STAT

Opinion: Peer review could have helped short-circuit the Theranos fake news scandal

Thanks to Theranos, startups might now face a greater burden of proof to demonstrate their technology is effective.
Source: Kristoffer Tripplaar/AP

Theranos had a product almost everyone could get behind: a revolutionary blood test that would allow individuals to quickly and easily access information about their health. Startups like Theranos rely on cutting-edge innovation, then leverage that innovation to attract investors. Now the company’s downfall is a signal to innovators, the public, and the media that we need more transparency and credibility built on peer-reviewed publications.

Holmes, who was accused of falsely claiming that Theranos had developed a portable analyzer that could perform virtually any medical test using with the Security and Exchange Commission for a penalty of $500,000, among other things.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from STAT

STAT1 min read
STAT+: No, Alcohol Isn’t Good For You. Will New Dietary Guidelines Be Shaped More By Health Or Industry Interests?
More and more studies show that alcohol isn't healthy after all. Dietary guidelines are up for revision in 2025, and already, there's debate over research and industry influence.
STAT1 min read
USDA Faulted For Disclosing Scant Information About Outbreaks Of H5N1 Avian Flu In Cattle
With 28 herds in eight states infected with H5N1 bird flu, scientists are calling on the U.S. to release more data to help them assess the risk.
STAT1 min read
STAT+: Health Care Leaders Plot How To Expand Diversity In Clinical Trials
Experts gathered at the Milken Institute Global Conference this week to discussed potential strategies to expand diversity in clinical trials. Here are some of their big ideas.

Related Books & Audiobooks