Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
A Workshop Hosted by: The College of Arts and Science, the Thompson Center for Learning and Teaching, and the Assistant Provost for Assessment and Institutional Accreditation December 1, 2006 University of Michigan-Flint
Agenda:
Introduction (Definitions and Objectives) Working Lunch (Critique and Share) Writing Well Stated Outcomes One Framework: Blooms Taxonomy Independent Work 1:
More measurable outcomes Better assessment Higher quality feedback Improved courses and programs Improved student learning and achievement
Deliver Forward
Program/course objectives are general goals that define what it means to be an effective program/course. They are general, indefinite, and not intended to be measured. They set the overall agenda for the program/course. Student learning outcomes are specific results the program/course seeks to achieve in order to attain the general goals defined in the objectives. Outcomes are definite and intended to be measured. They establish the particular means by which the agenda (as defined by objectives) is achieved. The achievement of outcomes is evidence that our students are learning.
assessment of learning: gathers evidence, based on student performance, which demonstrates the learning itself.
Examples: most classroom testing for grades or evaluation of a research paper on specific criteria
Indirect
assessment of learning: gathers reflection about the learning or secondary evidence of its existence.
Embedded assessment: a means of gathering information about student learning that is built into, and is a natural part of the teachinglearning process.
Example: as part of a course, expecting each senior to complete a research paper that is graded for content and style, but is also assessed for advanced ability to locate and evaluate Web-based information (as part of a program level, or a college-wide outcome to demonstrate information literacy).
Formative assessment: the gathering of information about student learning - during the progression of a course or program and usually repeatedly - to improve the learning of current students. Summative assessment: the gathering of information at the conclusion of a course, program, or undergraduate career to improve learning of the next cohort of students or to meet accountability demands.
Assessment for accountability: assessment of some unit (could be a department, program or entire institution) to satisfy stakeholders external to the unit itself. Results are often compared across units, compared to state and national norms, and always summative. Assessment for improvement: assessment that feeds directly, and often immediately, back into revising the course, program or institution to improve student learning results. This can be formative or summative.
Levels of Assessment
Assessment of individuals: uses the individual student, and his/her learning, as the level of analysis. Assessment of programs: uses the department or program as the level of analysis. Ideally program goals and objectives would serve as the basis for the assessment. Assessment of institutions: uses the institution as the level of analysis. Ideally, institution-wide goals and objectives would serve as a basis for the assessment. At this level it is essential to examine institutional documents such as mission and vision statements, as well as strategic plans.
Lunch Activity
Share your experiences with writing learning outcomes for courses or programs with those at your table.
What do you like/not like with respect to the learning outcomes in each syllabus? Use Worksheet 1 (blue) to make individual observations and the same worksheet (buff) for collective observations
rather than professor focused focused on the learning resulting from an activity rather than on the activity itself focused on skills and abilities central to the discipline and based on professional standards of excellence general enough to capture important learning but clear and specific enough to be measurable focused on aspects of learning that will develop and endure but that can be assessed in some form now
Appreciate Become aware of Become familiar with Develop Know Learn Understand
Students will understand Eriksons developmental stages. Students will be familiar with the major sociological perspectives and how they relate to their daily lives.
Students will identify and summarize each of Eriksons stages of development. Students will describe each of the major sociological perspectives and will illustrate how each perspective relates to events in their daily lives. Students will design, conduct, and analyze a research project using appropriate scientific theory and methodology
Students will develop the skills necessary for conducting research in the natural sciences.
Learning Domains
A now classic system that classifies educational goals to facilitate the development and evaluation of college and university curricula. A hierarchical taxonomy of student behaviors that reflect the development of increasingly complex cognitive abilities and skills as a result of instructional experiences.
There are 6 categories, listed hierarchically from simplest to most complex Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation
ability to remember information from simple (facts, terminology) to more complex/abstract (theories, principles)
Student
Learning Verbs:
List, name, identify, show, define, recognize, recall, state, describe, label, match, outline, reproduce, select
student will
ability to understand material at a level sufficient for grasping its meaning and inferring its implications Translating, comprehending, or interpreting information based on prior learning
Student
Learning Verbs:
Summarize, explain, interpret, describe, compare, paraphrase, differentiate, demonstrate, restate, illustrate
next context, interprets facts, compare and contrast, order, group, infer, predict
The
student will
Definition:
ability to correctly and independently bring to bear abstractions (e.g., theories, principles, methods) in solving concrete problems The selection, transfer, and use of data and principles to complete a task with a minimum of direction
Solve, illustrate, calculate, compute, use, interpret, relate, manipulate, apply, classify, modify, demonstrate, construct, discover, predict
Write an instructional objective for each level of Blooms taxonomy of the cognitive domain
Definition:
ability to parse information into is constituent elements and to identify the relationships between those elements Student distinguishes, classifies, and relates the assumptions hypotheses, evidence, or structure of a statement or question
Analyze, organize, categorize, deduce, choose, contrast, compare, distinguish, separate, differentiate, discriminate
Compare and contrast the cognitive and affective domains as specified by Bloom
Definition:
ability to combine elements into new wholes (e.g., ideas, plans of action, abstract relations) that are more than the sums of their respective parts Student originates, integrates, and combines ideas into a product, plan, or proposal that is new to him or her.
Design, create, hypothesize, invent, develop, support, schematize, write, report, discuss, plan, devise, compare, construct, compose, generate
Design a classification scheme for writing educational objectives that combines the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains.
Definition:
Ability to offer quantitative and qualitative judgments about the value of ideas and methods Student appraises, assesses, or critiques on a basis of specific standards and criteria
Evaluate, choose, estimate, judge, defend, criticize, justify, recommend, critique, interpret, support
between ideas, assess value of theories or presentations, make choices based on reasoned argument, verify value of evidence, recognize subjectivity
The
student will
Analysis
Synthesis
Evaluation
X X X
1.c.1. Outcome
2.a.1. Outcome 2.b.1. Outcome
Note: While this worksheet accommodates 7 learning outcomes, your specific course will most likely have more than this single worksheet can accommodate. The purpose of the worksheet is to provide a framework and not set parameters.
your student learning outcomes, what specific tasks or activities will you have students complete to promote learning? Given these student learning outcomes, how will you know when your students have achieved the outcomes for that lesson or course (what assessments will you use)?
How do my outcomes fit with those of more advanced courses? What do I expect students to have learned by the time they when they enter this class? How do all of the courses within a programs curriculum fit together? How do the program curricula contribute to the institutional outcomes?
Programmatically:
Deliver Forward
References
Leskes (2002) Beyond Confusion: An Assessment Glossary, Peer Review. 2 Huba and Freed. 2000. Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses. 3 Bloom.1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain 4 From Don Clark, http://www.nwlink.com/~dpmc;arl/hrd/bloom.html, the Learning Skills Program at the University of Victoria (htttp://www.coun.uvic.ca/learn/program/hndouts/bloom. html) , the Faculty Roles and Rewards Program at Portland State University (http://edtech.clas.pdx.edu/presentations/frr99/blooms.ht m), and W. Huitt, http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/cogsys/bloom.html.
1