Imponderables(R): Science
2/5
()
About this ebook
In gathering the most fascinating questions asked about science into a handy Gem format, pop culture guru David Feldman demystifies these and much more in Imponderables®: Science. Providing you with information you can't find in encyclopedias, dictionaries, or almanacs, Science is a fun look at the little things that make life so interesting.
David Feldman
David Feldman, MD, is Emeritus Professor of Medicine (Active) at Stanford University School of Medicine where he has been on the faculty since 1974. He has been a full professor since 1984 and was chief of the Endocrinology Division for 10 years. His laboratory studies the role of steroid hormone receptors, particularly the vitamin D receptor, and its mechanism of action. His current major research focus is hormone-dependent cancer including breast cancer and prostate cancer and the pathways by which vitamin D inhibits cancer growth. Professor Feldman is actively involved in both basic science approaches to the anti-cancer actions of vitamin D as well as to clinical trials studying the use of vitamin D in breast and prostate cancer. Professor Feldman was recently honored with an award for a Career of Outstanding Contributions to Vitamin D Research. He has authored over 290 medical research articles, reviews, editorials, and book chapters. In addition to being a co-editor of all four editions of OSTEOPOROSIS, he is the editor-in-chief of Vitamin D, just published in its third edition.
Read more from David Feldman
Who Put The Butter In Butterfly?: ... And other Fearless Investigations into Our Illogical Language Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Small By Design: The Entrepreneur’s Guide For Growing Big While Staying Small Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImponderables(R): Fun and Games Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related to Imponderables(R)
Related ebooks
Are Lobsters Ambidextrous?: An Imponderables Book Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Why Do Roller Coasters Make You Puke?: Over 150 Curious Questions & Intriguing Answers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDo Elephants Jump? Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Know It All: 132 Head-Scratching Questions About the Science All Around Us Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5F for Effort: More of the Very Best Totally Wrong Test Answers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat Did We Use Before Toilet Paper?: 200 Curious Questions & Intriguing Answers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ask a Science Teacher: 250 Answers to Questions You've Always Had About How Everyday Stuff Really Works Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Barkham Burroughs' Encyclopaedia of Astounding Facts and Useful Information Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy Do Clocks Run Clockwise?: Mysteries of Everyday Life Explained Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Your Brain on Facts: Things You Didn't Know, Things You Thought You Knew, and Things You Never Knew You Never Knew Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlad You Asked: Intriguing Names, Facts, and Ideas for the Curious-Minded Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When Do Fish Sleep?: An Imponderables Book Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Big Book of Facts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDo Geese Get Goose Bumps?: & More Than 199 Perplexing Questions with Astounding Answers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Flip Side of History: (Gift for Men Who Have Everything) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA People's History of the Peculiar: A Freak Show of Facts, Random Obsessions and Astounding Truths Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Where in the Hell is Sourdough: Tales of Mischief, Males, and Mayhem Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5#TIL: Today I Learned: Hilarious, Entertaining, and Educational Trivia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitics Weird-o-Pedia: The Ultimate Book of Surprising, Strange, and Incredibly Bizarre Facts about Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNow You Know Absolutely Everything: Absolutely every Now You Know book in a single ebook Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Loo Companion: Are You Sitting Comfortably? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom the Ridiculous to the Sublime Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnknown Facts in a Nutshell Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn This Day: 365 Tales of History, Mystery, and More Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMore Senior Moments (The Ones We Forgot) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInstant Genius: Fast Food for Thought Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Big Book of Interesting Stuff! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Weirdest and Wackiest World Records: From the Absolutely Bizarre to the Downright Shocking Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUncle John's How to Toilet Train Your Cat: And 61 Other Ill-Conceived Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Humor & Satire For You
Love and Other Words Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Man Called Ove: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I Will Judge You by Your Bookshelf Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Screwtape Letters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mindful As F*ck: 100 Simple Exercises to Let That Sh*t Go! Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Don't Panic: Douglas Adams & The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Farrell Covington and the Limits of Style: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5101 Fun Personality Quizzes: Who Are You . . . Really?! Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Best F*cking Activity Book Ever: Irreverent (and Slightly Vulgar) Activities for Adults Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Swamp Story: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everything Is F*cked: A Book About Hope Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Big Swiss: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Maybe You Should Talk to Someone: the heartfelt, funny memoir by a New York Times bestselling therapist Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar...: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anxious People: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the Guys Who Killed the Guy Who Killed Lincoln: A Nutty Story About Edwin Booth and Boston Corbett Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Soulmate Equation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I Hope They Serve Beer In Hell Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5My Favorite Half-Night Stand Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Go the F**k to Sleep Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everything I Know About Love: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Year of Living Biblically: One Man's Humble Quest to Follow the Bible as Literally as Possible Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Britt-Marie Was Here: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In a Holidaze Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Solutions and Other Problems Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Stay Married: The Most Insane Love Story Ever Told Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sex Hacks: Over 100 Tricks, Shortcuts, and Secrets to Set Your Sex Life on Fire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5And Every Morning the Way Home Gets Longer and Longer: A Novella Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Imponderables(R)
1 rating0 reviews
Book preview
Imponderables(R) - David Feldman
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
PARTLY CLOUDY
AND PARTLY SUNNY
IN A WEATHER REPORT?
The expression partly sunny was brought to you by the same folks who brought you comfort station and sanitary engineer. As a technical meteorological term, partly sunny doesn’t exist. So while you might assume that a partly sunny sky should be clearer than a partly cloudy one, the two terms signify the same condition. You have merely encountered a weathercaster who prefers to see the glass as half full rather than half empty.
