The Christian Science Monitor

Overruled: Is precedent in danger at the Supreme Court?

In the early years of Oklahoma’s statehood, tracts of public land were leased to energy companies on the condition that a portion of the revenue be put into a state fund for public schools. When the federal government tried to levy income tax on that revenue the case eventually went to the United States Supreme Court. It ruled the federal taxation unconstitutional, citing a precedent from a decade earlier.

In a dissent to that 1932 opinion, Justice Louis Brandeis articulated what still forms the core of how the high court approaches one of its weightiest powers: overturning precedent.

– a doctrine, dating back to English Common Law, that courts should follow the precedent set by past cases – is not a “universal, inexorable command,” he wrote. But it “is usually the wise policy, because in most matters it is

Four factors‘Serious cost to keeping an error on the books’‘How much of a change?’

Stai leggendo un'anteprima, registrati per continuare a leggere.

Altro da The Christian Science Monitor

The Christian Science Monitor2 min lettiPolitics
How Young Africans Find Liberation
When Africans began to shake off colonial rule six decades ago and formed independent states, new leaders used their roles in the liberation to justify their hold on power. Now a new generation of Africans has flipped the script. They want liberation
The Christian Science Monitor4 min letti
Points Of Progress: FIFA Guarantees Maternity Leave, And More
In good news this week: The world's largest soccer organization ensures female players will receive maternity leave – plus more positive headlines.
The Christian Science Monitor9 min letti
Plantation Tours Bypass The ‘Big House’ To Focus On The Enslaved
Plantations are revamping their tours to portray slavery more accurately and inclusively, hoping the past can help combat racial injustice today.