Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Mirko Farina
farinamirko@gmail.com
Complementarity in a Nutshell
Complementarity defences of EMT argue that many of the kinds of cognition humans excel at can only be accomplished by brains working together with a body that directly manipulates and acts on the world I take SSDs as my empirical case study to explore and illustrate the ramifications of Complementarity
Todays Talk
In the first part of this talk, I quickly look at the issue of whether there is truly substitution (either visual or tactile) or not
I argue that there is no real substitution but rather cognitive and perceptual supplementation
I finish up by relating my conclusions to the idea of Complementarity
Keeleys Dedication
Keeley believes that possessing an authentic sensory modality involves the acquisition of a genuine, wired-up (dedicated) sense organ
This organ has to be phylogenetically developed to facilitate survival with respect to an identifiable class of phenomena
For Keeley, the eyes are necessary for seeing and nothing can see that doesnt have a sense that has evolved for detecting properties via light. The coupling with the SSD only allows the agent to jerry-rig a sensory system dedicated to the reception of mechanical distortion (his skin) into one capable of providing him with generally reliable information about the electromagnetic spectrum. [Keeley (2002),p.20]. SSD provides the impaired users with information but only via a dedicated (tactile/auditory) channel that has already evolved to detect properties in the world.
They concede that SSDs encode spatial contents but argue that this only enables the visually impaired to use some features of the proximal stimulus to make cognitive inferences on the basis of dedicated neural pathways
Is it rather Vision?
Hurley and No have argued that after substantial training and adaptation the phenomenology of the perception obtained through the coupling with an SSD switches from tactile/auditory to visual
Is it TRULY substitution?
I argue it is not !
It is a supplementation
tactile sensation persists over time AFTER TRAINING - veridical representations of things out there in a three-dimensional space
This new type of experience doesnt entirely qualify as tactile nor exclusively as visual, but possesses both components
Quasi Vision?
Through the coupling with SSDs the visually impaired gets a mode of access to the world that depends vertically on pre-existing modes of perception whilst nevertheless counting as something entirely new This new mode of access emerges from users preexisting sensory modalities, and its novelty is determined by the fact that it no longer aligns with them
So SSD perception, stands at a new level above the pre-existing perceptual modalities and its various sensory divisions
Artificial Synaesthesia?
Synaesthesia is condition in which stimulation of one sensory or cognitive pathway leads to automatic and unintentional occurrences in a second sensory or cognitive pathway.
Synaesthesia is often described as a merging of the senses, a cross-modal union of different sensory modalities!
If cross-modal plasticity in SSD users is explained in terms of disinhibition and this form of disinhibition or unmasking also characterises the phenomenon of synaesthesia, couldnt we propose that a form of artificially induced synaesthesia can occur in SSD perception?
A Report:
Monochrome artificially induced synaesthesia in certain frequencies of sound...The thing I experience is not in color, is in my mind's eye, and can be very distracting. The shapes are consistent and can be reproduced by the same sound. It is almost as if you had a computer with two monitors running simultaneously different pictures, one was a very grey blurred version of the real world, and the other was a pure grey background with a big semi-circular light grey arc on it, and sometimes you switched your attention between both. [Ward & Meijer (2010),p.497-498].
Their brain has internalized the vOICe rules for mapping between hearing and vision and these rules are deployed, by virtue of mental imagery, both when the device is worn and when it is not
Cognitive Reengineering
Auvray &Myin (2009)have argued that, such devices should not be understood as merely external stand-ins for already existing purely internal processes ... but rather taken to transform cognition and perception in a qualitative way [Auvray & Myin (2009), p.1051]; in a way that would otherwise be precluded to the impaired non-SSD user
Through learning in fact, they get factored and integrated into the impaired users perceptual processing and become a different but complementary part of the machinery that realises her cognitive capacity
SSDs are therefore an example of cognitive and perceptual transformation, achieved via acquisition of embodied expertise
Thus SSDs, via plasticity, provide the visually impaired with the means for expanding perception towards new horizons SSD perception isnt a mere substitution but rather an addition, a supplementation or better a complement
The result of this complement is a biotechnological synthesis that entails the creation of a new space of coupling between a human being and the world