Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Contents
Microwave Industry Technology Market Recent Development of Microwave
Le Petit Chef Le Petit Product Line Project Selection and Execution Le Petit Market Development Crisis and Dilemma
Solution
History
1940
Radar(Radio
1946
Magnetron
1947
The
first commercial product hit the market first home microwave model, $1295
5 feet tall Over 750 pounds $5000
1952
The
Microwave oven uses various combinations of electrical circuits and mechanical devices to produce and control the output of microwave energy for heating and cooking. Two fundamental sections:
Control
section
11%
5% 3% 100%
(magnetron, waveguide)
15%
Door
Controls Final Assembly Other Total Cost of Grill, Crisp & Control*
Over 40%
10%
10% 10% 15% 100% 40%
*Impact of providing an additional grill feature on the cost structure of a basic oven.
Recent Developments
Combi-Ovens
A
combination of microwave and other cooking modes to provide a variety of options. Steaming, browning and grilling
Accessories
Allowed
Intelligence
Fuzzy
New
logic
control technique Improve the ease of use and performance of microwave ovens
Introduction
History & Profile Le Petit Chef was founded in 1989 by Laurent Laferrire. Headquartered in Paris By 1999, Le Petit Chef was a Private held Regional manufacturer Product Kitchen counter-top appliances mixers/blenders, coffee/expresso machines, griller/toasters, microwave ovens Employee & Organization
600+ employees Administrative, Finance, Sales & Service and Marketing departments in Paris. R&D, Manufacturing, Procurement and Logistics in Lyon.
Sales
Product Mix Turnover by geographic region
Strategy
Differentiated through
Technical innovation Performance features
Combi-ovens
Combined cooking modes of grilling and convection heating with microwave cooking. Exclusive recipes Innovation design and high performance
Operating structure
High conformance quality Reliable order deliveries Low costs Strong control over suppliers Heavy investment in R&D Inter-functional coordinate and cooperation
Organization Structure
CEO CFO
Finance Admin
Manufact uring
Marketing
Sales
R&D
Liberte Ultigril 20L Liberte Ultigril 25L Liberte Ultigril 35L Liberte Electoniqu e 20L Liberte Electoniqu e 25L Liberte Electoniqu e 35L
Liberte 25L
1990
1991
1992 1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
Project Selection
Project Execution
Marketin g
Sale s
R& D
Manufacturi ng
Price Decline
Positioning
Upper End of Price Range
Lower Cost Structure
Improvement in Operation
The Crisis
Manufacturing
Cant reduce cost anymore coz it will lower quality lack of unit volumes for each product offering Accessories is not compatible for other product
Marketing
Delay in development and introduction of new models Lack of visible product differentiation made it impossible to sustain premium prices for the models. Aggressive advertising and promotion already made, more marketing expenses is impossible.
R&D
Limited number of engineer with large number of project cause delay R&D is an uncertain process, without meeting company standard , new product can not be release. They are churning out over five model upgrades every year, more than any of our competitors
306 person
NPV 7,000,000 18 months
72 People
NPV 20,000,000 12 months
180 People
NPV 10,000,000 18 months
24 People
NPV 15,500,000 6 months
30 People
NPV 14,400,000 6 months
On Going Project
Product Design Redesign wave Research on Material Product Modification Develop Egalite Compact model Add Egalite Line Capability User Interface for Egalite
Improve Existing Product more Aesthetically Differentiated Retailer Feedback NPV 16,000,000 / 25 Improve wave diffusion in Liberte line Test Kitchen Feedback NPV 12,000,000 / 48
Change grill element material in Liberte to make it longer lasting Feed back from Sales and Service NPV 7,000,000 / 12 Modify HV supply power in Egalite and Liberte to be able to use it in other country Feed back from Sales and Service NPV 5,000,000 / 36 Reconfigure Component lay out to reduce overall volume occupied Proposal from marketing NPV 12,000,000 / 72
Hologen lamp grilling R&D Proposal NPV 22,500,000 / 108 Redesign user interface for faster user input (one-touch cooking) and expand recipe offering All competitor have it NPV 13,700,000 / 18
Gagnes Dilemma
Propose Project On going Project
Too many projects overall. Too many derivative projects( v.s Platform project). Overcommitted resources. Inappropriate skill mix in R&D. Little top-down input to project generation (the focus being on bottom-up suggestion). Dealing with potentially radical disruptive technology trends.
Things to Consider
Solution
Rescheduling Project Standardized component for various product line Encourage all division to involve in R&D
Increase Top-down input in project generation Give training for engineer to increase skill mix in R&D
Solution ..
Fuzzy Logic Project Create new product Line for low end market with new brand
Product differentiations
Hai
Depend on the NPV, I may choose the highest one. But we still need to know more detail and information about the projects. If we just consider about numbers, such as NPV, human resources and time to complete the project, I may choose the fourth project. Depend on the strategy, considering about time limited. The company can choose the second project to create a new market.
Because of NPV, people and time, the second is the best one. In another way, Asian market is another chance, because of Asian people may think the brand from Europe is kind of luxury. It will be another chance to create low end market. Combine on going project for product design and product modification The choices is base on the company strategy, if I could choose one of the project, then :
Short term strategy: The fourth project Long term strategy: The first project
To think about why people use microwave oven, one important reason is they want to save time. So the performance is important, project 4 enhance the speed of cooking. Marketing department always focus on low price, good quality, they can sale easily. R&D department want to create unique, high quality product. Focus in product design for the on going project. NPV is just a prediction, its only project prediction. We can not just look at the NPV in deciding which project to go on. I rather choose first project which is fuzzy logic as it is a new innovation in the market and this is very important for company which its operation based on the innovation to be able to compete in the market. It might give lower NPV but company can be a market leader for the technology We can not stop the on going project and we have new project thus we can use heavy weight model to link each other project.
ANGEL