Unavailable
Unavailable
Unavailable
Ebook469 pages8 hours
Blindfolds Off: Judges On How They Decide
By Joel Cohen
Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
Remarkably little is known to the general public, or even to the practicing legal profession, about judges—how they decide cases, how they allocate work between staff and themselves, their work ethic, their psychology, the extralegal influences that play on them.
This important new book penetrates that veil of secrecy with thirteen interviews tape recorded in the chambers of the respective judges. The author, Mr. Joel Cohen, who practices at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, LLP in New York, is a skillful and tenacious, though invariably courteous, interviewer. He has picked as the interviewees federal district judges who have presided in famous, publicity-attracting cases, cases most likely to challenge a judge’s fidelity to a passive, formalistic—which is to say traditional—mode of judicial decision making, and he has focused the interviews on those cases.
The book features selected specific, well known cases for the free-flowing dialogues which follow, from the thousands of cases to which these thirteen judges have been assigned. These are cases which have raised critical questions about justice, policy, precedent and the law and the way in which the currents and tides of their lives and of our ever-changing society have influenced those rulings.
You'll discover if the judges have been open, even aware, of what experiences have influenced their rulings, and where judges acknowledge awareness of these potential influences—of their "priors" as Judge Posner would articulate it—are they fully candid, to themselves and others, about whether, and to what degree, it has informed their rulings? Or have they contrarily decided, after inwardly acknowledging the "awareness," that they can or did fairly decide the case, so that they needn’t publicly reveal themselves?
If you are even remotely curious about how judges make decisions, this book provides some eye-opening interviews that will shed light on their decision-making process.
This important new book penetrates that veil of secrecy with thirteen interviews tape recorded in the chambers of the respective judges. The author, Mr. Joel Cohen, who practices at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, LLP in New York, is a skillful and tenacious, though invariably courteous, interviewer. He has picked as the interviewees federal district judges who have presided in famous, publicity-attracting cases, cases most likely to challenge a judge’s fidelity to a passive, formalistic—which is to say traditional—mode of judicial decision making, and he has focused the interviews on those cases.
The book features selected specific, well known cases for the free-flowing dialogues which follow, from the thousands of cases to which these thirteen judges have been assigned. These are cases which have raised critical questions about justice, policy, precedent and the law and the way in which the currents and tides of their lives and of our ever-changing society have influenced those rulings.
You'll discover if the judges have been open, even aware, of what experiences have influenced their rulings, and where judges acknowledge awareness of these potential influences—of their "priors" as Judge Posner would articulate it—are they fully candid, to themselves and others, about whether, and to what degree, it has informed their rulings? Or have they contrarily decided, after inwardly acknowledging the "awareness," that they can or did fairly decide the case, so that they needn’t publicly reveal themselves?
If you are even remotely curious about how judges make decisions, this book provides some eye-opening interviews that will shed light on their decision-making process.
Unavailable
Read more from Joel Cohen
How to Lose a Marathon: A Starter's Guide to Finishing in 26.2 Chapters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I Swear: The Meaning of an Oath Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Blindfolds Off
Related ebooks
Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCourts: A Comparative and Political Analysis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Common Sense Rules of Advocacy for Lawyers: A Practical Guide for Anyone Who Wants to Be a Better Advocate Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCardozo: A Study in Reputation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Evidence of the Law: Proving Legal Claims Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Art of Practicing Law: Talking to Clients, Colleagues and Others Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lawyers in Practice: Ethical Decision Making in Context Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Language of Statutes: Laws and Their Interpretation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Nature of the Judicial Process Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Scalia's Court: A Legacy of Landmark Opinions and Dissents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Theory and Practice of Statutory Interpretation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJustice vs. Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Justices Behind Roe V. Wade: The Inside Story, Adapted from The Brethren Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Death of the American Trial Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Quotable Lawyer Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Constrained Court: Law, Politics, and the Decisions Justices Make Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Psychology of Jury Selection Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Before Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5No Higher Calling, No Greater Responsibility: A Prosecutor Makes His Case Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReason in Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlind Injustice: A Former Prosecutor Exposes the Psychology and Politics of Wrongful Convictions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ordinary Injustice: How America Holds Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Spirit of International Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Introduction to Legal Reasoning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitutional Conscience: The Moral Dimension of Judicial Decision Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOverruled: The Long War for Control of the U.S. Supreme Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Judge in a Democracy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Reluctant Prosecutor: My Journey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Courts For You
Everybody's Guide to Small Claims Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDisOrder in the Court: 31 Funny, Frivolous & Outrageous Lawsuits that Will Make You Laugh Out Loud Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Represent Yourself in Court: Prepare & Try a Winning Civil Case Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Credentialed Court: Inside the Cloistered, Elite Supreme Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFederal Rules of Civil Procedure: Hyperlinked, #2 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Neighbor Law: Fences, Trees, Boundaries & Noise Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Casey Anthony: Mother of Disappeared Caylee Anthony Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOrdinary Injustice: How America Holds Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Make Your Case: Finding Your Win in Civil Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Win Your Case In Traffic Court Without a Lawyer Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5N*gga Theory: Race, Language, Unequal Justice, and the Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Filing and Winning Small Claims For Dummies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew York Notary Public Exam Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Nolo's Deposition Handbook: The Essential Guide for Anyone Facing or Conducting a Deposition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Why the Innocent Plead Guilty and the Guilty Go Free: And Other Paradoxes of Our Broken Legal System Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Your Day in Court: Using Common Law with Common Sense Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How Would You Rule? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe New Debtors' Prison: Why All Americans Are in Danger of Losing Their Freedom Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Representing Yourself In Court (US): How to Win Your Case on Your Own Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Stanford Law Review: Volume 63, Issue 2 - January 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolice Interactions 101: How To Interact With the Police in Your Car, On the Streets, In Your Home Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tough Cases: Judges Tell the Stories of Some of the Hardest Decisions They’ve Ever Made Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElements of Judicial Strategy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDivorce Without Court: A Guide to Mediation and Collaborative Divorce Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Collect Your Small Claims Judgment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRepresenting Yourself In Court (CAN): How to Win Your Case on Your Own Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Obtaining A Criminal Pardon: Clear Your Name Legally Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Complete Small Claims Court Guide: Winning Without a Lawyer Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All My Trials: Tales of a Hired Gun Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Blindfolds Off
Rating: 4.25 out of 5 stars
4.5/5
2 ratings0 reviews