimo libro preferito

Abbonati oggi e leggi gratis per 30 giorni
Unexpected Treason: Barack Hussein Obama

Unexpected Treason: Barack Hussein Obama

Leggi anteprima

Unexpected Treason: Barack Hussein Obama

Lunghezza:
1,545 pagine
27 ore
Editore:
Pubblicato:
Sep 26, 2016
ISBN:
9781483581682
Formato:
Libro

Descrizione

The book that was never supposed to be written – Unexpected Treason is a comprehensive academic analysis and political expose of the presidency of Barack Obama, that proves Obama is a radical Muslim and committed treason. Obama’s policies of hope and change were a scam created to institute policies that intended to advance the interests of Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood, other Islamist organizations and states, and a future caliphate, that would eventually transition the United States and the West to a society dominated by Islam. This evaluation clearly shows that Obama was the largest single financier and enabler of Islamic terrorism the world has ever known, reversed centuries of American foreign policy, negated America’s role as the world’s sole superpower, weakened America at home and abroad, attempted to create the circumstances that would lead to Israel’s demise, and advanced all these policies through the machinations of taqiyya, continual deception and lies. Through meticulous research starting before he became president, many truths and secrets have been revealed about Obama, which define his path to power, shed light on his motives and his decision making as president, and even reveal the truth surrounding al Qaeda’s attack on the Benghazi consulate and the unbelievable events surrounding the death of Ambassador Stevens. Unexpected Treason will be an indispensable resource that will clarify the policies, events and circumstances surrounding the presidency of Barack Hussein Obama.
Editore:
Pubblicato:
Sep 26, 2016
ISBN:
9781483581682
Formato:
Libro

Informazioni sull'autore

James McCormack is the author of Double Bogey and Murder at the Cappuccino Cup. He is an avid golfer, loves to try his hand at oil paintings and enjoys spending time with friends and family. He lives in New York’s Hudson Valley and is working on his next novel which explores the separation of wealth in the United States.


Correlato a Unexpected Treason

Libri correlati
Articoli correlati

Categorie correlate

Anteprima del libro

Unexpected Treason - James McCormack

Footnotes

Introduction

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor, he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared. Marcus Tullius Cicero, Roman orator and statesman, 45 B.C.

A dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people, than under the forbidding appearances of zeal for the firmness and efficiency of government. History will teach us that the former has been found a much more certain road to the introduction of despotism than the latter, and that of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people; commencing demagogues, and ending tyrants. Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 1.

There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true. Soren Kierkegaard, Danish philosopher, (1813 – 1855).

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so. Mark Twain, American author and philosopher.

Barack Hussein Obama was elected the 44th president of the United States with many controversies surrounding his campaign. Where was he born? Kenya or Hawaii? What type of influence did Reverend Wright, Bill Ayers, or Frank Marshall Davis have over Obama? What was Obama’s position when Wright preached G-d damn America, and espoused anti-American rhetoric for over two decades on a regular basis? [Falsani: Do you still attend Trinity? Obama: Yep. Every week. Eleven o’clock service. Ever been there? Good service. (source – Interview with State Sen. Barack Obama, Sojourners, Cathleen Falsani, March 27, 2004)] But the one controversy that continues to fester and cross the minds of world leaders and the average American citizen pertains to Obama’s religion. Is Obama a Muslim?

Of course Obama is a Muslim. With the information presented in this book, an objective reviewer could easily deduce Obama is a radical Muslim. Having a conservative Muslim as a leader of a country could advance many of the principles we cherish in America: free speech, capitalism, a nonviolent exchange of ideas, a clear delineation of good and evil, and a recognition of America’s special and cherished role as a leader of the West and the free world. Unfortunately, a radical Muslim will continually side with America’s enemies, will try to advance and embed Sharia law in the American ethos, and will do his best to destroy the two major enemies of fundamentalist Islam – America and Israel. Obama sided with the radical Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, with a stated goal to destroy the United States, over General Sisi, who is a moderate Muslim and wants to reform Islam. Obama supported the radical Islamist Iranian regime with sanctions relief and a pathway to nuclear empowerment while refusing to support moderate Iranian student protesters in 2009. Obama is partners with CAIR, which is allied with Hamas and is identified as a terrorist organization by foreign governments, and has placed many Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers in sensitive government positions relating to defense, national security and intelligence. Obama empathizes with the legitimate grievances of ISIS terrorists, Hezbollah fighters, and al-Qaeda operatives who committed the 9-11 atrocities. Obama’s words, actions and policies define his proclivities and support of radical Islam – which reinforces Obama’s identity as a radical Muslim.

Every one of Obama’s major policy decisions weakens and/or harms America, whether he is increasing the budget deficit through various policies, gutting the defense establishment, advancing the interests of America’s adversaries, strengthening the radical Islamic forces throughout the world, implementing catch and release policies with radical Muslim terrorists, releasing thousands of criminal illegal aliens throughout America by executive orders, or flooding America with poorly vetted Muslim immigrants from Middle Eastern nations supportive of jihad and Shari law. With respect to Israel, his major goals revolve around creating a peace agreement wherein a terror state is created in the heart of the Holy Land, creating or transferring radical Islamic armies on all of Israel’s borders, or just humiliating Israeli leadership whenever he gets the opportunity. Most, if not all, of Obama’s policies eventually help strengthen and expand radical Islamic forces and weaken or destroy those countries that do not support a caliphate or the Muslim Brotherhood. With Obama as president for eight years, the war against Islamic terrorism has shifted from the Middle East to Paris, San Bernardino, Chattanooga, Orlando, Brussels and Nice, which is an intentional result of Obama’s pro-Islamist, pro-jihad rhetoric and policies.

