Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Trinity Six: A Novel
The Trinity Six: A Novel
The Trinity Six: A Novel
Ebook458 pages7 hours

The Trinity Six: A Novel

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

A Washington Post Notable Fiction Book of the Year

The most closely-guarded secret of the Cold War is about to be exposed – the identity of a SIXTH member of the infamous Cambridge spy ring. And people are killing for it, in Charles Cumming's bestselling thriller The Trinity Six.

London, 1992. Late one night, Edward Crane, 76, is declared dead at a London hospital. An obituary describes him only as a 'resourceful career diplomat'. But Crane was much more than that – and the circumstances surrounding his death are far from what they seem.

Fifteen years later, academic Sam Gaddis needs money. When a journalist friend asks for his help researching a possible sixth member of the notorious Trinity spy ring, Gaddis knows that she's onto a story that could turn his fortunes around. But within hours the journalist is dead, apparently from a heart attack.

Taking over her investigation, Gaddis trails a man who claims to know the truth about Edward Crane. Europe still echoes with decades of deadly disinformation on both sides of the Iron Curtain. And as Gaddis follows a series of leads across the continent, he approaches a shocking revelation – one which will rock the foundations of politics from London to Moscow…

"Cumming's novel is characterized by a gripping sense of realism. He displays a vast knowledge of spycraft and Cold War history, and the dense, three-dimensional world he crafts comes complete with seedy hotels and smoky nightclubs. The result is absolutely gripping. Taut, atmospheric and immersive—an instant classic." – Kirkus Reviews (starred review) on The Trinity Six

Kirkus Reviews Best of 2011 Thrillers title.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateMar 15, 2011
ISBN9781429919425
Author

Charles Cumming

Charles Cumming was born in Scotland in 1971. In the summer of 1995, he was approached for recruitment by the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6). A year later he moved to Montreal where he began working on a novel based on his experiences with MI6, and A Spy by Nature was published in the UK in 2001. In 2012, Charles won the CWA Ian Fleming Steel Dagger for Best Thriller and the Bloody Scotland Crime Book of the Year for A Foreign Country. A Divided Spy is his eighth novel.

Read more from Charles Cumming

Related to The Trinity Six

Related ebooks

Crime Thriller For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for The Trinity Six

Rating: 3.6931818181818183 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

88 ratings85 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    An extremely good Cold War thriller set in the present day when our protagonist, a British professor, finds himself investigating claims surrounding the classic Cambridge affair and the Cold War decades afterwards. It seems that there are still people out there who don't particularly like the fact that he's doing research and dredging up old stories, but who's trying to kill him and those close to him? In today's thriller world, most geopolitical thrillers involve Muslim extremists, and for good reason, but it was a blast here to get something of a flashback to the glory days of the likes of Ludlum and Le Carre, when the Russians were the bad guys and the global stakes were huge. This was a joy to read and fun from start to finish. It was full of good characters, starting with the protagonist and carrying through to the "retired" spies and the new breed of spies who have replaced them. And then there are the bad guys, of course. The story was good, as well, and I had no complaints with the pacing, which seems to be a rarity for me these days. Really, the only beef I had was in the fact that there really weren't any last-minute plot twists, or anything. In that sense, you could have pretty much figured out where this was all headed when you were about halfway to two-thirds of the way through it. An eleventh-hour surprise or two could have lifted this one to five-star status, but instead it's "just" a very solid four.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This one fits what I like to call the "spy/thriller beach read" genre. The story follows a familiar plot trajectory: Academic follows up on information for a potential new book and in the process becomes an unlikely participant in the high-stakes espionage activities of two world super powers. Building on the real world Cambridge Spy Ring - proven fodder for numerous other espionage thrillers - this one has the look and feel of the familiar. The story has a very slow start, with the "adrenaline-pumping thriller" part being pretty much non-existence except for certain parts of the last 1/3 of the story. For readers who like to see a solid female character - always a challenge to find when reading spy genre - Cummings does a decent job with the creation of Tanya, an MI6 spy. Breaking the usual spy writing mode, Tanya is not glamorous. She is good at her job and wants to be appreciated for her abilities while trapped in the typical male-centrist MI6 world and reporting to a dismissive boss. Cummings weaves the usual plot where we find spies spying on Gaddis while being spied on by other spies.Overall, the familiar and predictable can make for good vacation reading and I would categorize this book as a decent vacation/beach read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I've been working my way steadily through Charles Cumming's backlist and I think this is the best so far. It helps that it relates back to the lodestone for much of British spy fiction, the Trinity Five; and it builds very cleverly from that base and links it to the modern world.
    The protagonist is another version of Cumming's flawed heroes, albeit a bit older, and I found my self in sympathy with him from quite early on,
    Like all good spy stories, the plot twists and turns with alacrity and it is certainly a page turner. Only "A Foreign Country" to go now; then my fixes of this excellent writer will slow down to the one book a year norm!
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Eh. Not great.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The Cambridge Five, as you probably know, was a ring of spies all recruited by the Soviets after having become communists during their years at university in the thirties. Four of the five--Kim Philby, Donald Duart Maclean, Guy Burgess, and Anthony Blunt--have been definitively known since the fifties and early sixties. The presence of a fifth member of the group was long suspected, and many consider John Cairncross to be the likeliest candidate.Charles Cumming, in his spy thriller The Trinity Six takes the premise a step further by positing a sixth spy, one who was never caught (or defected), and who may still be alive. His novel slants the action differently than most spy novels by making the protagonist not a spy or an intelligence officer, but rather a professor of Russian studies. Sam Gaddis is the fortyish academic, divorced, behind in his mortgage and tax payments and being pressed by his ex-wife for additional child support. When asked by a journalist friend to co-write a book based on interviews she's currently conducting about the possible sixth man, Gaddis jumps at the chance. Days later his friend is dead. As he pursues the leads she had begun to uncover, Gaddis discovers most people unwilling to discuss the subject with him...and those who do seem to end up dead as well. Cummings has written a tidy (though perhaps a bit coincidence-ridden) thriller which flies along at a satsifyingly brisk clip. Sam Gaddis is mopey and self-centered, but smart and capable as well. The Trinity Six, while not one for the ages, is still a worthy contribution to the spy thriller genre, and well worth a read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I thought this book was great. It does shift and twist a bit from what I thought would be a book mainly about a sixth member of the Cambridge Five and his exploits. But the twist is interesting and entertaining. It leaves one to wonder if perhaps the current Russian leaders may have similar skeletons in their collective closets.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This is a great spy novel set in 2007. Dr. Sam Gaddis has financial problems and needs to generate some income to pay his debts. . He's a professor of Russian Studies at a London University and has authored a book on the current Russian president. (In Sam's book, this is a Putin-like character). Charlotte, a journalist friend, offers him the chance to work with her on an expose of the mythical sixth member of the Cambridge Five (Guy Burgess and friends). Things get dicey for Sam when Charlotte suddenly dies. Her death starts a tense and suspenseful spy story which has Sam on the run from both MI6 and the Russian FSB. It takes him to such places as Berlin, Vienna, Barcelona, Budapest and Moscow. Along the way, Sam learns and uses the tricks of the spy trade in order to keep ahead of his pursuers. It comes down to a tense face-to-face encounter in London with a pair of Russian assassins.This is one of Cumming's better efforts and well worth a read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Although this book wasn't what I was expecting, I enjoyed it very much. The title is a reference to the infamous "Cambridge spy ring"--Kim Philby being its most notorious member--who had infiltrated British intelligence, but had been working for the Soviets from World War II through the early '60s. There had been 5 in that ring, and some had speculated that there had also been a 6th as-yet-undiscovered member. This novel premises that that indeed was true.

