Sei sulla pagina 1di 82

PETE 689 Underbalanced Drilling (UBD)

Lesson 4 Air, Gas and Mist Drilling.


Read:

UDM - Chapter 2.1 - 2.4


Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Air, Gas, and Mist Drilling


Gases used in UBD.
Dry air drilling. Nitrogen drilling. Natural gas drilling. Mist drilling.

Optimized hole cleaning.


Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Gases for UB Drilling


Air. Cryogenic Nitrogen. Membrane Nitrogen. Engine Exhaust. Natural gas.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Gases for UB Drilling


Compressed Air
79% N2 , 21% O2. Corrosion. Fire.

US$3,000 Day. Mod and Demob.


Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Cryogenic Nitrogen
40 year old technology. Made as a by product of liquid oxygen manufacture. Air replacement. No corrosion. No downhole fires. 99.9% pure N2 7K-40K US$/day.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Cryogenic Nitrogen

Delivery
Bottled gas. Truck. Storage tank on a ship.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Cryogen Nitrogen-Pumping Equipment


Stainless Steel Carbon Steel Vaporizer
Liquid Nitrogen (-320OF)

Pump Gaseous Nitrogen to well 80OF, 0-10,000 psi


Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Procedure
Determine Gas Volume Required. Convert from Liquid Volume. 1 gallon liquid nitrogen produces 93.12 ft3 of N2 at SCP. 1 m3 of N2 liquid produces 698 m3 of gas at SCP.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Nitrogen Conversion Factors


1 gal of liquid nitrogen is 93.12 ft3 at STC. 1 gal of liquid nitrogen is 0.1333 ft3. 1 liter of liquid nitrogen is 698 litres of gas at STC.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Cryogenic Nitrogen Cost


World-wide 1-3 US $/gal. 0.10 US $/scf. Canada 0.02 US $/scf. South America 1.00 US $/m3.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

UB Drilling Gas Alternatives


Nitrogen Membranes
95% N2 , 3-5% O2. Corrosion considerations. Combustion considerations. Approximately 15,000 US $/day. Mob/demob costs.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Membrane Nitrogen
On site manufacture. Dependent on concentration. Directly proportional to pressure and rate. Inversely proportional to gas partial pressure. Driven by dissolution and diffusion.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Individual Hollow Polmeric Gas Separation Fiber

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Individual Hollow Polmeric Gas Separation Fiber


Nitrogen Oxygen Water Vapor
Nitrogen

Oxygen and Water Vapor are Fast Gases which quickly permeate the membrane, allowing Nitrogen to flow through the fiber bores as the product stream.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

N2 Generating Unit A Bundle Of Fibers


HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANE

NITROGEN ENRICHED GAS

OXYGEN- ENRICHED AIR

FEED AIR
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Equipment Required
Compressor. Filters-fibers will plug if the air is not filtered. NPU or NGU. Controller. Booster(s).
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Membrane Nitrogen Production Unit


Drilling Rig

Optional Booster Compressor

Filter and Air Separation Feed Air Membrane System Compressor

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

1997 Nitrogen Unit.


N2 units with coolers. 8x30x8 high 23,000 psi 1200 scfm N2 at 5% 02
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Skid-Mounted Nitrogen Producing Unit (NPU)1998

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Weatherford 2000 Nitrogen Generation Unit.


1.

3.

2.

1. 2. 3. 4.

N2 500-600 scfm. 2000 psi comp. 27 gph diesel. 8x20x16 high. Nominal O2 5%

4.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Nitrogen Membrane System 1999

3
1

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Procedure
Determine volume requirement. Determine maximum oxygen concentration. Determine effective volume from units. Determine pressure requirement.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Oxygen Concentration
% Oxygen is only partially a valid concept for fire.
Ignition temperatures and water content play a big part.

% Oxygen is important for corrosion.


Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Recent Combustion Work


Testing:
Alberta Research Council. Counter claims of increased corrosion and combustion with membrane generated N2

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Minimum Oxygen for Combustion (with Methane)


% Oxygen Required for Combustion
12.00 11.50 11.00

10.50
10.00 9.50 9.00

8.50
8.00 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

Pressure (psia)
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Nitrogen Source Selection Cryogenic vs. Membrane


Location. Job duration. Volume requirement. Pressure requirement. Purity requirement.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Operating Cost
Canada USA
Crossover between cryogenic costs and membrane costs is generally about three days of operation. Transportation and mobilization are big items.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Cryogenic Nitrogen Operating Cost


Canada
10,000 US $/day minimum.

40,000 US $/day maximum. (500-1800 scfm for 20 hrs/day).

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Flow Path

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Exhaust Gas Generating Unit 1980

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Exhaust Gas System

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Natural Gas for UB Drilling


Available. No downhole fires. No corrosion. Low cost, long term contracts.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Pressure
Determine requirement as for air, but allow for lesser specific gravity. Delivery pressure set at source.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Fuel Gas & Group Gas Pipeline

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Natural Gas Pipeline Hook Up


(Lyons, 1984)
Main Pipeline. ~500 Psig Auxiliary line to rig.

