Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
In 1988 the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) was established by the Government of India through an executive resolution, and was subsequently upgraded as a fully autonomous body (a statutory Board) in the year 1992 with the passing of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act (SEBI Act) on 30th January 1992. PREAMBLE The Preamble of the Securities and Exchange Board of India describes the basic functions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India as ..to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto
Objectives of SEBI
The primary objective of SEBI is to promote healthy and orderly growth -of the securities market and secure investor protection. The objectives of SEBI are as follows: To protect the interest of investors, so that, there is a steady flow of savings into the capital market. To regulate the securities market and ensure fair practices. To promote efficient services by brokers, merchant bankers, and other intermediaries, so that, they become competitive and professional.
The SEBI Act, 1992 has entrusted with two functions, they are Regulatory functions And Developmental functions
Regulatory Functions
Regulation of stock exchange and self regulatory organizations. Registration and regulation of stock brokers, sub-brokers, Registrars to all issues, merchant bankers, underwriters, portfolio managers etc. Registration and regulation of the working of collective investment schemes including mutual funds. Prohibition of fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to securities market. Prohibition of insider trading Regulating substantial acquisition of shares and takeover of companies.
SEBI has three functions rolled into one body: quasilegislative, quasi-judicial and quasi-executive. It drafts regulations in its legislative capacity, it conducts investigation and enforcement action in its executive function and it passes rulings and orders in its judicial capacity. Though this makes it very powerful, there is an appeals process to create accountability
SEBI Regulation
FII
Developmental Functions
Promoting investors education Training of intermediaries Conducting research and publishing information useful to all market participants. Promotion of fair practices Promotion of self regulatory organizations
Investigations
Investigations are carried out with a view to gather evidence of alleged violations of securities market such as price rigging, creation of artificial market, insider trading, public issue related irregularities and other misconduct, as well as to find out persons/entities behind these irregularities and violations. SEBI has been strengthening its investigation activities over the years and these activities were further strengthened during 1999-2000.
Powers of SEBI
Power to call periodical returns from recognized stock exchanges. Power to compel listing of securities by public companies. Power to levy fees or other charges for carrying out the purposes of regulation. Power to call information or explanation from recognized stock exchanges or their members. Power to grant approval to bye-laws of recognized stock exchanges.
Powers of SEBI
Power to control and regulate stock exchanges. Power to direct enquiries to be made in relation to affairs of stock exchanges or their members. Power to make or amend bye-laws of recognized stock exchanges. Power to grant registration to market intermediaries. Power to declare applicability of Section 17 of the Securities Contract (Regulation) Act 1956, in any State or area, to grant licenses to dealers in securities.
Public Issue
Any company or a listed company making a public issue or a rights issue of value of more than Rs 50 lakhs is required to file a draft offer document with SEBI for its observations. The company can proceed further only after getting observations from SEBI. The company has to open its issue within three months from the date of SEBI's observation letter. Through public issues, SEBI has laid down eligibility norms for entities accessing the primary market. The entry norms are only for companies making a public issue (IPO or FPO) and not for listed company making a rights issue.
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the capital market regulator informed the Supreme Court, on Monday, that it will look into the report on the National Securities Depository Limited's (NSDL) failure that led to the initial public offering (IPO) scam of 2003-05. The probe by Sebi revealed that, what was kept for retail investors shares were acquired illegally by some large investors through at least 59,000 fake demat accounts.
IPO Scam
The Securities and Exchange Board of Indias (SEBI) decisive crackdown against rampant manipulation of initial public offerings (IPOs) for several years is welcome. At the end of December 2011, SEBI issued ad interim orders against seven companiesTaksheel Solutions, RDB Rasayans, Onelife Capital Advisors, Brooks Laboratories, PG Electroplast, Tijaria Polypipes and Bharatiya Global Infomediaand nearly a 100 officials and investment bankers associated with them, barring them from accessing the capital market. The orders exposed their fraudulent intent, diversion of funds and false/fabricated or concealed information. companies collude with investment bankers and a set of market operators or high net-worth individuals (HNIs) to fix the entire process, to rip off investors. companies collude with investment bankers and a set of market operators or high net-worth individuals (HNIs) to fix the entire process, to rip off investors.
Inaugurating the Conference, Mr. U K Sinha, Chairman, SEBI called for more research in the field of investor education. He also said that the various financial regulators in India and the Government of India are working together in the formulation of a National Policy on Financial Education. Emphasizing that investor grievance redressal should be a matter of priority, Mr. Sinha said that an effective grievance redressal mechanism should have features like uniformity, predictability and consistency. This is interesting because the apparent failure of SEBIs surveillance department and its sophisticated software has been repeatedly raised byMoneylife. The regulator has scrapped one expensive inter-market surveillance system (of HCL Technologies) and decided to replace it with another from TCS (Tata Consultancy Services) without a word of explanation. The orders also raise serious questions about SEBIs process of vetting IPOs which is clearly flawed. Will anyone in the government finally ask SEBI about the quality of its surveillance software, if it fails to catch even large connections such as promoters and directors of listed entities? Wed say both! Think about it at a time when the US Securities and Exchange commission is creating benchmarks after benchmarks in ensuring that not only are US stock markets pristinely transparent, but also that they are rid of the scourge of insider trading by targeting and prosecuting all guilty parties, SEBI is still trying to find its feet in understanding what constitutes insider trading. Frankly, for much of the history since it came into existence in 1992, taking over command from the Comptroller of Capital Issues, SEBI has been up a blind alley on insider trading.