    Having just read a book (non-fiction) about Philby, I thought this novel might be atmospherically set in that time, ala Alan Furst or LeCarre's George Smiley books. However, it has a contemporary setting, in which a London academic stumbles upon the research of a friend who has found a source alleging the "6th man" did indeed exist and was still alive. But neither British nor Russian intelligence wants that information to become public knowledge (they both have their reasons), and pursuits and deaths result.

    The Trinity Six falls into that long-honored story tradition of the innocent man caught in intrigues he can barely comprehend, and it tells that story well.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I'd give this 3.5 stars if I could. The writing is solid, but at times I almost feel like the author was telling a non-fiction story. The prose is pretty dry and straightforward, and nowhere near as gripping as what we've read in his later books. The story is quite interesting and it's tricky to follow the actions of the various characters, none of whom may be who you (or the protagonist) think they are and all of whom have hidden agendas. I thought the character development was a little light, but based on the roles the individuals had and the already relatively lengthy story I suppose that was understandable.

    My real complaint is with some of the actions of the academic 'hero'. They didn't exactly seem to make sense. In some cases, he acts with extreme naivete', especially toward the Russians he ends up encountering, while in others he handles situations with the aplomb you'd expect from a professional spy. Other than that, it's a good story by a writer that I'm really enjoying.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    It is 1992, a few years after the cold war and in a hospital in London late one night, a low level diplomat, Edward Crane is declared dead. But Crane was much more than that, and not everything is as it seems.

    A decade and a half later, Sam Gaddis, an academic with a particular interest in Russia, suddenly has a mountain of debt to pay. The huge tax bill, and demands from his ex wife means he needs to land a lucrative book deal. An old friend hints that she is onto the story of a lifetime, that she has discovered that there was a sixth member of the infamous Cambridge spy ring. He agrees to help with the research. But both the British and the Russians want this secret suppressed, and within a few hours she is dead from a heart attack.

    With the blessing of her late husband, he picks up the investigation. His research is flagged at the heart of the British Secret service and the wheels are set in motion to counter what Gaddis is trying to find out. As he contacts people that knew about Crane, the Russians are not far behind, and they are taking steps to ensure that no secrets are ever spoken again.

    He is contacted by a man in a nursing home, who hints that he knows about the enigmatic man, Crane. With his details and the records of a Russian journalist, Gaddis is closing in on his scoop of the century, but the threat to his life is ever more perilous.

    Cummings has written here a magnificent spy thriller. He has plenty of tension, a plausible plot that rings almost true, and a way of writing that means that you connect with the main character Gaddis. It has a good pace too, even though it is just over 400 page in this edition, I zipped through this in no time at all. It has all the hallmarks of a classic spy novel too, cold war history, double agents, tradecraft and secrets. Cumming has also managed to convey that feeling of fear that as Gaddis suddenly realises that he is in way deeper than he imagined was possible.

    Great stuff. Will definitely be reading all his others.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Charles Cummings is quickly moving up my list. A solid British spy novel.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Another new author and an excellent read. Le Carre style espionage, exciting with good characters and great settings.
    Thank you public library for the ability to read so much without the expense!
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Anyone who is in any way interested in spies, spying and the world of espionage in general, has surely read at least one of John le Carré's genre defining classics. Not the later gardening and Panama nonsense, but the unforgettable Cold War, 'Smiley' intrigues.

    Especially if you're English, that is.

    And if you are lucky enough to be English and of a certain age, then you probably already have the whole '30's Cambridge spy ring, the old boy network running the country from their hushed, mahogany and teak Club in The City, the Cold War and the whole East vs West thing as a big game, already with you when you read a book like this. You don't need the spy world explained to you again from scratch. You know what a 'dead letter-box' is, you know what 'tradecraft', 'Moscow Centre' and 'C' are. The author can, with a nod and a wink and relatively few words, have you with him and get on with other things. You understand the world he is writing about and what I can well imagine would seem a rather unbelievable, class-ridden, privileged, strange world - makes perfect sense.

    (However, that could be surely be why a non-middle-aged, non-English person would get nothing from, for example, the recent (poor) 'Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy' re-adaption. My Danish wife, for example).

    But one big problem the way I see it, is like this: How much is fact and how much is John le Carré fiction become fact in our collective recollection? I can imagine that it might also be a problem for any new authors wanting to write a novel set in this world: Do you write about actual institutions, actual events and run the risk that no one believes the world you're describing, or do you use some of le Carré's inventions, base your fiction on fiction and have your readers assume you're writing about the truth.

    Basically what I mean is, that all novels written into this particular period of the spy genre, surely have to be compared in some way or another, with the world le Carré created. How they stand up to that comparison is, unfortunately, how we then rate them. "It's good, but it's not as good as le Carré." "It's better than le Carré." "It's unrealistic (doesn't use le Carre's world)" That kind of thing. Maybe.

