Los Angeles Times

Patient accused doctor of sex abuse in 2014, but UCLA let him continue working

LOS ANGELES - The UCLA Medical Center learned in 2014 that a breast cancer patient had made abuse allegations against gynecologist Dr. James Mason Heaps, but officials did not move to fire him until four years later, after more accusations came to light, university records and interviews show.

The patient said she told UCLA Health that she was "completely shocked and embarrassed" by what she claimed were inappropriate sexual touching and comments during a medical consultation. She also filed a complaint with the California Medical Board.

A month later, a UCLA Health manager told the woman that the executive chair and vice chair of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology had "thoroughly reviewed and investigated" the allegations, according to the documents reviewed by the Los Angeles Times. Virgie N. Mosley, manager of patient affairs, did not inform the woman about the review's outcome, telling her in an April 2014 letter that the internal process

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times2 min read
Lakers Fade Again In Game 3 Loss To Denver, Moving To Brink Of Elimination
LOS ANGELES — The climb is mountainous, trouble lurking at every step. One bad dribble, and Denver runs the other direction, creating an open three. One missed assignment, and Aaron Gordon cuts baseline for a dunk. One whiffed box out and the Nuggets
Los Angeles Times3 min readCrime & Violence
Editorial: In Eco-minded California, There’s Still No Constitutional Right To Clean Air And Water
California may be a leader in the fight against climate change, but the state is years, even decades, behind other states when it comes to granting environmental rights to its citizens. While a handful of other state constitutions, including those of
Los Angeles Times4 min readAmerican Government
Supreme Court’s Conservatives Lean In Favor Of Limited Immunity For Trump As An Ex-president
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court’s conservative justices said Thursday they agree a former president should be shielded from prosecution for his truly official acts while in office, but not for private schemes that would give him personal gain. They al

Related