Audiobook11 hours
The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes' Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines, and Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Controversy
Written by Sharon Bertsch McGrayne
Narrated by Laural Merlington
Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
3.5/5
()
About this audiobook
Bayes' rule appears to be a straightforward, one-line theorem: by updating our initial beliefs with objective new information, we get a new and improved belief. To its adherents, it is an elegant statement about learning from experience. To its opponents, it is subjectivity run amok.In the first-ever account of Bayes' rule for general readers, Sharon Bertsch McGrayne explores this controversial theorem and the human obsessions surrounding it. She traces its discovery by an amateur mathematician in the 1740s through its development into roughly its modern form by French scientist Pierre Simon Laplace. She reveals why respected statisticians rendered it professionally taboo for one hundred and fifty years-at the same time that practitioners relied on it to solve crises involving great uncertainty and scanty information, even breaking Germany's Enigma code during World War II, and explains how the advent of off-the-shelf computer technology in the 1980s proved to be a game-changer. Today, Bayes' rule is used everywhere from DNA decoding to Homeland Security.Drawing on primary source material and interviews with statisticians and other scientists, The Theory That Would Not Die is the riveting account of how a seemingly simple theorem ignited one of the greatest controversies of all time.
Author
Sharon Bertsch McGrayne
Sharon Bertsch McGrayne is the author of five books on the history of science, including Nobel Prize Women in Science, The Theory That Would Not Die, and A Lab of One’s Own, which she coauthored with Rita Colwell. She lives in Seattle.
Related to The Theory That Would Not Die
Related audiobooks
The Knowledge Machine: How Irrationality Created Modern Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Idea is Brilliant: Lost, Overlooked, and Underappreciated Scientific Concepts Everyone Should Know Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Delusions Of Crowds: Why People Go Mad in Groups Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Exact Thinking in Demented Times: The Vienna Circle and the Epic Quest for the Foundations of Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Life at the Speed of Light: From the Double Helix to the Dawn of Digital Life Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Homo Mysterious: Evolutionary Puzzles of Human Nature Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Galileo's Middle Finger: Heretics, Activists, and the Search for Justice in Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Standard Deviations: Flawed Assumptions, Tortured Data, and Other Ways to Lie with Statistics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Models of the Mind: How Physics, Engineering and Mathematics Have Shaped Our Understanding of the Brain Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Math of Life and Death Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Most Elegant Equation: Euler's Formula and the Beauty of Mathematics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Counting: How We Use Numbers to Decide What Matters Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Science Fictions: How Fraud, Bias, Negligence, and Hype Undermine the Search for Truth Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Journey to the Edge of Reason: The Life of Kurt Gödel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Genome Odyssey: Medical Mysteries and the Incredible Quest to Solve Them Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Why Trust Science? Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Joy of X: A Guided Tour of Math, from One to Infinity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Failure: Why Science Is So Successful Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Alice and Bob Meet the Wall of Fire: The Biggest Ideas in Science from Quanta Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Drunkard's Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fluke: The Math and Myth of Coincidence Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Infinite Powers: How Calculus Reveals the Secrets of the Universe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Prime Number Conspiracy: The Biggest Ideas in Math from Quanta Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Explains Everything: Deep, Beautiful, and Elegant Theories of How the World Works Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Equation That Couldn't Be Solved: How Mathematical Genius Discovered the Language of Symmetry Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Half-Life of Facts: Why Everything We Know Has an Expiration Date Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What the Luck?: The Surprising Role of Chance in Our Everyday Lives Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Social Science For You
Come As You Are: Revised and Updated: The Surprising New Science That Will Transform Your Sex Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Song of Achilles: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All the Light We Cannot See: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Radiolab: Journey Through The Human Body Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Road Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Own It All: How to Stop Waiting for Change and Start Creating It. Because Your Life Belongs to You. Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Name of the Wind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Demon Copperhead: A Novel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fourth Turning Is Here: What the Seasons of History Tell Us about How and When This Crisis Will End Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Deepest Well: Healing the Long-Term Effects of Childhood Adversity Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Radium Girls: The Dark Story of America's Shining Women Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Razorblade Tears: A Novel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cultish: The Language of Fanaticism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Hate U Give Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Parable of the Sower Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Attention Span: A Groundbreaking Way to Restore Balance, Happiness and Productivity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Year of Magical Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Overstory Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Being Mortal: Medicine and What Matters in the End Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Perfection Trap: Embracing the Power of Good Enough Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Left Hand of Darkness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Do Nothing: Resisting the Attention Economy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Kindred Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Leave the World Behind: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for The Theory That Would Not Die
Rating: 3.650862013793103 out of 5 stars
3.5/5
116 ratings10 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Wonderful (in the true sense of the word) history of Bayes Theorem. Incredible journey about a shunned theorem -through human disbelief, scepticism, personal vendettas and military secrecy - that changed the world. You are probably reading the review as a result of this theorem! From the gambling table to machine based translation, from exploding stars to mapping genomes, this book puts the theorem into it's right place within the world. Clear and gripping narrative style combing the human, mathematical and philosophical. Just loved it!
