The Study of Economic impact of Commonwealth Games 2010 On Indian Economy

Prepared By: Rekha R. Satasiya (097600592002) Pragna J. Mangroliya (097600592006)

INTRODUCTION
All journeys have secret destination of which the traveler is unaware
An association of 53 independent countries Head is Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II Headquarter in London 1.7 billion people are in CWG 19th CWG first time in India at Delhi & second time in Asia 28 sports like cycling, netball, weightlifting, shooting, table tennis etc.
2

Literature Review
[A] Survey By FICCI
[B] Will the CWG Delhi 2010 be World Class? [C] Delhi is Wrong choice to host CWG2010

Objectives
1. 2. Main Objective: To analyse the contribution of common wealth games 2010 in the economic development of India. For the comparison of the methods, strategy, plan and vision adopted by India for making commonwealth games successes compared to the other countries who have already hosted the games. Sub Objectives: To analyze the impact of common wealth games in various sectors like infrastructure, tourism, employment etc. To know the Awareness of the people of India and the expectations of the people of India from the games. To study the development and the problems Delhi has undergone during the buildup of the games. To access the ability and capability of India as a nation to host a international event like the commonwealth games.
4

1. 2. 3. 4.

Research Method
Primary Data:
- Questionnaire Secondary Data: -News Paper - Magazine - Articles - Websites -Information broadcasted CWG2010 Delhi

on

official

websites

of

Sampling Design
Scope of the Project Sampling Method Sample Size : Amreli City : Convenience Sampling : 100 respondent of Amreli City

Instrument of data collection: Questionnaire

Data analysis & Interpretation

Questions
Awareness about CWG Boost to the economy & overall development Gain Investment Hub 12%

Yes
60% 58%

No
40% 28%

Can t Say
13%

Sporting Infrastructure 10%

Growth Path for transforming 16%

All of the above 60%

Other

Respondents

2%
8

Cont
Occupation Respondents

Business 16%

Professional 28%

Students 37%

Services 09%

Other 10%

Industries Respondents

Transport 24%

Sports Goods Mfg. 16%

Hospitality 15%

Tourism 28%

All Of the above 17%

9

Commonwealth & Indian Business

Economic Impact Employment Hospitality(Hotel Industry) Transportation Sector Tourism Business promotion Training the workforce Sports Infrastructure
49% increase in GDP 24.2 lakh jobs 7000 athletes, accommodation to tourist 2000 low floor buses, Improved infrastructure of airports 10 million foreign tourist visited India Medical tourism, Food processing, energy & education Teach English, skill for servicing tourist Development of 20 training venues
10

Hypothesis Testing
H0: 1 = 2 = 3 = 4 = 5 H1: At least one of the mean () is different from the other.
INDUSTRIES Business Transport Infrastructure Sports Goods mfg. Company Hospitality Tourism All of the above 7 2 2 3 2 OCCUPATION Professional 2 1 3 2 2 Student 3 4 1 2 3 Service Other 2 3 8 1 2 1 2 2

Fcal < Ftab 0.7853 < 5.37

So, Our Null hypothesis is accepted. It shows that there is no significance difference in any of the mean.
11

Findings
India s Share in foreign Tourist India s GDP Awareness of People Displaced families Net Loss Expenditure on Sports Infrastructure Foreign Direct Investment Comparative Findings Vision Statement Development aspect Legacy Focused on Development of sports culture in every India Focused only at domestic level Lack of long term legacy
12

From 0.5% to 1.5% 49% increment 60% 30,000 to 40,000 Rs. 1707.82 Crore 2160% $100 billion

Recommendations
 Need for a post-games audit and detailed social and environmental impact assessment.  Need for a full public disclosure of all finances related to the CWG.  Need for the government to have a long-term legacy plan based on principles of human rights and environmental sustainability.  Need for detailed inquiry into the decision-making and bidding process as well as on the total expenditure of the CWG.  Provision of a high standard of customer service with easily accessible customer care helps lines.
13

Significance Of the Study

[A] To Country [B] To Region [C] To Researcher [D] To Cultural Sector

14

Limitations Of the Study

    Lack of accuracy in Data Only overview of all the topics Biasness from the respondents Limited Area

15

Learning from The study

During this project we understand the importance of time management and group dynamics. This experience gives us a right blend theoretical as well as practical exposure. From this project we learn that proper budget estimation is required to manage allocated funds. We also learned that how to convince respondents and how to make understand them about the purpose behind the study when they are not ready to respond.
16

Conclusion

17

Bibliography
http://www.cwgame2010.com/cw-games-history http://www.cwgdelhi2010.org/ http://www.ficci.com/SEDocument/20085/ficci-cwg-survey.pdf http://www.hicsarp.org/documents/Whose%20Wealth_Whose%20Commons.pdf http://www.proprofs.com/polls/poll/?title-games-delhi-2010-be-world-class http://www.financialexpress.com/news/cwg-2010-will-result-in-economicimpact-of-4.94-bn/691826/3ness http://www.delhispider.com/resources/3337-Common-Wealth-Gains.aspx http://www.articlesbase.com/sports-and-fitness-articles/delhisdevelopments-due-to-the-commonwealth-games-2010-1726356.html  http://ssaaseminar2011.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/cwg-2010-image-ofdelhi
18

Thank You
19