Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Unavailable
Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem
Unavailable
Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem
Unavailable
Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem
Ebook733 pages10 hours

Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem

Rating: 3 out of 5 stars

3/5

()

Currently unavailable

Currently unavailable

About this ebook

What sets the practice of rigorously tested, sound science apart from pseudoscience? In this volume, the contributors seek to answer this question, known to philosophers of science as “the demarcation problem.” This issue has a long history in philosophy, stretching as far back as the early twentieth century and the work of Karl Popper. But by the late 1980s, scholars in the field began to treat the demarcation problem as impossible to solve and futile to ponder. However, the essays that Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry have assembled in this volume make a rousing case for the unequivocal importance of reflecting on the separation between pseudoscience and sound science.
            Moreover, the demarcation problem is not a purely theoretical dilemma of mere academic interest: it affects parents’ decisions to vaccinate children and governments’ willingness to adopt policies that prevent climate change. Pseudoscience often mimics science, using the superficial language and trappings of actual scientific research to seem more respectable. Even a well-informed public can be taken in by such questionable theories dressed up as science. Pseudoscientific beliefs compete with sound science on the health pages of newspapers for media coverage and in laboratories for research funding. Now more than ever the ability to separate genuine scientific findings from spurious ones is vital, and The Philosophy of Pseudoscience provides ground for philosophers, sociologists, historians, and laypeople to make decisions about what science is or isn’t.  
LanguageEnglish
Release dateAug 16, 2013
ISBN9780226051826
Unavailable
Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem

Related to Philosophy of Pseudoscience

Related ebooks

Philosophy For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Philosophy of Pseudoscience

Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
3/5

1 rating1 review

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I learned some things from this book, but overall didn't like it. (To be honest, some of it whizzed over my head.) The authors admit, over and over again, that there's no really satisfying definition of what exactly science is. So, of course, it's a bit tricky to demarcate the borderline between science and pseudoscience. Good subject to think about, but I don't think this book is quite worthwhile. Really liked Pigliucci's previous book "Nonsense on Stilts" better - on similar topics but much more readable.