Audiobook8 hours
The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy
Written by David Graeber
Narrated by Mike Chamberlain
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
4/5
()
About this audiobook
From the author of the international bestseller Debt: The First 5,000 Years comes a revelatory account of the way bureaucracy rules our lives
Where does the desire for endless rules, regulations, and bureaucracy come from? How did we come to spend so much of our time filling out forms? And is it really a cipher for state violence?
To answer these questions, the anthropologist David Graeber-one of our most important and provocative thinkers-traces the peculiar and unexpected ways we relate to bureaucracy today, and reveals how it shapes our lives in ways we may not even notice . . . though he also suggests that there may be something perversely appealing-even romantic-about bureaucracy.
Leaping from the ascendance of right-wing economics to the hidden meanings behind Sherlock Holmes and Batman, The Utopia of Rules is at once a powerful work of social theory in the tradition of Foucault and Marx, and an entertaining reckoning with popular culture that calls to mind Slavoj Zizek at his most accessible.
An essential book for our times, The Utopia of Rules is sure to start a million conversations about the institutions that rule over us-and the better, freer world we should, perhaps, begin to imagine for ourselves.
Where does the desire for endless rules, regulations, and bureaucracy come from? How did we come to spend so much of our time filling out forms? And is it really a cipher for state violence?
To answer these questions, the anthropologist David Graeber-one of our most important and provocative thinkers-traces the peculiar and unexpected ways we relate to bureaucracy today, and reveals how it shapes our lives in ways we may not even notice . . . though he also suggests that there may be something perversely appealing-even romantic-about bureaucracy.
Leaping from the ascendance of right-wing economics to the hidden meanings behind Sherlock Holmes and Batman, The Utopia of Rules is at once a powerful work of social theory in the tradition of Foucault and Marx, and an entertaining reckoning with popular culture that calls to mind Slavoj Zizek at his most accessible.
An essential book for our times, The Utopia of Rules is sure to start a million conversations about the institutions that rule over us-and the better, freer world we should, perhaps, begin to imagine for ourselves.
Author
David Graeber
David Graeber (1961–2020) was a Professor of Anthropology at the London School of Economics. His bestselling books include The Dawn of Everything, cowritten with David Wengrow, and DEBT: The First 5,000 Years. He was a contributor to Harper’s Magazine, The Guardian, and The Baffler.
More audiobooks from David Graeber
Pirate Enlightenment, or the Real Libertalia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bullshit Jobs: A Theory Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Debt - Updated and Expanded: The First 5,000 Years Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Utopia of Rules
Related audiobooks
Rendezvous with Oblivion: Reports from a Sinking Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Shipwrecked Mind: On Political Reaction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Renegade History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wages of Rebellion Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Pity the Billionaire: The Hard-Times Swindle and the Unlikely Comeback of the Right Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Age of Reform Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sickness is the System: When Capitalism Fails to Save Us from Pandemics or Itself Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Invisible Hands: The Making of the Conservative Movement from the New Deal to Reagan Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalism, Alone: The Future of the System That Rules the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Like a Thief in Broad Daylight: Power in the Era of Post-Human Capitalism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Marx, Capital, and the Madness of Economic Reason Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Brief History of Neoliberalism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Conquest of Bread Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Divide: Global Inequality from Conquest to Free Markets Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Theory of the Leisure Class Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5McMindfulness: How Mindfulness Became the New Capitalist Spirituality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bowling Alone: Revised and Updated: The Collapse and Revival of American Community Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Politics For You
The 48 Laws of Power Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Prince Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cobalt Red: How the Blood of the Congo Powers Our Lives Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Behold a Pale Horse Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Vision of the Anointed: Self-congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Nazi Conspiracy: The Secret Plot to Kill Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Razorblade Tears: A Novel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5All the Sinners Bleed: A Novel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5You Can't Joke About That: Why Everything Is Funny, Nothing Is Sacred, and We’re All in This Together Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Elon Musk Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory: American Evangelicals in an Age of Extremism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5While Time Remains: A North Korean Girl's Search for Freedom in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5People Love Dead Jews: Reports from a Haunted Present Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Do Nothing: Resisting the Attention Economy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Black AF History: The Un-Whitewashed Story of America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Overstory Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The MAGA Diaries: My Surreal Adventures Inside the Right-Wing (And How I Got Out) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Romney: A Reckoning Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Undoing Project: A Friendship that Changed Our Minds Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Radium Girls: The Dark Story of America's Shining Women Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Warmth of Other Suns: The Epic Story of America's Great Migration Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for The Utopia of Rules
Rating: 4.109677438709677 out of 5 stars
4/5
155 ratings9 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5As always, with Graeber, this is an incredible book. It's an engaging read and a great subject to discuss in such detail. There was a weird part where he talked about Star Trek for an inordinate amount of time. Either way, it was amusing and, strangely, on topic. If you're reading this, then read the book.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Not as boring as it sounds? Still kind of boring though.
Basically it is a glimpse into bureaucracy and it's role in society. Some of the points it made, were really interesting. The relationship with capitalism, exploitation, and how bureaucracy enables it was interesting. His points about bureaucracy always having a structure of violence to support it really made me look at it differently.