I’ve always been a Christian … The only connection I’ve had to Islam is that my grandfather on my father’s side came from that country [Kenya]. But I’ve never practiced Islam. Obama, December 2007, early taqiyya (strategic Islamic lying or misrepresentation)

Obama Has Never Been a Muslim, And Is a Committed Christian. Obama Campaign Website, November 2007, early taqiyya

Obama was born a Muslim since Islam is passed paternally, and his father was a Muslim. Obama’s whole family on his father’s side is Muslim. Obama has a Muslim grandfather and grandmother, the latter of whom recently made the Hajj pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia at the age of 93. Obama’s stepfather from Indonesia, with whom he lived for many years, was a Muslim. All of Obama’s siblings, including sister and half-brothers are Muslims. Maya, Obama’s Muslim sister, told Jodi Kantor of The New York Times, My whole family was Muslim, and that includes her brother Barack. Obama’s brother, Abongo Roy Obama is a militant Muslim. The Obama Foundation in Africa, which is named for Barack Obama, is aligned with Hamas and jihad. Obama said of Roy in Dreams, The person who made me proudest of all was Roy, who has stated that the Black man must liberate himself from the poisoning influences of European culture. Obama’s paternal family originated from Sudan, an Arab Muslim country, before they migrated to Kenya. Romy Amir, one of Obama’s classmates in Indonesia remembered, Barry was previously quite religious in Islam, and all the relatives of Barry’s father were very devout Muslims. Obama’s family formally registered him twice as a Muslim when he enrolled in two different elementary schools in Indonesia.¹ Emirsyah Satar, who was one of Obama’s classmates and is now CEO of Garuda Indonesia, said of Obama, "He was often in the prayer room … He was quite religious in Islam, but only after marrying Michelle, he changed his religion. [for political expediency] Tine Hahiyary, one of Obama’s teachers and principals in Indonesia remembered that he had studied ‘mengaji’ [recitation of the Quran in Arabic]." Mengaji studies are only undertaken by fundamentally religious Muslim families, and not by moderate or secular Muslim families.² Obama proudly recited the Muslim call to prayer with a perfect Arabic accent in a New York Times interview with Nicholas Kristof. According to many Islamic scholars, just reciting the call to prayer makes one a Muslim. Thus, Obama may be fluent or near fluent in Arabic and may be able to recite much of the Quran in Arabic from memory, which he has hidden from the American public. Arabic is a difficult language, and Obama would have to recite the prayers regularly to repeat them perfectly in an interview. Obama is a Muslim, and the world, especially the Muslim world, knows it.

Obama never had a formally documented baptism. Where are the photos, the documents, or the witnesses to this event? Obama has admitted at least twice that he is a Muslim. Once with George Stephanopoulos, Obama acknowledged, during a 2008 campaign interview, "my Muslim faith. Lack of sleep and a difficult challenging campaign let the truth out for a split second. During his National Prayer Day Breakfast speech in 2015, Obama stated, And so, as people of faith, we are summoned to push back against those who try to distort our religion -- any religion -- for their own nihilistic ends. Here Obama is complaining about people who try to project the violence of ISIS on the Islamic world as a whole. Obama stated his religion as our religion, and not their religion. Reverend Wright and his church welcomed Muslims as members, and maintained strong ties with the Nation of Islam. Obama has admitted that Reverend Wright dabbled in Islam, and that Wright was his spiritual mentor for 20 years. Reverend Wright told Ed Klein that he made it comfortable" for Obama to be a member of his church without having to renounce his Muslim faith.³

Obama wants to present himself to the world with an Islamic front. Obama changed his name from a Christian name of Barry Soetero to an Islamic name of Barack Hussein Obama after visiting Pakistan during a college vacation. Interestingly, Obama failed to mention his trip to Pakistan in his autobiography, as it is a trip he has tried to keep out of the public eye. This name change occurred after visiting countries specializing in jihad. In The Audacity of Hope, Obama declared his allegiance to Islam when he stated, when the political winds shift in an ugly direction … I stand with the Muslims. After making a pro-Muslim Brotherhood speech in Cairo and an apologetic anti-American speech in Turkey, Obama bowed at the feet of the King of Saudi Arabia, the protector of Mecca, for all the world to see. With the rise of ISIS and the expansion of al-Qaeda since Obama became president, and with his predilection to advance and empower the Muslim Brotherhood, one can easily conclude that he is a radical Muslim.

As Obama entered the final years of his second presidential term and has no more elections to win, his true inclinations have become more apparent. Obama’s radicalism, which is enabling Iran to become a nuclear power and is destroying the balance of power in the Middle East, has pushed the Saudi regime to support Netanyahu in his drive to block the nuclear agreement that Obama acknowledged as one of the hallmark achievements of his presidency. The Saudi-owned anti-Israeli paper al-Arabiya published an editorial by its editor-in-chief, Faisal Abbas, stating, it is extremely rare for any reasonable person to ever agree with anything Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says or does. However, one must admit, Bibi did get it right, at least when it came to dealing with Iran … [regarding the nuclear agreement endorsed by Obama and the political vacuum created by Obama filled by] terror organizations, mostly backed by Iran. Saudi Arabia recognizes the terror groups sponsored by Iran are strengthened by creating a nuclear umbrella for them and funding them with Iranian sanctions relief. Iranian hegemony was also advanced in the Middle East after Obama invited Iran and the IRGC to fight ISIS. Shia troops were instrumental in retaking Falluja, where banners of the ayatollah were displayed after ISIS retreated after losing to Iraqi and IRGC troops in June 2016.

The sad truth is that the whole world knows Obama is a Muslim, with the exception of the American public, especially the liberal American public. Even the foreign minister of Egypt was told in confidence by Obama in 2009 that he was a Muslim. At a State Department function, Obama confidently displayed the one finger affirmation of the Islamic faith in front of all the African delegates, which is also known as the Muslim gang sign. Obama was confirming his allegiance to Mohammed and Allah, and to the Muslim world, a world that is continually in a state of jihad against the West, with the ultimate goal of creating a worldwide Islamic caliphate. Unfortunately for America and the West, Obama gave the same sign that the ISIS terrorists give when they are victorious in the battlefield or when they are beheading infidels. Many influential and prominent Middle Easterners believe that Obama is a Shiite Muslim, a conclusion bolstered by Obama’s support of the Iranian nuclear deal which kept Iran’s nuclear infrastructure intact and gave the ayatollah’s regime up to $150 billion in sanctions relief. Much of these funds would be directed toward strengthening Iran’s military, an existential threat to neighboring Arab Sunni states. Individuals supporting this theory include Dhahi Khalfan Tamim, the head of general security for the emirate of Dubai, Taha al Lahibi, a former member of the Iraqi parliament, and Muhydin Lazikani, a well-respected Syrian writer. Hussein is the name of the Shiites’ most worshipped and respected martyr, and is also Obama’s middle name.

