Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Examples of this need can be found among the various marketing and research associations:
The Marketing Research Associations (MRA) Code of Marketing Research Standards was established to: Ensure that MRA members conduct research in an honest and ethical manner; Instill confidence in research to encourage public cooperation; Instill confidence that research is done in a professional and fair manner; Provide members with guidelines that lead to research being conducted in accordance with scientific, statistical and proven practical methods; Carry out every research project in accordance with the Code; Respect the general public and its rights (The code of marketing research standards, 2007). In addition to MRA members adherence to the code, they also encourage non-members to familiarize themselves with this Code to facilitate their dealing with MRA members and to use as an educational tool.
The American Marketing Association (AMA) commits to promoting the highest standard of professional ethical norms and values for its members (practitioners, academics and students). First, and foremost of the AMAs ethical norms and ethical values is to do no harm. With this one statement as a guidepost, we can now distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable behavior.
Research Ethics
Respondents have certain rights, including the rights to choose whether to participate in a marketing research project, the right to safety from physical and psychological harm, the right to be informed of all aspects of the research task, and the right to privacy. However, in certain cases, unethical practices are followed ranging from low-ball pricing to violating client confidentiality.
Low-Ball Pricing
Quoting an unrealistically low price to secure a firms business and then using some means to substantially raise the price. For example, quoting a price based on an unrealistically high incidence rate is a form of lowball pricing. Offering to conduct a focus group at $6,000 a group and, after the client commits, saying, The respondents fees for participating in the group discussion are, of course, extra is a form of low-balling. > Incidence Rate : Percentage of the respondents in the sample that will qualify to complete the survey.
Example: Burger King once used positive responses to the following question in an advocacy study in an attempt to justify the claim that its method of cooking hamburgers was preferred over that of McDonalds: Do you prefer your hamburgers flame-broiled or fried? When another researcher rephrased the questionDo you prefer a hamburger that is grilled on a hot stainless-steel grill or cooked by passing the meat through an open gas flame?the results were reversed: McDonalds was preferred to Burger King.
Abusing Respondents
Respondent abuse can take several forms. Perhaps the most common is lengthy interviews.
As a result of long interviews and telephone sales pitches, more and more people are refusing to participate in survey research. The refusal rate for telephone surveys now averages 60-plus percent, an increase of 10 percent over 10 years. Forty-nine percent of the people who do participate say the surveys are too personal.
The thorniest issue in confidentiality is determining where background knowledge stops and conflict arises as a result of work with a previous client.
Client Ethics
Like research suppliers, clients (or users) also have a number of ethical dos and donts. Some of the more common client problems are: Requesting Bids When a Supplier Has Been Predetermined It is not uncommon for a client to prefer one research supplier over another. Such a preference may be due to a good working relationship, cost considerations, ability to make deadlines, friendship, or quality of the research staff. It is unethical to predetermine which supplier will receive a contract and yet ask for proposals from other suppliers to satisfy corporate requirements.