Actually, most of the meteorological terms that seem vague and arbitrary have precise meanings. The degree of cloudiness is measured by the National Weather Service and described according to the following scales:
Where does fair
weather fit into this spectrum? Fair weather generally refers to any day with less than a 50 percent cloud cover (thus even some partly cloudy
days could also be fair
). But even a cloudy day can be termed fair if the cover consists largely of transparent clouds. On days when a profusion of thin cirrus clouds hangs high in the sky but does not block the sun, it is more descriptive to call it a fair day than a partly cloudy one, since one thick cloud formation can screen more sunshine than many willowy cirrus formations.
You might also have heard the aviation descriptions of cloud cover used in weather forecasts. Here’s what they mean:
Not many people know what the weather service means when it forecasts that there is a chance
of rain. Precipitation probabilities expressed in vague adjectives also have precise meaning:
How does the National Weather Service determine the daily cloud cover in the space age? Do they send up weather balloons? Satellites? Not quite. They send a meteorologist to the roof of a building in a relatively isolated area (airports are usually used in big cities) and have him or her look up at the sky and make a well-informed but very human guess.
WHY DO STRAWS IN DRINKS
SOMETIMES SINK AND SOMETIMES
RISE TO THE SURFACE?
The movement of the straw depends upon the liquid in the glass and the composition of the straw itself. The rapidly rising straw phenomenon is usually seen in glasses containing carbonated soft drinks. Reader Richard Williams, a meteorologist at the National Weather Service, explains the phenomenon:
…the rise occurs as carbon dioxide bubbles form on both the outside and inside of the straw. This increases the buoyancy of the straw and it gradually rises out of the liquid.
The gas is under considerable pressure when the drink is first drawn or poured. When that pressure is released the gas forms small bubbles on the sides of the glass and on the straw. As the bubbles grow the straw becomes buoyant enough to float
higher and higher in the container.
Occasionally, though, a straw will rise in a noncarbonated beverage, and we didn’t get a good explanation for this phenomenon until we heard from Roger W. Cappello, president of strawmaker Clear Shield National. We often get asked how our sources react to being confronted with strange questions. The only answer we can give is—it varies. Sure, we like authoritative sources who fawn over us and smother us in data. But we must confess we have a special place in our hearts for folks like Cappello, who make us sweat a little before divulging their secrets. Here is his letter to Imponderables, verbatim, skipping only the obvious pleasantries:
After pondering your question for a while, I decided to toss your letter as I was too busy for this. I later retrieved the letter and decided I would attempt to give you an answer that is slightly technical, mixed with some common sense and some B.S.
First off, I know the action you were referring to had something to do with specific gravity.
Specific gravity, as defined by Webster, is the rate of the density of a substance to the density of a substance (as pure water) taken as a standard when both densities are obtained by weighing in air.
Straws today are formed from polypropylene, whereas many years ago they were made of polystyrene, before that paper, and before that, wheat shafts.
Assuming water has a specific gravity of 1, polypropylene is .9, and polystyrene is 1.04. A polypropylene straw will float upward in a glass of water, whereas a polystyrene straw will sink. However, a polystyrene straw will float upward in a carbonated drink as the carbonation bubbles attach themselves to the side of the straw, which will help offset the slight specific gravity difference between water and polystyrene. A polypropylene straw will float higher in a carbonated drink for the same reason. If you put a polypropylene straw in gasoline, and please don’t try this, it will sink because the specific gravity of gas is lighter than water.
If you lined up ten glasses of different liquids, all filled to the same level, the straws would most likely float at all different levels due to the different specific gravities of the liquids and the attachment of various numbers of bubbles to the straws.
I really wish you hadn’t brought this up as I’m going to lunch now. I think I’ll order hot coffee so I can ponder the Imponderables of my business without distraction.
Good luck.
We can use all that good luck you were wishing us. I’m sure you had a productive lunch, too. Anyone willing to share information with us can eat (and sleep) with a clear conscience, knowing that he has led to the enlightenment of his fellow humans.
Submitted by Merrill Perlman of New York, New York.
WHY CAN’T YOU SEE STARS IN THE
BACKGROUND IN PHOTOS OR LIVE
SHOTS OF ASTRONAUTS IN SPACE?
There actually are folks out there who believe that NASA pulled off a giant hoax with the so-called Moon landings.
Often, the lack of stars in the background of photos of the astronauts is cited as startling evidence to support the conspiracy.
Sheesh, guys. If you want to be skeptical about something, be dubious about whether When you’re here, you’re family
at Olive Garden, or whether State Farm Insurance will be there for you the next time you’re in trouble. But don’t use a dark background in a photo of outer space to convince yourself that astronauts have never gotten farther into space than a Hollywood soundstage.
The answer to this Imponderable has more to do with photography than astronomy. Next time you go to a football game on a starry night, try taking a photo of the sky with your trusty 35mm point-and-shoot camera or camcorder. Guess what? The background will be dark—no stars will appear, let alone twinkle, in the background.
The stars don’t show up because their light is so dim that they don’t produce enough light on film in the short exposures used to take conventional pictures. But you have seen many photos of stars, haven’t you? These were undoubtedly time-lapse photographs, taken with fast film and with the camera shutter left open for at least ten to fifteen seconds. Without special film and a long exposure time, the camera lens can’t focus enough light on the film for the image to appear. Jim McDade, director of space technology for the University of Alabama at Birmingham, elaborates:
Even if you attempt to take pictures of stars on the dark side
of the Earth during an EVA [an extra-vehicular activity involving astronauts leaving the primary space module, such as a spacewalk] in low-earth orbit, a time exposure from a stable platform of about