Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
- AN OVERVIEW
ABOUT ME
I am known as Ananthanarayanan. A graduate in Mechanical Engineering in year 1969 from Kerala University. After 2 years of plant training, started the work in the Stainless Steel fabrication shop at Atomic Energy, Mumbai. Joined Steel Authority of India in the year 1980 at their Stainless project at Salem. Was attached to the Product Development and Application Department. Took Voluntary retirement in the year 2002. Now enjoying retired life combined with Independent Technical Consulting in the area of Stainless Steel.
Iron and Steel are the most commonly used fabrication material
Why because
Abundantly available Lower cost Easy to fabricate, cast and forge Good strength Easy for ameliorating the properties by adding alloying elements and heat treatment Recyclable & eco friendly
Yes
More prone to general & other forms of corrosion. Corrosion protection processes are costly and time consuming. Higher strength with compromise in workability.
Yes.
Other metals like Aluminum, plastics etc which again have different sets of limitations of fabricability, cost, strength, availability, recyclability, ecology
ADVANTAGES OF SS
While normal steel is Ferritic with body centered cubic structure, SS is available in both BCC (Ferritic) & FCC (Austenitic) structures. Austenitics are cold work hardenable (Higher strength without compromising workability) General corrosion resistance. Fabricable, recyclable, indigenously available, eco friendly Costly per kg, but cheap
HOW IS IT POSSIBLE?
INTERNATIONAL DATA
Basel Switzerland
Grade 301L
Grade 304
Grade 301LN
Railcars made of UNS S20100 or UNS S20153 alloys have long-lasting strength and beauty
NIROSTA 4003
INDIAN EXPERIENCE
SS IN INDIAN RAILWAYS
1965 Toilet pan, wash basin in SS 304 1984-85 Trough floor in SS 301 1990 Toilet inlays in SS 304 1990 LHB Coach in SS in DIN 5512 1.4003 1995 Internal furnishings in SS 304 1997 IRS M 44/97 specs for wagons 1998 Box N wagon in SS - 44/77 2000 CK-201 specs of SS for coaches 2000 44/97 used for structural in ICF designed coaches.
ALL SS COACHES
1980s developed in South Africa and UK as 3 CR12 grade utility SS for coal/ore transportation. (low carbon, 11% Cr and Titanium) 1990s Modified 3 CR12 for better toughness (low carbon, 11% Cr, 0.3 minimum Ni, Ti removed) DIN 5512 of German Spec for railway SS specify this grade for freight wagons and passenger coach as 1.4003 LHB specifies DIN 5512 (1.4003) for new coach design in India. LHB approves Indian manufacturer. 1997 IR specifies 44/97 (containing Ti max for trial wagons) 2000 ASTM spec UNS 40977 for Utility Ferritic SS (low carbon, 11% Cr, minimum Ni, no Ti) 2001 IR specifies in CK 201 utility Ferritic matching 1.4003 2005 Internationally EN 1.4003 and UNS 40977 specifications followed for utility grade Ferritic SS (Low carbon, 11% Cr, 0.3 min Ni and NO Ti)
&
The Surface Treatment Depends on the Stainless Steel Grades Selected for the Shell Components
Ferro Magnetism
Higher Strength Levels Ductility (Workability)
Yes
No OK
No
No
Fair
Good
Good
No Very Good
No Very Good
Cost
Costlier
0.03 max 0.8 - 1.5 0.03 max 0.03 max 1.0 max 10.8 12.5 1.5 max Nil 0.75 max
350 - 450
450 - 650
450 - 600
450 650
500
20
18 - 20
20
25
0.07 max 2.0 max 0.045 max 0.03 (0.015) max 0.75 (1) max 17.5 19.5 8 10.5 0.10 (0.11 Max)
0.03 max 2.0 max 0.045 max 0.03 (0.015) max 1 max 16 18 (16.5 18.5) 68 0.20 (0.1 0.2) max
Titanium
Nil
Nil
0.03 max 5.5 7.5(6 - 8) 0.045 max 0.03 max (0.015) 0.75 max (1) 16 18 (16 - 17) 3.5 5.5 0.25 max (0.15 0.2) Nil
760 830
35 25 20
STAINLESS STEEL RESISTS CORROSION CORRODES BY FORMING CHROMIUM OXIDE LAYER ON SURFACE
GALVANIC CORROSION
ANODE CATHODE
- LESS NOBLE - LESS PASSIVE - MORE ACTIVE0 THE ANODE - CORRODES AT INCREASED RATE
- LESS NOBLE - LESS PASSIVE - MORE ACTIVE THE CATHODE - IS PROTECTED - CORRODES LEAST OR NIL
BECOMES
GALVANIC SERIES GOLD MONEL STAINLESS TYPE 316 STAINLESS TYPE 304 STAINLESS 430 SILVER ALUMINIUM BRONZE COPPER BRASS CAST IRON CARBON STEEL ZINC MAGNESIUM
1200 1000 800 YIELD STRENGTH 600 400 200 40 5 0 20 40 COLD WORK, PERCENT 60 80
ELONGATION
HAZ
WELD DEPOSIT
PARENT METAL
SCHEMATIC ILLUSTRATION OF SENSITIZATION WITHIN THE HAZ, WITH ASSOCIATED CHROME CARBIDE PRECIPITATION AND CHROMIUM DEPLETION AT THE GRAIN BOUNDARIES.