Throughout his presidency, Obama has regularly made astonishing decisions that generally advance goals counterproductive to the interests of the United States and Israel. The one explanation that can easily and consistently explain Obama’s motivations and actions with respect to so many diverse arenas of policy is that he is a radical Muslim. Politics. Economics. Nuclear treaties. Speeches. Friendships. Allies. Commentators and politicians on both sides of the aisle list many excuses or explanations covering for Obama’s duplicity. These (comments from many nationally known media personalities and politicians) include that Obama is:

… hopelessly naïve, completely disconnected, delusional, bizarre, detached, defies reality, a fanatical liar (advancing taqiyya), anti-colonialist, an unknown something, an untold story, a poor negotiator, very insulated, has a personality flaw, is unable to open his mind, doesn’t know what he is doing, is a hard-core liberal progressive, advancing appeasement (or strategic patience), operating in a parallel universe, afraid to insult peaceful Muslims, has a warped view, ignorant, has no serious understanding of history, afraid to engage or offend the Muslim world, has a fundamental lack of understanding where policy decisions beget chaos, the United States is leaderless with the war on terror, blinded by his own ideology, worried about global warming while terrorists blow up the country, don’t know what makes him tick, he just doesn’t get it, disconnected from reality, radically out of touch, or does not have the fortitude to do what needs to be done.

Michael Oren, the former Israeli Ambassador to the United States, surmised in Foreign Policy in June 2015, I could imagine how a child raised by a Christian mother might see himself as a natural bridge between her two Muslim husbands. I could also speculate how that child’s abandonment by those men could lead him, many years later, to seek acceptance by their co-religionists. Some or all of this may be true. At least Oren’s train of thought was headed in the right direction when he focused on Obama’s religious constitution. But Obama is a Muslim who is always advancing the cause of radical Islam and implementing policies that will help build and expand the Islamic caliphate. It is that simple.

In the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections, Obama has received the support of over 95% of Muslim American voters, while receiving the support of about 40% of the American public. Do Muslim Americans know something that the average American is reluctant to acknowledge? Obama refuses to acknowledge the existence of radical Islam, which has been present ever since Mohammed made jihad the core driving principle of Islam. Obama’s strategy is to downplay Islamic violence while divorcing it from Islam, diverting attention to other subjects, advancing blasphemy awareness in the West, pushing gun control on infidels, accelerating the immigration jihad of Middle Eastern Muslims into Europe and the United States, and proselytizing for Islam by always putting it in a positive glowing light while maintaining a politically correct environment. Obama has repeatedly criticized America, Christianity, Christ and other aspects of the Judeo-Christian world, but he will never criticize Islam or Mohammed, which he views as blasphemy, a major Islamic crime punishable by death.

With Obama’s promise to fundamentally change America (and Europe via mass Muslim immigration), to introduce policies contrary to American interests and that are aligned with our enemies, and to enable and strengthen enemy forces, one could reasonably deduce Obama was planted in the American political system decades ago by a foreign government whose interests are not aligned with American or Western interests or values. His goal would be to empower his foreign sponsors, weaken the United States, and accelerate the mass migration of Muslims to the West so there would be a major shift in the balance of power in America, Western Europe, in the Middle East, and in the Far East. With the destabilization of Europe via mass Muslim immigration, the gutting of the American defense establishment, the expansion and the solidification of the Iranian-Shiite crescent that extends from Afghanistan to Lebanon, and increasing Chinese and Russian hegemony, this scenario must be considered. Obama’s end result would be the permanent removal of the United States as a superpower, the enabling of Iran, the increase in the political power of Muslims throughout the West, and the destruction of Israel. Obama may even have been sponsored by a foreign power seeking to diminish the capacity of the United States as a superpower, so she could no longer protect the West and Israel, leaving them vulnerable to jihad and destruction.

I take my predictions and deductions seriously, and have made many accurate future assessments regarding political actions and policies in previous writings. Examples of my predictions include observations from Eighteen Insights That Help Define Barack Obama in the 2008 Presidential Campaign, which was written from 2007 through 2008. Accurate predictions from Eighteen Insights include but are not limited to:

•"Obama blames Israel for the worldwide jihad terrorist attacks by the Muslim extremists…. Thus, Obama is laying the groundwork for stating that in order to solve the worldwide Islamic extremist terrorism threat plaguing the world, the Israeli-Palestinian issues must be solved first."

•   "Since Obama has made contact with Hamas before the election (2008), and may have lied to Israel and American voters during the campaign, it can be expected that Obama will at some point walk away from America’s long term commitment to Israel’s security, and will subtly or outright back the Palestinians with their conflict with Israel."

•   "With the political strengthening of Hamas (by Obama’s direct contacts), one can expect that the main tenets in their charter and the political aspirations of their clerics and leaders will be advanced and fortified. This will mean increased terrorism directed against the West, Europe, America and any Judeo-Christian and non-Muslim interests worldwide." The rise of ISIS and Boko Haram have perpetrated such extreme barbarianism and terror against non-Muslims, and al-Qaeda and ISIS have spread during Obama’s presidency. The rise of Boko Haram in Africa was also predicted.

•   "Obama would be using taxpayer dollars to fund the transfer of Hamas agent from Gaza to the United States … Is Obama setting up a Trojan Horse scenario?" Obama is importing huge numbers of Muslim refugees from Syria and Iraq, many of whom may be trained ISIS terrorists. Representative Michael McCaul, chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security stated in a Fox News editorial on March 9, 2016, "If we don’t get more assertive in resolving the crisis, it will be remembered for becoming a terrorist Trojan Horse."

•   Israel being invaded by 50,000 – 100,000 elite troops in the north composed of forces from Syria, Hezbollah and the Iranian Revolutionary Guards. Iran has moved large numbers of their forces into Syria under the guise of fighting ISIS with the Russians. In March 2016, Foreign Affairs revealed that Hezbollah is seriously considering launching an offensive war into northern Israel. In April 2016, Iran instructed its youth in an official government-sanctioned video to prepare for the invasion of Jerusalem. By June 2016, Iran has established multiple military bases equipped with missile launchers in Syria and Iraq after being invited by Obama to fight ISIS, which has allowed Iran to move its military forces closer to Israel.