    Whatever your opinions or experience of le Carré and the spy genre, it's well worth giving Charles Cummings' 'Trinity Six' a go. it won't disappoint. It is set in the recent past, after the fall of the Berlin Wall, but is actually all about the present day repercussions from events that took place over the eighty years up until the fall of Communism. A middle-aged, recently separated from his wife academic, a lecturer in Russian affairs and part-time writer, gets dragged into present day intrigues and puts himself unknowingly in danger by getting himself caught up in other, old spy games. We travel around in Europe (surely a little less exciting since the fall of the Berlin Wall?) and we meet a variety of nice, not so nice and not so sure if they're nice, characters. There are young spies, middle-aged spies and un-reformed old Cambridge spies. It's very nearly bang up-to-date, technology-wise, but with enough links back to the good old spying glory days, to satisfy those still missing decent books about the Cold War - me, for instance. It's nicely paced and focussed, it doesn't dash unnecessarily about all over the place, it stays believable and has some decent twists, turns and revelations. Of course, the ordinary person caught up in an extraordinary world the don't understand, is nothing new, but the intrigue is genuine and there's some nice moments of suspense and uncertainty.

    'Trinity Six' is a good, enjoyable read which often feels like an Alan Furst, (obviously set today rather than between the wars). That's absolutely ok with me. For those of us who have read le Carré's spy books, there's no avoiding the fact that it's not quite be up there with the Master's best. But if you haven't read le Carré, you may actually be the lucky ones and so 'Trinity Six' is an excellent entré to the mirror world of British old-school espionage.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A good read but not his best... However, I did especially like the last chapter.

    One interesting item in the book is the use of sodium fluoroacetate [although he spelled it wrong] to assassinate one of the characters. The symptoms of poisoning can look like the victim had heart failure. In the book he says it is undetectable after death but I couldn't find anything about that on the Internet. It apparently tastes just like salt.

