Why I Am Not a Christian: And Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects
Written by Bertrand Russell
Narrated by Qarie Marshall
4.5/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this audiobook
Dedicated as few men have been to the life of reason, Bertrand Russell has always been concerned with the basic questions to which religion also addresses itself — questions about man’s place in the universe and the nature of the good life, questions that involve life after death, morality, freedom, education, and sexual ethics. He brings to his treatment of these questions the same courage, scrupulous logic, and lofty wisdom for which his other work as philosopher, writer, and teacher has been famous. These qualities make the essays included in this collection perhaps the most graceful and moving presentation of the freethinker's position since the days of Hume and Voltaire.
Whether listeners share or reject Bertrand Russell’s views, they will find this book an invigorating challenge to set notions, a masterly statement of a philosophical position, and a pure joy to listen to. This collection was edited, with Lord Russell’s full approval and cooperation, by Professor Paul Edwards of the Philosophy Department of New York University.
Bertrand Russell
Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) was born in Wales and educated at Trinity College, Cambridge. His long career established him as one of the most influential philosophers, mathematicians, and social reformers of the twentieth century.
More audiobooks from Bertrand Russell
Why I Am Not a Christian and Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Conquest of Happiness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Religion and Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Proposed Roads to Freedom Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5What I Believe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related to Why I Am Not a Christian
Related audiobooks
Eyeless in Gaza - Bringing Philosophy to Life #21 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFirst Principles Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSome Problems of Philosophy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Dao De Jing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Duns Scotus: The Subtle Doctor Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Macat Analysis of C. S. Lewis's The Abolition of Man Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Varieties of Religious Experience Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fundamentals of Ethics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Essential Mystery Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Class in Miracles: New Frontiers in Mind Metaphysics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Twelve Houses Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Emerson Essential Master Course Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDiscourses of the Elders: The Aztec Huehuetlatolli A First English Translation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBringing Philosophy to Life #5 - Education for All Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond the Wager: The Christian Brilliance of Blaise Pascal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPaul: In Fresh Perspective Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Living with our Gift from Prometheus - Bringing Philosophy to Life #17 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Short History of Philosophy: From Ancient Greece to the Post-Modernist Era Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Renewing the Christian Mind: Essays, Interviews, and Talks Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Eastern Wisdom, Modern Life: Collected Talks: 1960-1969 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5For the Life of the World: Theology That Makes a Difference Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Enchiridion Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jesus in the Flesh, Here and Now Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Hundred Remedies of the Tao: Spiritual Wisdom for Interesting Times Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Discourse Upon the Origin and the Foundation of the Inequal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Enchiridion of Epictetus Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Discourse Upon the Origin and the Foundation the Inequality Among Mankind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Philosophy Emerson: A Conversation between Ralph Waldo Emerson and Ernest Holmes Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Philosophy For You
The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up: The Japanese Art of Decluttering and Organizing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why Buddhism is True: The Science and Philosophy of Meditation and Enlightenment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Disliked: How to Free Yourself, Change Your Life, and Achieve Real Happiness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5101 Essays That Will Change The Way You Think Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Communicating Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Many Lives, Many Masters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Four Thousand Weeks: Time Management for Mortals Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Tao of Pooh Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Be Perfect: The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5People of the Lie Vol. 1: Toward a Psychology of Evil Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Living: Peace and Freedom in the Here and Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Noticer: Sometimes, all a person needs is a little perspective. Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Book of Five Rings Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/512 Rules for Life by Jordan B. Peterson - Book Summary: An Antidote to Chaos Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Stoicism: How to Use Stoic Philosophy to Find Inner Peace and Happiness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Holographic Universe: The Revolutionary Theory of Reality Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Destroy America in Three Easy Steps Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Life Is a 4-Letter Word: Laughing and Learning Through 40 Life Lessons Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The More of Less Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Be Free: An Ancient Guide to the Stoic Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The School of Life: An Emotional Education Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mastering Logical Fallacies: The Definitive Guide to Flawless Rhetoric and Bulletproof Logic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Why I Am Not a Christian