SCHAEFFLER-DE LONG DIAGRAM SHOWING THE FERRITE CONTENT OF THE WELD METAL
30 A = AUSTENITE 25
20
M +A
2
X
A+F
5 4
15 M 10 M = MARTENSITE 5 M+A+F
40% F
100% F
1X
F + M 0 CARBON STEEL M+F F = FERRITE 5 10 15 20 25 30
CHORIMIUM EQUIVALENT (%Cr+%Mo+1.5 x %Si+0.5 x %Nb) - WELD METAL X - SHEET & PLATE
Identifying different SS
430 grade SS 304 Grade SS
4 % Nickel SS
2 % Nickel SS
1 % Nickel SS
CLEANING OF SS WELDS
AT LOWER CARBON CONTENTS IT TAKES LONGER FOR THE MATERIAL TO BE SUSCEPTIBLE TO INTERGRANULAR CORROSION
TEMPERATURE C C=0.08 900
800
700
10
50
SCHEMATIC ILLUSTRATION OF THE THREE ZONES OF WELDING AND THE RELATED CONFINED AREA OF HIGH TEMPERATURE
WELD METAL HEAT AFFECTED ZONE PARENT METAL(UNAFFECTED) WELD ZONE MELTING POINT
TEMPERATURE(C)
ROOM TEMPERATURE
mmpy 0.200 0.175 CORROSION RATE 0.150 0125 0.100 0.075 0.050 0.025
10
12
14
16
% CHROMIUM
The effect of nickel price on the price difference between AL 201HP alloy and Type 304 based on the Ni raw-material surcharge [2]
UNS S20100
Type 304
Samples of UNS S20100 alloy and Type 304 following 100 hours of exposure in a salt spray test [15]
Comparison of Moon Rock V/s Slip Free Finishes for Floor Applications
Moon Rock Finish SS 430 2 dimensional Low 250 Mpa (passed through one etched and one plain roll)
Slip Free Finish SS 304/ SS 430 3 dimensional High 375 Mpa (passed thru male/female deep engraved rolls)
Relief
High 400 N/mm(depth is around 1.5 mm minimum) Over the relief thickness will be around 2.5mm
Least slippage (contoured Surface with ups and downs) Test procedure attached Higher Vickers 275 (more reduction due to male /female system ) Wear Resistance High Dry process rolling 1.25MM /1.6 mm 10 Kg / Sq. Mtr Easy and self cleaning (easy flow pattern for water) Best used in flooring Rs. 100 / Kg andRs. 1000 / Sq. Mtr
Slippage Hardness Process of making Suggested thickness Weight. per unit area Cleanability International Practice Cost
Corrosion Comparison
Carbon Steel
409M
Summary
I suggest Change 301 to 301L for all trough floors of coaches (Improves weldability and corrosion resistance Modify IRS M44 in line with CK 201 to meet International standards For LHB coach use 301L for trough floor and roof Can avoid painting for wagons (if required one primer coat) Avoid heating 4003 panels as it reduces the strength Use dull satin finish 2F for external panel for better paintability and avoid sand blasting Design inner structural members with 201L for metro coaches and use 201L for exterior panel of metro coach with/without painting Design tank wagons with 201L to reduce weight. Use double side embossed slip free finish for flooring and reduce weight Use Stretch forming process for making structural members to avoid wrinkles Use more of spot welding for fixing structural to panel
WHAT NEXT
Unpainted normal SS coaches (301L panel, 1.4003 structural) Painted normal SS coaches with weight reduction (1.4003 panels, 201L structurals) Painted Cost effective Metro coaches (1.4003 panels, 201L structurals) Tank wagons (Thickness reduction and unpainted) 201L
I AM REACHABLE