    This was the first time I have come across this seemingly simple method.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Slow to get going for me, but then I enjoyed it.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The excellent BBC mini-series Cambridge Spies left me with an enduring fascination with the Blunt/Burgess/Philby/MacLean quartet and I was eager to read any book that might shed further light on the thoughts and activities of these unlikely traitors who went from a life of enviable privilege to one of dreary austerity behind the Iron Curtain. Apparently there was a Fifth Man, John Cairncross, who spent the war decoding German ciphers at Bletchly Park, but whose identity was never revealed. The Trinity Six postulates, obviously, that there was even a sixth man [candidates include Prime Minister Harold Wilson and MI5 head Sir Roger Hollis] and the ring of Soviet agents extended to Oxford as well.Protagenist Sam Geddis teaches Russian history at London University College: his latst book The Tsars, which compares Peter the Great with current Russian dictator Sergei Platov [he dosn't even try to hide the fact he's writing on Vladimir Putin; only the name is changed] may be well regarded but has not made him any money and he is in urgent need of a popular best-seller to pay the IRS and his daughter's school fees. When a journalist friend drunkenly reveals she has the identity of the Sixth Man in the Cambridge Spy ring and suggests they collaborate on a book, it seems too good to be true: she dies shortly thereafter and Gaddis tries to find leads in her notes andf computer, which eventually lead him to Edward Anthony Crane, whose death was faked by the secret service many years previous. As he delves deeper into the long-buried secrets of Cold War espionage, he coms to the attention of both the English and the Russian secret services: his trips to various European cities such as Vienna, Budapest and Moscow put him in danger and it is only the intervention of beautiful British spy Tanya Acocella that saves him on more than one occassion as his contacts keep getting murdered. Agents, double agents, triple agents, and embarrassing secrets governments will kill to protect even 20 years later, The Trinity Six is an interesting and excellent thriller. It has less about the original Cambridge Four than I would have liked but it is still an informative and exciting read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is a fun, readable suspense novel. It is well-written and fast-paced. Not particularly memorable, indeed, but enjoyable. A good example of the genre.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I really had a difficult time caring about any of the characters in this book enough to keep reading it. I've picked it up a few times and read a little bit, and then put it down in favor of something else.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A very enjoyable novel, based on the premise that there may have been a "sixth man" in the infamous Cambridge spy ring. The tension was maintained at a high pitch throughout the book, though I was a little disappointed by the ending. Still, on the whole I felt that this was one of the better spy novels that I have read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Cumming draws on real British spy history in linking his tale to Burgess, Maclean, Blunt, Philby et. al. His hero is a Russian history scholar, Dr. Sam Gaddis, who has just published a book comparing Putin to Peter the Great. A journalist friend gives him a hint a a blockbuster story she is working on...and then dies. He figures out the basics of the story, but as he begins researching the tale other people die. Slowly, it dawns on him that he is going down a forbidden road, and that is the main problem with the book. Sam is a bit of a dolt. He is constantly being surprised as thugs in both the British and Russian secret services play a dirty game of keeping him, or trying to keep him, in the dark. He is saved by his persistence and a 20-something female operative who is as competent and street-smart as he is not. Stieg Larsson has, with Lisbeth Salander, provided a template for many writers these days to create young, tough, and jaded female heroines who save their men. Cumming gets the atmospherics down perfectly, and the history is interesting. But it would have been a better book if Dr. Sam Gaddis was a stronger, more capable, more aware individual.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This my first exposure to the details of the Cambridge Five spies. Cumming makes learning the history of this group interesting. This is a entertaining work of fiction. "The Trinity Six" is a great tale of deception, greed, and betrayal.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    An excellent thriller! Much has been written about the Cambridge Spies, fiction and non-fiction. This is an excellent addition to the oeuvre. A little predictable in some sections but a thoroughly enjoyable read nonetheless.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This book was received from LibraryThing through their Early Reviewers program.By mixing the history of “The Cambridge Five” spy ring in the 1930’s and adding another dimension of an additional spy, we begin the thriller of tracking down that “sixth” member.When Sam Gaddis, a British professor of Russian studies agrees to co-author a book with his ex-girlfriend and now good friend, Charlotte he never dreams that she would die so suddenly.Because of his financial obligations, Sam pushes on with her husband’s approval and starts to investigate this intriguing speculation. Events keep stirring the pot and unanswered questions just keep Sam on the trail of the missing member.So many exciting details of the espionage between England and Russian keep us twisting in our seats and never knowing where to turn. Who can you trust? Who is who? The deals made between countries remind me of the “political world” that exists everywhere and that we are unable to escape from. Every situation has a price and what are we willing to pay?The final message is you cannot keep a good spy down.Any reader who likes spy novels or thrillers should give The Trinity Six a chance to stimulate their senses. Charles Cummings is on his way to becoming an author to follow in the future. I know I will look forward to his next book.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I love spy thrillers. I love reading late into the night to find out if the double agent is really a good guy or if he can get over the Berlin Wall without getting shot. I love how the fate of the world rests on them revealing this or that secret (or McGuffin, to borrow a term from Alfred Hitchcock). So why does Charles Cummings' Trinity Six leave me out in the cold? For starters, it advertises itself as a thriller based on the question of whether or not there was a sixth member of the actual Cambridge spy ring that consisted of several 1930s Cambridge classmates who were recruited by the Soviets and then, over the course of the next few decades, worked their way into trusted positions within the government and leaked an enormous amount of sensitive information. This would be an interesting question if the book were set back when these men were young enough and powerful enough to do some damage but it's not. It is set in modern times, where the Soviet Union no longer exists and Russia is run by former president and KGB officer Vladimir Putin, (sorry, Sergei Platov). I spent much of the book wondering how this plotline could segue into something that could possibly be a threat to anyone still living. True, people around protagonist Sam Gaddis are dying at an alarming rate, but why? What possible reason could there be for it? Perhaps the author felt the same way because about halfway through the book the story takes a 90-degree turn and Gaddis spends the rest of the book running for his life and chasing the McGuffin. The change takes place so dramatically that I almost felt that I'd been the victim of the old bait-and-switch game. Much of what I have just said is a description of the frustration I felt while reading the book. In the end Cummings does answer my questions but I'll leave it up to you to decide if the McGuffin was worth the chase. John Lee is an excellent choice as narrator for the audio version of Trinity Six. His classic upper-class English accent is as at home in a British spy thriller as an Austin Martin or a vodka martini (shaken, not stirred).
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I REALLY wanted to love this book. It had all the pieces of a good spy thriller, but the characters seemed under developed and the story was not as absorbing as it should have been. Maybe because it was blending Cold War espionage in a post 9/11 world. There has been a shift in ideology and motivation for the spies in this book, but also in how to tell this type of story. The book just did not do it for me.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    The book had potential, but the clunky prose made it difficult to engage in the premise of the story. The characters were pretty cliche (particularly the females) and the reader could get quickly surmise the direction the different "twists" were taking. Hopefully, Cumming's future works will be progressively get polished, but I'll stick to Tom Rob Smith for quality suspense and prose!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    In The Trinity Six, Charles Cummings picks up on the tradition of authors such as John le Carre in the genre of Cold War British spy novel. The prime innovation is that rather than using a spy as the main character, Cummings uses a professor of Russian history named Sam Gaddis. Gaddis is an academic trope of sorts in that he is an excellent historian, but down on his luck and in his attempt to extricate himself stumbles upon a quarter century old story that could collapse a government.But I am getting ahead of myself. One of the most famous spy rings in history was the Magnificent Five. Maclean, Burgess, Blunt, Philby and Cairncross were students at Cambridge in the 1930's when they were recruited by a professor as spies for Russia. At the time of recruitment they were soldiers in the war against fascism in Europe. Each excelled and took posts in the British government, working against fascism, but also passing information to their Russian masters. In the 1950's when the Americans began to break encryption patterns from World War II, they caught on to Maclean and Burgess and the ring began to collapse. The last of the Magnificent Five, Blunt was not exposed until 1979. But perhaps these five were not alone; perhaps there was a sixth, and that is the discovery from which all of Gaddis' adventures stem. One revelation leads to another and Gaddis finds himself unravelling one Cold War myster after another.Despite the traditional qualifier that all characters are used fictitiously and the story is a product of the author's imagination, the situation presented of an immensely popular Russian President who was a mid-ranking officer in the last years of the Cold War, but through brutal suppression of opponents of his reign had transformed into a dictator in all but name, smacks of reality. Perhaps incidental, but Cummings reveals a commentary on the Russian state. All the while The Trinity Six is compelling and an easy read. My only critique is that at one or two points the supposedly coincidental events seem to be a stretch. As such they make the story seem somewhat railroaded, rather than a narrative that actually could happen. But it is not the characters or anything that they do, or even the scenario that is unconvincing. Simply put, there was just one too many coincidences.Anyone who likes thrillers or spy novels ought to give The Trinity Six a read. Cummings is not yet to the level of le Carre, however the best is yet to come and this is a good place to start.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Nicely done. This novel would make a good movie. For those who follow world news the book is enjoyable because the author alludes to actual events, though the names of the real victims have been changed. For example, the reader will recognize the references to the unexplained murder of journalist Anna Politkovskaya and the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko. The author also transports the reader to various British, European and Russian locales that add to the authenticity of this spy thriller. Of particular appreciation are the references to Russian culture, such as Bulgakov's classic, The Master and Margarita.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I enjoyed this book. The characters were developed to my liking and the storyline was interesting and kept me reading. A good spy/mystery book that is well written.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Cumming has written four previous spy novels, all well received, but the first somewhat less enthusiastically than the books which followed. Two of the novels share the same protagonist but the other books are stand-alones. The title refers to the long held rumor that theres was a 6th, unidentified spy with links to the notorious Cambridge group that included Philby, Maclean, Burgess etc. In this book which I have rated 5 stars, University College London professor Sam Gaddis has recently published another book on Russian history, another well received poor seller which nets him his usual pittance. He finds himself in financial straits largely due to a very expensive divorce, and now must find a big story. One night Charlotte, an old friend and former lover, drunkenly shares an overview of research she has been doing on the sixth man, and invites Sam to partner with her. Suddenly bodies start dropping left and right. Gaddis manages to survive despite his spy clumbsiness, and begins to get closer to the truth of the 6th man, much to the chagrin of Russian and British intelligence services. The story very subtley takes an unexpected turn and the focus shifts from the sixth man to a betrayal initiated by a mid-level Russian spy back in the 80's. Somehow, Gaddis manages twice to survive becoming collateral damage despite his close proximity to the victims (like within feet, and seconds) and both times is rescued by agent Tanya. As you read my comments here you might be thinking "not my cup of tea, I prefer something more subtle, more George Smiley, don't care for action novels". Well, "The Trinity Six" is that and more. Extremely well written, well plotted, interesting characters, high tension, subtle. I was especially taken by one scene where the tension was built particularly slowly, an everyday scene, yet particularly tense for our hero and the situation he was in. This is a scene at an airport that is not to be missed for the incredible level of tension that Cumming builds. I have read many spy novels and my favorite all-time books are "Tinker Tailor", "The Spy Who Came In From the Cold", Deighton's trilogy squared, and Littell's "The Company". I feel nobody has written anything close to those books, including the authors of those books. And now I add "The Trinity Six" to that group, and yes, I will read all his other books.