All that being said, there were many tangents that didn't feel relevant at all, and it really felt like padding. I think Graeber is an interesting writing and he brings up a lot of questions that are very insightful. I'll probably check out more of his work. His book on Debt sounds a lot better, honestly. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5So much to think about. Will need to re-read so I can really parse it all.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5At one point the author writes "it should now be obvious where this is going" but even after finishing the book I'm not quite sure what his point was. On a positive note this is the first time I really understood the argument against grammar books.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Well written, logical, persuasive, and interesting set of three (and 1/3) essays, purportedly about bureaucracy, its appeal, its powers, its flaws, and its dangers, but mostly about why you can't fight the system within the system. An anthropologist and a participant in Occupy Wall Street, Graeber combines the rigor of the trained academic writer with a knack for a pungent and articulate put-down: "Bureaucracies public and private appear . . . to be organized in such a way as to guarantee that a significant proportion of actors will not be able to perform their tasks as affected," for instance. (48) He references Marx and Weber, of course, but also Descartes and LeGuin, and he talks about the "grand cosmic hirarchies of late Antiquity, with their archons, planets, and gods" as well as about what made the movie The Dark Knight Rises so bad.
I don't buy his argument that high fantasy is a mechanism for reinforcing bureaucracy, but his notion is interesting that games are a "utopia of rules," and therefore bureaucratic in nature, while play is opposed to bureaucracy. He does a lovely job of pointing out that the Star Trek universe is "an Americanized vision of a kinder, gentler Soviet Union, and above all, one that actually 'worked.'" But it is his comparison of the post office (once such a successful model that "postalization" was an ideal and the Soviets modeled their organization on the German postal system) to the Internet that is the most persuasive.
It's a lovely rant, a little too self-enclosed in its rationality (great discussion of the nature of rationality in the book, by the way) to be entirely true, but I gained a huge number of insights into a thread of American thought that led to the World Trade Organization demonstrations, Occupy Wall Street, and the phenomenon of non-Democrats rallying behind Bernie Sanders. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Phew. Another book that is hard to rate. I came in expecting a history of Bureaucracy, maybe coupled with a sort of instruction manual for how to navigate it. What I got was a series of essays by a left-wing anarchist sociology professor. Which is awesome, for me at least, but probably not what other people may be looking for.
If you are looking for a history and instruction manual, look elsewhere. If you are looking for a sociological analysis of bureaucracy, politics and Batman (yes, Batman), then this may be for you. Just be prepared for excursions into communist and anarchist thinking. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Another fine book by Graeber - this one is an even handed exploration of the power of organizations to enact collective efficiencies and simultaneously reduce people to stupidity of enacting mindlessly the rules of order. Well worth the read from the anthropologist who coined the term 'We are the 99%"
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5As usual, Graeber's viewpoints and rhetoric are fascinating. This is a book about the Age of Bureaucracy. Unlike many of Graeber's other books, this one is just thrown together: an introduction, plus a series of four essays, already published in other places [albeit found here in long form].
The themes of the book include:
*The tension between imagination and structure, and where violence comes into each
*The myth of progress, and why it has stalled out
When reading the book, you can't help but notice that we're completely surrounded by bureaucracy. Changing plane flights. Going through customs. Changing your cell-phone plan. Filing taxes. It's like anything we do requires paperwork.
And he's also right about paperwork becoming the single most meaningful symbol in our lives. I declined a college degree, precisely because of the value [and privilege] that comes with it. This hasn't been of disadvantage to me, because I'm in the alternative professional world, but I sometimes have discussion with people on the subject.
If I had a critique, it would be that I wish Graeber was more accepting of spirituality and the natural world. For him, society or humanity seem to be everything, and this leaves some of his conclusions rather limited and incomplete. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5This is actually a collection of three essays and a film review. The critique of the quasi-Fascist 2012 Batman film "The Dark Knight rises" is the best part as he shows the strange attraction of the audience for the all powerful superheroes and their opponents who use their powers to fight one another instead of engaging in productive activities. Bane's plan for Gotham City was especially hare-brained, even by the low standards of superhero film franchises.The other three essays work as short pieces but are not profound enough to stand on their own as a book. Graeber's reaction to bureaucracy and its inherent preservation of structural violence ("Herrschaft") is mostly emotional. His bad experience, even, is not the result of actual bureaucracy but is due to his own incompetence as well as the people he selects to do the job. To get legal custody for his ill mother's bank account, Graeber needs a notarized power of attorney. Unfortunately, neither the notary nor Graeber make sure that all the necessary signatures are on the document so that the process has to be repeated three times. The amount of signatures necessary is the absolute minimum for the transaction, so the fault lies with Graeber and the incompetent notary - caused by the reverse Peter principle common in the USA: A job is reorganized until it is executed by the lowest paid person who can barely complete routine transactions.As far as a real bureaucracy is concerned, Graeber's essays suffer from incomplete research. He does not take into account what has been written about the topic in law and economics (what is known in German as Legalitätsprinzip and Ermessensspielraum). Bureaucracy means programming outcomes according to a fixed process which somewhat guarantees a similar treatment for everybody but can be onerous if the conditions required do not match the case. Bureaucracy is not flexible and efforts to change bureaucracy leads to even more layers of bureaucracy.Graeber justly notes that bureaucracy is a form of forcing others into compliance. In contrast to direct force, the veiled fist of bureaucracy hides the real power structures. Graeber, however, fails to see the positive side of bureaucracy in limiting civil servants in their discretion ("Ermessensspielraum"). A core rule of bureaucracy is to treat equal cases equally, so that some can not be more equal. In practice, this is often violated and despite bureaucratic procedures, a bribe can speed of processes or allow different outcomes for those that more equal. This is not a failure of bureaucracy itself but a failure of accountability in the organization and its socio-political environment. Graeber, in my view, cheaply chastises the wrong object. There are unfortunately too few defenders of efficient bureaucracy left. Markets are often ill-equipped to handle the complexities bureaucracies can deal with in their internal contracts.