Putin, the Russian Elite, and the Future of Russia
By Alex Markman
()
About this ebook
There is a dialectical logic to why an individual like Putin came to power in Russia. His policies in the past were controversial at best, but now, after the annexation of Crimea and turmoil in Ukraine, Russia’s future is not expected to be bright. Why do Russia’s leaders always seem embroil the country in one conflict after another?
Every nation has a character—the sum of its temperament, values, traditions, and mindset—that explains its history and its present, and helps define its future. It provides the foundations of social life, both for individuals and the whole society. In this thoughtful monograph, the author traces how this character has shaped the evolution of Russia, with a particular focus on how the ruling “elite” has led the country from one disaster to another.
The book explores a conspicuous phenomenon: Russia has always had the wrong people in power. These people, incapable of making decisions based on logic or wisdom, have invariably chosen paths that lead either to terror or to other forms of oppression. This work is an attempt to answer three questions: Why? What is wrong with the nation? And why it is always in the wrong hands?
Readers will also learn why terror in Russia was inevitable after World War I, regardless of who assumed the power, the Reds or the Whites. The author analyses the mechanics of the leadership selection process, designed to concentrate power at the top with the “elite” echelon, and its effect on the country’s governance since Lenin’s regime. This includes an objective look at why and how Putin ascended to power, and outlines some of his successes—and reasons for his inevitable failure.
Supporting his arguments with statistics, the author shows demographic trends that have resulted in the depopulation of vast Russian territories, a shrinking of labour force, and a negative effect on economy. Statistics also present a picture of the deterioration of the nation’s integrity and sense of decency, as evidenced by the number of abandoned and homeless children, high rates of alcoholism and violent crime, and many other manifestations of the nation’s trouble mental and spiritual health.
The book provides some interesting data about the Russian army, including the price of its victories in the past and a comparison of its strength with the primary military powers of the twenty-first century. The author devotes serious analysis to the Crimea and Ukrainian crises, the Russian mob mentality, and on the country’s role in global political and economic affairs.
Examining Russia through the lens of character, the nation’s psychology and mentality, the author offers insights into the economic, political, and social evolution, and provides a somber view of the country’s near and the distant futures.
Read more from Alex Markman
Twins in Sex Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Messenger of Death Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Dark Days of Love Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPayback for Revenge Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBreakfast with the Cleaning Lady Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProfessionsl Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEx-US Marine, Lala, Matador Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJustice of Brenda The Wolverine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBorn with Sin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsОднажды в таверне Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMistaken Identity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFarewell to Past Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Drama and Mockery of Fate Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Putin, the Russian Elite, and the Future of Russia
Related ebooks
The Return: Russia's Journey from Gorbachev to Medvedev Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Russian Legends: The Life and Legacy of Leon Trotsky Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPutin’s Russia (Revised and Expanded Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Soviet Potpourri Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCreating Russophobia: From the Great Religious Schism to Anti-Putin Hysteria Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5I'm Going to Ruin Their Lives: Inside Putin's War on Russia's Opposition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lenin's Legacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKicking the Kremlin: Russia's New Dissidents and the Battle to Topple Putin Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Socialist Lies: From Stalin to the Clintons, Obamas, and Sanders Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPutin's Labor Dilemma: Russian Politics between Stability and Stagnation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlowing up Ukraine: The Return of Russian Terror and The Threat of World War III Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOne Day We Will Live Without Fear: Everyday Lives Under the Soviet Police State Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Post-Imperium: A Eurasian Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThree Months in Soviet Russia (1921) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPutinomics: Power and Money in Resurgent Russia Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Rise of Russia and the Fall of the Soviet Empire Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Russian-American relations in the post-Cold War world Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Inside Russian Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKremlin Winter: Russia and the Second Coming of Vladimir Putin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond Ukraine: EU and Russia in Search of a New Relation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The German Colonial Empire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fragile Empire: How Russia Fell In and Out of Love with Vladimir Putin Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Corporate Europe: How Big Business Sets Policies on Food, Climate and War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPutin's Asymmetric Assault on Democracy in Russia and Europe: Implications for U.S. National Security Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnglo-American Relations and the Transmission of Ideas: A Shared Political Tradition? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPower in modern Russia: Strategy and mobilisation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBanking on the State: The Political Economy of Public Savings Banks Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntelligence and Security Sector Reforms in Greece, Romania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Germany and Italy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRussian Grand Strategy in the era of global power competition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Asian History For You