Book preview

The Trinity Six - Charles Cumming

1

The dead man was not a dead man. He was alive but he was not alive. That was the situation.

Calvin Somers, the nurse, stopped at the edge of the towpath and looked behind him, back along the canal. He was a slight man, as stubborn and petulant as a child. Gaddis came to a halt beside him.

Keep talking, he said.

It was the winter of 1992, an ordinary Monday night in February. Somers took an apple from his coat pocket and bit into it, chewing over the memories. The patient’s name was Edward Crane. It said he was seventy-six on his notes, but none of us knew what was true and what wasn’t. He looked midsixties to me. They started walking again, black boots pressing through the mud. They’d obviously worked out it was best if they admitted him at night, when there were fewer people around, when the day staff had gone off shift.

Who’s ‘they’? Gaddis asked.

The spooks. A mallard lifted off the canal, quick wings shedding water as he turned towards the sun. Crane was brought in on a stretcher, unconscious, just after ten on the evening of the third. I was ready for him. I’m always ready. He bypassed A and E and was put straight into a private room off the ward. The chart said he had no next of kin and wasn’t to be resuscitated in the event of cardiac arrest. Nothing unusual about that. Far as anyone was concerned, this was just another old man suffering from late-stage pancreatic cancer. Hours to live, liver failure, toxic. At least, that was the story MI6 was paying us to pedal.

Somers threw the half-eaten apple at a plastic bottle floating on the canal and missed by three feet.

Soon as I got Crane into the room, I hooked him up to some drips. Dextrose saline. A bag of amikacin that was just fluid going nowhere. Even gave him a catheter. Everything had to look kosher just in case a member of staff stuck their head round the door who wasn’t supposed to.

Did that happen? Did anybody see Crane?

Somers scratched the side of his neck. Nah. At about two in the morning, Meisner called for a priest. That was all part of the plan. Father Brook. He didn’t suspect a thing. Just came in, administered the last rites, went home. Soon after that, Henderson showed up and did his little speech.

What little speech?

Somers came to a halt. He didn’t make eye contact very often but did so now, assuming a patrician tone which Gaddis took to be an attempt at impersonating Henderson’s cut-glass accent.

‘From this point onwards, Edward Crane is effectively dead. I would like to thank you all for your work thus far, but a great deal remains to be done.’

A man pushing a rusty bicycle came towards them on the towpath, ticking past in the dusk.

We were all there, said Somers. Waldemar, Meisner, Forman. Meisner was so nervous he looked as if he was going to throw up. Waldemar didn’t speak much English and still didn’t really understand what he’d got himself involved in. He was probably just thinking about the money. That’s what I was doing. Twenty grand in 1992 was a lot of cash to a twenty-eight-year-old nurse. You any idea what we got paid under the Tories?

Gaddis didn’t respond. He didn’t want to have a conversation about underfunded nurses. He wanted to hear the end of the story.

Anyway, at some point Henderson took a checklist out of his coat pocket and ran through it. First, he turned to Meisner and asked him if he’d filled out the death certificate. Meisner said he had and produced a ballpoint pen from behind his ear, as if that proved it. I was told to go back down to Crane’s room and wrap the body. ‘No need to clean him,’ Henderson said. For some reason, Waldemar—we called him Wally—thought this was funny and we all just stood there watching him laugh. Then Henderson tells him to pull himself together and gives him instructions to have a trolley waiting, to take the old man down to the ambulance. I remember Henderson didn’t talk to Forman until the rest of us had gone. Don’t ask me what he’d agreed with her. Probably to tag a random corpse in the mortuary, some tramp from Praed Street with no ID, no history. How else could they have got away with it? They needed a second body.

This is useful, Gaddis told him, because he felt that he needed to say something. This is really useful.

Well, you get what you pay for, don’t you, Professor? Somers produced a smug grin. What was hard is that we had other patients to attend to. It was a normal Monday night. It wasn’t as if everything could just grind to a halt because MI6 were in the building. Meisner was the senior doctor, too, so he was always moving back and forth around the hospital. At one point I don’t think I saw him for about an hour and a half. Wally had jobs all over the place, me as well. Added to that, I had to try to keep the other nurses out of Crane’s room. Just in case they got nosey. The path narrowed beside a barge and the two men were obliged to walk in single file. In the end, everything went like clockwork. Meisner got the certificate done, Crane was wrapped up with a small hole in the fabric he could breathe through, Wally took him down to the ambulance, and the old man was gone by six A.M., out into his new life.

His new life, Gaddis muttered. He looked up at the darkening sky and wondered, not for the first time, if he would ever set eyes on Edward Anthony Crane. And that’s it?

Almost. Somers wiped his nose in the failing light. "Eight days later I was going through The Times. Found an obituary for an ‘Edward Crane.’ Wasn’t very long. Tucked down the right-hand side of the page under ‘Lives Remembered,’ next to some French politician who’d fucked up during Suez. Crane was described as a ‘resourceful career diplomat.’ Born in 1916, educated at Marlborough College, then Trinity, Cambridge. Postings to Moscow, Buenos Aires, Berlin. Never married, no offspring. Died at St. Mary’s Hospital, Paddington, after ‘a long battle with cancer.’"