•   "France and other Western European countries have an increasingly hostile Muslim insurrection [rape epidemics during New Year’s eve celebrations especially in Cologne, sexual assaults in public baths in Germany and Scandinavia, and Muslim gangs throughout continental Europe and Great Britain involved with sexual grooming of teenage non-Muslim women and Sharia law enforcement in no-go zones], and civil war in their major cities, similar to previous conflagrations, but this time the Muslims are armed with sophisticated weaponry [plans to infiltrate nuclear facilities in Belgium], and implement their military strategy with marked precision, aided by foreign fighters." Charlie Hebdo, ISIS penetration and infiltration of Western Europe and ISIS Paris and Brussels attacks.

•   "Increasing Russian aggression in Eastern Europe, especially … Ukraine, and Poland." This predicted, even before the famous reset, the invasion of Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea.

•   "Will Taiwan, Israel, Columbia, Iraq, Kenya, or Ukraine be politically and militarily compromised?" Four out of these six countries have been severely militarily compromised or radically altered politically secondary to Obama’s policies. Obama also blocked the sale of advanced fighter aircraft to Taiwan, while China has expanded its influence around the South China Sea. Even Kenya has experienced increasing threats by Islamic extremists at its borders.

•   "Obama’s inexperience and questionable judgment may lead some of our adversaries to adopt more aggressive policies that challenge the United States’ policies and interests." Vladimir Putin, China, Iran.

•   We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded. Obama, Colorado Springs National Security campaign speech, July 2, 2008 … Eighteen Insights: "If this program is just as well funded as the military, Obama will be pouring over $500 billion into training and potentially arming domestic civilian national security forces [Obama has been building paramilitary forces in almost all federal agencies] only loyal to him and his politics, at the same time gutting our standing military [Obama has decimated the military with massive budget cuts and the sequester, and has purged the military of its most experienced and trained leaders]. Is this laying the groundwork for domestic revolutionary violence [Black Lives Matter protests, domestic jihad attacks] that would be used to advance radical agendas? [strict gun control, federal control over local and state police forces with a significant loss of states’ rights]"

•   "Obama wants to expand the powers of the UN, at the expense of U.S. influence." And what is the UN? It is a Muslim majority world body organization that refused to recognize the Jewish connection to the Temple Mount or the Western Wall. When announcing the framework nuclear agreement with Iran, Obama wanted to bypass the Senate and only be required to obtain UN Security Council approval for any future deal with Iran. Obama wants the global climate change agenda to be administered by the UN, which would basically control worldwide economic activity. Obama labelled the 2015 Paris climate change agreement an executive agreement, in order to bypass the need to have the Senate ratify this new diplomatic and economic relationship as a treaty, where UN ratification alone would make it legally binding. Obama also wants UN agencies to help select which Muslim immigrants will gain entrance to the United States as refugees, and has partnered with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to help formulate U.S. immigration policy and increase immigration target numbers. Obama is contemplating allowing the UN to dictate a two-state solution in the Middle East without Israeli input during the last year of his presidency.

The insights that allowed me to make accurate history changing predictions in 2008 have been refined with the benefit of eight years of an Obama presidency, and describe in full detail and complete confidence the real Barack Hussein Obama and his role in American politics. The assertions in this book will eventually be proven accurate, for past is prologue with respect to Eighteen Insights’ previous predictions and Obama’s political history. Keeping an open mind, listening to Obama’s own words, and seeing directly who benefits and who is compromised by his policies, will lead to conclusions similar to what is presented in this discussion.

Chapter 1 – Churchill, Blasphemy, and France

If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter. George Washington

The right of freely examining public characters and public measures, and of free communication among the people thereon… has ever been justly deemed, the only effectual guardian of every other right. James Madison

Stay quiet and you’ll be okay. Mohammed Atta, Hijacker on 9-11, right before he crashed his hijacked jetliner into the World Trade Center.

To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize. Voltaire (1694 – 1778), French philosopher, writer and historian. Islam under Obama.

When Barack Obama became president, after having run on a platform of hope and change, he performed many functions on the first and momentous day of his presidency. Out of all the world leaders to initially contact with his first phone call to a foreign leader, Obama favored Mahmoud Abbas, head of the PLO and the Palestinian Authority (PA) and successor to Yasir Arafat. This was confirmed by Nabil Abu Rudeina, Abbas’s spokesman, who quoted Obama, stating, This is my first phone call to a foreign leader and I am making it only hours after I took office. Abbas was intimately involved in the planning and funding of the Black September kidnapping and massacre of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Summer Olympic Games in Munich, West Germany, according to the autobiography of Muhammad Daoud Oddeh, a PLO official who masterminded the attack. Abbas’s doctoral thesis was based on denying the Holocaust. As head of the Palestinian Authority, Abbas regularly honors and memorializes terrorists who kill Israelis by having schools and roads named after them. Another decision Obama made on his first day as president was to remove the bust of Winston Churchill from the Oval Office and return it to Great Britain. These two actions alone predicted his personal inclinations and major policy directives and set the tone for the remainder of his presidency.

The Churchill bust is a rare piece of art by Jacob Epstein and was displayed by President Bush during the two terms of his presidency; the British gave it to Bush as a source of inspiration after 9-11. Britain and the United States have had a special relationship since the War of 1812, but especially since World War II. One would expect Obama to show a little more respect to the man who rallied his nation during the Nazi onslaught, and who, together with the United States, beat the Nazis on the Western front. Reasons backing Obama’s decision to remove Churchill’s bust have included Obama’s antipathy towards Churchill’s conservatism, Britain’s role in suppressing the Mau Mau rebellion in Kenya, and Obama’s dislike of British neocolonialism in Africa. The British may have also treated Obama’s Muslim father poorly, which reinforced his antipathy toward that nation. Great Britain, along with Russia and the United States, defeated the Nazis, with whom the Islamic world was allied. Obama, being a Muslim, may gravitate his political affinities with Islam’s earlier military and political partner, and thus resented the powers that defeated the Nazis (and the Muslims), namely the United States and Great Britain. But as a religious Muslim, Obama hated Churchill because he had committed one of the worst offenses against Islam, blasphemy. Churchill insulted Mohammed and Islam in his book, The River War, when he summarized his impressions of Islam after observing Muslim communities first hand in Africa and the Middle East.

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome."