The Art of War: Illustrated Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Vory: Russia's Super Mafia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Yakuza: life and death in the Japanese underworld Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShogun: The Life of Tokugawa Ieyasu Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnit 731: The Forgotten Asian Auschwitz Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ghosts of the Tsunami: Death and Life in Japan's Disaster Zone Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Midnight in Chernobyl: The Untold Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Climb: Tragic Ambitions on Everest Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Revolution of the Mind: Higher Learning among the Bolsheviks, 1918–1929 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Red Hotel: Moscow 1941, the Metropol Hotel, and the Untold Story of Stalin's Propaganda War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of Caste (Oprah's Book Club): by Isabel Wilkerson - The Origins of Our Discontents - A Comprehensive Summary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Forgotten Highlander: An Incredible WWII Story of Survival in the Pacific Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inglorious Empire: what the British did to India Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dead Mountain: The Untold True Story of the Dyatlov Pass Incident Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rasputin: Faith, Power, and the Twilight of the Romanovs Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-1962 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Voices from Chernobyl Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Gulag Archipelago: The Authorized Abridgement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anarchy: The East India Company, Corporate Violence, and the Pillage of an Empire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Red Notice: A True Story of High Finance, Murder, and One Man's Fight for Justice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalism: A Ghost Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of 'brainwashing' in China Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 2]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Genghis Khan: A Life From Beginning to End Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Putin, the Russian Elite, and the Future of Russia
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Putin, the Russian Elite, and the Future of Russia - Alex Markman
This essay is not in a framework of political correctness. Instead, I tried to be as objective and unambiguous as I could, and therefore expect vicious attacks from left and right. I accept it as an inevitable destiny for anyone who tells the truth.
I begin this study with a few arguments in defence of Putin. I expect an outcry from those who put their destiny on the line to expose the corruption of his regime: rampant theft and population plunder by government officials; absence of justice, law, and order; political oppression; and uncountable other crimes and sins. I believe that there is no need to reference a particular work or document confirming their arguments, as information is in abundance on the Internet, in official statistics, and in periodicals. I assure you though that the issues of both Putin’s personality and his policies are not as simple as they look at first glance.
The core problem of Russia is not a particular personality, if we consider a period longer than an average human life. Personalities do play a significant role in Russian history, but not as much as some contemporary thinkers suggest. All countries’ leaders have to deal with the people of their country, be they dictators or democrats. No doubt Churchill, Hitler, Roosevelt, or Stalin, strong personalities in their times, would not do much if they were leaders of Haiti, Congo, or Zimbabwe. I am sure that Stalin would not be able to become a Great Britain dictator, and Roosevelt would not be able to become a great democrat in Russia. Every nation has particular characteristics that make it behave the way it does.
I can illustrate this thought in a particularly vivid example. At the beginning of World War II, Stalin ordered the relocation of all colonies of Germans—approximately two million people living by the Volga River—to Ural, Siberia, and other remote, inhospitable locations. It was winter, and nothing was prepared for Germans to survive, let alone to settle. It took many years for those people to rebuild their lives from scratch. After they did, however, any stranger could easily have distinguished those German villages from those elsewhere in Russia. The Germans had built decent houses, paved roads, and nice, clean agricultural facilities, whereas Russian villages had distinct features of decay: dirt roads that shot clouds of dust after any passing vehicle, unkempt children playing everywhere, old houses hardly suitable for living, and population that were generally drunk at night. Both groups had the same government above them; the same communist rules, regulations, and order; and the same taxes and restrictions. What was possible and desirable for one people, however, was impossible and unnecessary for another. In the long run, it is a nation that is collectively responsible for its deeds and history.
How to Read This Work
I have used mostly Russian sources: all citations are my translations from Russian, unless I explicitly mention a translator.
A superscript number (#) refers to the source of information or citation, which you can find on the last page of this work.