A light drizzle was beginning to fall. Gaddis passed a set of lock gates and moved in the direction of a pub. Somers pushed a hand through his hair.

So that’s what happened, Professor, he said. Edward Crane was a dead man, but he was not a dead man. Edward Crane was alive but he was not alive. That was the situation.

*   *   *

The pub was packed.

Gaddis went to the bar and ordered two pints of Stella Artois, a packet of peanuts, and a double of Famous Grouse. Thanks to Somers, he was down to the loose change in his pockets and had to pay the barman with a debit card. Inside his jacket he found the torn scrap of paper on which he kept his passwords and PIN numbers and punched in the digits while the landlord made a noise through his teeth. With Somers still in the Gents’, Gaddis sank the whisky as a single shot, then found a table at the back of the pub where he could watch groups of shivering smokers huddled outside and try to convince himself that he had made the right decision to quit.

Got you a Stella, he said when Somers came up to the table. For an instant it looked as though he wasn’t going to sit down, but Gaddis pushed the pint towards him and said: Peanuts.

It was just past six o’clock. West Hyde on a Tuesday night. Suits, secretaries, suburbia. A jukebox was crooning Andy Williams. Tacked up beside a dartboard in the far corner of the room was an orange poster emblazoned with the words: CURRY NIGHT—WEDNESDAY. Gaddis took off his corduroy jacket and looped it over the arm of a neighbouring chair.

So what happened next?

He knew that this was the part Somers liked, playing the pivotal role, playing Deep Throat. The nurse—the senior nurse, as he would doubtless have insisted—produced another of his smug grins and took a thirsty pull on the pint. Something about the warmth of the pub had restored his characteristic complacency; it was as if Somers had reprimanded himself for being too open beside the canal. After all, he was in possession of information that Gaddis wanted. The professor had paid three grand for it. It was gold dust to him.

"What happened next?"

That’s right, Calvin. Next.

Somers leaned back in his chair. Not much. He seemed to regret this answer and rephrased it, searching for more impact. I watched the ambulance turn past the post office, had a quick smoke, and went back inside. Took the lift up to Crane’s room, cleared it out, threw away the bags and catheter, and sent the medical notes down to Patient Records. You could probably check them if you want. Far as the hospital was concerned, a seventy-six-year-old cancer patient had come in suffering from liver failure and died during the night. The sort of thing that happened all the time. It was a new day, a new shift. Time to move on.

And Crane?

What about him?

You never heard another word?

Somers looked as if he had been asked an idiotic question. That was the trouble with intellectuals. So fucking stupid.

Why would I hear another word? He took a long draw on the pint and did something with his eyes which made Gaddis want to deck him. Presumably he was given a new identity. Presumably he enjoyed another ten years of happy life and died peacefully in his bed. Who knows?

Two smokers, one coming in, one going out, pushed past their table. Gaddis was obliged to move a leg out of the way.

And you never breathed a word about it? Nobody asked you any questions? Nobody apart from Charlotte has brought up this subject for over ten years?

You could say that, yeah.

Gaddis sensed a lie here, but knew there was no point pursuing it. Somers was the type who shut down once you caught him in a contradiction. He said: And did Crane talk? What kind of man was he? What did he look like?

Somers laughed. You don’t do this very often, do you, Professor?

It was true. Sam Gaddis didn’t often meet male nurses in pubs on the outskirts of London and try to extract information about seventy-six-year-old diplomats whose deaths had been faked by men who paid out twenty grand in return for a lifetime of silence. He was divorced and forty-three. He was a senior lecturer in Russian History at University College London. His normal beat was Pushkin, Stalin, Gorbachev. Nevertheless, that remark took him to the edge of his patience and he said: "And how often do you do it, Calvin?" just so that Somers knew where he stood.

The reply did the trick. A little frown of panic appeared in the gap between Somers’s eyes which he tried, without success, to force away. The nurse sought refuge in some peanuts and got salt on his fingers as he wrestled with the packet.

Look, he said, Crane didn’t speak at all. Before he was admitted, they’d given him a mild anaesthetic which had rendered him unconscious. He had grey hair, shaved to look like he’d undergone chemotherapy, but his skin was too healthy for a man supposedly in his condition. He probably weighed about seventy kilos, between five foot ten and six foot. I never saw his eyes, on account of the fact they were always closed. That good enough for you?

Gaddis didn’t answer immediately. He didn’t need to. He let the silence speak for him. And Henderson?

What about him?

What kind of man was he? What did he look like? All you’ve told me so far is that he wore a long black overcoat and sounded like somebody doing a bad impression of David Niven.

Somers turned his head and stared at the far corner of the room.

Charlotte never told you?

Told me what?

Somers blinked rapidly and said: Pass me that newspaper.

There was a damp, discarded copy of The Times lying in a trickle of beer on the next-door table. A black girl listening to a pink iPod smiled her assent when Gaddis asked if he could take it. He straightened it out and handed the newspaper across the table.

You’ve heard of the Leighton Inquiry? Somers asked.

Leighton was a judicial inquiry into an aspect of government policy relating to the war in Afghanistan. Gaddis had heard of it. He had read the op-eds, caught the reports on Channel Four News.

Go on, he said.

Somers turned to page five. You see this man?

He flattened out the newspaper, spinning it through a hundred and eighty degrees. The nurse’s narrow, nail-bitten finger skewered a photograph of a man ducking into a government Rover on a busy London street. The man was in late middle age and surrounded by a crush of reporters. Gaddis read the caption.

Sir John Brennan leaves Whitehall after giving evidence to the inquiry.

There was a smaller, formal Foreign Office portrait of Brennan set inside the main photograph. Gaddis looked up. Somers saw that he had made the connection.

"Henderson is John Brennan? Are you sure?"

As sure as I’m sitting here looking at you. Somers drained his pint. The man who paid me twenty grand sixteen years ago to cover everything up wasn’t just any old spook. The man who called himself Douglas Henderson in 1992 is now the head of MI6.

2

It was a long way from Daunt Books on Holland Park Avenue to that suburban September pub in West Hyde.