29 ratings15 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The question of whether there is a god, and if so, what our relations with them should be, is a timeless one. I decided to read this book as a counterpoint to a book arguing for the existence and relevance of god a month or two ago. In contrast, Russell's point of view, expressed eloquently and forcefully, is that he believes there not to be a god, and that religion has by and large been a force for tyranny, anti-intellectualism, and negativity in the world through history. He attempts to refute the reasonable arguments for the existence of god, as well as rejecting the moral ones, and finally deploring the policies of religion that have listed until this day, in many cases, such as being anti-contraception.Russell's prose is very well-written and persuasive, and the longest essay of the book, What I Believe, lays out a very interesting way of life for people to follow, as well. Other essays, concerning other atheists and their fate (on Thomas Paine), dealing with children, the ethics of sexuality, and other topics, are also very well done. Since it's a list of essays on similar topics, there is certainly overlap, but it's not too great, and that they were written at different times allows one to see the growth and changes in his thought over time. I really enjoyed this book, and found it both thought-provoking and something that I will carry with me over time. The final essay, regarding how Russell was refused employment at the City College of New York by local government due to his atheism in 1940, shows that the influence of religion on politics and authority were already apparent, and the effects of atheism overblown, even then. It may have gotten worse since, but it's still visible in our past.This one's definitely worth reading, if you have an open mind about the question of religion.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I read this book many years ago when I was an agnostic who was still trying to figure out the great mysteries of Christianity. Even now, I question all of the things that I was taught as a child, but that is another story entirely. I certainly understand Russell's thoughts and opinions, though I may be inclined to disagree with a few of them. Nevertheless, he works desperately to prove his point, and that part cannot be ignored. I think he was a man who long sought to find the truth, and this book takes us down that search right along with him.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Classic treatise on atheism from a deep thinker. Some essays are better than others (a bit outmoded language) - but a very worthwhile read.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5these ratinjgs here are as pernicious and prejorative as the indiv idual's mind who rates the book. having said that, i am joyful with Russell's sardonic style. I do wonder if tghe Lord Bertrand read much of Mark Twain as they both have this acerbic knife they uswe on their enemies (or those who do not agree with them). he essays were read by thiks writer during his early college days (mid 1960s), and I remmeber being enthralled at the man's erudition, yet being "common enough" to be understood by the layman. The piece at the end explaining the process of Lord Russell's being blackballed by the New York city political system was eye-opening. Next time anyone calls a New Yorker a "liberal," I'm going to jump in whatever fray they are in and they WILL take note of what I say. YOU WANT A LIBERAL? read this book.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5One of the first books I read on freethought and agnosticism, this still holds a fond spot for me. Although the arguments presented here would not be new to me at this time, this was the first time I had heard many of them presented. Unlike many of today's philosophers, Russell writes lucid prose with clarity rather than obfuscation. From what I've read, and what I've observed from the philsophy departments I've been associated with, I believe Russell was truly one of the last original thinkers in the field. This book made a big impression on me, and I need to reread it soon.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Russell first defines what he means by a Christian: someone who believes in God, the immortality of the soul, and Jesus Christ. Then he explains why he does not believe. Step-by-step he dismisses as fallacious the arguments for the existence of God: the first cause argument, the argument from design, etc. Then he discusses whether we survive death. Then the character of Jesus, as presented in the Gospels. He agrees that Jesus was an admirable man, but not divine and not the best or wisest of men. He gives examples from the Gospels. He believes that all religions are false and harmful. He even calls religion "a disease born of fear" and "a source of untold misery to the human race." Fear leads to cruelty, he says. "A habit of basing convictions upon evidence, and of giving them only that degree of certainty which the evidence warrants, would, if it became general, cure most of the ills from which the world is suffering." He explains his agnostic views with his usual lucidity. Russell was not an atheist; he was just not convinced by the arguments for God. He was always wary of certainties. So this book does not resolve anything, but it will give you plenty to think about. It is not a difficult read.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This is neither Russell's best nor his most cohesive work (there is a good deal of repetition between the essays, and they were written for a number of different venues); however, this is Bertrand Russell we're talking about ... so for this reviewer, anyway, the temptation to mark particularly good passages was strong. For the most part these essays sparkle with the usual fire.I will say that the long Appendix (not written by Russell) detailing how Russell was prevented from teaching at the City College of New York leaves me breathless with revulsion.Certainly in these frighteningly Bible-thumping times in the U.S., this material is highly relevant.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Suffers from being outdated in some places ... and discussion of what makes up "the good life" wanders into some soft territory.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A classic, and just as powerful today as when it was written.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A call to reason from a great thinker.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Good, clear writing; ideas that sound very current (for better or worse, the discussion has not changed much in 60 - 80 years); a lot to recommend this fairly short read.