In one paragraph, Churchill summarized the very issues confronting and threatening Western civilization today, especially with the massive immigration of Muslims into Europe. Churchill insulted Mohammed throughout this whole paragraph, especially with the first sentence referring to dreadful curses, and calling Islam, no stronger retrograde force. In today’s world there would be countless fatwas issued from even moderate Muslim clerics for these confrontational, politically incorrect, blasphemous words advanced by Churchill.

How does Obama feel about blasphemy? The Obama administration sternly criticized the Charlie Hebdo publishers in 2012 after they had published cartoons satirizing Islam. Jay Carney, the White House Press secretary, stated, "We are aware that a French magazine published cartoons featuring a figure resembling the Prophet Muhammad, and obviously, we have questions about the judgment of publishing something like this. We know that these images will be deeply offensive to many and have the potential to be inflammatory … we don’t question the right of something like this to be published; we just question the judgment behind the decision to publish it. Later that year, Obama himself stated at the UN in 2012, the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Obama knows the widespread implications of blasphemy in the Islamic world, whether the words critical of Mohammed are from a Muslim or a non-Muslim individual, or spoken in earnest or in jest. Blasphemy is not tolerated by any Muslim, and Obama would not have allowed the image of anyone uttering the above words in the Oval Office.

Islamic religious texts support killing blasphemers. In the hadith, Sunan Abu Dawud 4361, Mohammed allows a husband’s killing of his wife, who criticized him. Mohammed stated that no one should punish the man for the murder. In Sunan Abu Dawud 4362, Mohammed also permits the murder of a Jewish woman who criticized him. Obama may believe that multiple types of punishments are warranted for insulting or criticizing Mohammed on any level, including murder. Obama showed his contempt for blasphemers when he falsely blamed the Benghazi attack on a filmmaker, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, who produced a video critical of Islam. Despite multiple government intelligence agencies and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton blaming al-Qaeda affiliates for the attack, and the observation that the attack occurred on the anniversary of 9-11, Obama and his policy team put the blame of the protests on one isolated video, and even had considered another anti-Islamic video produced by an American pastor as a candidate for blame. Obama, with White House staff and administrators, worked to keep the focus on the video in the period immediately after the terrorist attack. Further, National Security Advisor Susan Rice pushed the video as the cause of the attacks on the following Sunday morning talk shows. Secretary of State Clinton never backed away from the video narrative, and even told many of the deceased relatives of the Benghazi attack that the video was the cause of that catastrophe. Ben Rhodes even adjusted the talking points to accommodate Obama’s desire to bring retribution upon the video producer.

All these people created this false narrative under the direction of President Obama, who saw this crisis as an opportunity to advance the cause of criminalizing criticism of Islam and Mohammed, which is also a major policy goal of the OIC (Organization of Islamic Conference). The video producer was arrested by a van of federal agents in the middle of the night and was later incarcerated for a year for a parole violation. The national security apparatus, the State Department and the Justice Department, used their power to punish Nakoula for insulting Mohammed under the guise of another token offense. Thus, Obama used the tragedy of Benghazi to falsely blame the video, which would advance Sharia law and blasphemy laws in the United States. Obama accomplished two goals: he diverted attention away from the terrorists and gave his administration the opportunity to safeguard Islam from political scrutiny.

Six years earlier, the Charlie Hebdo offices had been fire bombed by al-Qaeda, for reprinting Danish cartoons mocking Mohammed. Instead of recognizing the courage of these political analysts and cartoonists, Obama backed the Islamic world’s criticism of this organization. When twelve people were murdered in Charlie Hebdo’s offices in January 2015, Obama clearly demonstrated his indifference for the victims and the magazine that caused multiple international crises. In his first response to the murders, Obama issued the following statement.

"I strongly condemn the horrific shooting at the offices of Charlie Hebdo magazine in Paris that has reportedly killed twelve people. Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims of this terrorist attack and the people of France at this difficult time. France is America’s oldest ally, and has stood shoulder to shoulder with the United States in the fight against terrorists who threaten our shared security and the world. [Then why couldn’t he have gone or sent a high ranking administration official to the rally of world leaders in Paris immediately after the attack?] Time and again, the French people have stood up for the universal values that generations of our people have defended. France, and the great city of Paris where this outrageous attack took place, offer the world a timeless example that will endure well beyond the hateful vision of these killers. We are in touch with French officials and I have directed my Administration to provide any assistance needed to help bring these terrorists to justice."

What’s missing after an obvious radical Muslim attack on Western free speech and on routine political parody? Obama failed to mention the word Islam. Obama would not recognize these actions as Islamic terrorism or state they were performed by radical Muslims, even though the perpetrators proclaimed after the attack they were avenging Mohammed, received their training in Yemen with an al-Qaeda affiliate and were aligned with ISIS. Even the prime minister of France stated that France was now in a war against terrorism, jihadism, and radical Islamism. In multiple press briefings at the White House, Obama’s press secretary continually denied any link between this attack and Islam, and said that those involved had a deviant illegitimate view of Islam, despite having their actions backed by hadiths and the fact that almost all Islamic countries have blasphemy laws that are meticulously enforced. Obama stayed true to form after the November 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, which killed 130 civilians, when he again failed to link Islam to the terrorist acts with his formal White House statement, even though the terrorists were heard screaming Allahu Akbar while they gunned down and eviscerated innocent civilians.

Obama callously decided not to send anyone to the January 2015 Paris rally immediately after the Charlie Hebdo attack. Yet, the rally was attended by over 40 heads of state and up to three million French citizens. It was the snub heard around the world. If Obama truly believed he needed to stand shoulder to shoulder with the French, then he would have flown to Paris or at least sent Vice President Biden, Secretary of State Kerry, or Attorney General Holder, who was already in Paris on other official business. There was not even a scheduling issue surrounding Obama’s ability to go to France and support the war against terrorism. Obama was watching a football game at the time of the rally and had no major plans. This inaction sent a clear message to the French, to the terrorists, the murder victims and their surviving family members. Further, Obama may not have wanted to be photographed with an Israeli prime minister (especially Netanyahu with whom he has had a dysfunctional relationship) or leading a rally against the basic Islamic laws that form the bedrock of keeping control in Islamic societies by their religious and political leadership.

