- DocumentoWilliam Ong Genato vs. Atty. Essex L. Silapan. a.C. No. 4078 - July 14, 2003caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoYu vs Bondal AC No. 5534, January 17, 2005caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoVenzon v. Atty. Peleo III, A.C. No. 9354, August 2019caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoUy Chico vs. Union Life Assurance Society., 29 Phil. 163, No. 9231 January 6, 1915caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoSaura, Jr. vs. Agdeppa, 325 SCRA 682, Adm. Case No. 4426, Adm. Case No. 4429 February 17, 2000caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoUy Chico vs. Union Life Assurance Society., 29 Phil. 163, No. 9231 January 6, 1915caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoSamson vs. Era, 701 SCRA 241, A.C. No. 6664 July 16, 2013caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoHornilla vs. Salunat, 405 SCRA 220, A.C. No. 5804 July 1, 2003caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoAniñon vs. Sabitsana, Jr., 669 SCRA 76, A.C. No. 5098 April 11, 2012caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoMaturan vs. Gonzales, 287 SCRA 443, A.C. No. 2597 March 12, 1998caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoGenerosa Buted and Benito Bolisay vs. Atty. Harold M. Hernando, A.C. No. 1359 October 17, 1991caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoLinsangan vs. Tolentino, 598 SCRA 133, A.C. No. 6672 September 4, 2009caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoChevron Phils. vs. BCDA , 630 SCRA 519caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoAmerican Bible Society vs. City of Manila, 101 Phil 386caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoCagayan Electric Power vs. CIR , 138 S 629caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoAbra College v. Aquino 162 S 106 SCRAcaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoCentral Azucarera vs. CA, 20 SCRA 344caricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoWhat is Complementarity_ - National Courts, The ICC and the Struggle Against Impunitycaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoProsecution and Peace_ a Role for Amnesty Before the ICCcaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoThe ICC Refrains From Affirming a General Ban on Amnesties in the Gaddafi Admissibility Appeal Decision – International Law Blogcaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoPreliminary Examination Phase Three - Admissibility _ Coalition for the International Criminal Courtcaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoLitigation Strategiescaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoReport 9 - The Relevance of 'A Situation' to the Admissibility and Selection of Cases Before the ICC - October 2009.pdfcaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoExhaustion of Domestic Remedies_Jurisdictioncaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoTreaties, States Parties, And Commentaries - Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1998 - 17 - Issues of Admissibilitycaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoKeller SCJIL Complementaritycaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoFactors Relevant for the Assessment of Sufficient Gravity in the ICC. Proceedings and the Elements of International Crimes - QIL QDIcaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoOpen Source Evidence and the International Criminal Courtcaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoJustice in the Balancecaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoEstablishing Admissibility at the International Criminal Court_ Dcaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoHansencaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoECHR Admissibilitycaricato da
Han Sam
- DocumentoAdmissibility Challenge - Ne Bis in Idem in 'New Zealand - ICC Act'caricato da
Han Sam
- Documento20.1 Buenaventura vs. CA.docxcaricato da
Han Sam
- Documento15.5 Republic vs. Orbecido IIIcaricato da
Han Sam
- Documento9.1 Silverio vs. Republic.docxcaricato da
Han Sam
- Documento19.4 Cebu Country Club vs. Elizagaquecaricato da
Han Sam
- Documento19.3 Uypitching vs. Quaimcocaricato da
Han Sam
- Documento21.2 Gashem Shookat Baksh vs. CAcaricato da
Han Sam
- Documento15.8 Aznar vs. Garciacaricato da
Han Sam
- Documento19.1 Sps. Custodio vs. CAcaricato da
Han Sam
- Documento14.1 Del Socorro vs Wilsem (15.1,17.2)caricato da
Han Sam
- Documento15.6 Bellis vs. Belliscaricato da
Han Sam
- Documento15.3 Pilapil vs. Ibay-Someracaricato da
Han Sam
- Documento15.4 Garcia-Recio vs. Reciocaricato da
Han Sam
- Documento15.2 Van Dorn vs. Romillo Jr.caricato da
Han Sam
- Documento6.2 Guy vs. CAcaricato da
Han Sam
- Documento4.3 Quiao vs. Quiaocaricato da
Han Sam
- Documento2.2 Tañada vs. Tuveracaricato da
Han Sam