Flow to rig.
Choke/Controller

Pipeline Flow

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Natural Gas Concerns


May be pressure limited. Heavier hydrocarbons repress foam so be sure that they are stripped out.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Amoco Crossfield Gas Recovery Project

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Amoco Crossfield 9-12 Well


88.9 mm Drill Pipe

Drilling Fluid Water = 1000 kg/m3 Viscosity = 1cP

2350 m

KOP = 2250 m 177.8 mm Casing @ 2403 m 155.6 mm Openhole 120.6mm PDM

Elkton: Gas BHP = 7.0 MPa BHT = 80oC

778 m Target TMD = 3181 m


Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Crossfield Gas Recovery Project


Why it was done:
Increasing public concerns over flaring. Increasing EUB requirements for public consultation and notification.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Crossfield Gas Recovery Project


Perfect fit with Amocos goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Try out new idea and technology. Great plumbing setup.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Gas Recovery Project


RBOPTM Gas Flare System Drilling Rig Choke Manifold

Flare Knockout Vessel

Horizontal Separator Feed Gas Compressors

Produced Gas Compressors Gas Gathering Line


Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Gas Processing Unit Feed Gas Line

Compression & Scrubber/Filter Units


Feed Gas Compressors Recovery Gas Compressors Scrubber/Filter Unit

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Flow Control Manifold

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Gas Scrubber & Filter Unit

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Gas Recovery Summary


16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Gas Conserved Gas Flared

MMCFD

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Gas Recovery Summary


Gas Conserved
16

Gas Flared

Conserved 92%. Inc. Cost 170k US $. No need to optimize GLRs. 75 MMCFD well.

14 12

10
8 6 4 2 0

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Crossfield Gas Recovery Project


Results
Estimated costs were 250k US $, actual cost was 170k US $. Conserved 92% of flow from the well. Eliminated need to optimize the gas/liquid ratios. 75 MMCFD storage well.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Hole Cleaning
Optimizing hydraulics with gasses is primarily concerned with hole cleaning - getting the cuttings that are generated by the bit out of the hole. With gas, rheological properties have very little to do with hole cleaning. Hole cleaning with gasses is almost entirely dependent on the annular velocity.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Drag and Gravitational Forces


Flowing air exerts a drag force on cuttings. Gravitational force on the cuttings Therefore there is a threshold velocity in which the cuttings will be lifted from the wellbore. Threshold velocity increases with size of cuttings.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Hole Cleaning
Compressibility of air (or gas) complicates matters. Frictional pressure increases downhole pressure - decreases velocity downhole. Suspended cuttings increase the density of the air, increasing downhole pressure.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Hole Cleaning
Temperature has an effect on volumetric flow rate. We must pump at a velocity high enough to remove the cuttings, but not too high where we waste energy.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Hole Cleaning Criteria


Terminal Velocity Criteria. Minimum Energy Criteria. Minimum BHP Criteria.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Terminal Velocity Criteria


Gray determined that the minimum velocity of the gas must be at least as high as the terminal velocity of the cutting in order to lift the cutting from the wellbore.
Vc = V f - Vt
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Terminal Velocity
Vt = 4gdc
g dc Cd

c f 3Cd f

gravitational acceleration, 32.17 ft/sec2 characteristic particle diameter, ft. drag coefficient. density of cuttings, lbm / ft3 density of fluid, lbm/ ft3
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

c f

Terminal Velocity
Vt = 3.369

dcTc
P

For flat cuttings


Vt = 4.164 dcTc P

For sub-round cuttings, T and P are at bottom hole conditions in 0R and psia.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Terminal Velocity
Terminal velocity in air drilling is determined mainly by:
cutting diameter, shape, and density. bottom hole temperature and pressure.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Factors Effecting Vt
Shape (roundness). Increased Size. Increased Temperature. Increased Density. Increased Pressure. Increases. Increases. Increases. Increases. Decreases.

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Terminal Velocity
As pressure increases Vt decreases. As pressure increases Air velocity decreases. If the mass flow rate of gas remains constant the local air velocity decreases with increasing pressure. The air flow rate required to lift the cuttings increases with increasing BHP.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Friction Pressure
dP dL fm =m + fm mV 2m 2g (Dh Dp) Eq. 2.5

m Vm g Dh Dp

Friction factor of the mixture of air and cuttings. Mixture density, lbm/cu.ft. Mixture velocity, ft/s. Acceleration due to gravity. Hole diameter, ft. Pipe diameter, ft.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Friction Pressure
fm = a + c Weymouth quation. a = 0.14 ( Dh Dp) 0.333

Gou argued that Nikuradse is more correct.

1
a

= 1.14 0.86ln

2 Dh - Dp

= absolute roughness of the pipe.


Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Friction Pressure
Mixture density of air and cuttings in the annulus is determined by the mass of the cuttings and the density of the air. Air density is a function of the pressure. Mass of the cuttings in the wellbore is a function of: ROP Hole cleaning efficiency.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Friction Pressure
Pressure drops down the drillstring and through the bit play a part in BHP due to temperature effects. Temperature is also effected by:
Formation temperature. Influx of formation fluid (expansion of gas into the wellbore). Mechanical friction. Pressure.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Required injection rates?


Relating downhole air velocities to surface injection rates is quite complex. We need cuttings shape and size to determine terminal velocity. Methods required knowledge of the cutting shape and size.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Minimum Energy Criteria


Probably the most widely used criteria was developed by Angel in 1957. Angel assumed that, for efficient cuttings transport downhole, the kinetic energy of the air striking each cutting should be the same as that of air giving efficient cuttings transport at standard pressure and temperature.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Minimum Energy Criteria


1 2

min V 2min =

1 2

stp V 2stp

Pmin Density of air (or gas) at the minimum

required downhole injection rate, lbm/cuft.

Vmin Air (or gas) velocity downhole, ft/min.


Pstp
Density of air (or gas) at standard temp and pressure, lbm/cuft.

Vstp

Air (or gas) velocity at standard Temp and pressure, ft/min.


Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Minimum Energy Criteria


Vmin = Vstp Pstp Pmin

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Minimum Energy Criteria


Experience from shallow blast holes, drilled in limestone quarrying operations, indicated that cuttings were transported efficiently if the air velocity equaled or exceeded 3,000 feet per minute. This is equivalent to Grays terminal velocity for flat cuttings with a diameter of 0.46 in. and for sub-rounded particles of 0.26 in.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Minimum Energy Criteria


Angel computed the downhole air pressure with eq. 2.5 dP dL = m+

m m V 2m
2g (Dh Dp) 1+

m = a
Wc Wa

Wc
Wa

Mass of cuttings generated in a given time; the mass flow rate of cuttings, lbm/min. Mass of air flowing past any point in the well in given time; the mass flow rate of air, lbm/min.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Minimum Energy Criteria


Pb = P2sabTs2 Ga T Ts
2a G

abT2 G-a

Ps Surface air pressure, lbf/sq.ft, absolute. Ts Surface temperature, 0F. G T h Annular temperature gradient, 0F/100. Downhole temperature = Ts+Gh Hole depth.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Minimum Energy Criteria


a= S Q SQ + 28.8 . ROP . Dh2 53.3Q Gas specific gravity (air=1) Gas flow rate, scf/m

ROP
b= Dh D2

Penetration rate, ft/hr 1.625 x 10-6Q2


(Dh Dp) 1.333 (Dh2 Dp2)2 Hole diameter, ft. Drillpipe diameter, ft.
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Minimum Energy Criteria


This was combined with the cuttings transport criterion defined in Eq 2.10 to deduce the minimum air flow rate as a function of hole depth, annular geometry, and penetration rate.
Vmin = Vstp

stp
min Eq. 2.10

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Minimum Energy Criteria


To simplify, the average downhole temperature can be used to calculate BHP.
6.61S(Ts + Gh) Q2
(D2h D2p)2 V2stp = (P2s + bT2av) e2ah/Tav bT2av

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Minimum Energy Criteria


This was solved numerically for the gas injection rate required to give an annular velocity equivalent in cuttings lifting power to air with a velocity of 3000 ft/min.
A series of charts was generated for different combinations of hole size, drillpipe diameter and penetration rates
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Minimum Energy Criteria


Qmin can be approximated by:

Qmin = Qo + NH
Qo N H Injection rate (scfm) at zero depth that corresponds to an annular velocity of 3000 ft/min Factor dependent on the penetration rate (Appendix C) Hole depth, (thousands of feet).
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Appendix C
Data for calculating approximate circulation rates required to produce a minimum annular air velocity which is equivalent in lifting power to standard air velocity of 3.000 ft/min. (Angel, 1957).

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

250

Bottomhole Pressure (psia)

200

150

100

50

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

Depth (feet)
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

80 70

Bottomhole Pressure (psia)

60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

Depth (feet)
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

7-7/8 hole
6 drill collars

3-1/2 drillpipe
3800 hole depth

Annular Bottomhole Pressuresin An Air Drilled Hole-comparison Of Predictions And Measurements Made While Circulating Off-bottom

Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

45

Bottomhole Pressure (psia)

40

35

30

25

20 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300

Flow Rate (scfm)


Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 500

Bottomhole Pressure (psia)

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

Flow Rate (scfm)


Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

3.5
3

Required Rate of Air (scfm)

2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0

2000

4000

6000

8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000

Depth ( feet) Comparison of air rates recommended by several different cuttings transport analyses (after Guo et al, 199412).
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Minimum BHP Criteria


Angel analysis does not predict a minimum BHP, but gives a pressure that decreases monotonically with decreasing air flow rate.

Annulus Pressure Drop

Annulus Air Velocity

The influence of air flow rate on annular pressure drop (after Supon and Adewumi, 19915).
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering

Annulus Pressure Drop

Potrebbero piacerti anche