As a fundamentalist Muslim who believes in the Quran and the fatwas issued against blasphemers by religious clerics, Obama was not going to actively protest against the violence perpetrated on the Charlie Hebdo publishers by attending the Paris rally, nor was he going to link Islam to the murders. Obama also showed support for the radical Islamists by not recognizing the religion of the Christians or Jews murdered by ISIS affiliated terrorists in Paris. He repeated this sentiment when he would not identify the religious background of the Coptic Christians beheaded in Libya, Christians beheaded in Ethiopia, or when seventy-two Christians were murdered by a Taliban suicide bomber in Pakistan on Easter Sunday 2016. By distancing the religion of the victims from the political discussion, Obama hoped to remove Islam as the root cause of these terrorist attacks and from the subsequent debate.

With respect to the French, Obama resented France’s earlier intervention and colonialization of North Africa, and their recent treatment of Muslim immigrants. Obama was a great fan of Frantz Fanon, a radical Black pro-jihadi, who fought with the Muslims in Algeria and wrote against French colonialism in Algeria. In Dreams from My Father, Obama described Fanon as a significant literary influence. Fanon wrote a book, The Wretched of the Earth, which Obama promoted and supported during his undergraduate years while he advanced radical, communist, and Islamic causes. Quotes from The Wretched of the Earth, which undoubtedly greatly influenced Obama’s formative years, include:

•"The well-being and progress of Europe have been built up with the sweat and with the dead bodies of Negroes, Arabs [Obama’s background], Indians, and the yellow races." Obama does not like Europe, and views them as a racist culture, like America.

•"Two centuries ago, a former European colony decided to catch up with Europe. It succeeded so well that the United States of America became a monster [Obama views America as a monster to be destroyed.], in which the taints, the sickness, and the inhumanity of Europe have grown to appalling dimensions."

•"The settler makes history and is conscious of making it. [Obama’s massive Muslim immigration/immigration jihad (hijrah) will eventually change Western history, past and present. Obama is clearing the path for the hijrah by falsely proclaiming Islam has always played a significant role in American history. When Muslims argue their case to control East Jerusalem and the Temple Mount, they state Judaism has had no historical connection to Jerusalem and even the Western Wall was never part of a Jewish temple but was always part of al Aqsa mosque. ISIS destroys all evidence of Christianity in territories they occupy. Obama hopes the Muslims will eventually eliminate American history as well.] And because he constantly refers to the history of his mother country, he clearly indicates that he himself is the extension of that mother-country. [Fanon defines immigration jihad or hijrah.] Thus the history which he writes is not the history of the country which he plunders but the history of his own nation [Islam] in regard to all that she skims off [the confiscatory jizya tax], all that she violates [rape epidemics, Muslim gangs, sexual assaults, harassments, murders] and starves. This quote can be interpreted as being anti-colonialist or pro-Muslim with their strategies regarding immigration and conquest. Obama views America and Europe as agents of rape and starvation to his homeland and religious alliances, whether in Africa or the Middle East. Obama is hoping the new wave of Muslim settlers and invaders of Europe, who have moved forth to new lands secondary to Obama’s policies, will eventually rewrite a fictional European, and eventually a fictional American history, that will be very pro-Islam. Obama has started rewriting the history of the United States by saying America is a Muslim-majority country and that Islam has always had a major role in the creation and development of America. Obama agrees with Fanon’s quote when he wrote in Dreams from My Father, The worst thing that colonialism did was to cloud our view of our past."

•"They realize at last that change does not mean reform, that change does not mean improvement." Hope and change does not necessarily mean improvement for America. Obama knew this from the beginning, and kept this secret from everybody. Hope and change, like blaming the video for the Benghazi attacks and his promises regarding Obamacare, were a fraud.

•"And it is clear that in the colonial countries the peasants alone are revolutionary, for they have nothing to lose and everything to gain. The starving peasant, outside the class system is the first among the exploited to discover that only violence pays. [Part of Obama’s political rational for supporting jihad, radical Islamic terrorists, Hamas, Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter.] For him there is no compromise, no possible coming to terms; colonization and decolonization is simply a question of relative strength. Obama supports violent revolutionaries inside and outside the United States, including the Black Lives Matter movement, ISIS and al-Qaeda. Obama views the massive waves of immigration of Muslim migrants and refugees as a means of Islamic colonization and eventual conquering of infidel lands. Fanon states that colonization or immigration is part of a revolutionary war against the West, which is why Obama has accelerated all avenues of immigration into America, whether from Central and South America or from the Islamic Middle East, especially during the last year of his presidency. In Texas alone in 2016, there are a record number of unaccompanied minor illegal aliens crossing the border coupled with significantly decreasing deportation proceedings. Obama wants a surge (from 10,000 to 200,000 Muslim Syrian refugees") of Muslim migrants from the Middle East to enter America during his last year. Fanon also mentions decolonization, which is the politically correct term for genocide or the societal displacement of one’s political opponents. During Obama’s term, the Christians have been almost fully decolonized from the Middle East, which is a policy supported by Obama with his empowerment of ISIS and Islamic radicals. Obama views the genocide of Christians in the Middle East as part of the Islamic decolonization process which is part of jihad. As a radical Muslim, Obama supports jihad. Obama’s ultimate plan for America is to set in motion its colonization based on third world immigrants that are culturally incompatible with Western democracy, i.e., support Sharia law and the contraction of indigenous Western populations. The latter policy is supported by Obama’s insistence that birth control be a mandatory part of Obamacare, especially for Catholics, and embracing gay marriage. High tax burdens on working families, declining median family incomes, increasing non-participation in the labor markets by American citizens, and increased healthcare costs with Obamacare inhibit many people from having extended families, secondary to financial considerations. Skewed government financial support and improved job opportunities in favor of foreigners and illegal aliens allow them to have more financial security, which gives them the stability to have more children, and statistically improves their chances of controlling the future colonization and political processes of America. Thus, Obama is approaching the issues surrounding the colonization/decolonization of the West including America from all political, sociological, economic, and eventually military perspectives.

•"The basic confrontation which seemed to be colonialism versus anti-colonialism, indeed capitalism versus socialism, is already losing its importance. What matters today, the issue which blocks the horizon, is the need for a redistribution of wealth. Humanity will have to address this question, no matter how devastating the consequences may be. Obama identifies with the socialist and communist underpinnings of the author. Obama’s political thoughts parallel Fanon with the quote from Dreams from My Father, If nationalism could create a strong and effective insularity, deliver on its promise of self-respect, then the hurt it might cause or the inner turmoil it caused people like me, would be of little consequence." In his first book, Obama paraphrased a major quote from Fanon’s political philosophy. Obama’s socialistic tendencies are strongly influenced by Fanon to this day.

