Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
commission or omission of an act, pursuant to a duty, that a reasonably prudent person in the same or similar circumstance would
or would not do, and acting or the non-acting of which is the proximate cause of injury to another person or his property
"failure to use such care as a reasonably prudent and careful person would use under similar circumstances." (JCAHO)
A more general term referring to a deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable and prudent person would use in a particular set of circumstances
The average judgment, foresight, intelligence, & skill that would be expected of a person with similar training and experience
Law of negligence is part of what is known as tort law tort French, means wrong
In this case a mother made a routine prenatal visit to the hospital. While in the waiting room
the mother complained to the nurse of severe abdominal pain. Over the next hour and a half the mother complained of pain five
times, and each time was told she would have to wait to be examined. When the mother was finally examined the fetal HR was
only 60-70 bpm. An emergency caesarean was performed but the baby was born severely depressed and hypoxic and
developed seizures within the first hour. The hospital settled this case for $2M for severe brain injury to the newborn infant
Injured party must prove that a breach of duty has occurred Involves the matter of foreseeability
Injury must have been actually caused by the breach of duty Most difficult to prove
to recover damages, actual damages must have occurred to the injured party
Failure to exercise the degree of diligence which the circumstances of the particular case demands
Failure to report observations Mistaken identity Wrong med., wrong conc., wrong route, wrong dose
Defects in equipment that may result in injuring patients Errors d/t family assistance
Administration of medicine without a doctors prescription Sample case: A case of negligence was filed against a
puericulture center nurse in 1979 for injecting Penstrep to a boy who had a swollen foot. The nurse informed the parents that she was
not a doctor. Upon insistence of the parents to have their child treated, she informed them that the doctor usually gave Penstrep injections in
such cases. She injected the medicine without a doctors prescription. The boy died of cardiorespiratory failure
secondary to anaphylactic shock d/t the injection of the drug. The nurse was found guilty as charged.
3 conditions are required to establish defendants negligence: 1. Injury of such nature wouldnt occur unless there was negligence
2. Injury caused by agency w/in control of defendant 3. Plaintiff did not engage in any way that would bring about injury
let the master answer for the acts of the subordinate Liability expanded to include master
an irresistible force
improper or unethical conduct or unreasonable lack of skill by a holder of a professional or official position (JCAHO)
Stepping beyond ones authority with serious consequences Term for negligence or carelessness of professional personnel
Lesnik (1962) Malpractice is used properly only when it refers to a negligent act committed in the course of professional performance
To determine what is and what is not careless, the law has developed a standard of care which can be determined by