A month earlier, Gaddis had been launching his latest book—Tsars, a comparative study of Peter the Great and the current Russian president, Sergei Platov—at a bookshop in central London. His editor, the part-owner of a boutique publishing house which had paid the princely sum of £4,750 for the book, hadn’t made it to the event. A lone diarist, on work experience at the Evening Standard, had poked her head around the door of the bookshop at six twenty-five, picked up a glass of room-temperature Sauvignon Blanc and, having established that she had more chance of finding a story on the top deck of the number 16 bus, left after ten minutes. No celebrity historian, no literary editor, nor any representative of the BBC had replied to the invitations which the PR girl insisted had gone out—first class—in the second week of July. A solitary notice in Saturday’s Independent had turned up one ashen-faced matriarch who had come "all the way from Hampstead because I so enjoyed your book on Bulgakov, as well as a former student of Sam’s named Colin who claimed that he had spent the previous year walking around Kazakhstan reading Herman Hesse." The rest were staff—the manager of the shop, someone to operate the till—about a dozen colleagues and students from UCL; Sam’s next-door neighbour Sue, who was highly sexed and always opened the front door in her dressing gown; and his close friend, the journalist Charlotte Berg.

Did Gaddis care that the new book would most probably disappear without a trace? Yes and no. Though politically active, he was under no illusions that a single book could change attitudes to Sergei Platov. Tsars would be politely reviewed by the broadsheet press in London and dismissed in Moscow as Western propaganda. It had taken three years to write and would sell perhaps a thousand copies in hardback. Long ago, Gaddis had decided to write solely for the pleasure of writing: to expect greater rewards was to invite frustration. If the public enjoyed his books, he was happy; if they didn’t, so be it. They had better things to be spending their hard-earned cash on. He had no desire for fame, no innate interest in making money: what mattered to him was the quality of the work. And Tsars was a book that he was proud of. It amounted to a sustained attack on the Platov regime, an attack which he had tried to condense, as succinctly as possible, into a 750-word op-ed in the Guardian which had appeared three days earlier.

Thus far, that had been the extent of the book’s publicity campaign. Gaddis wasn’t particularly interested in cultivating a public image. Four years earlier, for example, he had published a biography of Trotsky which had been enthusiastically talked up on Radio 4. An enterprising young television producer had invited him to screen-test for a series of programmes about Great Revolutionary Figures. Gaddis had declined. Why? Because he felt at the time that it would mean spending too long away from his baby daughter, Min, and abandoning his students at UCL. His friends and colleagues had thought it was a missed opportunity. What was the point of being a successful academic in twenty-first-century Britain if you didn’t want to appear on BBC4? Think of the tie-ins, they said. Think of the money. With his crooked good looks, Gaddis would have been a natural for television, but he valued his privacy too much and didn’t want to sideline the career he loved for what he described as the dubious pleasure of seeing my mug on television. There was stubbornness in the decision, certainly, but Dr. Sam Gaddis thought of himself, first and foremost, as a teacher. He believed in the unarguable notion that if a young person is lucky enough to read the right books at the right time in the company of the right teacher, it will change their life forever.

So what do we have with Sergei Platov? he began. The manager of Daunt was sure that no more of the thirty seats set out in the bookshop would be filled by curious passersby and had asked Gaddis to begin. Is he saint or sinner? Is Platov guilty of war crimes in Chechnya, of personally authorizing the murder of journalists critical of his regime, or is he a statesman who has restored the might of Mother Russia, thereby rescuing his country from decadence and corruption?

The question, as far as Gaddis was concerned, was rhetorical. Platov was a stain on the Russian character, a borderline sociopath who had, in less than ten years, destroyed the possibility of a democratic Russia. A former KGB spy, he had green-lit the murder of Russian civilians on foreign soil, held Eastern European countries to ransom over the supply of gas, and encouraged the murder of journalists and human rights activists brave enough to criticize his regime. One such journalist—Katarina Tikhonov—had been a good friend of Gaddis’s. They had corresponded for over fifteen years and met whenever he visited Moscow. She had been shot in the elevator of her apartment building three years earlier. Not a single suspect had been arrested in connection with the murder, an anomaly which he had exposed in his new book.

He turned to his notes.

"History tells us that Sergei Platov is a survivor, from a family of survivors."

What do you mean? The Hampstead matriarch was sitting in the front row and already asking questions. Gaddis flattered her with a patient smile which had the useful simultaneous effect of making her feel embarrassed for interrupting.

"What I mean is that his family survived the worst excesses that twentieth-century Russia could throw at them. Platov’s grandfather worked as a chef for Josef Stalin and lived to tell the tale. That in itself is a miracle. His father was one of only four soldiers from a unit of twenty-eight men who survived after they were betrayed to the Germans at Kingisepp in 1941. Sergei Spiridonovich Platov was pursued into the surrounding countryside and only avoided capture by breathing through a hollow reed while submerged in a pond. Sean Connery had the same trick in Dr. No."

Somebody laughed. Traffic hummed on Holland Park Avenue. Sam Gaddis was looking at a sea of nodding, attentive faces.

Do you know about the siege of Leningrad? he asked. He hadn’t meant to start on that, not tonight, but it was a subject on which he had lectured many times at UCL and the Daunt crowd would go for it. The manager, standing near the door, was bobbing his head in a way that looked enthusiastic.

It’s the winter of 1942. Minus twenty degrees at night. Three million people in a city surrounded by German troops, a million of them women and children. The matriarch gasped. There is so little food that people are dying at the rate of five thousand a day. Leningrad’s entire supply of flour has been destroyed by German firebombs. The fires cause molten sugar to saturate the earth at the Badayev warehouses. People are so hungry that they are prepared to dig into the frozen ground to extract the sugar and sell it on the black market. The top three feet of soil sells for one hundred roubles a glass, the next three feet for fifty.

A bell and a sudden burst of traffic. The door of the bookshop opened and a young woman stepped inside: shoulder-length black hair, knee-high leather boots over denim jeans, and the sort of figure that a forty-three-year-old divorced academic who has drunk three glasses of Sauvignon Blanc notices and photographs with his eyes, even while giving a talk at his own book launch. The woman whispered something to the manager, briefly caught Sam’s eye, then settled in a seat at the back.