With the massive African and Middle Eastern Muslim immigration coming to haunt France’s Western future starting from early 2015 - 2016, Obama is probably chuckling and supporting what his spiritual mentor, Reverend Wright, boasted, the chickens have come home to roost. Obama may be supporting the pressures that the African Muslim immigrants are inflicting on French and European society. He may appreciate the karma reflected in the European discomfort associated with the immigrants not assimilating into society and supporting Sharia law, since he was revolted by the way the European powers treated the Africans during their colonialist sojourns in Africa during the previous century. Despite the increasing crime and terrorist attacks throughout Europe, along with the hundreds of no-go zones; the increasing rape attacks, especially in Sweden; and the escalating anti-Semitism paralleling the influx of Muslim immigrants, Obama blames the Europeans for their struggles. Obama also paints the Muslims as victims in light of these heinous Paris terrorist attacks. At a White House press meeting with the British Prime Minister Cameron, Obama stated, "Our biggest advantage, Major, is that our Muslim populations feel themselves to be Americans and there is this incredible process of immigration and assimilation that is part of our tradition [taqiyya]… There are parts of Europe in which that’s not the case [Obama is attacking Europe and Great Britain and is basically calling them racists, like Fanon.] … it’s important for Europe not to simply respond with a hammer and law enforcement and military approaches to these problems." It is clear that Obama favors the Muslims and does not want the Europeans to counter the Islamic lawlessness in their communities with strict law enforcement and military intervention.

But blasphemy and supporting Islamic causes were not the only reasons why Obama did not attend the Charlie Hebdo rally. Besides not recognizing the Paris attack as Islamic, Obama did not recognize that Jews were targeted by the Muslim terrorists even though they attacked a kosher deli, the perpetrator admitted he was targeting Jews, and they specifically targeted Jewish editors at the Charlie Hebdo offices. Obama stated during an interview regarding the attack, "It is entirely legitimate for the American people to be deeply concerned when you’ve got a bunch of violent, vicious zealots who behead people or randomly shoot a bunch of folks in a deli in Paris."

Four points from this one sentence show that Obama is anti-Semitic and pro-Islamist. First, Obama called the Islamic terrorists – zealots, thus disassociating Islam from terror. Second, Obama stated that the attack on the deli was random and a not a targeted attack on a Jewish establishment. Third, Obama also failed to mention that Jews were attacked by calling them a bunch of folks, and fourth, he also left out the fact that the deli was kosher. Amedy Coulibaly, the lone terrorist who perpetrated the killings in the kosher supermarket in Paris, was seen on video asking the religion of his hostages, and killing those who were identified as Jewish, while espousing anti-Semitic propaganda. Obama is clearly covering for the anti-Semitic actions of hardcore Muslim terrorists, and may even agree with their objectives. Besides not wanting to march with Prime Minister Netanyahu, Obama may not have cared to honor Jewish victims while concomitantly enduring a trans-Atlantic flight.

To the Islamic world, Obama’s boycott of the Charlie Hebdo rally showed quiet, yet firm support for the Islamic terrorists and their strike against the blasphemers. Obama’s 2012 UN statement, quoted above, showed his disdain and contempt for blasphemy. Because Obama and his administration would not link this and multiple other terror attacks to Islam, he is protecting and shielding the motivations of the jihadists. This is similar to Obama’s downplay of Iran during his initial presidential campaign in 2008 when he referred to Iran as tiny and his downplay of ISIS when they crossed into Iraq to set up the caliphate, by calling them a JV team. In all these instances, Obama was trying to divert attention from the Islamic goals of obtaining a nuclear weapon for Iran, changing the balance of power in the Middle East, establishing a unified caliphate from Afghanistan to North Africa, punishing anyone who insults Islam or Mohammed, and killing Jews. In Islamic countries, individuals who commit blasphemy or who are even accused of committing blasphemy are often murdered, tortured, jailed, or flogged in public. Obama will not do anything that interferes with these legal and religious precedents. Therefore, Obama, who has strong affinities for everything Islam, is not going join in a rally that will provide a platform to support and continue the criticism and moral evaluation of Islam.

In 2015, over 300 Texans participated in a free speech event in Garland, Texas, where they displayed political cartoons critical of Mohammed. Pamela Geller, a political activist, sponsored the event. Two Muslims travelled over 1,000 miles armed with assault rifles to attack and massacre the participants. Fortunately, the perpetrators were killed by the police almost immediately after they started firing their weapons. ISIS claimed credit for the operation. Hundreds of people could have been massacred if the assailants were successful. This was the first major ISIS-related terror attack in the United States, yet Obama said nothing. There was no press conference or formal statement from the president. Obama did not address the attacks as a guest on the David Letterman Show the next day.

Instead, the media, especially the liberal commentators, attacked Geller for being provocative. But why wasn’t there also a media examination of a recent poll where 12% of American Muslims support the death penalty for blasphemy? The presence of Jews in society is provocative to fundamental Muslims. Singing and the arts are provocative to many fundamental Muslims, as are the crucifixes displayed in America’s Christian churches and hospitals. Muslims generally don’t like dogs, and many Muslim taxi cab drivers refuse to pick up blind people with seeing-eye dogs. Where does Obama want to draw the line? When a Western society compromises its freedoms and traditions to placate Muslim demands, society will naturally evolve into a Sharia-based community, with non-Muslims being treated as second-class citizens subservient to the whims of the Muslims. Islam means submission, and the political correctness associated with the gagging of free speech that identifies the prejudices and injustices prevalent in all Islamic societies will cause the disintegration of Western liberal democracies. Such a movement will usher in an era of strife, civil war and terror.

Obama repeatedly called for mutual respect between the West and Islam, so why can’t Muslims respect America’s Bill of Rights with its guarantees of free speech? Why can’t they allow the criticism of Mohammed, his life, the violence, and prejudice at the core of Islam? To Obama, is mutual respect a one-way street? Unfortunately, to accommodate the sensitivities of the Muslim community, Obama and many of his supporters are willing to put limits on the First Amendment and subtly institute Sharia law, which forbids the criticism of Mohammed. Is Obama compromising the foundations of our liberal society by demanding limits on American liberties? With Obama’s support for Islam and its utter disdain for people critical of their religion and Mohammed, Obama thereby condones such heinous Islamic practices as female genital mutilations and honor killings, as well as the unending conflict and genocide that accompany Muslim societies whenever they collide with other cultures.