I often place the word elite
in quotation marks. To me, this word means a collection of the best people in a field, be it literature, art, technology, or politics. In the past one hundred years, there were only a few people, if any, in the Russian top layer of society who were qualified for such respect.
Breaking from the Past
A country’s present is always a product of the past. It is mandatory to view the present through the prism of history, which is why I chose to start this work by comparing Putin’s regime with the regimes of the other leaders of Russia since the October Revolution of 1917.
For comparison I chose three criteria: political freedom, freedom of business activity, and population welfare. I will not offer the reader many numeric measurements of these factors, as they have been the subjects of voluminous studies for many years. Instead I will offer just a few indicators, as I believe that they, along with common sense and some knowledge of history, are sufficient to substantiate my arguments. For those who are interested in more information about the subject, plenty can be obtained via the Internet.
Vladimir Lenin
The first leader in the post revolutionary Russia—the Soviet Union, to be exact—was Vladimir Lenin. Few would question my assertion that Putin’s regime is much, much better than Lenin’s. Lenin was the architect of mass terror and the annihilation of Russia’s population. Even if we accept arguments that Putin is personally responsible for deaths of dozens or even hundreds of journalists, businesspeople, and others, those numbers hardly compare to the millions of murders and concentration camp deaths under Lenin’s regime.
Freedom of speech and democracy during the two regimes are also beyond compare. Under Lenin, the official policy was the dictatorship of proletariat.
Its meaning is difficult to comprehend for the younger generation, but essentially it meant that any word—written or whispered—could be grounds for punishment by death if it was deemed wrong by commissars. Under Putin, the freedom of speech is an extant phenomenon, even though some attempts to restrict it are undertaken, and it is seen more as a privilege than a right.
The freedom of economic activity of the two periods also differed significantly. During Lenin’s regime, private property was abolished: all assets, personal and corporate, were confiscated; being rich, or better off than the majority of population, was considered a severe crime. There was a short period of limited business activity, called NEP—New Economic Policy—but that ended tragically for its participants. Even then, it was a far cry from the freedom of Putin’s regime.
Joseph Stalin
The second communist dictator was Joseph Stalin. His regime, even worse than Lenin’s, manifested a scale of brutality and senseless persecution of innocent people that had no precedent in history. Entrepreneurship was considered one of the worst political crimes. Poverty levels were appalling, and in many cities the critical living conditions were considered to be three or fewer square metres (thirty square feet) per person. Widespread hunger and shortages of just everything were the signature of the epoch. There is no doubt that people are faring much better under Putin’s regime than people fared under Stalin.
Nikita Khrushchev
Stalin’s successor was Nikita Khrushchev. His period was dubbed as the thaw,
but it was actually much better than that. Terror stopped. There were no political prisoners. A wrong word, uttered in private, was no longer a punishable offence. Measures were undertaken to improve living conditions of the population. White bread appeared in supermarkets.
However, notwithstanding some progress, the principles of internal and international Soviet politics remained the same as they had been under Stalin. There was no freedom of speech, private business activity was considered as a serious crime, and living conditions remained very poor for the general population. Again, few would dispute that the average Russian fares better under Putin’s regime than the people under Khrushchev.
Leonid Brezhnev
After Khrushchev came Leonid Brezhnev as leader. During Brezhnev’s regime, repression of dissent became notably stronger, private initiative was persecuted, and living standards remained stagnant. Under Brezhnev the Soviet Union economy was steadily rolling down. People are faring better under Putin’s regime than did the people under Brezhnev.
Yuri Andropov and Konstantin Chernenko
There is not much to compare in the regimes of either Yuri Andropov or Konstantin Chernenko: each one was in the office for just a few months, and changed nothing.
Mikhail Gorbachev
The next, and the last, leader of the Soviet Union was Mikhail Gorbachev. A master of half-measures, with his irresolute novelties he brought the country to the verge of collapse. It could have been a developing nation, like China, but neither he nor his team had enough combined intellect and resolution to implement workable reforms. The result was the so-called Perestroika (restructuring or rebuilding) and