Gaddis wished that he had brought his props. At UCL, his annual lecture on the siege of Leningrad was a must-see sellout, one of the very few events that every student in the Russian history programme felt both obliged and enthused to attend. Gaddis always began by standing behind a table on which he had placed a third of a loaf of sliced white bread, a pound of minced beef, a bowl of bran flakes, a small cup of sunflower oil, and three digestive biscuits.

This, he tells the packed auditorium, is all that you get to eat for the next thirty days. This is all that an adult citizen of Leningrad could claim on their ration cards in the early years of World War II. Kind of puts the January detox in perspective, doesn’t it? The lecture takes place in the early weeks of the New Year, so the joke always whips up a satisfying gale of nervous laughter. But enjoy it while you can. Confused looks in the front row. Plate by plate, bowl by bowl, Dr. Gaddis now tips the food onto the floor until all that remains on the table in front of him are ten slices of stale white bread. By the time the siege really starts to bite, bread is more or less the only form of sustenance you’re going to get, and its nutritional value is nil. The people of Leningrad don’t have access to Hovis or Mother’s Pride. This bread—he picks up a piece and tears it into tiny pieces, like a child feeding ducks—is made mostly from sawdust, from sweepings on the floor. If you’re lucky enough to have a job in a factory, you get 250 grams of it every week. How much is 250 grams? Gaddis now picks up six slices of the bread and hands them to a student in the front row. "That’s about how much it is. But if you don’t work in a factory—three of the slices come back—you get only 125 grams."

And I warn you not to be young, he continues, channelling Neil Kinnock now, a politician from yesteryear whom most of his students are too young to remember. I warn you not to fall ill. I warn you not to grow old in the Leningrad of 1942. Because if you do—at this point, he gets hold of the final three slices of bread, tossing them to the floor—if you do, you’ll most likely starve to death. He lets that one settle in before delivering the coup de grâce. And don’t be an academic, either. Don’t be an intellectual. Another gale of nervous laughter. Comrade Stalin doesn’t like people like us. As far as he’s concerned, academics and intellectuals can starve to death.

The beautiful woman in the knee-high boots was staring at him intently. At UCL, Gaddis usually picked out a volunteer at this stage and asked them to take off their shoes, which he then placed on a table at the front of the lecture hall. He liked to pull grass clippings and pieces of bark from the pockets of his jacket. Christ, if Health and Safety had allowed it, he’d have brought a dead rat and a dog in, as well. That, after all, was what the citizens of Leningrad survived on as the Germans tightened the noose: grasses and bark; leather shoes boiled down for sustenance; the flesh of vermin and dogs. Cannibalism was also rife. Children would disappear. Limbs would mysteriously be removed from corpses left to freeze in the street. The meat pies on sale in the markets of war-torn Leningrad could contain anything from horseflesh to human being.

But tonight he kept things simple. Tonight Dr. Gaddis spoke about Platov’s aunt and first cousin surviving three years in a German concentration camp in the Baltics. He related how, on one occasion, Platov’s mother had passed out from hunger only to wake up while she was being taken to a cemetery by men who had assumed she was dead. Towards eight o’clock, he read a short extract from the new book about Platov’s early years in the KGB and, by eight fifteen, people were applauding and he was taking questions from the floor, trying to make the case that Russia was reverting to totalitarianism and all the time wondering how to persuade the girl in the knee-high boots to join his party for dinner.

In the end, he didn’t need to. As the launch was beginning to thin out, she approached him at the makeshift bar and held out her hand.

Holly Levette.

Sam. Her hand was slim and warm and had rings all over it. She was about twenty-eight with huge blue eyes. You were the one who was late.

A smile of what looked like genuine embarrassment. Her right cheek had a little scar on the bone which he liked. Sorry, I was held up on the Tube. I hope I didn’t interrupt anything.

They moved away from the bar.

Not at all. He was trying to work out what she did for a living. Something in the arts, something creative. Have we met before?

"No, no. I just read your article in the Guardian and knew that you were speaking tonight. I have something that I thought you might be interested in."

They had found themselves in a small clearing in the Travel section. In his peripheral vision, Gaddis could sense somebody trying to catch his eye.

What kind of something?

Well, my mother has just died.

I’m sorry to hear that.

It didn’t look as though Holly Levette needed much comforting.

Her name was Katya Levette. Before her death she was working on a book about the history of the KGB. A lot of her information came from sources in British and Russian Intelligence. I don’t want her papers to go to waste. All that hard work, all those interviews. I wondered whether you might like to have a look at her research, see if there’s any value in it?

It could have been a trap, of course. A mischievous source in MI6 or the Russian FSB looking to use a mid-level British historian for purposes of propaganda. After all, why come all the way to the bookshop? Why not just phone him at UCL or send an e-mail to his Web site? But the chances of a honeytrap were slim. If the spooks wanted a scandal, if they wanted headlines, they would have gone for Beevor or Sebag-Montefiore, for Andrew or West. Besides, Gaddis would be able to tell in five minutes if the documents were genuine. He’d spent half his life in the museums of London, Moscow, and St. Petersburg. He was a citizen of the historical archive.

Sure, I could take a look at them. You’re kind to think of me. Where are the papers?

At my flat in Chelsea.

And suddenly the tone of the conversation shifted. Suddenly Holly Levette was looking at Dr. Sam Gaddis in the way that mischievous female students sometimes look at attractive, fortysomething bachelor academics when they are up to no good. As if her flat in Chelsea promised more than just dust-gathering notebooks on the KGB.

Your flat in Chelsea, Sam repeated. He caught the smell of her perfume as he drank more wine. I should probably take your number.

She was smiling, enjoying the game, promising him something with those huge blue eyes. From the hip pocket of her slim jeans, Holly Levette produced a card which she pressed into his hand. Why don’t you ring me when you’re not so busy? she suggested. Why don’t you call and we can arrange for you to come and pick them up?

It’s a good idea. Gaddis looked at the card. There was nothing on it except a name and a telephone number. And you say your mother was researching the history of Soviet Intelligence?

The KGB, yes.

A pause. There were so many questions to ask that he could say nothing; if he started, they would never stop. A male colleague from UCL materialized beside Gaddis and stared, with abandon, deep into Holly’s cleavage. Gaddis didn’t bother introducing

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1