Purely for historical reasons, it was interesting to read the last portion of the book concerning the furor over Russell's appointment to a professorship in New York, and the social, political and (extra-) legal wranglings to keep him from "corrupting the youth." It serves as a reminder how much things have changed, and how quickly; and how much is at risk today in parts, geographically and otherwise, of the country that seem so ready to rush into a reversal of liberal ideals. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Honestly this book didn't seem all that focused on religion or Christianity, especially considering Russell seems to always find a way to tie a complaint or two about religion into his books. (At least he has in every one I've read so far, I imagine it would be harder in his math books.) The essay the book takes it's title from doesn't put any significant consideration into why Russell was an atheist, just why he disapproved of the Christian church, which seems like a pretty big piece to leave out of a book by an atheist that's theoretically about religion.There are several essays that directly relate to religion, I really liked "Can Religion Cure Our Troubles" and there are a few that you might be able to kinda sorta relate back to religion, but you'd be making the connection there, not Bertrand. An example of that would be the essay on Thomas Paine. I know Thomas Paine was very outspoken about religion, but the extent to which it comes up in the essay is that he pissed off Jefferson and Washington for running his mouth off about his non traditional beliefs (he was Deist). They shared those beliefs they just weren't about to admit it and didn't like Paine's uncompromising literature. That probably accounts for about two sentences of the essay.Another of my favorites, "Nice People", could certainly point the finger at hypocritical behavior of some Christians...or any other person that projects a mantle of moral superiority while acting without disregard for the well-being of other people. It certainly never singles Christians out, or any other group for that matter. The essay does just fine coyly listing examples of the sorts nice behavior practiced by "nice people". For example:"Above all they keep alive the pleasures of the hunt. In a homogeneous country population, such as that of the English shire, people are condemned to hunt foxes; this is expensive and sometimes even dangerous. Moreover, the fox cannot explain very clearly how much he dislikes being hunted. In all these respects the hunting of the human being is better sport, but if it were not for the nice people, it would be difficult to hunt human beings with a good conscience. Those whom the nice people condemn are fair game; at their call of "Tallyho" the hunt assembles, and the victim is pursued to prison or death. It is especially good sport when the victim is a woman, since this gratifies the jealousy of the women and the sadism of the men."All and all the book is a bit of a mixed bag. Some of the essays are great. But a fair chunk are just so-so and two of them didn't read like Bertrand at all. This is the consequence of the essays being drawn from the first fifty years of Bertrand's writing. Two essays written in the 'ots lack all of the confidence, wit and simplicity that make Bertrand so enjoyable to me. They sounded an awful lot like a unsure, but overachieving college student that tries too hard to write seriously by using cold, formal and overly decorated language.The book ends with a reasonably detailed account of Bertrand's dismissal from New York City College before he actually got a chance to start. It's a pretty outrageous case of ideological bigotry. Though he had widespread support of the college's board, students and their parents Russell was ousted by what amounted to an angry mob and a shady judge that decided that Bertrand's astonishingly modern, but shamelessly misrepresented views on sex, marriage and (egads) masturbation would corrupt students and encourage them to violate New York's penal laws. These were laws that among other things made extramarital sex and cohabitation a felony, especially if it was with "an unmarried female of any age of a previously chaste character".
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The question of whether there is a god, and if so, what our relations with them should be, is a timeless one. I decided to read this book as a counterpoint to a book arguing for the existence and relevance of god a month or two ago. In contrast, Russell's point of view, expressed eloquently and forcefully, is that he believes there not to be a god, and that religion has by and large been a force for tyranny, anti-intellectualism, and negativity in the world through history. He attempts to refute the reasonable arguments for the existence of god, as well as rejecting the moral ones, and finally deploring the policies of religion that have listed until this day, in many cases, such as being anti-contraception.Russell's prose is very well-written and persuasive, and the longest essay of the book, What I Believe, lays out a very interesting way of life for people to follow, as well. Other essays, concerning other atheists and their fate (on Thomas Paine), dealing with children, the ethics of sexuality, and other topics, are also very well done. Since it's a list of essays on similar topics, there is certainly overlap, but it's not too great, and that they were written at different times allows one to see the growth and changes in his thought over time. I really enjoyed this book, and found it both thought-provoking and something that I will carry with me over time. The final essay, regarding how Russell was refused employment at the City College of New York by local government due to his atheism in 1940, shows that the influence of religion on politics and authority were already apparent, and the effects of atheism overblown, even then. It may have gotten worse since, but it's still visible in our past.This one's definitely worth reading, if you have an open mind about the question of religion.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Collection of Russell`s short critical essays about Christianity. Interesting to see how valid and thought provoking his arguments are 80-100 years later.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I found the the first two chapters a fantastic clear summary of why, Christianity is not where ethics needs/should be derived. The following chapters were to me an answer to a discussion not too relevant to, as far as I'm able to understand our current times. The last third of the book was again to me very exciting starting from the life of Thomas Paine. Other highlights were the radio debate on the existence of God and appendix of Russels denial to teach in state of New York due to allegedly immoral viewpoints. The latter is to me relevant in a discussion on cancel culture vs democratic pluralism. Essay on "Nice people" is also very strong.