Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Agenda
BNP Paribas Globally and in the US Improved Cooperation Among Regulators Globally BNP Paribas Response Whats Next?
Presence
Market Cap @ 5/2/06 Net Banking Income (excl BNL) After-tax ROE (excl BNL) France Italy Rest of Europe USA Asia & Other 48% 17% 16% 13% 6%
BNL 12 %
French
22 %
Retail
22 %*
BNL 12 %*
25 %*
* Retail Banking 59%
and
742 branches in the Western United States and Hawaii
Retail Banking
Presence in New York, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, San Francisco, Los Angeles
Financing Activities
Securities Services
Holding Co
Home
Other
Significant Regulators
CBOT
NYMEX
BOX
Large
Onsight regulatory supervision (6 permanent staff) Targeted, horizontal and peer review examinations
Agenda
BNP Paribas Globally and in the US Improved Cooperation Among Regulators Globally BNP Paribas Response Whats Next?
Internal communication between a Home Office and its international network Externally - between Home Office and Home Country Regulator - between local regulated entities and their Host Country Regulators
Cooperation
High degree of cooperation between Host and Home Country regulators, facilitating
Increased efficiency for regulators and bank staff Improved quality of examination results Minimization of unnecessary cost and burden
Places a premium on comprehensive and regular internal communication between a Home Office and its foreign operations. Avoids inconsistent and varying guidance from Home/Host Regulators to the individual banking organization.
Transparency
Pro-active sharing of information with primary regulators to provide a complete understanding of business and control activities Globalization of businesses and reporting has improved information flow to all regulators
Standardization
of Best Practices
Promoting broader application of improved operations and controls through Benchmarking of Best Practices and Horizontal Peer Reviews by Regulators, when available. Contributing to enhanced understanding of local standards by Home Regulators
Agenda
BNP Paribas Globally and in the US Improved Cooperation Among Regulators Globally BNP Paribas Response Whats Next?
Dedicated
U.S. Regulatory Relationship Oversight Committee Regulatory Relationship Officers covering all of Corporate and Investment Banking and Retail Banking for the U.S. Corporate Governance Committee and a process by which all Controls and Risk Indicators are reviewed
Evolution of U.S. Staff Interfacing with the Primary Regulators in the U.S. (Corporate and Investment Banking)
44
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
2001 2006
Global Functions
Establishment of a Head Office Regulatory Coordinator for all business lines Reinforcement of the Global Head of Compliance role in Paris Creation of a Globally Centralized Regulatory Relationship Function that oversees the 11 main international territories for action plans, regulatory communications and review of operational controls
Communication
Weekly meeting held between Regulator Relationship Officer and onsite Regulators for status updates Monthly meetings with the U.S. Regulatory Relationship Oversight Committee to discuss exams, findings and implementation. Participants include Legal, Compliance, Audit, external Counsel and Head Office Management Semi-Annual meetings between primary U.S. Regulators and BNP Paribas Management (local and global). Alternative meeting locations between New York and Paris Creation of a Global Regulatory Relationship Function allows BNP Paribas to communicate effectively to all International Regulators.
10
Addressing
Findings/Recommendations
Dedicated Internal staff to follow up and help resolve Regulatory and Internal Audit Findings Disciplined process for identification of aged or unresolved Findings are analyzed and escalated to Senior Management, Locally and Head Office
11
Agenda
BNP Paribas Globally and in the US Improved Cooperation Among Regulators Globally BNP Paribas Response Whats Next?
12
Whats Next
Develop
Support
Chairman Bernankes recent call, which was in connection with Basel II implementation, for flexibility among supervisors to ensure appropriate standardization of requirements is combined with flexible accommodation of differing approaches by different institutions that achieve consistent results II Capital Standards Encourage the Accord Implementation Group to avoid duplication of validation requirements by home/host regulators
Basel
13
Whats Next
Recommend
increased reliance on home country data and reporting and supervisory analysis
Unless specifically needed to satisfy host country safety and soundness responsibilities. Particularly essential in wholesale markets where the risks being measured are cross border and global in their effects.
Support
further coordination between home/host regulators regarding examinations and on-site oversight.
Proven efficiencies from joint exams currently conducted by multiple domestic regulators with the US Home/host regulators who share common standards should be especially well equipped to combine their efforts.
14
15