Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
L. Williams, M.D. Chief Executive Officer United States Pharmacopeia International Seminar Intellectual Property and Access to Medicines July 5, 2004 Lima
Topics
Policy Body
Convention Membership
Convention President
Chairperson (USP's Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer) Council of Experts Executive Committee
(12 individual memberDivision Executive Committee chairpersons and at-large members selected by COE chairperson)
Council of Experts
(62 members elected by USP Convention)
IND/NDA
Single Manufacturer
Post-approval Change
Efficacy
Safety
Additional Manufacturers
Shelf-life
Ti m e
Equivalence
Equivalence
Guidance on the selection of comparator pharmaceutical products for equivalence assessment of interchangeable multisource (generic) products
WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations, Thirty-Sixth Report, 1999
Glossary
Bioavailability (rate and extent as measured by system exposure) Bioequivalence (relative bioavailability) Dosage form Therapeutic equivalence Generic product (confusinguse instead interchangeable product) Innovator pharmaceutical product Interchangable pharmaceutical product Multisource pharmaceutical product Pharmaceutical equivalence (same amount of active ingredient, same dosage form, same route) Reference product
Topics
No Need to Access Private Data of Pioneer Reverse Engineers from Pioneer Product in the Market Place This is the Comparator Pharmaceutical Product (WHO Termin the US: Reference Listed Drug) What is Needed? 1. Pharmaceutical Equivalence 2. Bioequivalence 3. Chemistry, Manufacturing, Controls (Impurities, Stability/expiry date, Packaging, Other Requirements)
Pharmaceutical Equivalence
Same active ingredient Same strength Same dosage form and route of administration Comparable labeling Meet compendial or other standards of identity, strength, quality, purity and potency
Bioequivalence
In vivo measurement of active moiety (moieties) in biologic fluid (blood/urine) In vivo pharmacodynamic comparison In vivo clinical comparison In vitro comparison Other
Reference
Generic/Similar
No Study
70-90% of Active Ingredients (Drug Substance) in US Come from India and China Control of Quality Important Change in Route of Synthesis Can Change Impurity Profile Impurities Can Also Arise from Excipients and from Degradation of the Active Ingredient Some Impurities May Be Dangerous
Enantiomer
Racemate
Non-Glycosylated Protein
Glycosylated Protein
Complex Mixture
Moiety(ies)
ICH: Draft guidance on Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Biotechnological/Biological Products. (FR June 9, 1998)
Looks at All Impurities in Innovators Marketed Dosage Form Compares with Planned Product Follows ICH Q3A R for isolation, characterization, qualification Generics Come in Market about Ten Years after Pioneer Newer Products (Pioneers and Generics) May Have Better Quality than Older Products
Generic Manufacturer Does Stability Studies in Package to Get an Expiry Date Manufacturing Must Be Controlled and Follow GMPs (WHO, FDA, ICH, other) Excipients Can Be Different Labeling General the Same But Can Differ IN SUMMARY Science/Technical Issues to Obtain an Interchangeable Generic Interchangeable with an Innovator Product are NOT a Problem
Summary
PIONEER DRUG (NDA) Requirements
Statutory authority for FDA approval of pre-and post-1962 generic drugs Reduce the cost of health care with generic drugs Eliminate Duplication of Clinical Trials Assure continued development of new drugs through patent extension and exclusivity granted to certain NDAs Hatch Waxman SuccessfulOver 50% of All Prescriptions in US Are Generic Innovators Make Generics
Types of Exclusivity
Orphan Drug Exclusivity (ODE) - 7 years New Chemical Entity (NCE) - 5 years for a
Pediatric exclusivity (PED) - 6 months added to existing patents or exclusivity EXCLUSIVITY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH PATENTS!
The Parties shall ensure that their technical regulations are not prepared, adopted or applied with a view to or with the effect of creating unnecessary barriers to international trade. For this purpose, technical regulations shall not be more trade- restrictive than necessary to fulfil a legitimate objective, taking account of the risks non-fulfilment would create. TBT Article 2.2
Japans MHW, FDA, EU/EC JPMA, PhRMA, EFPIA Observers: WHO, Canada, EFTA First Conference: Brussels 1991 Second Conference: Orlando 1993 Third Conference: Yokohama 1995 Fourth Conference: Brussels 1997 Fifth Conference: San Diego 2000 Sixth Conference: Osaka 2003
1.1 ToC of Module 1 or overall ToC, including Module 1 2.1 ToC of CTD (Mod 2,3,4,5) 2.2 Introduction 2.3 Quality Overall Summary 2.4 Nonclinical Overview 2.5 2.7
Module 5
1.0 2.1
Module 2
Participants
Regulators
Steering Committee
Group
WG WG WG
Academia Professional As
Working Groups
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Good Manufacturing Practices Good Clinical Practices Classification of Products Counterfeit Drugs Good Pharmacy Practices Pharmacopoeia Drug Regulatory Agencies (Study) Regional Entity: WHATS THIS?
ICH: efforts have helped generic manufacturers PAHO and PANDRH: more work but a start US Congress considering parallel imports (equivalence approach) Recent US law limits ways to impede generics USP working on science/technical approaches to generic biologics
New Approaches A Single Comparator Pharmaceutical Product in the Americas? A Pharmacopeias of the Americas? USP is working with pharmacopeias of the Americas and is planning a Spanish translation of USP-NF.