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Bayes really deserves a better book than this one. I don't think it's particularly well-written, and it makes the subject matter appear drier than it really is. I think there's a good book in the subject matter, but this one isn't it.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Lacks sufficient mathematical presentation to make the history meaningful.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Even if you failed math in college this book is good. Basically it's a history one statistical theorem. Put simply by updating intial your belief about something with objective new information , you get a new and improved belief. So simple but so controvrsial. The book is not easy to read in fact I was Googling some of the ideas, persons, places mentioned to understand what was going on but in the end it was worth all the time spent.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Sharon McGrayne is a very good and engaging writer. She has an interesting story to tell about the last 250 years of Bayesian thinking, how the theory has developed, and its many applications including how to price insurance, how to aim artillery, how to break the Enigma code, who wrote The Federalist Papers, how to find Russian nuclear subs, how to estimate the probability of a shuttle disaster, when to do various cancer screenings, whether cigarette smoking is harmful, etc. She also has a great set of characters, a parade of statisticians who are more colorful than I could have imagined, from the pioneers of Bayes, Price and Laplace to most recent statisticians like Cornfield, Tukey and Mosteller.
But, the book is deeply flawed and disappointing because it does so little to actually explain Bayes Theorem, how it was applied, how it led to different confusions than frequentism, and how the two have recently been theoretically synthesized. Most of this is not very complicated, one knows a decent amount already, but it would be more interesting to understand hot it was applied. Instead, the book concentrates much more on personality and the more surface descriptions rather than dwelling deeper and working out at least a few examples in more detail, both more of the theory from first principals but also better understanding what data and calculations various of her protagonists were using. Absent that, the book is often literally superficial.
Still, the book has a lot of upside -- but given that there is not exactly a huge selection of books covering this ground (unlike, say, quantum mechanics) to have this as nearly the sole choice is disappointing. - Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5I was disappointed by this book. I had read a good review that played up this interesting view on the world of statistics and how the Bayes Rule had becoming a compelling tool for statistical analysis.Perhaps it was my poor showing in statistics during my college days. Perhaps I wanted to make up for my mistake of signing up for a course like stats that had class on Friday afternoons. But I thought this book could be interesting, despite the somewhat dry core subject. The book did little for me in helping to show how the rule worked in theory and in practice. It did a great job of showing the power of Bayes Rule as a problem solving tool. It may have lead to the victory in WWII for its use in cracking the German U-Boat enigma codes.Maybe I had my expectations too high and maybe I was looking for more substance about the statistics tools themselves
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Interesting subject, very poorly written
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A well written history of Bayes Theorem. I found the information fascinating and educational. This is one of the best books I have read in years. I strongly recommend this to anyone who has an interest in statistics, science, and history.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The book basically says that some people like using Bayesian statistics, and other people don't think that Bayesian statistics should be utilized. However, it did not discuss in any detail how to apply Bayesian statistics to any actual problems, nor does it give any numeric examples. Although there were many pages of references in the back, the book did not seem to make any points clearly.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I love Bayesian probability, and here's a book about it! Actually it's mostly about the people and the politics surrounding the Bayesians' fight against frequentists (who didn't believe in using the subjective probabilities that full-on Bayes/Laplace analysis requires). McGrayne tracks the various uses of Bayes to solve problems across multiple fields, from cryptography to finding lost submarines, but I really wished it had been mathier: I felt like a lot of times I was taking her word that Bayes made the problem at issue easier to solve than frequentism. Concededly, it can be super hard to explain this--I have had hour-long discussions with very smart people over the Monty Hall problem. But I wished she'd tried more; her explanation of Monte Carlo modeling was clear and easy to follow.