Chapter 2 – Muslim or Christian, You Decide

Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached. Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Palaeologus, 1391. Pope Benedict XVI quoted this statement before he prematurely resigned as Pope.

In the Muslim community, jihad is a religious duty because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the jihad was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense. But Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations. Esteemed Muslim philosopher and historian Ibn Khaldun (d. 1406)

The sword of Mahomet, and the Koran, are the most fatal enemies of civilization, liberty, and truth, which the world has yet known. William Muir (1819 – 1905). One of the most knowledgeable and respected Western Islamic scholars. Author of Life of Mohamet.

"I think you’ll find, brother, that there are Muslims everywhere. Wherever you find militancy today among so-called Negroes [Nation of Islam, Black Liberation Theology, Reverend Wright, Black Lives Matter (Dallas, Baton Rouge), Black Panthers, Obama], watch real closely. You’re liable to be looking at a Muslim." Malcolm X

Does Obama favor Islam or Christianity? Does his spiritual center revolve around Islam or Christianity? When has Obama ever said anything negative about Islam? Does he show the same respect to Christianity or Judaism? Obama – Muslim or Christian? You decide. Some of the most compelling evidence comes directly from Obama himself, without any additional discovery needed. Following are some of the most glaring quotes from Obama during various speeches and interviews that paint a very clear picture of his true faith.

1.Obama: "Let’s not play games. What I was suggesting – you’re absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith. And you’re absolutely right that that has not come." Stephanopoulos: Christian faith? Obama: My Christian faith. Well, what I’m saying is that he (McCain) hasn’t suggested that I’m a Muslim. And I think that his campaign’s upper echelons have not, either. What I think is fair to say is that, coming out of the Republican camp, there have been efforts to suggest that perhaps I’m not who I say I am when it comes to my faith – something which I find deeply offensive, and that has been going on for a pretty long time. Obama blows his cover after an exhausting campaign and a lack of sleep. This is the first time in history when a leading public figure has identified himself freely as a Muslim while being an alleged Christian. Interview with George Stephanopoulos, 2008.

2."And so, as people of faith, we are summoned to push back against those who try to distort our religion – any religion – for their own nihilistic ends." National Prayer Breakfast Address, February 5, 2015. Obama admits for the second time he is a Muslim by saying our religion when talking about Islam, as our is the plural form of "my."

3."I think on the one hand, non-Muslims cannot stereotype. But I also think the Muslim community has to think about how we make sure that children are not being infected with this twisted notion that somehow they can kill innocent people and that is justified …" Obama, G20 Summit closing news conference. November 16, 2015. Obama subtly admits he is a Muslim by using the plural personal pronoun we after the phrase, the Muslim community, while addressing the violence surrounding the ISIS attack in Paris where 130 civilians were murdered.

4."So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed." Obama, Cairo University Speech, June 4, 2009. Obama admits his Islamic faith by stating that he knows Islam. A non-Muslim would not use the term first revealed. Only a person who believes in Islam and has studied many of its precepts would use the term revealed.

5.By reciting the Islamic call to prayer during a New York Times interview during his 2008 presidential campaign, Obama declared himself to be a practicing Muslim from a theological and spiritual perspective.

6."Many other Americans have Muslims in their families or have lived in a Muslim-majority country – I know, because I am one of them." Obama, Turkish Parliament speech, 2009, where he basically states that he is one of those Muslims in families. This is a subliminal message to the Muslim world that he is a Muslim.

7."The American President told me in confidence that he is a Muslim." Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit, Nile TV, 2009.

8.The Daily Caller, in the article Book Says University of Chicago Medical Center VP Bribed Jeremiah Wright, from April 14, 2012, discusses an interview between author Ed Klein and Reverend Wright reporting that "Klein also said Wright told him he made it comfortable’ for Obama to accept Christianity without having to renounce his Islamic background …’ When Klein asked Reverend Wright if he actually converted Obama to Christianity, Klein reflected on Wright’s response and commented, He said, I don’t know about that, but I can tell you that I made it easy for him to come to an understanding of who Jesus Christ is and not feel that he was turning his back on his Islamic friends and his Islamic traditions and his understanding of Islam." Reverend Wright, the man who would have supervised the conversion, admitted that Obama did not formally convert to Christianity. There are no photos or accompanying supporting documents that prove Obama was baptized or converted to Christianity.

9."The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Obama, UN General Assembly speech, September 25, 2012. Obama was rallying against blasphemy and still promoting the video as the cause of the Benghazi attack.

10.Obama permits Afghan commanders and officers to commit pediatric rape on U.S. bases in Afghanistan in the presence of U.S. military personnel, and punishes those American servicemen who attempt to prevent those crimes. If Obama was a Christian or was grounded in Western morals, he would not allow this behavior to occur in territory controlled by America, especially on U.S. military bases.

11."It is just wonderful to be back in Oregon. And over the last 15 months we have travelled to every corner of the United States. I now have been in 57 states. I think one left to go. One left to go." Obama campaigning in Oregon in 2008. The Harvard Law School graduate is either not familiar with the basic structure of the United States government or he made a Freudian slip. There are only 50 states in the United States, but there are 57 Islamic member states in the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC). The OIC advances Islamic interests across the globe, and has spearheaded the adoption of blasphemy laws around the world, wants to spread Sharia law worldwide, and create a worldwide Islamic caliphate. This accidental reference is evidence that Obama’s heart and mind is with the OIC.

12."And if, in fact, we defend the legal right of a person to insult another’s religion, we’re equally obligated to use our free speech to condemn such insults – and stand shoulder-to-shoulder with religious communities, particularly religious minorities who are the targets of such attacks. Just because you have the right to say something doesn’t mean the rest of us shouldn’t question those who would insult others in the name of free speech."

Hai raggiunto la fine di questa anteprima. Registrati per continuare a leggere!
Pagina 1 di 1

Recensioni

Cosa pensano gli utenti di Unexpected Treason

0
0 valutazioni / 0 Recensioni
Cosa ne pensi?
Valutazione: 0 su 5 stelle

Recensioni dei lettori